1. 06 7月, 2016 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: validate s_reserved_gdt_blocks on mount · 5b9554dc
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      If s_reserved_gdt_blocks is extremely large, it's possible for
      ext4_init_block_bitmap(), which is called when ext4 sets up an
      uninitialized block bitmap, to corrupt random kernel memory.  Add the
      same checks which e2fsck has --- it must never be larger than
      blocksize / sizeof(__u32) --- and then add a backup check in
      ext4_init_block_bitmap() in case the superblock gets modified after
      the file system is mounted.
      Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      5b9554dc
  2. 27 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  3. 08 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  4. 13 5月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      ext4: fix race in transient ENOSPC detection · dbc427ce
      Jan Kara 提交于
      When there are blocks to free in the running transaction, block
      allocator can return ENOSPC although the filesystem has some blocks to
      free. We use ext4_should_retry_alloc() to force commit of the current
      transaction and return whether anything was committed so that it makes
      sense to retry the allocation. However the transaction may get committed
      after block allocation fails but before we call
      ext4_should_retry_alloc(). So ext4_should_retry_alloc() returns false
      because there is nothing to commit and we wrongly return ENOSPC.
      
      Fix the race by unconditionally returning 1 from ext4_should_retry_alloc()
      when we tried to commit a transaction. This should not add any
      unnecessary retries since we had a transaction running a while ago when
      trying to allocate blocks and we want to retry the allocation once that
      transaction has committed anyway.
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      dbc427ce
  5. 12 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  6. 18 10月, 2015 3 次提交
  7. 08 6月, 2015 1 次提交
    • L
      ext4: verify block bitmap even after fresh initialization · 41e5b7ed
      Lukas Czerner 提交于
      If we want to rely on the buffer_verified() flag of the block bitmap
      buffer, we have to set it consistently. However currently if we're
      initializing uninitialized block bitmap in
      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait() we're not going to set buffer verified
      at all.
      
      We can do this by simply setting the flag on the buffer, but I think
      it's actually better to run ext4_validate_block_bitmap() to make sure
      that what we did in the ext4_init_block_bitmap() is right.
      
      So run ext4_validate_block_bitmap() even after the block bitmap
      initialization. Also bail out early from ext4_validate_block_bitmap() if
      we see corrupt bitmap, since we already know it's corrupt and we do not
      need to verify that.
      Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      41e5b7ed
  8. 03 4月, 2015 2 次提交
  9. 13 10月, 2014 1 次提交
    • D
      ext4: move error report out of atomic context in ext4_init_block_bitmap() · aef4885a
      Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
      Error report likely result in IO so it is bad idea to do it from
      atomic context.
      
      This patch should fix following issue:
      
      BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/buffer_head.h:349
      in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 137, name: kworker/u128:1
      5 locks held by kworker/u128:1/137:
       #0:  ("writeback"){......}, at: [<ffffffff81085618>] process_one_work+0x228/0x4d0
       #1:  ((&(&wb->dwork)->work)){......}, at: [<ffffffff81085618>] process_one_work+0x228/0x4d0
       #2:  (jbd2_handle){......}, at: [<ffffffff81242622>] start_this_handle+0x712/0x7b0
       #3:  (&ei->i_data_sem){......}, at: [<ffffffff811fa387>] ext4_map_blocks+0x297/0x430
       #4:  (&(&bgl->locks[i].lock)->rlock){......}, at: [<ffffffff811f3180>] ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait+0x5d0/0x630
      CPU: 3 PID: 137 Comm: kworker/u128:1 Not tainted 3.17.0-rc2-00184-g82752e4 #165
      Hardware name: Intel Corporation W2600CR/W2600CR, BIOS SE5C600.86B.99.99.x028.061320111235 06/13/2011
      Workqueue: writeback bdi_writeback_workfn (flush-1:0)
       0000000000000411 ffff880813777288 ffffffff815c7fdc ffff880813777288
       ffff880813a8bba0 ffff8808137772a8 ffffffff8108fb30 ffff880803e01e38
       ffff880803e01e38 ffff8808137772c8 ffffffff811a8d53 ffff88080ecc6000
      Call Trace:
       [<ffffffff815c7fdc>] dump_stack+0x51/0x6d
       [<ffffffff8108fb30>] __might_sleep+0xf0/0x100
       [<ffffffff811a8d53>] __sync_dirty_buffer+0x43/0xe0
       [<ffffffff811a8e03>] sync_dirty_buffer+0x13/0x20
       [<ffffffff8120f581>] ext4_commit_super+0x1d1/0x230
       [<ffffffff8120fa03>] save_error_info+0x23/0x30
       [<ffffffff8120fd06>] __ext4_error+0xb6/0xd0
       [<ffffffff8120f260>] ? ext4_group_desc_csum+0x140/0x190
       [<ffffffff811f2d8c>] ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait+0x1dc/0x630
       [<ffffffff8122e23a>] ext4_mb_init_cache+0x21a/0x8f0
       [<ffffffff8113ae95>] ? lru_cache_add+0x55/0x60
       [<ffffffff8112e16c>] ? add_to_page_cache_lru+0x6c/0x80
       [<ffffffff8122eaa0>] ext4_mb_init_group+0x190/0x280
       [<ffffffff8122ec51>] ext4_mb_good_group+0xc1/0x190
       [<ffffffff8123309a>] ext4_mb_regular_allocator+0x17a/0x410
       [<ffffffff8122c821>] ? ext4_mb_use_preallocated+0x31/0x380
       [<ffffffff81233535>] ? ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x205/0x8e0
       [<ffffffff8116ed5c>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xfc/0x180
       [<ffffffff812335b0>] ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x280/0x8e0
       [<ffffffff8116f2c4>] ? __kmalloc+0x144/0x1c0
       [<ffffffff81221797>] ? ext4_find_extent+0x97/0x320
       [<ffffffff812257f4>] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0xbc4/0x1050
       [<ffffffff811fa387>] ? ext4_map_blocks+0x297/0x430
       [<ffffffff811fa3ab>] ext4_map_blocks+0x2bb/0x430
       [<ffffffff81200e43>] ? ext4_init_io_end+0x23/0x50
       [<ffffffff811feb44>] ext4_writepages+0x564/0xaf0
       [<ffffffff815cde3b>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2b/0x40
       [<ffffffff810ac7bd>] ? lock_release_non_nested+0x2fd/0x3c0
       [<ffffffff811a009e>] ? writeback_sb_inodes+0x10e/0x490
       [<ffffffff811a009e>] ? writeback_sb_inodes+0x10e/0x490
       [<ffffffff811377e3>] do_writepages+0x23/0x40
       [<ffffffff8119c8ce>] __writeback_single_inode+0x9e/0x280
       [<ffffffff811a026b>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x2db/0x490
       [<ffffffff811a0664>] wb_writeback+0x174/0x2d0
       [<ffffffff810ac359>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x29/0x190
       [<ffffffff811a0863>] wb_do_writeback+0xa3/0x200
       [<ffffffff811a0a40>] bdi_writeback_workfn+0x80/0x230
       [<ffffffff81085618>] ? process_one_work+0x228/0x4d0
       [<ffffffff810856cd>] process_one_work+0x2dd/0x4d0
       [<ffffffff81085618>] ? process_one_work+0x228/0x4d0
       [<ffffffff81085c1d>] worker_thread+0x35d/0x460
       [<ffffffff810858c0>] ? process_one_work+0x4d0/0x4d0
       [<ffffffff810858c0>] ? process_one_work+0x4d0/0x4d0
       [<ffffffff8108a885>] kthread+0xf5/0x100
       [<ffffffff810990e5>] ? local_clock+0x25/0x30
       [<ffffffff8108a790>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
       [<ffffffff815ce2ac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
       [<ffffffff8108a790>] ? __init_kthread_work
      Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      aef4885a
  10. 05 9月, 2014 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: prepare to drop EXT4_STATE_DELALLOC_RESERVED · e3cf5d5d
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      The EXT4_STATE_DELALLOC_RESERVED flag was originally implemented
      because it was too hard to make sure the mballoc and get_block flags
      could be reliably passed down through all of the codepaths that end up
      calling ext4_mb_new_blocks().
      
