Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 27 5月, 2017 1 次提交
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum: Set port's mode according to FID mappings · 4aafc368
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      We currently transition the port to "Virtual mode" upon the creation of
its first VLAN upper, as we need to classify incoming packets to a FID
using {Port, VID} and not only the VID.

However, it's more appropriate to transition the port to this mode when
the {Port, VID} are actually mapped to a FID. Either during the
enslavement of the VLAN upper to a VLAN-unaware bridge or the
configuration of a router port.

Do this change now in preparation for the introduction of the FID core,
where this operation will be encapsulated.

To prevent regressions, this patch also explicitly configures an OVS
slave to "Virtual mode". Otherwise, a packet that didn't hit an ACL rule
could be classified to an existing FID based on a global VID-to-FID
mapping, thus not incurring a FID mis-classification, which would
otherwise trap the packet to the CPU to be processed by the OVS daemon.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4aafc368
  3. 26 5月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 18 5月, 2017 6 次提交
  7. 01 5月, 2017 1 次提交
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Simplify VRF enslavement · b1e45526
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      When a netdev is enslaved to a VRF master, its router interface (RIF)
needs to be destroyed (if exists) and a new one created using the
corresponding virtual router (VR).

>From the driver's perspective, the above is equivalent to an inetaddr
event sent for this netdev. Therefore, when a port netdev (or its
uppers) are enslaved to a VRF master, call the same function that
would've been called had a NETDEV_UP was sent for this netdev in the
inetaddr notification chain.

This patch also fixes a bug when a LAG netdev with an existing RIF is
enslaved to a VRF. Before this patch, each LAG port would drop the
reference on the RIF, but would re-join the same one (in the wrong VR)
soon after. With this patch, the corresponding RIF is first destroyed
and a new one is created using the correct VR.

Fixes: 7179eb5a ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add support for VRFs")
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      b1e45526
  9. 21 4月, 2017 1 次提交
  11. 29 3月, 2017 2 次提交
  13. 26 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  15. 25 3月, 2017 2 次提交
  17. 22 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  19. 17 3月, 2017 6 次提交
  21. 11 3月, 2017 6 次提交
  23. 02 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  25. 11 2月, 2017 3 次提交
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add support for route replace · 599cf8f9
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      Upon the reception of an ENTRY_REPLACE notification, resolve the FIB
node corresponding to the prefix and length and insert the new route
before the first matching entry.

Since the notification also signals the deletion of the replaced route,
delete it from the driver's cache.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      599cf8f9
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add support for route append · 4283bce5
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      When a new route is appended, it's placed after existing routes sharing
the same parameters (prefix, length, table ID, TOS and priority).

While the device supports only one route with the same prefix and length
in a single table, it's important to correctly place the appended route
in the driver's cache, as when a route is deleted the next one is
programmed into the device.

Following the reception of an ENTRY_APPEND notification, resolve the
FIB node corresponding to the prefix and length and correctly place the
new entry in its entry list.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4283bce5
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Correctly handle identical routes · 9aecce1c
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      In the device, routes are indexed in a routing table based on the prefix
and its length. This is in contrast to the kernel's FIB where several
FIB aliases can exist with these parameters being identical. In such
cases, the routes will be sorted by table ID (LOCAL first, then MAIN),
TOS and finally priority (metric).

During lookup, these routes will be evaluated in order. In case the
packet's TOS field is non-zero and a FIB alias with a matching TOS is
found, then it's selected. Otherwise, the lookup defaults to the route
with TOS 0 (if it exists). However, if the requested scope is narrower
than the one found, then the lookup continues.

To best reflect the kernel's datapath we should take the above into
account. Given a prefix and its length, the reflected route will always
be the first one in the FIB alias list. However, if the route has a
non-zero TOS then its action will be converted to trap instead of
forward, since we currently don't support TOS-based routing. If this
turns out to be a real issue, we can add support for that using
policy-based switching.

The route's scope can be effectively ignored as any packet being routed
by the device would've been looked-up using the widest scope (UNIVERSE).

To achieve that we need to do two changes. Firstly, we need to create
another struct (FIB node) that will hold the list of FIB entries sharing
the same prefix and length. This struct will be hashed using these two
parameters.

Secondly, we need to change the route reflection to match the above
logic, so that the first FIB entry in the list will be programmed into
the device while the rest will remain in the driver's cache in case of
subsequent changes.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      9aecce1c
  27. 09 2月, 2017 8 次提交
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Don't reflect LINKDOWN nexthops · df6dd79b
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      The kernel resolves the nexthops for a given route using
FIB_LOOKUP_IGNORE_LINKSTATE which means a notification can be sent for a
route with one of its nexthops being LINKDOWN.

