1. 03 12月, 2010 1 次提交
  2. 20 10月, 2010 1 次提交
    • N
      arm: remove machine_desc.io_pg_offst and .phys_io · 6451d778
      Nicolas Pitre 提交于
      Since we're now using addruart to establish the debug mapping, we can
      remove the io_pg_offst and phys_io members of struct machine_desc.
      
      The various declarations were removed using the following script:
      
        grep -rl MACHINE_START arch/arm | xargs \
        sed -i '/MACHINE_START/,/MACHINE_END/ { /\.\(phys_io\|io_pg_offst\)/d }'
      
      [ Initial patch was from Jeremy Kerr, example script from Russell King ]
      Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
      Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao at canonical.com>
      6451d778
  3. 09 10月, 2010 1 次提交
    • M
      OMAP2plus: Fix static function warnings · 04aeae77
      Manjunath Kondaiah G 提交于
      This patch fixes sparse warnings due non declarations of static functions.
      
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer-gp.c:115:12: warning: symbol 'omap2_gp_clockevent_set_gptimer' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c:993:5: warning: symbol 'pwrdm_set_lowpwrstchange' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-flash.c:141:8: warning: symbol 'board_nand_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c:416:6: warning: symbol 'n8x0_mmc_slot1_cover_handler' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c:544:13: warning: symbol 'n8x0_mmc_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c:902:13: warning: symbol 'rx51_peripherals_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-video.c:107:13: warning: symbol 'rx51_video_mem_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-debugboard.c:155:12: warning: symbol 'zoom_debugboard_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-peripherals.c:280:13: warning: symbol 'zoom_peripherals_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-igep0020.c:110:13: warning: symbol 'igep2_flash_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-am3517evm.c:109:6: warning: symbol 'am3517_evm_ethernet_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/mtd/onenand/omap2.c:577:5: warning: symbol 'omap2_onenand_rephase' was not declared. Should it be static?
      Signed-off-by: NManjunath Kondaiah G <manjugk@ti.com>
      Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
      Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      04aeae77
  4. 30 9月, 2010 1 次提交
  5. 04 8月, 2010 2 次提交
  6. 02 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 16 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  8. 05 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  9. 16 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  10. 13 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  11. 12 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • F
      omap2/3/4: ehci: avoid compiler error with touchbook · 6f69a181
      Felipe Balbi 提交于
      the early_param() call in board-omap3touchbook.c expands to:
      
      static const char __setup_str_early_touchbook_revision[]
      	__section(.init.rodata) _aligned(1) = tbr;
      [...]
      
      and we have a non-const variable being added to the
      same section:
      
      static struct ehci_hcd_omap_platform_data ehci_pdata
      __section(.init.rodata);
      
      because of that, gcc generates a section type conflict
      which can (and actually should) be avoided by marking
      const every variable marked with __initconst.
      
      This patch fixes that for the ehci_hdc_omap_platform_data.
      Signed-off-by: NFelipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@nokia.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      6f69a181
  12. 16 2月, 2010 2 次提交
  13. 04 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  14. 12 12月, 2009 2 次提交
  15. 26 11月, 2009 1 次提交