1. 08 7月, 2016 10 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: fix release reserved extents trace points · 31bada7c
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      We were doing trace_btrfs_release_reserved_extent() in pin_down_extent which
      isn't quite right because we will go through and free that extent later when we
      unpin, so it messes up apps that are accounting for the reservation space.  We
      were also unconditionally doing it in __btrfs_free_reserved_extent(), when we
      only actually free the reservation instead of pinning the extent.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      31bada7c
    • J
      Btrfs: add tracepoints for flush events · f376df2b
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      We want to track when we're triggering flushing from our reservation code and
      what flushing is being done when we start flushing.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      f376df2b
    • J
      Btrfs: fix delalloc reservation amount tracepoint · f485c9ee
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      We can sometimes drop the reservation we had for our inode, so we need to remove
      that amount from to_reserve so that our tracepoint reports a valid amount of
      space.
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      f485c9ee
    • J
      Btrfs: trace pinned extents · c51e7bb1
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Pinned extents are an important metric to keep track of for enospc.
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      c51e7bb1
    • J
      Btrfs: introduce ticketed enospc infrastructure · 957780eb
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Our enospc flushing sucks.  It is born from a time where we were early
      enospc'ing constantly because multiple threads would race in for the same
      reservation and randomly starve other ones out.  So I came up with this solution
      to block any other reservations from happening while one guy tried to flush
      stuff to satisfy his reservation.  This gives us pretty good correctness, but
      completely crap latency.
      
      The solution I've come up with is ticketed reservations.  Basically we try to
      make our reservation, and if we can't we put a ticket on a list in order and
      kick off an async flusher thread.  This async flusher thread does the same old
      flushing we always did, just asynchronously.  As space is freed and added back
      to the space_info it checks and sees if we have any tickets that need
      satisfying, and adds space to the tickets and wakes up anything we've satisfied.
      
      Once the flusher thread stops making progress it wakes up all the current
      tickets and tells them to take a hike.
      
      There is a priority list for things that can't flush, since the async flusher
      could do anything we need to avoid deadlocks.  These guys get priority for
      having their reservation made, and will still do manual flushing themselves in
      case the async flusher isn't running.
      
      This patch gives us significantly better latencies.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      957780eb
    • J
      Btrfs: add tracepoint for adding block groups · c83f8eff
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      I'm writing a tool to visualize the enospc system inside btrfs, I need this
      tracepoint in order to keep track of the block groups in the system.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      c83f8eff
    • J
      Btrfs: warn_on for unaccounted spaces · d555b6c3
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      These were hidden behind enospc_debug, which isn't helpful as they indicate
      actual bugs, unlike the rest of the enospc_debug stuff which is really debug
      information.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      d555b6c3
    • J
      Btrfs: always reserve metadata for delalloc extents · 48c3d480
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      There are a few races in the metadata reservation stuff.  First we add the bytes
      to the block_rsv well after we've set the bit on the inode saying that we have
      space for it and after we've reserved the bytes.  So use the normal
      btrfs_block_rsv_add helper for this case.  Secondly we can flush delalloc
      extents when we try to reserve space for our write, which means that we could
      have used up the space for the inode and we wouldn't know because we only check
      before the reservation.  So instead make sure we are always reserving space for
      the inode update, and then if we don't need it release those bytes afterward.
      Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      48c3d480
    • J
      Btrfs: fix callers of btrfs_block_rsv_migrate · 25d609f8
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      So btrfs_block_rsv_migrate just unconditionally calls block_rsv_migrate_bytes.
      Not only this but it unconditionally changes the size of the block_rsv.  This
      isn't a bug strictly speaking, but it makes truncate block rsv's look funny
      because every time we migrate bytes over its size grows, even though we only
      want it to be a specific size.  So collapse this into one function that takes an
      update_size argument and make truncate and evict not update the size for
      consistency sake.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      25d609f8
    • J
      Btrfs: add bytes_readonly to the spaceinfo at once · e40edf2d
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      For some reason we're adding bytes_readonly to the space info after we update
      the space info with the block group info.  This creates a tiny race where we
      could over-reserve space because we haven't yet taken out the bytes_readonly
      bit.  Since we already know this information at the time we call
      update_space_info, just pass it along so it can be updated all at once.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      e40edf2d
  2. 23 6月, 2016 2 次提交
    • C
      btrfs: fix deadlock in delayed_ref_async_start · 0f873eca
      Chris Mason 提交于
      "Btrfs: track transid for delayed ref flushing" was deadlocking on
      btrfs_attach_transaction because its not safe to call from the async
      delayed ref start code.  This commit brings back btrfs_join_transaction
      instead and checks for a blocked commit.
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      0f873eca
    • J
      Btrfs: track transid for delayed ref flushing · 31b9655f
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Using the offwakecputime bpf script I noticed most of our time was spent waiting
      on the delayed ref throttling.  This is what is supposed to happen, but
      sometimes the transaction can commit and then we're waiting for throttling that
      doesn't matter anymore.  So change this stuff to be a little smarter by tracking
      the transid we were in when we initiated the throttling.  If the transaction we
      get is different then we can just bail out.  This resulted in a 50% speedup in
      my fs_mark test, and reduced the amount of time spent throttling by 60 seconds
      over the entire run (which is about 30 minutes).  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      31b9655f
  3. 18 6月, 2016 2 次提交
    • J
      btrfs: account for non-CoW'd blocks in btrfs_abort_transaction · 64c12921
      Jeff Mahoney 提交于
      The test for !trans->blocks_used in btrfs_abort_transaction is
      insufficient to determine whether it's safe to drop the transaction
      handle on the floor.  btrfs_cow_block, informed by should_cow_block,
      can return blocks that have already been CoW'd in the current
      transaction.  trans->blocks_used is only incremented for new block
      allocations. If an operation overlaps the blocks in the current
      transaction entirely and must abort the transaction, we'll happily
      let it clean up the trans handle even though it may have modified
      the blocks and will commit an incomplete operation.
      
