- 29 4月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Fix following warnings: tadpole.c:21:6: warning: symbol 'cpu_pwr_save' was not declared. Should it be static? tadpole.c:101:13: warning: symbol 'clock_stop_probe' was not declared. Should it be static? This actually revealed that cpu_pwr_save is only assigned. It was left static with a TODO comment for now - this should be cleaned up later. Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Fix following warning: devices.c:114:13: warning: symbol 'device_scan' was not declared. Should it be static? Add prototype to asm/setup.h Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
We used to runtime patch the trap table for srmmu. With the removal of sun4c support this is no longer required. With the sun4c trap removed we can remove all the referenced trap handling which is sun4c specific. This also allows us to get rid of the nosun4c.c file that contained only dummy functions/data. Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Disintegrate asm/system.h for Sparc. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
-
- 22 4月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Do not require user to add "-p" to boot arguments to see early info printed to prom console. This is similar to the sparc64 functionality - which was added with: 3c62a2d3 ("[SPARC64]: Always register a PROM based early console.") Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
We did a cpu_probe() call each time a CPU got online - which only effect was to save latest CPU/FPU info for use by show_cpuinfo(). Use same setup as for sparc64 where we probe for this info during startup, and only once. This allowed us to annotate a few functions __init which again fixed the following section mismatch warnings: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x65f0): Section mismatch in reference from the function set_cpu_and_fpu() to the (unknown reference) .init.rodata:(unknown) WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x65f8): Section mismatch in reference from the function set_cpu_and_fpu() to the (unknown reference) .init.rodata:(unknown) WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x664c): Section mismatch in reference from the function set_cpu_and_fpu() to the variable .init.rodata:manufacturer_info WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x6650): Section mismatch in reference from the function set_cpu_and_fpu() to the variable .init.rodata:manufacturer_info Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andres Salomon 提交于
Rather than passing around ints everywhere, use the phandle type where appropriate for the various functions that talk to the PROM. Signed-off-by: NAndres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
-
- 11 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Engelhardt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Grant Likely 提交于
In struct device_node, the phandle is named 'linux_phandle' for PowerPC and MicroBlaze, and 'node' for SPARC. There is no good reason for the difference, it is just an artifact of the code diverging over a couple of years. This patch renames both to simply .phandle. Note: the .node also existed in PowerPC/MicroBlaze, but the only user seems to be arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pfunc_core.c. It doesn't look like the assignment between .linux_phandle and .node is significantly different enough to warrant the separate code paths unless ibm,phandle properties actually appear in Apple device trees. I think it is safe to eliminate the old .node property and use phandle everywhere. Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: NWolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 05 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
It is always equals y so no need to test for it Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Bunk 提交于
While doing some easy cleanups on the sparc code I noticed that the CONFIG_SUN4 code seems to be worse than the rest - there were some "I don't know how it should work, but the current code definitely cannot work." places. And while I have seen people running Linux on machines like a SPARCstation 5 a few years ago I don't recall having seen sun4 machines, even less ones running Linux. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 12月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
There should be an of_node_put when breaking out of a loop that iterates using for_each_node_by_type. Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 22 7月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
By using for_each_node_by_type(). Also, correct a spurioud test in check_cpu_node() on sparc64. It is only called with nodes that have device_type "cpu". Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jörn Engel 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-