- 01 3月, 2010 40 次提交
-
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Now that we can allow the guest to play with cr0 when the fpu is loaded, we can enable lazy fpu when npt is in use. Acked-by: NJoerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
If two conditions apply: - no bits outside TS and EM differ between the host and guest cr0 - the fpu is active then we can activate the selective cr0 write intercept and drop the unconditional cr0 read and write intercept, and allow the guest to run with the host fpu state. This reduces cr0 exits due to guest fpu management while the guest fpu is loaded. Acked-by: NJoerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Currently we don't intercept cr0 at all when npt is enabled. This improves performance but requires us to activate the fpu at all times. Remove this behaviour in preparation for adding selective cr0 intercepts. Acked-by: NJoerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
init_vmcb() sets up the intercepts as if the fpu is active, so initialize it there. This avoids an INIT from setting up intercepts inconsistent with fpu_active. Acked-by: NJoerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Instead of selecting TS and MP as the comments say, the macro included TS and PE. Luckily the macro is unused now, but fix in order to save a few hours of debugging from anyone who attempts to use it. Acked-by: NJoerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Follow the hardware. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
If the guest fpu is loaded, there is nothing interesing about cr0.ts; let the guest play with it as it will. This makes context switches between fpu intensive guest processes faster, as we won't trap the clts and cr0 write instructions. [marcelo: fix cr0 read shadow update on fpu deactivation; kills F8 install] Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Defer fpu deactivation as much as possible - if the guest fpu is loaded, keep it loaded until the next heavyweight exit (where we are forced to unload it). This reduces unnecessary exits. We also defer fpu activation on clts; while clts signals the intent to use the fpu, we can't be sure the guest will actually use it. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
We will use this later to give the guest ownership of cr0.ts. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Since we'd like to allow the guest to own a few bits of cr0 at times, we need to know when we access those bits. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
clts writes cr0.ts; lmsw writes cr0[0:15] - record that in ftrace. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
An SLB entry contains two pieces of information related to size: 1) PTE size 2) SLB size The L bit defines the PTE be "large" (usually means 16MB), SLB_VSID_B_1T defines that the SLB should span 1 GB instead of the default 256MB. Apparently I messed things up and just put those two in one box, shaked it heavily and came up with the current code which handles large pages incorrectly, because it also treats large page SLB entries as "1TB" segment entries. This patch splits those two features apart, making Linux guests boot even when they have > 256MB. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
When we get a program interrupt in guest kernel mode, we try to emulate the instruction. If that doesn't fail, we report to the user and try again - at the exact same instruction pointer. So if the guest kernel really does trigger an invalid instruction, we loop forever. So let's better go and forward program exceptions to the guest when we don't know the instruction we're supposed to emulate. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
When we need to reinject a program interrupt into the guest, we also need to reinject the corresponding flags into the guest. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Reported-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
The code to unset HID5.dcbz32 is broken. This patch makes it do the right rotate magic. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Reported-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
Book3S needs some flags in SRR1 to get to know details about an interrupt. One such example is the trap instruction. It tells the guest kernel that a program interrupt is due to a trap using a bit in SRR1. This patch implements above behavior, making WARN_ON behave like WARN_ON. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
Currently we're racy when doing the transition from IR=1 to IR=0, from the module memory entry code to the real mode SLB switching code. To work around that I took a look at the RTAS entry code which is faced with a similar problem and did the same thing: A small helper in linear mapped memory that does mtmsr with IR=0 and then RFIs info the actual handler. Thanks to that trick we can safely take page faults in the entry code and only need to be really wary of what to do as of the SLB switching part. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
Using an RFI in IR=1 is dangerous. We need to set two SRRs and then do an RFI without getting interrupted at all, because every interrupt could potentially overwrite the SRR values. Fortunately, we don't need to RFI in at least this particular case of the code, so we can just replace it with an mtmsr and b. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