      In the long-term, I'd like to do closer tracking of when the fs
      is actually modified so we can still recover as gracefully as possible,
      but that approach will need some discussion.  In the short term,
      since this is the only code using trans->blocks_used, let's just
      switch it to a bool indicating whether any blocks were used and set
      it when should_cow_block returns false.
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.4+
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
      Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      64c12921
    • L
      Btrfs: check if extent buffer is aligned to sectorsize · c871b0f2
      Liu Bo 提交于
      Thanks to fuzz testing, we can pass an invalid bytenr to extent buffer
      via alloc_extent_buffer().  An unaligned eb can have more pages than it
      should have, which ends up extent buffer's leak or some corrupted content
      in extent buffer.
      
      This adds a warning to let us quickly know what was happening.
      
      Now that alloc_extent_buffer() no more returns NULL, this changes its
      caller and callers of its caller to match with the new error
      handling.
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      c871b0f2
  4. 31 5月, 2016 1 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix race between device replace and discard · 2999241d
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      While we are finishing a device replace operation, we can make a discard
      operation (fs mounted with -o discard) do an invalid memory access like
      the one reported by the following trace:
      
      [ 3206.384654] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
      [ 3206.387520] Modules linked in: dm_mod btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis psmouse tpm ppdev sg parport_pc evdev i2c_piix4 parport
      processor serio_raw i2c_core pcspkr button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom ata_generic sd_mod virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci
      virtio_ring scsi_mod e1000 virtio floppy [last unloaded: btrfs]
      [ 3206.388595] CPU: 14 PID: 29194 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-29+ #1
      [ 3206.388595] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
      [ 3206.388595] task: ffff88017ace0100 ti: ffff880171b98000 task.ti: ffff880171b98000
      [ 3206.388595] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8124d233>]  [<ffffffff8124d233>] blkdev_issue_discard+0x5c/0x2a7
      [ 3206.388595] RSP: 0018:ffff880171b9bb80  EFLAGS: 00010246
      [ 3206.388595] RAX: ffff880171b9bc28 RBX: 000000000090d000 RCX: 0000000000000000
      [ 3206.388595] RDX: ffffffff82fa1b48 RSI: ffffffff8179f46c RDI: ffffffff82fa1b48
      [ 3206.388595] RBP: ffff880171b9bcc0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
      [ 3206.388595] R10: ffff880171b9bce0 R11: 000000000090f000 R12: ffff880171b9bbe8
      [ 3206.388595] R13: 0000000000000010 R14: 0000000000004868 R15: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b
      [ 3206.388595] FS:  00007f6182e4e700(0000) GS:ffff88023fdc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      [ 3206.388595] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
      [ 3206.388595] CR2: 00007f617c2bbb18 CR3: 000000017ad9c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
      [ 3206.388595] Stack:
      [ 3206.388595]  0000000000004878 0000000000000000 0000000002400040 0000000000000000
      [ 3206.388595]  0000000000000000 ffff880171b9bbe8 ffff880171b9bbb0 ffff880171b9bbb0
      [ 3206.388595]  ffff880171b9bbc0 ffff880171b9bbc0 ffff880171b9bbd0 ffff880171b9bbd0
      [ 3206.388595] Call Trace:
      [ 3206.388595]  [<ffffffffa042899e>] btrfs_issue_discard+0x12f/0x143 [btrfs]
      [ 3206.388595]  [<ffffffffa042899e>] ? btrfs_issue_discard+0x12f/0x143 [btrfs]
      [ 3206.388595]  [<ffffffffa042e862>] btrfs_discard_extent+0x87/0xde [btrfs]
      [ 3206.388595]  [<ffffffffa04303b5>] btrfs_finish_extent_commit+0xb2/0x1df [btrfs]
      [ 3206.388595]  [<ffffffff8149c246>] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x150/0x15b
      [ 3206.388595]  [<ffffffffa04464c4>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x7fc/0x980 [btrfs]
      [ 3206.388595]  [<ffffffff8149c246>] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x150/0x15b
      [ 3206.388595]  [<ffffffffa0459af6>] btrfs_sync_file+0x38f/0x428 [btrfs]
      [ 3206.388595]  [<ffffffff811a8292>] vfs_fsync_range+0x8c/0x9e
      [ 3206.388595]  [<ffffffff811a82c0>] vfs_fsync+0x1c/0x1e
