The comment has been incorrect since commit 4dea5806
("cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering").
Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The show() and store() routines in the cpufreq core don't need to
check if the struct freq_attr they want to use really provides the
callbacks they need as expected (if that's not the case, it means
a bug in the code anyway), so change them to avoid doing that.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

The preprocessor magic used for setting the default cpufreq governor
(and for using the performance governor as a fallback one for that
matter) is really nasty, so replace it with __weak functions and
overrides.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Currently next_policy() explicitly checks if a policy is the last
policy in the cpufreq_policy_list. Use the standard list_is_last
primitive instead.
Signed-off-by: NGautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Notice that the boost_supported field in struct cpufreq_driver is
redundant, because the driver's ->set_boost callback may be left
unset if "boost" is not supported.  Moreover, the only driver
populating the ->set_boost callback is acpi_cpufreq, so make it
avoid populating that callback if "boost" is not supported, rework
the core to check ->set_boost instead of boost_supported to
verify "boost" support and drop boost_supported which isn't
used any more.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

cpufreq_boost_supported() is not used outside of cpufreq.c, so make
it static.

While at it, refactor it as a one-liner (which it really is).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

For cpufreq drivers which use setpolicy interface, after offline->online
the policy is set to default. This can be reproduced by setting the
default policy of intel_pstate or longrun to ondemand and then change to
"performance". After offline and online, the setpolicy will be called with
the policy=ondemand.

For drivers using governors this condition is handled by storing
last_governor, during offline and restoring during online. The same should
be done for drivers using setpolicy interface. Storing last_policy during
offline and restoring during online.
Signed-off-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Subsys interface's ->remove_dev() is called when the cpufreq driver is
unregistering or the CPU is getting physically removed. We keep removing
the cpuX/cpufreq link for all CPUs except the last one, which is a
mistake as all CPUs contain a link now.

Because of this, one CPU from each policy will still contain a link (to
an already removed policyX directory), after the cpufreq driver is
unregistered.

Fix that by removing the link first and then only see if the policy is
required to be freed. That will make sure that no links are left out.

Fixes: 96bdda61 ("cpufreq: create cpu/cpufreq/policyX directories")
Reported-and-tested-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The sysfs policy directory is postfixed currently with the CPU number
for which the policy was created, which isn't necessarily the first CPU
in related_cpus mask.

To make it more consistent and predictable, lets postfix the policy with
the first cpu in related-cpus mask.
Suggested-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The cpufreq sysfs interface had been a bit inconsistent as one of the
CPUs for a policy had a real directory within its sysfs 'cpuX' directory
and all other CPUs had links to it. That also made the code a bit
complex as we need to take care of moving the sysfs directory if the CPU
containing the real directory is getting physically hot-unplugged.

Solve this by creating 'policyX' directories (per-policy) in
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ directory, where X is the CPU for which
the policy was first created.

This also removes the need of keeping kobj_cpu and we can remove it now.
Suggested-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: is more of a general agreement from the person that he is
Reviewed-by: is a more strict tag and implies that the reviewer has
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

They don't do anything special now, remove the unnecessary wrapper.
Reviewed-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Later patches will need to create policy specific directories in
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ directory and so the cpufreq directory
wouldn't be ever empty.

And so no fun creating/destroying it on need basis anymore. Create it
once on system boot.
Reviewed-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

->related_cpus is empty at this point of time and copying ->cpus to it
or orring ->related_cpus with ->cpus would result in the same value. But
cpumask_copy makes it rather clear.
Reviewed-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We just made sure policy->cpu is online and this check will always fail
as the policy is active. Drop it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

When scaling_available_frequencies is read on an offlined cpu, then
either lockup or junk values are displayed. This is caused by
freed freq_table, which policy is using.
Signed-off-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

cpufreq_cpu_get() called by get_cur_freq_on_cpu() is overkill,
because the ->get() callback is always invoked in a context in
which all of the conditions checked by cpufreq_cpu_get() are
guaranteed to be satisfied.

Use cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() instead of it and drop the
corresponding cpufreq_cpu_put() from get_cur_freq_on_cpu().
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Some cpufreq drivers may set suspend frequency only for
selected setups but still would like to use the generic
suspend handler.  Thus don't treat !policy->suspend_freq
condition as an incorrect one.
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Its better to use __func__ to print functions name instead of writing
the name in the print statement. This also has the advantage that a
change in function's name doesn't force us to change the print message
as well.
Reviewed-by: NPreeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() isn't used by any external users, staticize it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Driver is guaranteed to be present on a call to cpufreq_parse_governor()
and there is no need to check for !cpufreq_driver. Drop it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Its always same as policy->policy, and there is no need to keep another
copy of it. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Its always same as policy->governor, and there is no need to keep
another copy of it. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

'user_policy' caches properties of a policy that are set by userspace.
And these must be updated only if cpufreq core was successful in
updating them based on request from user space.

