cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_rwsem
cpufreq_rwsem was introduced in commit 6eed9404 ("cpufreq: Use rwsem for protecting critical sections) in order to replace try_module_get() on the cpu-freq driver. That try_module_get() worked well until the refcount was so heavily used that module removal became more or less impossible. Though when looking at the various (undocumented) protection mechanisms in that code, the randomly sprinkeled around cpufreq_rwsem locking sites are superfluous. The policy, which is acquired in cpufreq_cpu_get() and released in cpufreq_cpu_put() is sufficiently protected already. cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu) /* Protects against concurrent driver removal */ read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu); kobject_get(&policy->kobj); read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); The reference on the policy serializes versus module unload already: cpufreq_unregister_driver() subsys_interface_unregister() __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish() per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data) = NULL; cpufreq_policy_put_kobj() If there is a reference held on the policy, i.e. obtained prior to the unregister call, then cpufreq_policy_put_kobj() will wait until that reference is dropped. So once subsys_interface_unregister() returns there is no policy pointer in flight and no new reference can be obtained. So that rwsem protection is useless. The other usage of cpufreq_rwsem in show()/store() of the sysfs interface is redundant as well because sysfs already does the proper kobject_get()/put() pairs. That leaves CPU hotplug versus module removal. The current down_write() around the write_lock() in cpufreq_unregister_driver() is silly at best as it protects actually nothing. The trivial solution to this is to prevent hotplug across cpufreq_unregister_driver completely. Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录