Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 29 1月, 2008 5 次提交
    • H
      [NET] CORE: Introducing new memory accounting interface. · 3ab224be
      由 Hideo Aoki 提交于 
      This patch introduces new memory accounting functions for each network
protocol. Most of them are renamed from memory accounting functions
for stream protocols. At the same time, some stream memory accounting
functions are removed since other functions do same thing.

Renaming:
	sk_stream_free_skb()		->	sk_wmem_free_skb()
	__sk_stream_mem_reclaim()	->	__sk_mem_reclaim()
	sk_stream_mem_reclaim()		->	sk_mem_reclaim()
	sk_stream_mem_schedule 		->    	__sk_mem_schedule()
	sk_stream_pages()      		->	sk_mem_pages()
	sk_stream_rmem_schedule()	->	sk_rmem_schedule()
	sk_stream_wmem_schedule()	->	sk_wmem_schedule()
	sk_charge_skb()			->	sk_mem_charge()

Removeing
	sk_stream_rfree():	consolidates into sock_rfree()
	sk_stream_set_owner_r(): consolidates into skb_set_owner_r()
	sk_stream_mem_schedule()

The following functions are added.
    	sk_has_account(): check if the protocol supports accounting
	sk_mem_uncharge(): do the opposite of sk_mem_charge()

In addition, to achieve consolidation, updating sk_wmem_queued is
removed from sk_mem_charge().

Next, to consolidate memory accounting functions, this patch adds
memory accounting calls to network core functions. Moreover, present
memory accounting call is renamed to new accounting call.

Finally we replace present memory accounting calls with new interface
in TCP and SCTP.
Signed-off-by: NTakahiro Yasui <tyasui@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NHideo Aoki <haoki@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      3ab224be
    • V
      [SCTP]: Follow Add-IP security consideratiosn wrt INIT/INIT-ACK · d6701191
      由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于 
      The Security Considerations section of RFC 5061 has the following
text:

   If an SCTP endpoint that supports this extension receives an INIT
   that indicates that the peer supports the ASCONF extension but does
   NOT support the [RFC4895] extension, the receiver of such an INIT
   MUST send an ABORT in response.  Note that an implementation is
   allowed to silently discard such an INIT as an option as well, but
   under NO circumstance is an implementation allowed to proceed with
   the association setup by sending an INIT-ACK in response.

   An implementation that receives an INIT-ACK that indicates that the
   peer does not support the [RFC4895] extension MUST NOT send the
   COOKIE-ECHO to establish the association.  Instead, the
   implementation MUST discard the INIT-ACK and report to the upper-
   layer user that an association cannot be established destroying the
   Transmission Control Block (TCB).

Follow the recomendations.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      d6701191
    • V
      [SCTP]: Implement ADD-IP special case processing for ABORT chunk · 75205f47
      由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于 
      ADD-IP spec has a special case for processing ABORTs:
    F4) ... One special consideration is that ABORT
        Chunks arriving destined to the IP address being deleted MUST be
        ignored (see Section 5.3.1 for further details).

Check if the address we received on is in the DEL state, and if
so, ignore the ABORT.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      75205f47
    • V
      [SCTP]: Update ASCONF processing to conform to spec. · a08de64d
      由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于 
      The processing of the ASCONF chunks has changed a lot in the
spec.  New items are:
    1. A list of ASCONF-ACK chunks is now cached
    2. The source of the packet is used in response.
    3. New handling for unexpect ASCONF chunks.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a08de64d
    • V
      [SCTP]: Discard unauthenticated ASCONF and ASCONF ACK chunks · 6afd2e83
      由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于 
      Now that we support AUTH, discard unauthenticated ASCONF and ASCONF ACK
chunks as mandated in the ADD-IP spec.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6afd2e83
  3. 09 1月, 2008 1 次提交
  5. 29 11月, 2007 1 次提交
  7. 20 11月, 2007 1 次提交
  9. 12 11月, 2007 1 次提交
    • J
      Fix memory leak in discard case of sctp_sf_abort_violation() · 9abed245
      由 Jesper Juhl 提交于 
      In net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c::sctp_sf_abort_violation() we may leak
the storage allocated for 'abort' by returning from the function
without using or freeing it. This happens in case
"sctp_auth_recv_cid(SCTP_CID_ABORT, asoc)" is true and we jump to
the 'discard' label.
Spotted by the Coverity checker.