In store_scaling_governor(), we are updating user_policy.policy and
user_policy.governor even if cpufreq_set_policy() failed. That's
incorrect.

Fix this by updating user_policy.* only if we were successful in
updating the properties.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

cpufreq_get_policy() is useful if the pointer to policy isn't available
in advance. But if it is available, then there is no need to call
cpufreq_get_policy(). Directly use memcpy() to copy the policy.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

What's being done from CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE, can also be done with
CPUFREQ_ADJUST. There is nothing special with CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE
notifier.

Kill CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE and fix its usage sites.

This also updates the numbering of notifier events to remove holes.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

In some cases it wouldn't be known at time of driver registration, if
the driver needs to support boost frequencies.

For example, while getting boost information from DT with opp-v2
bindings, we need to parse the bindings for all the CPUs to know if
turbo/boost OPPs are supported or not.

One way out to do that efficiently is to delay supporting boost mode
(i.e. creating /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost file), until the
time OPP bindings are parsed.

At that point, the driver can enable boost support. This can be done at
->init(), where the frequency table is created.

To do that, the driver requires few APIs from cpufreq core that let him
do this. This patch provides these APIs.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Its return value is not used by the subsys core and nothing meaningful
can be done with it, even if we want to use it. The subsys device is
anyway getting removed.

Update prototype of ->remove_dev() to make its return type as void. Fix
all usage sites as well.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

This check was originally added by commit 9c9a43ed ("[CPUFREQ]
return error when failing to set minfreq").It attempt to return an error
on obviously incorrect limits when we echo xxx >.../scaling_max,min_freq
Actually we just need check if new_policy->min > new_policy->max.
Because at least one of max/min is copied from cpufreq_get_policy().

For example, when we echo xxx > .../scaling_min_freq, new_policy is
copied from policy in cpufreq_get_policy. new_policy->max is same with
policy->max. new_policy->min is set to a new value.

Let me explain it in deduction method, first statement in if ():
new_policy->min > policy->max
policy->max == new_policy->max
==> new_policy->min > new_policy->max

second statement in if():
new_policy->max < policy->min
policy->max < policy->min
==>new_policy->min > new_policy->max (induction method)

So we have proved that we only need check if new_policy->min >
new_policy->max.

After apply this patch, we can also modify ->min and ->max at same time
if new freq range is very much different from current freq range. For
example, if current freq range is 480000-960000, then we want to set
this range to 1120000-2240000, we would fail in the past because
new_policy->min > policy->max. As long as the cpufreq range is valid, we
has no reason to reject the user. So correct the check to avoid such
case.
Signed-off-by: NPan Xinhui <xinhuix.pan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

To protect against races with concurrent CPU online/offline, call
get_online_cpus() before registering a cpufreq driver.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

The recover_policy is unsed in cpufreq_online() to indicate whether
a new policy object is created or an existing one is reinitialized.

The "recover" part of the name is slightly confusing (it should be
"reinitialization" rather than "recovery") and the logical not (!)
operator is applied to it in almost all of the checks it is used in,
so replace that variable with a new one called "new_policy" that
will be true in the case of a new policy creation.

While at it, drop one of the labels that is jumped to from only
one spot.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

To separate the CPU online interface from the CPU device
registration, split cpufreq_online() out of cpufreq_add_dev()
and make cpufreq_cpu_callback() call the former, while
cpufreq_add_dev() itself will only be used as the CPU device
addition subsystem interface callback.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Suggested-by: NRussell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Change cpufreq_policy_alloc() to take a CPU number instead of a CPU
device pointer as its argument, as it is the only function called by
cpufreq_add_dev() taking a device pointer argument at this point.

That will allow us to split the CPU online part from cpufreq_add_dev()
more cleanly going forward.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

The related_cpus mask includes CPUs whose cpufreq_cpu_data per-CPU
pointers have been set the the given policy.  Since those pointers
are only set at the policy creation time and unset when the policy
is deleted, the related_cpus should not be updated between those
two operations.

