- 16 9月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mi Jinlong 提交于
For checking the size of reply before calling a operation, we need try to get maxsize of the operation's reply. v3: using new method as Bruce said, "we could handle operations in two different ways: - For operations that actually change something (write, rename, open, close, ...), do it the way we're doing it now: be very careful to estimate the size of the response before even processing the operation. - For operations that don't change anything (read, getattr, ...) just go ahead and do the operation. If you realize after the fact that the response is too large, then return the error at that point. So we'd add another flag to op_flags: say, OP_MODIFIES_SOMETHING. And for operations with OP_MODIFIES_SOMETHING set, we'd do the first thing. For operations without it set, we'd do the second." Signed-off-by: NMi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com> [bfields@redhat.com: crash, don't attempt to handle, undefined op_rsize_bop] Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 14 9月, 2011 18 次提交
-
-
由 Mi Jinlong 提交于
For ipv6 link-local addresses, sunrpc do not compare those scope id. This patch let sunrpc compares scope id only on link-local addresses. Signed-off-by: NMi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Mi Jinlong 提交于
For IPv6 local address, lockd can not callback to client for missing scope id when binding address at inet6_bind: 324 if (addr_type & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL) { 325 if (addr_len >= sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6) && 326 addr->sin6_scope_id) { 327 /* Override any existing binding, if another one 328 * is supplied by user. 329 */ 330 sk->sk_bound_dev_if = addr->sin6_scope_id; 331 } 332 333 /* Binding to link-local address requires an interface */ 334 if (!sk->sk_bound_dev_if) { 335 err = -EINVAL; 336 goto out_unlock; 337 } Replacing svc_addr_u by sockaddr_storage, let rqstp->rq_daddr contains more info besides address. Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> [ cel: since this is server-side, use nfsd4_ prefix instead of nfs4_ prefix. ] [ cel: implement S_ISVTX filter in bfields-normal form ] Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
There are no more users... Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The current code is sort of hackish in that it assumes a referral is always matched to an export. When we add support for junctions that may not be the case. We can replace nfsd4_path() with a function that encodes the components directly from the dentries. Since nfsd4_path is currently the only user of the 'ex_pathname' field in struct svc_export, this has the added benefit of allowing us to get rid of that. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
First, we shouldn't care here about the structure of the opaque part of the stateid. Second, this hash is really dumb. (I'm not sure the replacement is much better, though--to look at it another patch.) Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Test_stateid should handle delegation stateid's as well. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
It's simpler to look up delegation stateid's in the same hash table as any other stateid. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We want delegations to share more with open/lock stateid's, so first we'll pull out some of the common stuff we want to share. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Note this is actually open-stateid specific. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We're only using those flags to choose lock or open stateid's at this point. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Move most of this into helper functions. Also move the non-CONFIRM case into caller, providing a helper function for that purpose. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Minor cleanup. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 07 9月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We'll use this elsewhere. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The stateowner has some fields that only make sense for openowners, and some that only make sense for lockowners, and I find it a lot clearer if those are separated out. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 04 9月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Move the CLOSE_STATE case into the unique caller that cares about it rather than putting it in preprocess_seqid_op. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 03 9月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
I don't see the point of having this check in nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op() when it's only needed by the one caller. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Sometimes the single-exit style is good, sometimes it's unnecessarily convoluted.... Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 01 9月, 2011 12 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
This is used only as a local variable. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Maybe we'll bring it back some day, but we don't have much real use for it now. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
If open fails with any error other than nfserr_replay_me, then the main nfsd4_proc_compound() loop continues unconditionally to nfsd4_encode_operation(), which will always call encode_seqid_op_tail. Thus the condition we check for here does not occur. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
There are currently a couple races in the seqid replay code: a retransmission could come while we're still encoding the original reply, or a new seqid-mutating call could come as we're encoding a replay. So, extend the state lock over the encoding (both encoding of a replayed reply and caching of the original encoded reply). I really hate doing this, and previously added the stateowner reference-counting code to avoid it (which was insufficient)--but I don't see a less complicated alternative at the moment. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Now that the replay owner is in the cstate we can remove it from a lot of other individual operations and further simplify nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op(). Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Set the stateowner associated with a replay in one spot in nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op() and keep it in cstate. This allows removing a few lines of boilerplate from all the nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op() callers. Also turn ENCODE_SEQID_OP_TAIL into a function while we're here. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Thanks to Casey for reminding me that 5661 gives a special meaning to a value of 0 in the stateid's seqid field, so all stateid's should start out with si_generation 1. We were doing that in the open and lock cases for minorversion 1, but not for the delegation stateid, and not for openstateid's with v4.0. It doesn't *really* matter much for v4.0 or for delegation stateid's (which never get the seqid field incremented), but we may as well do the same for all of them. Reported-by: NCasey Bodley <cbodley@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Follow the recommendation from rfc3530bis for stateid generation number wraparound, simplify some code, and fix or remove incorrect comments. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
There's no reason to have two separate hash tables for open and lock stateid's. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The trick free_stateid is using is a little cheesy, and we'll have more uses for this field later. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Wow, I wonder how long that typo's been there. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The values here represent highest slotid numbers. Since slotid's are numbered starting from zero, the highest should be one less than the number of slots. Reported-by: NRick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 31 8月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We don't need this any more. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 28 8月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
When called with OPEN_STATE, preprocess_seqid_op only returns an open stateid, hence only an open owner. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We've got some lock-specific code here in nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op which is only used by nfsd4_lock(). Move it to the caller. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-