      [ 3206.388595]  [<ffffffff811a8417>] do_fsync+0x31/0x4a
      [ 3206.388595]  [<ffffffff811a8637>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x14
      [ 3206.388595]  [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8
      [ 3206.388595]  [<ffffffff81100c6b>] ? time_hardirqs_off+0x9/0x14
      [ 3206.388595]  [<ffffffff8108e87d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x1f/0xaa
      
      This happens because when we call btrfs_map_block() from
      btrfs_discard_extent() to get a btrfs_bio structure, the device replace
      operation has not finished yet, but before we use the device of one of the
      stripes from the returned btrfs_bio structure, the device object is freed.
      
      This is illustrated by the following diagram.
      
                  CPU 1                                                  CPU 2
      
       btrfs_dev_replace_start()
      
       (...)
      
       btrfs_dev_replace_finishing()
      
         btrfs_start_transaction()
         btrfs_commit_transaction()
      
         (...)
      
                                                                  btrfs_sync_file()
                                                                    btrfs_start_transaction()
      
                                                                    (...)
      
                                                                    btrfs_commit_transaction()
                                                                      btrfs_finish_extent_commit()
                                                                        btrfs_discard_extent()
                                                                          btrfs_map_block()
                                                                            --> returns a struct btrfs_bio
                                                                                with a stripe that has a
                                                                                device field pointing to
                                                                                source device of the replace
                                                                                operation (the device that
                                                                                is being replaced)
      
         mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex)
         mutex_lock(&fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex)
         mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex)
      
         btrfs_dev_replace_update_device_in_mapping_tree()
           --> iterates the mapping tree and for each
               extent map that has a stripe pointing to
               the source device, it updates the stripe
               to point to the target device instead
      
         btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked()
           --> waits for fs_info->bio_counter to go down to 0
      
         btrfs_rm_dev_replace_remove_srcdev()
           --> removes source device from the list of devices
      
         mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex)
         mutex_unlock(&fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex)
         mutex_unlock(&uuid_mutex)
      
         btrfs_rm_dev_replace_free_srcdev()
           --> frees the source device
      
                                                                          --> iterates over all stripes
                                                                              of the returned struct
                                                                              btrfs_bio
                                                                          --> for each stripe it
                                                                              dereferences its device
                                                                              pointer
                                                                              --> it ends up finding a
                                                                                  pointer to the device
                                                                                  used as the source
                                                                                  device for the replace
                                                                                  operation and that was
                                                                                  already freed
      
