If socket is create by PF_INET type, it can not used IPv6 address to
send/recv DATA, So we can not used IPv6 address even if peer tell us it
support IPv6 address.
This patch fix to only enabled peer IPv6 address support on PF_INET6 socket.
Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Replacing (almost) all invocations of list_for_each() with
list_for_each_entry() tightens up the code and allows for the deletion
of numerous list iterator variables that are no longer necessary.
Signed-off-by: NRobert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

RFC 4890 has the following text:

  The HMAC algorithm based on SHA-1 MUST be supported and
  included in the HMAC-ALGO parameter.

As a result, we need to check in sctp_verify_param() that HMAC_SHA1 is
present in the list.  If not, we should probably treat this as a
protocol violation.

It should also be a protocol violation if the HMAC parameter is empty.
Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

133886    2004     220  136110   213ae sctp.new/sctp.o
134018    2004     220  136242   21432 sctp.old/sctp.o
Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

If an address family is not listed in "Supported Address Types"
parameter(INIT Chunk), but the packet is sent by that family, this
address family should be considered as supported by peer.  Otherwise,
an error condition will occur. For instance, if kernel receives an
IPV6 SCTP INIT chunk with "Support Address Types" parameter which
indicates just supporting IPV4 Address family. Kernel will reply an
IPV6 SCTP INIT ACK packet, but the source ipv6 address in ipv6 header
will be vacant. This is not correct.

refer to RFC4460 as following:
      IMPLEMENTATION NOTE: If an SCTP endpoint lists in the 'Supported
      Address Types' parameter either IPv4 or IPv6, but uses the other
      family for sending the packet containing the INIT chunk, or if it
      also lists addresses of the other family in the INIT chunk, then
      the address family that is not listed in the 'Supported Address
      Types' parameter SHOULD also be considered as supported by the
      receiver of the INIT chunk.  The receiver of the INIT chunk SHOULD
      NOT respond with any kind of error indication.

Here is a fix to comply to RFC.
Signed-off-by: NGui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

In a few instances, we need to remove the chunk from the transmitted list
prior to freeing it.  This is because the free code doesn't do that any
more and so we need to do it manually.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>

I was notified by Randy Stewart that lksctp claims to be
"the reference implementation".  First of all, "the
refrence implementation" was the original implementation
of SCTP in usersapce written ty Randy and a few others.
Second, after looking at the definiton of 'reference implementation',
we don't really meet the requirements.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>

This patch fix miss of check for report unrecognized HMAC Algorithm
parameter.  When AUTH is disabled, goto fall through path to report
unrecognized parameter, else, just break
Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The Security Considerations section of RFC 5061 has the following
text:

   If an SCTP endpoint that supports this extension receives an INIT
   that indicates that the peer supports the ASCONF extension but does
   NOT support the [RFC4895] extension, the receiver of such an INIT
   MUST send an ABORT in response.  Note that an implementation is
   allowed to silently discard such an INIT as an option as well, but
   under NO circumstance is an implementation allowed to proceed with
   the association setup by sending an INIT-ACK in response.

   An implementation that receives an INIT-ACK that indicates that the
   peer does not support the [RFC4895] extension MUST NOT send the
   COOKIE-ECHO to establish the association.  Instead, the
   implementation MUST discard the INIT-ACK and report to the upper-
   layer user that an association cannot be established destroying the
   Transmission Control Block (TCB).

Follow the recomendations.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The processing of the ASCONF chunks has changed a lot in the
spec.  New items are:
    1. A list of ASCONF-ACK chunks is now cached
    2. The source of the packet is used in response.
    3. New handling for unexpect ASCONF chunks.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The ADD-IP "Set Primary IP Address" parameter is allowed in the
INIT/INIT-ACK exchange.  Allow processing of this parameter during
the INIT/INIT-ACK.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The Address Parameter in the parameter list of the ASCONF chunk
may be a wildcard address.  In this case special processing
is required.  For the 'add' case, the source IP of the packet is
added.  In the 'del' case, all addresses except the source IP
of packet are removed. In the "mark primary" case, the source
address is marked as primary.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Some recent changes completely removed accounting for the FORWARD_TSN
parameter length in the INIT and INIT-ACK chunk.  This is wrong and
should be restored.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Supported extensions parameter was not coded right and ended up
over-writing memory or causing skb overflows.  First, remove
the FWD_TSN support from as it shouldn't be there and also fix
the paramter encoding.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>

There was a typo that cleared the HMACS parameters when no
authenticated chunks were specified.  We whould be clearing
the chunks pointer instead of the hmacs.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>

SCTP-AUTH and future ADD-IP updates have a requirement to
do additional verification of parameters and an ability to
ABORT the association if verification fails.  So, introduce
additional return code so that we can clear signal a required
action.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>

This patch adds a tunable that will allow ADD_IP to work without
AUTH for backward compatibility.  The default value is off since
the default value for ADD_IP is off as well.  People who need
to use ADD-IP with older implementations take risks of connection
hijacking and should consider upgrading or turning this tunable on.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>

Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>

After learning more about rcu, it looks like the ADD-IP hadling
doesn't need to call call_rcu_bh.  All the rcu critical sections
use rcu_read_lock, so using call_rcu_bh is wrong here.
Now, restore the local_bh_disable() code blocks and use normal
call_rcu() calls.  Also restore the missing return statement.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>

If ASCONF chunk is bundled with other chunks as the first chunk, when
process the ASCONF parameters, full packet data will be process as the
parameters of the ASCONF chunk, not only the real parameters. So if you
send a ASCONF chunk bundled with other chunks, you will get an unexpect
result.
This problem also exists when ASCONF-ACK chunk is bundled with other chunks.