      Since then, we have mb_flags passed down through most of the code
      paths, so getting rid of EXT4_STATE_DELALLOC_RESERVED isn't as tricky
      as it used to.
      
      This commit plumbs in the last of what is required, and then adds a
      WARN_ON check to make sure we haven't missed anything.  If this passes
      a full regression test run, we can then drop
      EXT4_STATE_DELALLOC_RESERVED.
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      e3cf5d5d
  11. 15 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  12. 26 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  13. 12 5月, 2014 3 次提交
  14. 15 4月, 2014 1 次提交
    • A
      ext4: fix ext4_count_free_clusters() with EXT4FS_DEBUG and bigalloc enabled · 036acea2
      Azat Khuzhin 提交于
      With bigalloc enabled we must use EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP() instead of
      EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP() otherwise we will go beyond the allocated buffer.
      
      $ mount -t ext4 /dev/vde /vde
      [   70.573993] EXT4-fs DEBUG (fs/ext4/mballoc.c, 2346): ext4_mb_alloc_groupinfo:
      [   70.575174] allocated s_groupinfo array for 1 meta_bg's
      [   70.576172] EXT4-fs DEBUG (fs/ext4/super.c, 2092): ext4_check_descriptors:
      [   70.576972] Checking group descriptorsBUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff88006ab56000
      [   72.463686] IP: [<ffffffff81394eb9>] __bitmap_weight+0x2a/0x7f
      [   72.464168] PGD 295e067 PUD 2961067 PMD 7fa8e067 PTE 800000006ab56060
      [   72.464738] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
      [   72.465139] Modules linked in:
      [   72.465402] CPU: 1 PID: 3560 Comm: mount Tainted: G        W    3.14.0-rc2-00069-ge57bce1 #60
      [   72.466079] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
      [   72.466505] task: ffff88007ce6c8a0 ti: ffff88006b7f0000 task.ti: ffff88006b7f0000
      [   72.466505] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81394eb9>]  [<ffffffff81394eb9>] __bitmap_weight+0x2a/0x7f
      [   72.466505] RSP: 0018:ffff88006b7f1c00  EFLAGS: 00010206
      [   72.466505] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000000050a RCX: 0000000000000040
      [   72.466505] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000080000 RDI: 0000000000000000
      [   72.466505] RBP: ffff88006b7f1c28 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000
      [   72.466505] R10: 000000000000babe R11: 0000000000000400 R12: 0000000000080000
      [   72.466505] R13: 0000000000000200 R14: 0000000000002000 R15: ffff88006ab55000
      [   72.466505] FS:  00007f43ba1fa840(0000) GS:ffff88007f800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      [   72.466505] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
      [   72.466505] CR2: ffff88006ab56000 CR3: 000000006b7e6000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
      [   72.466505] Stack:
      [   72.466505]  ffff88006ab65000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000010000
      [   72.466505]  ffff88006ab6f400 ffff88006b7f1c58 ffffffff81396bb8 0000000000010000
      [   72.466505]  0000000000000000 ffff88007b869a90 ffff88006a48a000 ffff88006b7f1c70
      [   72.466505] Call Trace:
      [   72.466505]  [<ffffffff81396bb8>] memweight+0x5f/0x8a
      [   72.466505]  [<ffffffff811c3b19>] ext4_count_free+0x13/0x21
      [   72.466505]  [<ffffffff811c396c>] ext4_count_free_clusters+0xdb/0x171
      [   72.466505]  [<ffffffff811e3bdd>] ext4_fill_super+0x117c/0x28ef
      [   72.466505]  [<ffffffff81391569>] ? vsnprintf+0x1c7/0x3f7
      [   72.466505]  [<ffffffff8114d8dc>] mount_bdev+0x145/0x19c
      [   72.466505]  [<ffffffff811e2a61>] ? ext4_calculate_overhead+0x2a1/0x2a1
      [   72.466505]  [<ffffffff811dab1d>] ext4_mount+0x15/0x17
      [   72.466505]  [<ffffffff8114e3aa>] mount_fs+0x67/0x150
      [   72.466505]  [<ffffffff811637ea>] vfs_kern_mount+0x64/0xde
      [   72.466505]  [<ffffffff81165d19>] do_mount+0x6fe/0x7f5
      [   72.466505]  [<ffffffff81126cc8>] ? strndup_user+0x3a/0xd9
      [   72.466505]  [<ffffffff8116604b>] SyS_mount+0x85/0xbe
      [   72.466505]  [<ffffffff81619e90>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
      [   72.466505] Code: c3 89 f0 b9 40 00 00 00 55 99 48 89 e5 41 57 f7 f9 41 56 49 89 ff 41 55 45 31 ed 41 54 41 89 f4 53 31 db 41 89 c6 45 39 ee 7e 10 <4b> 8b 3c ef 49 ff c5 e8 bf ff ff ff 01 c3 eb eb 31 c0 45 85 f6
      [   72.466505] RIP  [<ffffffff81394eb9>] __bitmap_weight+0x2a/0x7f
      [   72.466505]  RSP <ffff88006b7f1c00>
      [   72.466505] CR2: ffff88006ab56000
      [   72.466505] ---[ end trace 7d051a08ae138573 ]---
      Killed
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      036acea2
  15. 31 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  16. 29 8月, 2013 4 次提交
    • D
      ext4: mark group corrupt on group descriptor checksum · bdfb6ff4
      Darrick J. Wong 提交于
      If the group descriptor fails validation, mark the whole blockgroup
      corrupt so that the inode/block allocators skip this group.  The
      previous approach takes the risk of writing to a damaged group
      descriptor; hopefully it was never the case that the [ib]bitmap fields
      pointed to another valid block and got dirtied, since the memset would
      fill the page with 1s.
      Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      bdfb6ff4
    • D
      ext4: mark block group as corrupt on block bitmap error · 163a203d
      Darrick J. Wong 提交于
      When we notice a block-bitmap corruption (because of device failure or
      something else), we should mark this group as corrupt and prevent
      further block allocations/deallocations from it. Currently, we end up
      generating one error message for every block in the bitmap. This
      potentially could make the system unstable as noticed in some
      bugs. With this patch, the error will be printed only the first time
      and mark the entire block group as corrupted. This prevents future
      access allocations/deallocations from it.
      