For this reason, avoid updating it whenever the first of the
"related" CPUs goes online.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

The dev argument of cpufreq_add_policy_cpu() and
cpufreq_add_dev_interface() is not used by any of them,
so drop it.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

The leftover out_release_rwsem label in cpufreq_add_dev() is not
necessary any more and confusing, so drop it.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Notice that when cpufreq_policy_restore() is called, its per-CPU
cpufreq_cpu_data variable has been already dereferenced and if that
variable is not NULL, the policy local pointer in cpufreq_add_dev()
contains its value.

Therefore it is not necessary to dereference it again and the
policy pointer can be used directly.  Moreover, if that pointer
is not NULL, the policy is inactive (or the previous check would
have made us return from cpufreq_add_dev()) so the restoration
code from cpufreq_policy_restore() can be moved to that point
in cpufreq_add_dev().

Do that and drop cpufreq_policy_restore().
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Since __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare() and __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish()
are about CPU offline rather than about CPU removal, rename them to
cpufreq_offline_prepare() and cpufreq_offline_finish(), respectively.

Also change their argument from a struct device pointer to a CPU
number, because they use the CPU number only internally anyway
and make them void as their return values are ignored.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

After commit 87549141 (cpufreq: Stop migrating sysfs files on
hotplug) there is a problem with CPUs that share cpufreq policy
objects with other CPUs and are initially offline.

Say CPU1 shares a policy with CPU0 which is online and is registered
first.  As part of the registration process, cpufreq_add_dev() is
called for it.  It creates the policy object and a symbolic link
to it from the CPU1's sysfs directory.  If CPU1 is registered
subsequently and it is offline at that time, cpufreq_add_dev() will
attempt to create a symbolic link to the policy object for it, but
that link is present already, so a warning about that will be
triggered.

To avoid that warning, make cpufreq use an additional CPU mask
containing related CPUs that are actually present for each policy
object.  That mask is initialized when the policy object is populated
after its creation (for the first online CPU using it) and it includes
CPUs from the "policy CPUs" mask returned by the cpufreq driver's
->init() callback that are physically present at that time.  Symbolic
links to the policy are created only for the CPUs in that mask.

If cpufreq_add_dev() is invoked for an offline CPU, it checks the
new mask and only creates the symlink if the CPU was not in it (the
CPU is added to the mask at the same time).

In turn, cpufreq_remove_dev() drops the given CPU from the new mask,
removes its symlink to the policy object and returns, unless it is
the CPU owning the policy object.  In that case, the policy object
is moved to a new CPU's sysfs directory or deleted if the CPU being
removed was the last user of the policy.

While at it, notice that cpufreq_remove_dev() can't fail, because
its return value is ignored, so make it ignore return values from
__cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare() and __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish()
and prevent these functions from aborting on errors returned by
__cpufreq_governor().  Also drop the now unused sif argument from
them.

Fixes: 87549141 (cpufreq: Stop migrating sysfs files on hotplug)
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: NRussell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

cpufreq_rwsem was introduced in commit 6eed9404 ("cpufreq: Use
rwsem for protecting critical sections) in order to replace
try_module_get() on the cpu-freq driver. That try_module_get() worked
well until the refcount was so heavily used that module removal became
more or less impossible.

Though when looking at the various (undocumented) protection
mechanisms in that code, the randomly sprinkeled around cpufreq_rwsem
locking sites are superfluous.

The policy, which is acquired in cpufreq_cpu_get() and released in
cpufreq_cpu_put() is sufficiently protected already.

  cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu)
    /* Protects against concurrent driver removal */
    read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
    policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
    kobject_get(&policy->kobj);
    read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);

The reference on the policy serializes versus module unload already:

  cpufreq_unregister_driver()
    subsys_interface_unregister()
      __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish()
        per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data) = NULL;
	cpufreq_policy_put_kobj()

If there is a reference held on the policy, i.e. obtained prior to the
unregister call, then cpufreq_policy_put_kobj() will wait until that
reference is dropped. So once subsys_interface_unregister() returns
there is no policy pointer in flight and no new reference can be
obtained. So that rwsem protection is useless.

The other usage of cpufreq_rwsem in show()/store() of the sysfs
interface is redundant as well because sysfs already does the proper
kobject_get()/put() pairs.

That leaves CPU hotplug versus module removal. The current
down_write() around the write_lock() in cpufreq_unregister_driver() is
silly at best as it protects actually nothing.

The trivial solution to this is to prevent hotplug across
cpufreq_unregister_driver completely.
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Return codes aren't honored properly in cpufreq_set_policy(). This can
lead to two problems:
- wrong errors propagated to sysfs
- we try to do next state-change even if the previous one failed

cpufreq_governor_dbs() now returns proper errors on all invalid
state-transition requests and this code should honor that.
Reviewed-and-tested-by: NPreeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>