- 24 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Florian Westphal 提交于
133886 2004 220 136110 213ae sctp.new/sctp.o 134018 2004 220 136242 21432 sctp.old/sctp.o Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 06 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Harvey Harrison 提交于
__FUNCTION__ is gcc-specific, use __func__ Signed-off-by: NHarvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Neil Horman 提交于
RFC 3873 specifies several MIB objects that can't be obtained by the current data set exported by /proc/sys/net/sctp/assoc. This patch adds the missing pieces of data that allow us to compute all the objects in the sctpAssocTable object. Signed-off-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 2月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
I was notified by Randy Stewart that lksctp claims to be "the reference implementation". First of all, "the refrence implementation" was the original implementation of SCTP in usersapce written ty Randy and a few others. Second, after looking at the definiton of 'reference implementation', we don't really meet the requirements. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
If STCP is started while /proc/sys/net/sctp/auth_enable is set 0 and association is established between endpoints. Then if /proc/sys/net/sctp/auth_enable is set 1, a received AUTH chunk will cause kernel panic. Test as following: step 1: echo 0> /proc/sys/net/sctp/auth_enable step 2: SCTP client SCTP server INIT ---------> <--------- INIT-ACK COOKIE-ECHO ---------> <--------- COOKIE-ACK step 3: echo 1> /proc/sys/net/sctp/auth_enable step 4: SCTP client SCTP server AUTH -----------> Kernel Panic This patch fix this probleam to treat AUTH chunk as unknow chunk if peer has initialized with no auth capable. > Sorry for the delay. Was on vacation without net access. > > Wei Yongjun wrote: >> >> >> This patch fix this probleam to treat AUTH chunk as unknow chunk if >> peer has initialized with no auth capable. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> > > Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> > >> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Oliver Pinter 提交于
Signed-off-by: NOliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
-
- 29 1月, 2008 7 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
When parameter validation fails, there should be error causes that specify what type of failure we've encountered. If the causes are not there, we lacked memory to allocated them. Thus make that the default value for the error. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Reported by Andrew Morton. net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c: In function 'sctp_sf_do_5_1C_ack': net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c:484: warning: 'error' may be used uninitialized in this function Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Hideo Aoki 提交于
This patch introduces new memory accounting functions for each network protocol. Most of them are renamed from memory accounting functions for stream protocols. At the same time, some stream memory accounting functions are removed since other functions do same thing. Renaming: sk_stream_free_skb() -> sk_wmem_free_skb() __sk_stream_mem_reclaim() -> __sk_mem_reclaim() sk_stream_mem_reclaim() -> sk_mem_reclaim() sk_stream_mem_schedule -> __sk_mem_schedule() sk_stream_pages() -> sk_mem_pages() sk_stream_rmem_schedule() -> sk_rmem_schedule() sk_stream_wmem_schedule() -> sk_wmem_schedule() sk_charge_skb() -> sk_mem_charge() Removeing sk_stream_rfree(): consolidates into sock_rfree() sk_stream_set_owner_r(): consolidates into skb_set_owner_r() sk_stream_mem_schedule() The following functions are added. sk_has_account(): check if the protocol supports accounting sk_mem_uncharge(): do the opposite of sk_mem_charge() In addition, to achieve consolidation, updating sk_wmem_queued is removed from sk_mem_charge(). Next, to consolidate memory accounting functions, this patch adds memory accounting calls to network core functions. Moreover, present memory accounting call is renamed to new accounting call. Finally we replace present memory accounting calls with new interface in TCP and SCTP. Signed-off-by: NTakahiro Yasui <tyasui@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NHideo Aoki <haoki@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The Security Considerations section of RFC 5061 has the following text: If an SCTP endpoint that supports this extension receives an INIT that indicates that the peer supports the ASCONF extension but does NOT support the [RFC4895] extension, the receiver of such an INIT MUST send an ABORT in response. Note that an implementation is allowed to silently discard such an INIT as an option as well, but under NO circumstance is an implementation allowed to proceed with the association setup by sending an INIT-ACK in response. An implementation that receives an INIT-ACK that indicates that the peer does not support the [RFC4895] extension MUST NOT send the COOKIE-ECHO to establish the association. Instead, the implementation MUST discard the INIT-ACK and report to the upper- layer user that an association cannot be established destroying the Transmission Control Block (TCB). Follow the recomendations. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