      Also tested by corrupting the block
      bitmap and forcefully introducing the mb_free_blocks error:
      (1) create a largefile (2Gb)
      $ dd if=/dev/zero of=largefile oflag=direct bs=10485760 count=200
      (2) umount filesystem. use dumpe2fs to see which block-bitmaps
      are in use by largefile and note their block numbers
      (3) use dd to zero-out the used block bitmaps
      $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdc4 bs=4096 seek=14 count=8 oflag=direct
      (4) mount the FS and delete the largefile.
      (5) recreate the largefile. verify that the new largefile does not
      get any blocks from the groups marked as bad.
      Without the patch, we will see mb_free_blocks error for each bit in
      each zero'ed out bitmap at (4). With the patch, we only see the error
      once per blockgroup:
      [  309.706803] EXT4-fs error (device sdb4): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:735: group 15: 32768 clusters in bitmap, 0 in gd. blk grp corrupted.
      [  309.720824] EXT4-fs error (device sdb4): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:735: group 14: 32768 clusters in bitmap, 0 in gd. blk grp corrupted.
      [  309.732858] EXT4-fs error (device sdb4) in ext4_free_blocks:4802: IO failure
      [  309.748321] EXT4-fs error (device sdb4): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:735: group 13: 32768 clusters in bitmap, 0 in gd. blk grp corrupted.
      [  309.760331] EXT4-fs error (device sdb4) in ext4_free_blocks:4802: IO failure
      [  309.769695] EXT4-fs error (device sdb4): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:735: group 12: 32768 clusters in bitmap, 0 in gd. blk grp corrupted.
      [  309.781721] EXT4-fs error (device sdb4) in ext4_free_blocks:4802: IO failure
      [  309.798166] EXT4-fs error (device sdb4): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:735: group 11: 32768 clusters in bitmap, 0 in gd. blk grp corrupted.
      [  309.810184] EXT4-fs error (device sdb4) in ext4_free_blocks:4802: IO failure
      [  309.819532] EXT4-fs error (device sdb4): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:735: group 10: 32768 clusters in bitmap, 0 in gd. blk grp corrupted.
      