This patch fix this problem.
Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>

This patch fixes the errors made in the users of the crypto layer during
the sg_init_table conversion.  It also adds a few conversions that were
missing altogether.
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Most drivers need to set length and offset as well, so may as well fold
those three lines into one.

Add sg_assign_page() for those two locations that only needed to set
the page, where the offset/length is set outside of the function context.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>

sctp fails to compile with
net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c: In function 'sctp_pack_cookie':
net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1516: error: implicit declaration of function 'sg_init_table'
net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1517: error: implicit declaration of function 'sg_set_page'

use the proper include file.

SCTP maintainers Vlad Yasevich and Sridhar Samudrala  are CCed.
Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>

Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>

ADD-IP spec requires AUTH. It is, in fact, dangerous without AUTH.
So, disable ADD-IP functionality if the peer claims to support
ADD-IP, but not AUTH.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

SCTP-AUTH, Section 6.2:

   Endpoints MUST send all requested chunks authenticated where this has
   been requested by the peer.  The other chunks MAY be sent
   authenticated or not.  If endpoint pair shared keys are used, one of
   them MUST be selected for authentication.

   To send chunks in an authenticated way, the sender MUST include these
   chunks after an AUTH chunk.  This means that a sender MUST bundle
   chunks in order to authenticate them.

   If the endpoint has no endpoint pair shared key for the peer, it MUST
   use Shared Key Identifier 0 with an empty endpoint pair shared key.
   If there are multiple endpoint shared keys the sender selects one and
   uses the corresponding Shared Key Identifier
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Implement processing for the CHUNKS, RANDOM, and HMAC parameters and
deal with how this parameters are effected by association restarts.
In particular, during unexpeted INIT processing, we need to reply with
parameters from the original INIT chunk.  Also, after restart, we need
to update the old association with new peer parameters and change the
association shared keys.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

SCTP Supported Extenions parameter is specified in Section 4.2.7
of the ADD-IP draft (soon to be RFC).  The parameter is
encoded as:

      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |     Parameter Type = 0x8008   |      Parameter Length         |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     | CHUNK TYPE 1  |  CHUNK TYPE 2 |  CHUNK TYPE 3 |  CHUNK TYPE 4 |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                             ....                              |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     | CHUNK TYPE N  |      PAD      |      PAD      |      PAD      |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

It contains a list of chunks that a particular SCTP extension
uses.  Current extensions supported are Partial Reliability
(FWD-TSN) and ADD-IP (ASCONF and ASCONF-ACK).

When implementing new extensions (AUTH, PKT-DROP, etc..), new
chunks need to be added to this parameter.  Parameter processing
would be modified to negotiate support for these new features.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

sctp_addto_param() can become static.
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

If ADDIP is enabled, when an ASCONF chunk is received with ASCONF
paramter length set to zero, this will cause infinite loop.
By the way, if an malformed ASCONF chunk is received, will cause
processing to access memory without verifying.

This is because of not check the validity of parameters in ASCONF chunk.
This patch fixed this.
Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>

Since the sctp_sockaddr_entry is now RCU enabled as part of
the patch to synchronize sctp_localaddr_list, it makes sense to
change all handling of these entries to RCU.  This includes the
sctp_bind_addrs structure and it's list of bound addresses.

This list is currently protected by an external rw_lock and that
looks like an overkill.  There are only 2 writers to the list:
bind()/bindx() calls, and BH processing of ASCONF-ACK chunks.
These are already seriealized via the socket lock, so they will
not step on each other.  These are also relatively rare, so we
should be good with RCU.

The readers are varied and they are easily converted to RCU.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Acked-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NSridhar Samdurala <sri@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

If an INIT with invalid parameter length look like this:
Parameter Type : 1
Parameter Length: 800
and not contain any payload, SCTP will ignore this  parameter and send
back a INIT-ACK.
This patch is fix to handle this invalid parameter length correctly.
Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>

PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause in ABORT is bad encode when make abort
chunk. When SCTP encode ABORT chunk with PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause,
it just add the error messages to PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause, the
rest four bytes(struct sctp_paramhdr) is just add to the chunk, not
change the length of error cause. This cause the ABORT chunk to be a bad
format. The chunk is like this:

ABORT chunk
  Chunk type: ABORT (6)
  Chunk flags: 0x00
  Chunk length: 72 (*1)
  Protocol violation cause
    Cause code: Protocol violation (0x000d)
    Cause length: 62 (*2)
    Cause information: 5468652063756D756C61746976652074736E2061636B2062...
    Cause padding: 0000
[Needless] 00030010
Chunk Length(*1) = 72 but Cause length(*2) only 62, not include the
extend 4 bytes.
((72 - sizeof(chunk_hdr)) = 68) != (62 +3) / 4 * 4
Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>

At function sctp_addto_chunk(), it do pad before add payload to chunk if
chunk length is not 4-byte alignment. But it do pad with a bad length.
This patch fixed this probleam.
Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>

Currently we only assign the sequence number to a packet that
we are about to transmit.  This however breaks the Partial
Reliability extensions, because it's possible for us to
never transmit a packet, i.e. it expires before we get to send
it.  In such cases, if the message contained multiple SCTP
fragments, and we did manage to send the first part of the
message, the Stream sequence numbers would get into invalid
state and cause receiver to stall.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>

Some code in function sctp_init_cause() seem useless, this patch remove
them.
Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>

Fixes the following sparse warnings:
net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1457:9: warning: symbol 'len' shadows an earlier one
net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1356:23: originally declared here
net/sctp/socket.c:1534:22: warning: symbol 'chunk' shadows an earlier one
net/sctp/socket.c:1387:20: originally declared here
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>

sctp_chunk_cachep & sctp_bucket_cachep is used module global, so move it
to a header file.
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>