ADD-IP spec has a special case for processing ABORTs: F4) ... One special consideration is that ABORT Chunks arriving destined to the IP address being deleted MUST be ignored (see Section 5.3.1 for further details). Check if the address we received on is in the DEL state, and if so, ignore the ABORT. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The processing of the ASCONF chunks has changed a lot in the spec. New items are: 1. A list of ASCONF-ACK chunks is now cached 2. The source of the packet is used in response. 3. New handling for unexpect ASCONF chunks. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Now that we support AUTH, discard unauthenticated ASCONF and ASCONF ACK chunks as mandated in the ADD-IP spec. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
When processing an unexpected INIT chunk, we do not need to do any preservation of the old AUTH parameters. In fact, doing such preservations will nullify AUTH and allow connection stealing. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 11月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Our treatment of Heartbeats is special in that the inital HB chunk counts against the error count for the association, where as for other chunks, only retransmissions or timeouts count against us. As a result, we had an off-by-1 situation with a number of Heartbeats we could send. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 20 11月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 11月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jesper Juhl 提交于
In net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c::sctp_sf_abort_violation() we may leak the storage allocated for 'abort' by returning from the function without using or freeing it. This happens in case "sctp_auth_recv_cid(SCTP_CID_ABORT, asoc)" is true and we jump to the 'discard' label. Spotted by the Coverity checker. The simple fix is to simply move the creation of the "abort chunk" to after the possible jump to the 'discard' label. This way we don't even have to allocate the memory at all in the problem case. Signed-off-by: NJesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 08 11月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Commit d0ce9291 broke several retransmit cases including fast retransmit. The reason is that we should only delay by rto while doing retranmists as a result of a timeout. Retransmit as a result of path mtu discover, fast retransmit, or other evernts that should trigger immidiate retransmissions got broken. Also, since rto is doubled prior to marking of packets elegable for retransmission, we never marked correct chunks anyway. The fix is provide a reason for a given retransmission so that we can mark chunks appropriately and to save the old rto value to do comparisons against. All regressions tests passed with this code. Spotted by Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 11 10月, 2007 4 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Add SCTP-AUTH API. The API implemented here was agreed to between implementors at the 9th SCTP Interop. It will be documented in the next revision of the SCTP socket API spec. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
This patch implements the receive path needed to process authenticated chunks. Add ability to process the AUTH chunk and handle edge cases for authenticated COOKIE-ECHO as well. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Implement processing for the CHUNKS, RANDOM, and HMAC parameters and deal with how this parameters are effected by association restarts. In particular, during unexpeted INIT processing, we need to reply with parameters from the original INIT chunk. Also, after restart, we need to update the old association with new peer parameters and change the association shared keys. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Neil Horman 提交于
This patch introduces autotuning to the sctp buffer management code similar to the TCP. The buffer space can be grown if the advertised receive window still has room. This might happen if small message sizes are used, which is common in telecom environmens. New tunables are introduced that provide limits to buffer growth and memory pressure is entered if to much buffer spaces is used. Signed-off-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 9月, 2007 4 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
If ADDIP is enabled, when an ASCONF chunk is received with ASCONF paramter length set to zero, this will cause infinite loop. By the way, if an malformed ASCONF chunk is received, will cause processing to access memory without verifying. This is because of not check the validity of parameters in ASCONF chunk. This patch fixed this. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
While processing OOTB chunks as well as chunks with an invalid length of 0, it was possible to SCTP to get wedged inside an infinite loop because we didn't catch the condition correctly, or didn't mark the packet for discard correctly. This work is based on original findings and work by Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Explicitely discard OOTB chunks, whether the result is a SHUTDOWN COMPLETE or an ABORT. We need to discard the OOTB SHUTDOWN ACK to prevent bombing attackes since responsed MUST NOT be bundled. We also explicietely discard in the ABORT case since that function is widely used internally. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Acked-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
When SCTP client received an INIT ACK chunk with missing mandatory parameter such as "cookie parameter", it will send back a ABORT with T-bit not set and verification tag is set to 0. This is because before we accept this INIT ACK chunk, we do not know the peer's tag. This patch change to reflect vtag when responding to INIT ACK with missing mandatory parameter. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 31 8月, 2007 3 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Currently we abort on the INIT chunk we our backlog is currenlty exceeded. Delay this about untill COOKIE-ECHO to give the user time to accept the socket. Also, make sure that we treat sk_max_backlog of 0 as no connections allowed. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