      Google-Bug-Id: 7258357
      
      [darrick.wong@oracle.com]
      Further modifications (by Darrick) to make more obvious that this corruption
      bit applies to blocks only.  Set the corruption flag if the block group bitmap
      verification fails.
      
      Original-author: Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      163a203d
    • D
      ext4: fix type declaration of ext4_validate_block_bitmap · dbde0abe
      Darrick J. Wong 提交于
      The block_group parameter to ext4_validate_block_bitmap is both used
      as a ext4_group_t inside the function and the same type is passed in
      by all callers.  We might as well use the typedef consistently instead
      of open-coding the 'unsigned int'.
      Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      dbde0abe
    • D
      ext4: error out if verifying the block bitmap fails · 48d9eb97
      Darrick J. Wong 提交于
      The block bitmap verification code assumes that calling ext4_error()
      either panics the system or makes the fs readonly.  However, this is
      not always true: when 'errors=continue' is specified, an error is
      printed but we don't return any indication of error to the caller,
      which is (probably) the block allocator, which pretends that the crud
      we read in off the disk is a usable bitmap.  Yuck.
      
      A block bitmap that fails the check should at least return no bitmap
      to the caller.  The block allocator should be told to go look in a
      different group, but that's a separate issue.
      
      The easiest way to reproduce this is to modify bg_block_bitmap (on a
      ^flex_bg fs) to point to a block outside the block group; or you can
      create a metadata_csum filesystem and zero out the block bitmaps.
      Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      48d9eb97
  17. 06 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: fix ext4_get_group_number() · 960fd856
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      The function ext4_get_group_number() was introduced as an optimization
      in commit bd86298e.  Unfortunately, this commit incorrectly
      calculate the group number for file systems with a 1k block size (when
      s_first_data_block is 1 instead of zero).  This could cause the
      following kernel BUG:
      