In case IGNORE_ROUTES_WITH_LINKDOWN is set for the nexthop netdev, then
we shouldn't reflect the nexthop to the device's table.

Once the nexthop netdev's carrier goes up we'll be notified using NH_ADD
and reflect it to the device.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      df6dd79b
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Flush resources when RIF is deleted · 9665b745
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      When the last IP address is removed from a netdev, its RIF is deleted.
However, if user didn't first remove neighbours and nexthops using this
interface, then they would still be present in the device's tables.

Therefore, whenever a RIF is deleted, make sure all the neighbours and
nexthops (adjacency entries) using it are removed from the relevant
tables as well.

The action associated with any route using this RIF would be refreshed,
most likely to trap. If the kernel decides to remove the route (f.e.,
because all the nexthops are now DEAD), then an event would be sent,
causing the route to be removed from the device.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      9665b745
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Reflect nexthop status changes · ad178c8e
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      When a packet hits a multipath route in the device's routing table, a
hash is computed over its headers, which is then used to select the
appropriate nexthop from the device's adjacency table.

There are situations in which the kernel removes a nexthop from a
multipath route (e.g., no carrier) and the device should do the same.

Upon the reception of NH_{ADD,DEL} events, add or remove a nexthop from
the device's adjacency table and refresh all the routes using the
nexthop group. If all the nexthops of a multipath route are invalid,
then any packet hitting the route would be trapped to the CPU for
forwarding.

If all the nexthops are DEAD, then the kernel would remove the route
entirely. On the other hand, if all the nexthops are merely LINKDOWN,
then the kernel would keep the route and forward any incoming packet
using a different route.

While the last case might sound like a problem, it's expected that a
routing daemon running in user space would remove such a route from the
FIB as it's dumped with the DEAD flag set.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ad178c8e
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Use trap action only for some route types · 70ad3506
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      The device can have one of three actions associated with a route:

1) Remote - packets continue to the adjacency table
2) Local - packets continue to the neighbour table
3) Trap - packets continue to the CPU

The first two actions can also trap packets to the CPU, but they do so
using a different trap ID, which has a lower traffic class and less
allotted bandwidth.

We currently use the third action for both RTN_{LOCAL,BROADCAST} routes
and RTN_UNICAST routes not pointing to the switch ports.

However, packets that merely need to be forwarded by the switch are
likely not control packets and can be therefore scheduled towards the
CPU using a lower traffic class.

Achieve the above by assigning the third action only to local and
broadcast routes and have any other route use either of the first two
actions, based on whether the route is gatewayed or not.

This will also allow us to refresh routes using the local action and
have them trap packets when their RIF is no longer valid following a
NH_DEL event.

One side effect of this patch is that we no longer give special
treatment to multipath routes using both switch and non-switch ports
towards their nexthops. If at least one of the nexthops can be resolved,
then the device will forward the packets instead of trapping them.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      70ad3506
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Determine offload status using generic function · 4b411477
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      The previous patch introduced a generic function to determine whether a
route should be offloaded or not. Make use of it here.

In the future we're going to add more conditions to this test (e.g.,
whether TOS is non-zero), so it makes sense to centralize it instead of
open coding it in a few places.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4b411477
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: More accurately set offload flag · 013b20f9
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      We currently set the RTNH_F_OFFLOAD flag for all routes using remote
action, but this isn't always correct. If none of the nexthops
associated with a gatewayed route can be offloaded into the device, then
any packet hitting it would be trapped to the CPU and forwarded by the
kernel.

Solve this by pushing the setting of the offload flag to after the route
was programmed into the device, thereby allowing us to take all the
parameters into account.

This change will also help us further in the patchset, when we refresh
routes following the reception of NH_{ADD,DEL} events.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      013b20f9
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Refactor nexthop init routine · a8c97014
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      The nexthop init and de-init functions both have symmetric parts
concerned with the reflection of the neighbour entry into the device's
adjacency table, in case it's used by a gatewayed route.

These sections of code also need to be called when a nexthop is marked
as valid / invalid following NH_{ADD,DEL} events. Break these out into
appropriate functions, so that they could be invoked following the
reception of above events.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a8c97014
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Remove FIB info from FIB entry struct · c8b03077
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      After the previous changes, the FIB info is embedded in every nexthop
group struct, which in turn is embedded in every FIB entry struct.

We can therefore safely remove the FIB info from the entry struct. This
has the added advantage of making the router-related structs more
generic and suitable for use with IPv6 offloads.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c8b03077