提交 bc90923e 编写于 作者: A Alexander Graf 提交者: Marcelo Tosatti

KVM: PPC: Get rid of unnecessary RFI

Using an RFI in IR=1 is dangerous. We need to set two SRRs and then do an RFI
without getting interrupted at all, because every interrupt could potentially
overwrite the SRR values.

Fortunately, we don't need to RFI in at least this particular case of the code,
so we can just replace it with an mtmsr and b.
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
上级 b4433a7c
......@@ -221,15 +221,8 @@ no_dcbz32_off:
mflr r5
std r5, VCPU_LR(r7)
/* XXX convert to safe function call */
/* Restore host msr -> SRR1 */
ld r6, VCPU_HOST_MSR(r7)
mtsrr1 r6
/* Restore host IP -> SRR0 */
ld r5, VCPU_HOST_RETIP(r7)
mtsrr0 r5
/*
* For some interrupts, we need to call the real Linux
......@@ -246,8 +239,9 @@ no_dcbz32_off:
cmpwi r12, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_DECREMENTER
beq call_linux_handler
/* Back to Interruptable Mode! (goto kvm_return_point) */
RFI
/* Back to EE=1 */
mtmsr r6
b kvm_return_point
call_linux_handler:
......@@ -260,10 +254,16 @@ call_linux_handler:
* interrupt handler!
*
* R3 still contains the exit code,
* R6 VCPU_HOST_RETIP and
* R7 VCPU_HOST_MSR
* R5 VCPU_HOST_RETIP and
* R6 VCPU_HOST_MSR
*/
/* Restore host IP -> SRR0 */
ld r5, VCPU_HOST_RETIP(r7)
/* XXX Better move to a safe function?
* What if we get an HTAB flush in between mtsrr0 and mtsrr1? */
mtlr r12
ld r4, VCPU_TRAMPOLINE_LOWMEM(r7)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册