The simple fix is to simply move the creation of the "abort chunk"
to after the possible jump to the 'discard' label. This way we don't
even have to allocate the memory at all in the problem case.
Signed-off-by: NJesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
      9abed245
  11. 08 11月, 2007 1 次提交
    • V
      SCTP: Fix difference cases of retransmit. · b6157d8e
      由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于 
      Commit d0ce9291 broke several retransmit
cases including fast retransmit.  The reason is that we should
only delay by rto while doing retranmists as a result of a timeout.
Retransmit as a result of path mtu discover, fast retransmit, or
other evernts that should trigger immidiate retransmissions got broken.

Also, since rto is doubled prior to marking of packets elegable for
retransmission, we never marked correct chunks anyway.

The fix is provide a reason for a given retransmission so that we
can mark chunks appropriately and to save the old rto value to do
comparisons against.

All regressions tests passed with this code.

Spotted by Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
      b6157d8e
  13. 11 10月, 2007 4 次提交
  15. 26 9月, 2007 4 次提交
  17. 31 8月, 2007 3 次提交
    • V
      SCTP: Abort on COOKIE-ECHO if backlog is exceeded. · 609ee467
      由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于 
      Currently we abort on the INIT chunk we our backlog is currenlty
exceeded.  Delay this about untill COOKIE-ECHO to give the user
time to accept the socket.  Also, make sure that we treat
sk_max_backlog of 0 as no connections allowed.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
      609ee467
    • W
      SCTP: Use net_ratelimit to suppress error messages print too fast · d99fa429
      由 Wei Yongjun 提交于 
      When multi bundling SHUTDOWN-ACK message is received in ESTAB state,
this will cause "sctp protocol violation state" message print many times.
If SHUTDOWN-ACK is bundled 300 times in one packet, message will be
print 300 times. The same problem also exists when received unexpected
HEARTBEAT-ACK message which is bundled message times.

This patch used net_ratelimit() to suppress error messages print too fast.
Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
      d99fa429
    • W
      SCTP: Fix to encode PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause correctly · 00f1c2df
      由 Wei Yongjun 提交于 
      PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause in ABORT is bad encode when make abort
chunk. When SCTP encode ABORT chunk with PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause,
it just add the error messages to PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause, the
rest four bytes(struct sctp_paramhdr) is just add to the chunk, not
change the length of error cause. This cause the ABORT chunk to be a bad
format. The chunk is like this:

ABORT chunk
  Chunk type: ABORT (6)
  Chunk flags: 0x00
  Chunk length: 72 (*1)
  Protocol violation cause
    Cause code: Protocol violation (0x000d)
    Cause length: 62 (*2)
    Cause information: 5468652063756D756C61746976652074736E2061636B2062...
    Cause padding: 0000
[Needless] 00030010
Chunk Length(*1) = 72 but Cause length(*2) only 62, not include the
extend 4 bytes.
((72 - sizeof(chunk_hdr)) = 68) != (62 +3) / 4 * 4
Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
      00f1c2df
  19. 02 8月, 2007 1 次提交
  21. 19 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  23. 05 5月, 2007 1 次提交
    • V
      [SCTP]: Set assoc_id correctly during INIT collision. · 07d93967
      由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于 
      During the INIT/COOKIE-ACK collision cases, it's possible to get
into a situation where the association id is not yet set at the time
of the user event generation.  As a result, user events have an
association id set to 0 which will confuse applications.

This happens if we hit case B of duplicate cookie processing.
In the particular example found and provided by Oscar Isaula
<Oscar.Isaula@motorola.com>, flow looks like this:
A				B
---- INIT------->  (lost)
	    <---------INIT------
---- INIT-ACK--->
	    <------ Cookie ECHO

When the Cookie Echo is received, we end up trying to update the
association that was created on A as a result of the (lost) INIT,
but that association doesn't have the ID set yet.
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      07d93967
  25. 26 4月, 2007 4 次提交
  27. 20 3月, 2007 1 次提交
  29. 27 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  31. 11 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  33. 24 1月, 2007 3 次提交
  35. 23 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  37. 03 12月, 2006 5 次提交