      [  568.877799] ------------[ cut here ]------------
      [  568.877833] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:3728!
      [  568.877840] Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1]
      [  568.877845] SMP NR_CPUS=32 NUMA pSeries
      [  568.877852] Modules linked in: binfmt_misc
      [  568.877861] CPU: 1 PID: 3516 Comm: fs_mark Not tainted 3.10.0-03216-g7c6809ff-dirty #1
      [  568.877867] task: c0000001fb0b8000 ti: c0000001fa954000 task.ti: c0000001fa954000
      [  568.877873] NIP: c0000000002f42a4 LR: c0000000002f4274 CTR: c000000000317ef8
      [  568.877879] REGS: c0000001fa956ed0 TRAP: 0700   Not tainted  (3.10.0-03216-g7c6809ff-dirty)
      [  568.877884] MSR: 8000000000029032 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI>  CR: 24000428  XER: 00000000
      [  568.877902] SOFTE: 1
      [  568.877905] CFAR: c0000000002b5464
      [  568.877908]
      GPR00: 0000000000000001 c0000001fa957150 c000000000c6a408 c0000001fb588000
      GPR04: 0000000000003fff c0000001fa9571c0 c0000001fa9571c4 000138098c50625f
      GPR08: 1301200000000000 0000000000000002 0000000000000001 0000000000000000
      GPR12: 0000000024000422 c00000000f33a300 0000000000008000 c0000001fa9577f0
      GPR16: c0000001fb7d0100 c000000000c29190 c0000000007f46e8 c000000000a14672
      GPR20: 0000000000000001 0000000000000008 ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000000
      GPR24: 0000000000000100 c0000001fa957278 c0000001fdb2bc78 c0000001fa957288
      GPR28: 0000000000100100 c0000001fa957288 c0000001fb588000 c0000001fdb2bd10
      [  568.877993] NIP [c0000000002f42a4] .ext4_mb_release_group_pa+0xec/0x1c0
      [  568.877999] LR [c0000000002f4274] .ext4_mb_release_group_pa+0xbc/0x1c0
      [  568.878004] Call Trace:
      [  568.878008] [c0000001fa957150] [c0000000002f4274] .ext4_mb_release_group_pa+0xbc/0x1c0 (unreliable)
      [  568.878017] [c0000001fa957200] [c0000000002fb070] .ext4_mb_discard_lg_preallocations+0x394/0x444
      [  568.878025] [c0000001fa957340] [c0000000002fb45c] .ext4_mb_release_context+0x33c/0x734
      [  568.878032] [c0000001fa957440] [c0000000002fbcf8] .ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x4a4/0x5f4
      [  568.878039] [c0000001fa957510] [c0000000002ef56c] .ext4_ext_map_blocks+0xc28/0x1178
      [  568.878047] [c0000001fa957640] [c0000000002c1a94] .ext4_map_blocks+0x2c8/0x490
      [  568.878054] [c0000001fa957730] [c0000000002c536c] .ext4_writepages+0x738/0xc60
      [  568.878062] [c0000001fa957950] [c000000000168a78] .do_writepages+0x5c/0x80
      [  568.878069] [c0000001fa9579d0] [c00000000015d1c4] .__filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x88/0xb0
      [  568.878078] [c0000001fa957aa0] [c00000000015d23c] .filemap_write_and_wait_range+0x50/0xfc
      [  568.878085] [c0000001fa957b30] [c0000000002b8edc] .ext4_sync_file+0x220/0x3c4
      [  568.878092] [c0000001fa957be0] [c0000000001f849c] .vfs_fsync_range+0x64/0x80
      [  568.878098] [c0000001fa957c70] [c0000000001f84f0] .vfs_fsync+0x38/0x4c
      [  568.878105] [c0000001fa957d00] [c0000000001f87f4] .do_fsync+0x54/0x90
      [  568.878111] [c0000001fa957db0] [c0000000001f8894] .SyS_fsync+0x28/0x3c
      [  568.878120] [c0000001fa957e30] [c000000000009c88] syscall_exit+0x0/0x7c
      [  568.878125] Instruction dump:
      [  568.878130] 60000000 813d0034 81610070 38000000 7f8b4800 419e001c 813f007c 7d2bfe70
      [  568.878144] 7d604a78 7c005850 54000ffe 7c0007b4 <0b000000> e8a10076 e87f0090 7fa4eb78
      [  568.878160] ---[ end trace 594d911d9654770b ]---
      
      In addition fix the STD_GROUP optimization so that it works for
      bigalloc file systems as well.
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      Reported-by: NLi Zhong <lizhongfs@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org  # 3.10
      960fd856
  18. 06 6月, 2013 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: optimize test_root() · f4afb4f4
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      The test_root() function could potentially loop forever due to
      overflow issues.  So rewrite test_root() to avoid this issue; as a
      bonus, it is 38% faster when benchmarked via a test loop:
      
      int main(int argc, char **argv)
      {
      	int  i;
      
      	for (i = 0; i < 1 << 24; i++) {
      		if (test_root(i, 7))
      			printf("%d\n", i);
      	}
      }
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      f4afb4f4
  19. 21 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  20. 10 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • L
      ext4: introduce reserved space · 27dd4385
      Lukas Czerner 提交于
      Currently in ENOSPC condition when writing into unwritten space, or
      punching a hole, we might need to split the extent and grow extent tree.
      However since we can not allocate any new metadata blocks we'll have to
      zero out unwritten part of extent or punched out part of extent, or in
      the worst case return ENOSPC even though use actually does not allocate
      any space.
      