When multi bundling SHUTDOWN-ACK message is received in ESTAB state, this will cause "sctp protocol violation state" message print many times. If SHUTDOWN-ACK is bundled 300 times in one packet, message will be print 300 times. The same problem also exists when received unexpected HEARTBEAT-ACK message which is bundled message times. This patch used net_ratelimit() to suppress error messages print too fast. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause in ABORT is bad encode when make abort chunk. When SCTP encode ABORT chunk with PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause, it just add the error messages to PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause, the rest four bytes(struct sctp_paramhdr) is just add to the chunk, not change the length of error cause. This cause the ABORT chunk to be a bad format. The chunk is like this: ABORT chunk Chunk type: ABORT (6) Chunk flags: 0x00 Chunk length: 72 (*1) Protocol violation cause Cause code: Protocol violation (0x000d) Cause length: 62 (*2) Cause information: 5468652063756D756C61746976652074736E2061636B2062... Cause padding: 0000 [Needless] 00030010 Chunk Length(*1) = 72 but Cause length(*2) only 62, not include the extend 4 bytes. ((72 - sizeof(chunk_hdr)) = 68) != (62 +3) / 4 * 4 Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 02 8月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
We need to drop the SACK if the peer is attempting to acknowledge unset data, i.e. the CTSN in the SACK is greater or equal to the next TSN we will send. Example: Endpoint A Endpoint B <--------------- DATA (TSN=1) SACK(TSN=1) ---------------> <--------------- DATA (TSN=2) <--------------- DATA (TSN=3) <--------------- DATA (TSN=4) <--------------- DATA (TSN=5) SACK(TSN=1000) ---------------> <--------------- DATA (TSN=6) <--------------- DATA (TSN=7) Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 19 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
-
- 05 5月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
During the INIT/COOKIE-ACK collision cases, it's possible to get into a situation where the association id is not yet set at the time of the user event generation. As a result, user events have an association id set to 0 which will confuse applications. This happens if we hit case B of duplicate cookie processing. In the particular example found and provided by Oscar Isaula <Oscar.Isaula@motorola.com>, flow looks like this: A B ---- INIT-------> (lost) <---------INIT------ ---- INIT-ACK---> <------ Cookie ECHO When the Cookie Echo is received, we end up trying to update the association that was created on A as a result of the (lost) INIT, but that association doesn't have the ID set yet. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 4月, 2007 4 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Spring cleaning time... There seems to be a lot of places in the network code that have extra bogus semicolons after conditionals. Most commonly is a bogus semicolon after: switch() { } Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
As stated in the sctp socket api draft: sac_info: variable If the sac_state is SCTP_COMM_LOST and an ABORT chunk was received for this association, sac_info[] contains the complete ABORT chunk as defined in the SCTP specification RFC2960 [RFC2960] section 3.3.7. We now save received ABORT chunks into the sac_info field and pass that to the user. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
So that it is also an offset from skb->head, reduces its size from 8 to 4 bytes on 64bit architectures, allowing us to combine the 4 bytes hole left by the layer headers conversion, reducing struct sk_buff size to 256 bytes, i.e. 4 64byte cachelines, and since the sk_buff slab cache is SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN... :-) Many calculations that previously required that skb->{transport,network, mac}_header be first converted to a pointer now can be done directly, being meaningful as offsets or pointers. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 3月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
2960bis states (Section 8.3): D) Request an on-demand HEARTBEAT on a specific destination transport address of a given association. The endpoint should increment the respective error counter of the destination transport address each time a HEARTBEAT is sent to that address and not acknowledged within one RTO. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NSridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 27 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Once we reach a point where we exceed the max.path.retrans, strike the transport before updating the rto. This will force transport switch at the right time, instead of 1 retransmit too late. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NSridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 24 1月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Brian Haley 提交于
> --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c > @@ -462,24 +461,6 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_do_5_1C_ack(const struct sctp_endpoint *ep, > - if (!init_tag) { > - struct sctp_chunk *reply = sctp_make_abort(asoc, chunk, 0); > - if (!reply) > - goto nomem; This introduced a compiler warning, easily fixed. Signed-off-by: NBrian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-