- 29 4月, 2014 17 次提交
-
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Fix following warnings: tadpole.c:21:6: warning: symbol 'cpu_pwr_save' was not declared. Should it be static? tadpole.c:101:13: warning: symbol 'clock_stop_probe' was not declared. Should it be static? This actually revealed that cpu_pwr_save is only assigned. It was left static with a TODO comment for now - this should be cleaned up later. Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Fix following warning: devices.c:114:13: warning: symbol 'device_scan' was not declared. Should it be static? Add prototype to asm/setup.h Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Fix following sparc32 warning: cpu.c:430:29: warning: symbol 'cpuinfo_op' was not declared. Should it be static? Fix following sparc64 warnings: cpu.c:364:14: warning: symbol 'dcache_parity_tl1_occurred' was not declared. Should it be static? cpu.c:365:14: warning: symbol 'icache_parity_tl1_occurred' was not declared. Should it be static? Rearrange asm/cpu.h to share more stuff between sparc32 and sparc64. Added missing include to cpu.c of kernel.h Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Fix following warnings: windows.c:16:6: warning: symbol 'flush_user_windows' was not declared. Should it be static? windows.c:109:6: warning: symbol 'try_to_clear_window_buffer' was not declared. Should it be static? Add missing include of cacheflush.h + add declaration of try_to_clear_window_buffer in kernel.h Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Fix following warnings: setup_32.c:106:15: warning: symbol 'cmdline_memory_size' was not declared. Should it be static? setup_32.c:270:16: warning: symbol 'fake_swapper_regs' was not declared. Should it be static? setup_32.c:368:55: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer Add missing declaration of cmdline_memory_size and remove the local one in init_32.c fake_swapper_regs was only used locally - so defined static. When replacing 0 with NULL also add a few spaces around operators Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Fix following warnings: ioport.c:189:38: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer ioport.c:78:25: warning: symbol 'sparc_iomap' was not declared. Should it be static? ioport.c:403:20: warning: symbol 'sbus_dma_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? ioport.c:684:39: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer Add one missing prototype, and use NULL. sbus_dma_ops declared static. Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Fix following warnings: signal_32.c:62:17: warning: symbol 'do_sigreturn' was not declared. Should it be static? signal_32.c:126:17: warning: symbol 'do_rt_sigreturn' was not declared. Should it be static? signal_32.c:344:39: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) signal_32.c:344:39: expected struct __siginfo_fpu_t [usertype] *fp signal_32.c:344:39: got void [noderef] <asn:1>*[assigned] tail signal_32.c:346:45: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) signal_32.c:346:45: expected struct __siginfo_fpu_t [noderef] [usertype] <asn:1>*fpu signal_32.c:346:45: got struct __siginfo_fpu_t [usertype] *fp signal_32.c:352:41: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) signal_32.c:352:41: expected struct __siginfo_rwin_t [usertype] *rwp signal_32.c:352:41: got void [noderef] <asn:1>*[assigned] tail signal_32.c:354:48: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) signal_32.c:354:48: expected struct __siginfo_rwin_t [noderef] [usertype] <asn:1>*rwin signal_32.c:354:48: got struct __siginfo_rwin_t [usertype] *rwp signal_32.c:509:6: warning: symbol 'do_notify_resume' was not declared. Should it be static? signal_32.c:520:16: warning: symbol 'do_sys_sigstack' was not declared. Should it be static? Add missing prototypes and annotate two variables with __user. Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Fix following warnings: process_32.c:67:6: warning: symbol 'arch_cpu_idle' was not declared. Should it be static? process_32.c:257:16: warning: symbol 'sparc_do_fork' was not declared. Should it be static? process_32.c:411:5: warning: symbol 'dump_fpu' was not declared. Should it be static? Add missing includes and add one missing prototype. Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Fix following warnings: irq_32.c:239:5: warning: symbol 'sparc_floppy_request_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? irq_32.c:294:24: warning: symbol 'fdc_status' was not declared. Should it be static? irq_32.c:297:6: warning: symbol 'pdma_vaddr' was not declared. Should it be static? irq_32.c:300:15: warning: symbol 'pdma_size' was not declared. Should it be static? irq_32.c:303:14: warning: symbol 'doing_pdma' was not declared. Should it be static? irq_32.c:306:6: warning: symbol 'pdma_base' was not declared. Should it be static? irq_32.c:309:15: warning: symbol 'pdma_areasize' was not declared. Should it be static? irq_32.c:317:6: warning: symbol 'sparc_floppy_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? The floppy parts were all added to iasm/setup.h - no other header files looked obvious. floppy_32.h was not an option as this file can only be included once from the floppy driver. Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Fix following warnings: sun4d_irq.c:146:6: warning: symbol 'sun4d_handler_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? sun4d_irq.c:239:17: warning: symbol 'sun4d_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? sun4d_irq.c:288:14: warning: symbol '_sun4d_build_device_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? sun4d_irq.c:323:14: warning: symbol 'sun4d_build_device_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? sun4d_irq.c:386:14: warning: symbol 'sun4d_build_timer_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? sun4d_irq.c:482:13: warning: symbol 'sun4d_init_sbi_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? Apply static when applicable, otherwise add prototype Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Fix following warnings: sun4m_irq.c:308:6: warning: symbol 'sun4m_nmi' was not declared. Should it be static? sun4m_irq.c:396:28: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) sun4m_irq.c:396:28: expected unsigned int volatile *extern [addressable] [toplevel] master_l10_counter sun4d_irq.c:469:28: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) sun4d_irq.c:469:28: expected unsigned int volatile *extern [addressable] [toplevel] master_l10_counter master_l10_counter is a pointer to __iomem - add annotations. Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Fix following warning: traps_32.c:47:6: error: symbol 'die_if_kernel' redeclared with different type - different modifiers Add __noreturn to both definition and declaration Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Fix following warnings: srmmu.c:870:13: warning: symbol 'srmmu_paging_init' was not declared. Should it be static? iommu.c:430:13: warning: symbol 'ld_mmu_iommu' was not declared. Should it be static? leon_mm.c:21:5: warning: symbol 'srmmu_swprobe_trace' was not declared. Should it be static? Add proper prototypes or define static to fix them. Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Fix following warnings: srmmu.c:78:5: warning: symbol 'flush_page_for_dma_global' was not declared. Should it be static? srmmu.c:85:5: warning: symbol 'viking_mxcc_present' was not declared. Should it be static? srmmu.c:103:6: warning: symbol 'srmmu_nocache_bitmap' was not declared. Should it be static? srmmu.c:176:24: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer srmmu.c:731:46: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer srmmu.c:731:46: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer srmmu.c:731:46: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer srmmu.c:870:13: warning: symbol 'srmmu_paging_init' was not declared. Should it be static? Add proper prototypes in mm_32.h and drop local prototype in init_32.c Replace 0 with NULL Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Fix following warning: init_32.c:112:22: warning: symbol 'bootmem_init' was not declared. Should it be static? Fix by adding a proper prototype in pgtable_32.h and drop the local prototype in srmmu.c Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Fix following warning: fault_32.c:38:24: error: symbol 'unhandled_fault' redeclared with different type - different modifiers When this warning was fixed several new warnings popped up - fix them too. Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
This file will be used for more than just srmmu stuff, so the old name was misleading. Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 28 4月, 2014 23 次提交
-
-
由 Alistair Popple 提交于