      Also in delalloc path we do reserve metadata and data blocks for the
      time we're going to write out, however metadata block reservation is
      very tricky especially since we expect that logical connectivity implies
      physical connectivity, however that might not be the case and hence we
      might end up allocating more metadata blocks than previously reserved.
      So in future, metadata reservation checks should be removed since we can
      not assure that we do not under reserve.
      
      And this is where reserved space comes into the picture. When mounting
      the file system we slice off a little bit of the file system space (2%
      or 4096 clusters, whichever is smaller) which can be then used for the
      cases mentioned above to prevent costly zeroout, or unexpected ENOSPC.
      
      The number of reserved clusters can be set via sysfs, however it can
      never be bigger than number of free clusters in the file system.
      
      Note that this patch fixes the failure of xfstest 274 as expected.
      Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      Reviewed-by: NCarlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
      27dd4385
  21. 04 4月, 2013 2 次提交
    • L
      ext4: introduce ext4_get_group_number() · bd86298e
      Lukas Czerner 提交于
      Currently on many places in ext4 we're using
      ext4_get_group_no_and_offset() even though we're only interested in
      knowing the block group of the particular block, not the offset within
      the block group so we can use more efficient way to compute block
      group.
      
      This patch introduces ext4_get_group_number() which computes block
      group for a given block much more efficiently. Use this function
      instead of ext4_get_group_no_and_offset() everywhere where we're only
      interested in knowing the block group.
      Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      bd86298e
    • L
      ext4: make ext4_block_in_group() much more efficient · 68911009
      Lukas Czerner 提交于
      Currently in when getting the block group number for a particular
      block in ext4_block_in_group() we're using
      ext4_get_group_no_and_offset() which uses do_div() to get the block
      group and the remainer which is offset within the group.
      
      We don't need all of that in ext4_block_in_group() as we only need to
      figure out the group number.
      
      This commit changes ext4_block_in_group() to calculate group number
      directly. This shows as a big improvement with regards to cpu
      utilization. Measuring fallocate -l 15T on fresh file system with perf
      showed that 23% of cpu time was spend in the
      ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(). With this change it completely
      disappears from the list only bumping the occurrence of
      ext4_init_block_bitmap() which is the biggest user of
      ext4_block_in_group() by 4%. As the result of this change on my system
      the fallocate call was approx. 10% faster.
      
      However since there is '-g' option in mkfs which allow us setting
      different groups size (mostly for developers) I've introduced new per
      file system flag whether we have a standard block group size or
      not. The flag is used to determine whether we can use the bit shift
      optimization or not.
      Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      68911009
  22. 03 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  23. 23 2月, 2013 1 次提交
    • L
      ext4: fix free clusters calculation in bigalloc filesystem · 304e220f
      Lukas Czerner 提交于
      ext4_has_free_clusters() should tell us whether there is enough free
      clusters to allocate, however number of free clusters in the file system
      is converted to blocks using EXT4_C2B() which is not only wrong use of
      the macro (we should have used EXT4_NUM_B2C) but it's also completely
      wrong concept since everything else is in cluster units.
      
      Moreover when calculating number of root clusters we should be using
      macro EXT4_NUM_B2C() instead of EXT4_B2C() otherwise the result might be
      off by one. However r_blocks_count should always be a multiple of the
      cluster ratio so doing a plain bit shift should be enough here. We
      avoid using EXT4_B2C() because it's confusing.
      
      As a result of the first problem number of free clusters is much bigger
      than it should have been and ext4_has_free_clusters() would return 1 even
      if there is really not enough free clusters available.
      
      Fix this by removing the EXT4_C2B() conversion of free clusters and
      using bit shift when calculating number of root clusters. This bug
      affects number of xfstests tests covering file system ENOSPC situation
      handling. With this patch most of the ENOSPC problems with bigalloc file
      system disappear, especially the errors caused by delayed allocation not
      having enough space when the actual allocation is finally requested.
      Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      304e220f
  24. 13 1月, 2013 1 次提交
    • E
      ext4: check bh in ext4_read_block_bitmap() · 15b49132
      Eryu Guan 提交于
      Validate the bh pointer before using it, since
      ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait() might return NULL.
      