To fetch the last instruction we were interrupted on, we enable DR in early exit code, where we are still in a very transitional phase between guest and host state. Most of the time this seemed to work, but another CPU can easily flush our TLB and HTAB which makes us go in the Linux page fault handler which totally breaks because we still use the guest's SLB entries. To work around that, let's introduce a second KVM guest mode that defines that whenever we get a trap, we don't call the Linux handler or go into the KVM exit code, but just jump over the faulting instruction. That way a potentially bad lwz doesn't trigger any faults and we can later on interpret the invalid instruction we fetched as "fetch didn't work". Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
We're being horribly racy right now. All the entry and exit code hijacks random fields from the PACA that could easily be used by different code in case we get interrupted, for example by a #MC or even page fault. After discussing this with Ben, we figured it's best to reserve some more space in the PACA and just shove off some vcpu state to there. That way we can drastically improve the readability of the code, make it less racy and less complex. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
We now have helpers for the GPRs, so let's also add some for CR and XER. Having them in the PACA simplifies code a lot, as we don't need to care about where to store CC or not to overflow any integers. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
All code in PPC KVM currently accesses gprs in the vcpu struct directly. While there's nothing wrong with that wrt the current way gprs are stored and loaded, it doesn't suffice for the PACA acceleration that will follow in this patchset. So let's just create little wrapper inline functions that we call whenever a GPR needs to be read from or written to. The compiled code shouldn't really change at all for now. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
由 Takuya Yoshikawa 提交于
The explanation of write_emulated is confused with that of read_emulated. This patch fix it. Signed-off-by: NTakuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Sheng Yang 提交于
Signed-off-by: NSheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Sheng Yang 提交于
Then the callback can provide the maximum supported large page level, which is more flexible. Also move the gb page support into x86_64 specific. Signed-off-by: NSheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Sheng Yang 提交于
We can use them in x86.c and vmx.c now... Signed-off-by: NSheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
The PowerPC C ABI defines that registers r14-r31 need to be preserved across function calls. Since our exit handler is written in C, we can make use of that and don't need to reload r14-r31 on every entry/exit cycle. This technique is also used in the BookE code and is called "lightweight exits" there. To follow the tradition, it's called the same in Book3S. So far this optimization was disabled though, as the code didn't do what it was expected to do, but failed to work. This patch fixes and enables lightweight exits again. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexander Graf 提交于
When we're loading bolted entries into the SLB again, we're checking if an entry is in use and only slbmte it when it is. Unfortunately, the check always goes to the skip label of the first entry, resulting in an endless loop when it actually gets triggered. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
When the guest acknowledges an interrupt, it sends an EOI message to the local apic, which broadcasts it to the ioapic. To handle the EOI, we need to take the ioapic mutex. On large guests, this causes a lot of contention on this mutex. Since large guests usually don't route interrupts via the ioapic (they use msi instead), this is completely unnecessary. Avoid taking the mutex by introducing a handled_vectors bitmap. Before taking the mutex, check if the ioapic was actually responsible for the acked vector. If not, we can return early. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
Some exit reasons missed their strings; fill out the table. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Avi Kivity 提交于
With slots_lock converted to rcu, the entire kvm hotpath on modern processors (with npt or ept) now scales beautifully. Increase the maximum vcpu count to 64 to reflect this. Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Marcelo Tosatti 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Marcelo Tosatti 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Marcelo Tosatti 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Marcelo Tosatti 提交于
Using a similar two-step procedure as for memslots. Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Marcelo Tosatti 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Marcelo Tosatti 提交于
Use two steps for memslot deletion: mark the slot invalid (which stops instantiation of new shadow pages for that slot, but allows destruction), then instantiate the new empty slot. Also simplifies kvm_handle_hva locking. Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Marcelo Tosatti 提交于
So its possible to iommu map a memslot before making it visible to kvm. Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Marcelo Tosatti 提交于
Which takes a memslot pointer instead of using kvm->memslots. To be used by SRCU convertion later. Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
由 Marcelo Tosatti 提交于
Required for SRCU convertion later. Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-