This patch fixes this section mismatch: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1efc4): Section mismatch in reference from the function apm821xx_pciex_init_port_hw() to the function .init.text:ppc4xx_pciex_wait_on_sdr.isra.9() The function apm821xx_pciex_init_port_hw() references the function __init ppc4xx_pciex_wait_on_sdr.isra.9(). This is often because apm821xx_pciex_init_port_hw lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of ppc4xx_pciex_wait_on_sdr.isra.9 is wrong. apm821xx_pciex_init_port_hw is only referenced by a struct in __initdata, so it should be safe to add __init to apm821xx_pciex_init_port_hw. Signed-off-by: NAlistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Preeti U Murthy 提交于
When the guest cedes the vcpu or the vcpu has no guest to run it naps. Clear the runlatch bit of the vcpu before napping to indicate an idle cpu. Signed-off-by: NPreeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Reviewed-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Preeti U Murthy 提交于
The secondary threads in the core are kept offline before launching guests in kvm on powerpc: "371fefd6:KVM: PPC: Allow book3s_hv guests to use SMT processor modes." Hence their runlatch bits are cleared. When the secondary threads are called in to start a guest, their runlatch bits need to be set to indicate that they are busy. The primary thread has its runlatch bit set though, but there is no harm in setting this bit once again. Hence set the runlatch bit for all threads before they start guest. Signed-off-by: NPreeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Reviewed-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Preeti U Murthy 提交于
Up until now we have been setting the runlatch bits for a busy CPU and clearing it when a CPU enters idle state. The runlatch bit has thus been consistent with the utilization of a CPU as long as the CPU is online. However when a CPU is hotplugged out the runlatch bit is not cleared. It needs to be cleared to indicate an unused CPU. Hence this patch has the runlatch bit cleared for an offline CPU just before entering an idle state and sets it immediately after it exits the idle state. Signed-off-by: NPreeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Reviewed-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Li Zhong 提交于
While testing memory hot-remove, I found following dead lock: Process #1141 is drmgr, trying to remove some memory, i.e. memory499. It holds the memory_hotplug_mutex, and blocks when trying to remove file "online" under dir memory499, in kernfs_drain(), at wait_event(root->deactivate_waitq, atomic_read(&kn->active) == KN_DEACTIVATED_BIAS); Process #1120 is trying to online memory499 by echo 1 > memory499/online In .kernfs_fop_write, it uses kernfs_get_active() to increase &kn->active, thus blocking process #1141. While itself is blocked later when trying to acquire memory_hotplug_mutex, which is held by process The backtrace of both processes are shown below: [<c000000001b18600>] 0xc000000001b18600 [<c000000000015044>] .__switch_to+0x144/0x200 [<c000000000263ca4>] .online_pages+0x74/0x7b0 [<c00000000055b40c>] .memory_subsys_online+0x9c/0x150 [<c00000000053cbe8>] .device_online+0xb8/0x120 [<c00000000053cd04>] .online_store+0xb4/0xc0 [<c000000000538ce4>] .dev_attr_store+0x64/0xa0 [<c00000000030f4ec>] .sysfs_kf_write+0x7c/0xb0 [<c00000000030e574>] .kernfs_fop_write+0x154/0x1e0 [<c000000000268450>] .vfs_write+0xe0/0x260 [<c000000000269144>] .SyS_write+0x64/0x110 [<c000000000009ffc>] syscall_exit+0x0/0x7c [<c000000001b18600>] 0xc000000001b18600 [<c000000000015044>] .__switch_to+0x144/0x200 [<c00000000030be14>] .__kernfs_remove+0x204/0x300 [<c00000000030d428>] .kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x68/0xf0 [<c00000000030fb38>] .sysfs_remove_file_ns+0x38/0x60 [<c000000000539354>] .device_remove_attrs+0x54/0xc0 [<c000000000539fd8>] .device_del+0x158/0x250 [<c00000000053a104>] .device_unregister+0x34/0xa0 [<c00000000055bc14>] .unregister_memory_section+0x164/0x170 [<c00000000024ee18>] .__remove_pages+0x108/0x4c0 [<c00000000004b590>] .arch_remove_memory+0x60/0xc0 [<c00000000026446c>] .remove_memory+0x8c/0xe0 [<c00000000007f9f4>] .pseries_remove_memblock+0xd4/0x160 [<c00000000007fcfc>] .pseries_memory_notifier+0x27c/0x290 [<c0000000008ae6cc>] .notifier_call_chain+0x8c/0x100 [<c0000000000d858c>] .