      I've seen this in fsfuzz testing.
      
       EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait:385: comm touch: Cannot get buffer for block bitmap - block_group = 0, block_bitmap = 3925999616
       BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at           (null)
       IP: [<ffffffff8121de25>] ext4_wait_block_bitmap+0x25/0xe0
       ...
       Call Trace:
        [<ffffffff8121e1e5>] ext4_read_block_bitmap+0x35/0x60
        [<ffffffff8125e9c6>] ext4_free_blocks+0x236/0xb80
        [<ffffffff811d0d36>] ? __getblk+0x36/0x70
        [<ffffffff811d0a5f>] ? __find_get_block+0x8f/0x210
        [<ffffffff81191ef3>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x33/0x140
        [<ffffffff812678e5>] ext4_xattr_release_block+0x1b5/0x1d0
        [<ffffffff812679be>] ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0xbe/0x100
        [<ffffffff81222a7c>] ext4_free_inode+0x7c/0x4d0
        [<ffffffff812277b8>] ? ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x88/0x230
        [<ffffffff8122993c>] ext4_evict_inode+0x32c/0x490
        [<ffffffff811b8cd7>] evict+0xa7/0x1c0
        [<ffffffff811b8ed3>] iput_final+0xe3/0x170
        [<ffffffff811b8f9e>] iput+0x3e/0x50
        [<ffffffff812316fd>] ext4_add_nondir+0x4d/0x90
        [<ffffffff81231d0b>] ext4_create+0xeb/0x170
        [<ffffffff811aae9c>] vfs_create+0xac/0xd0
        [<ffffffff811ac845>] lookup_open+0x185/0x1c0
        [<ffffffff8129e3b9>] ? selinux_inode_permission+0xa9/0x170
        [<ffffffff811acb54>] do_last+0x2d4/0x7a0
        [<ffffffff811af743>] path_openat+0xb3/0x480
        [<ffffffff8116a8a1>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x251/0x3b0
        [<ffffffff811afc49>] do_filp_open+0x49/0xa0
        [<ffffffff811bbaad>] ? __alloc_fd+0xdd/0x150
        [<ffffffff8119da28>] do_sys_open+0x108/0x1f0
        [<ffffffff8119db51>] sys_open+0x21/0x30
        [<ffffffff81618959>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      
      Also fix comment for ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait()
      Signed-off-by: NEryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      15b49132
  25. 22 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  26. 17 8月, 2012 1 次提交
  27. 01 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  28. 08 6月, 2012 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: fix the free blocks calculation for ext3 file systems w/ uninit_bg · b0dd6b70
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      Ext3 filesystems that are converted to use as many ext4 file system
      features as possible will enable uninit_bg to speed up e2fsck times.
      These file systems will have a native ext3 layout of inode tables and
      block allocation bitmaps (as opposed to ext4's flex_bg layout).
      Unfortunately, in these cases, when first allocating a block in an
      uninitialized block group, ext4 would incorrectly calculate the number
      of free blocks in that block group, and then errorneously report that
      the file system was corrupt:
      
      EXT4-fs error (device vdd): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:741: group 30, 32254 clusters in bitmap, 32258 in gd
      
      This problem can be reproduced via:
      
          mke2fs -q -t ext4 -O ^flex_bg /dev/vdd 5g
          mount -t ext4 /dev/vdd /mnt
          fallocate -l 4600m /mnt/test
      
      The problem was caused by a bone headed mistake in the check to see if a
      particular metadata block was part of the block group.
      
      Many thanks to Kees Cook for finding and bisecting the buggy commit
      which introduced this bug (commit fd034a84, present since v3.2).
      Reported-by: NSander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
      Reported-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      Tested-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
      Cc: stable@kernel.org
      b0dd6b70
  29. 16 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  30. 30 4月, 2012 2 次提交