__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x6c/0xe0 [<c00000000071ddec>] .of_property_notify+0x7c/0xc0 [<c00000000071ed3c>] .of_update_property+0x3c/0x1b0 [<c0000000000756cc>] .ofdt_write+0x3dc/0x740 [<c0000000002f60fc>] .proc_reg_write+0xac/0x110 [<c000000000268450>] .vfs_write+0xe0/0x260 [<c000000000269144>] .SyS_write+0x64/0x110 [<c000000000009ffc>] syscall_exit+0x0/0x7c This patch uses lock_device_hotplug() to protect remove_memory() called in pseries_remove_memblock(), which is also stated before function remove_memory(): * NOTE: The caller must call lock_device_hotplug() to serialize hotplug * and online/offline operations before this call, as required by * try_offline_node(). */ void __ref remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size) With this lock held, the other process(#1120 above) trying to online the memory block will retry the system call when calling lock_device_hotplug_sysfs(), and finally find No such device error. Signed-off-by: NLi Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Anton Blanchard 提交于
module_init should return 0 or a negative errno. Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Anton Blanchard 提交于
Bump the boot wrapper BOOT_COMMAND_LINE_SIZE to match the kernel. Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Anton Blanchard 提交于
I've had a report that the current limit is too small for an automated network based installer. Bump it. Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Anton Blanchard 提交于
We have two definitions of COMMAND_LINE_SIZE, one for the kernel and one for the boot wrapper. I assume this is so the boot wrapper can be self sufficient and not rely on kernel headers. Having two defines with the same name is confusing, I just updated the wrong one when trying to bump it. Make the boot wrapper define unique by calling it BOOT_COMMAND_LINE_SIZE. Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Cody P Schafer 提交于
The catalog version number was changed from a be32 (with proceeding 32bits of padding) to a be64, update the code to treat it as a be64 Signed-off-by: NCody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Cody P Schafer 提交于
Signed-off-by: NCody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Cody P Schafer 提交于
Signed-off-by: NCody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Cody P Schafer 提交于
Signed-off-by: NCody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Cody P Schafer 提交于
fixup for "powerpc/perf: Add support for the hv gpci (get performance counter info) interface". Makes the "not enabled" message less awful (and hidden unless debugging). Signed-off-by: NCody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Cody P Schafer 提交于
fixup for "powerpc/perf: Add support for the hv 24x7 interface" Makes the "not enabled" message less awful (and hides it in most cases). Signed-off-by: NCody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
The if condition check was based on a draft ISA doc. Remove the same. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Anton Blanchard 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Anton Blanchard 提交于
We have two copies of code that creates an OPAL sg list. Consolidate these into a common set of helpers and fix the endian issues. The flash interface embedded a version number in the num_entries field, whereas the dump interface did did not. Since versioning wasn't added to the flash interface and it is impossible to add this in a backwards compatible way, just remove it. Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Anton Blanchard 提交于
Fix little endian issues with the OPAL error log code. Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Reviewed-by: NStewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Anton Blanchard 提交于
The bitmap in opal_poll_events and opal_handle_interrupt is big endian, so we need to byteswap it on little endian builds. Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Anton Blanchard 提交于
We had some duplication of the internal OPAL functions. Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Anton Blanchard 提交于
Using size_t in our APIs is asking for trouble, especially when some OPAL calls use size_t pointers. Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Reviewed-by: NStewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Wei Yang 提交于
On PowerNV platform, we are holding an unnecessary refcount on a pci_dev, which leads to the pci_dev is not destroyed when hotplugging a pci device. This patch release the unnecessary refcount. Signed-off-by: NWei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-