      So fix this by surrounding the call to btrfs_map_block(), and the code
      that uses the returned struct btrfs_bio, with calls to
      btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked() and btrfs_bio_counter_dec(), so that
      the finishing phase of the device replace operation blocks until the
      the bio counter decreases to zero before it frees the source device.
      This is the same approach we do at btrfs_map_bio() for example.
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      2999241d
  5. 26 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  6. 13 5月, 2016 3 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix race between block group relocation and nocow writes · f78c436c
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      Relocation of a block group waits for all existing tasks flushing
      dellaloc, starting direct IO writes and any ordered extents before
      starting the relocation process. However for direct IO writes that end
      up doing nocow (inode either has the flag nodatacow set or the write is
      against a prealloc extent) we have a short time window that allows for a
      race that makes relocation proceed without waiting for the direct IO
      write to complete first, resulting in data loss after the relocation
      finishes. This is illustrated by the following diagram:
      
                 CPU 1                                     CPU 2
      
       btrfs_relocate_block_group(bg X)
      
                                                     direct IO write starts against
                                                     an extent in block group X
                                                     using nocow mode (inode has the
                                                     nodatacow flag or the write is
                                                     for a prealloc extent)
      
                                                     btrfs_direct_IO()
                                                       btrfs_get_blocks_direct()
                                                         --> can_nocow_extent() returns 1
      
         btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(bg X)
           --> turns block group into RO mode
      
         btrfs_wait_ordered_roots()
           --> returns and does not know about
               the DIO write happening at CPU 2
               (the task there has not created
                yet an ordered extent)
      
         relocate_block_group(bg X)
           --> rc->stage == MOVE_DATA_EXTENTS
      
           find_next_extent()
             --> returns extent that the DIO
                 write is going to write to
      
           relocate_data_extent()
      
             relocate_file_extent_cluster()
      
               --> reads the extent from disk into
                   pages belonging to the relocation
                   inode and dirties them
      
                                                         --> creates DIO ordered extent
      
                                                       btrfs_submit_direct()
                                                         --> submits bio against a location
                                                             on disk obtained from an extent
                                                             map before the relocation started
      
         btrfs_wait_ordered_range()
           --> writes all the pages read before
               to disk (belonging to the
               relocation inode)
      
         relocation finishes
      
                                                       bio completes and wrote new data
                                                       to the old location of the block
                                                       group
      
      So fix this by tracking the number of nocow writers for a block group and
      make sure relocation waits for that number to go down to 0 before starting
      to move the extents.
      
      The same race can also happen with buffered writes in nocow mode since the
      patch I recently made titled "Btrfs: don't do unnecessary delalloc flushes
      when relocating", because we are no longer flushing all delalloc which
      served as a synchonization mechanism (due to page locking) and ensured
      the ordered extents for nocow buffered writes were created before we
      called btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(). The race with direct IO writes in nocow
      mode existed before that patch (no pages are locked or used during direct
      IO) and that fixed only races with direct IO writes that do cow.
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      f78c436c
    • F
      Btrfs: don't do unnecessary delalloc flushes when relocating · 9cfa3e34
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      Before we start the actual relocation process of a block group, we do
      calls to flush delalloc of all inodes and then wait for ordered extents
      to complete. However we do these flush calls just to make sure we don't
      race with concurrent tasks that have actually already started to run
      delalloc and have allocated an extent from the block group we want to
      relocate, right before we set it to readonly mode, but have not yet
      created the respective ordered extents. The flush calls make us wait
      for such concurrent tasks because they end up calling
      filemap_fdatawrite_range() (through btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() ->
      __start_delalloc_inodes() -> btrfs_alloc_delalloc_work() ->
      btrfs_run_delalloc_work()) which ends up serializing us with those tasks
      due to attempts to lock the same pages (and the delalloc flush procedure
      calls the allocator and creates the ordered extents before unlocking the
      pages).
      
      These flushing calls not only make us waste time (cpu, IO) but also reduce
      the chances of writing larger extents (applications might be writing to
      contiguous ranges and we flush before they finish dirtying the whole
      ranges).
      
      So make sure we don't flush delalloc and just wait for concurrent tasks
      that have already started flushing delalloc and have allocated an extent
      from the block group we are about to relocate.
      
      This change also ends up fixing a race with direct IO writes that makes
      relocation not wait for direct IO ordered extents. This race is
      illustrated by the following diagram:
      
              CPU 1                                       CPU 2
      
       btrfs_relocate_block_group(bg X)
      
                                                 starts direct IO write,
                                                 target inode currently has no
                                                 ordered extents ongoing nor
                                                 dirty pages (delalloc regions),
                                                 therefore the root for our inode
                                                 is not in the list
                                                 fs_info->ordered_roots
      
                                                 btrfs_direct_IO()
                                                   __blockdev_direct_IO()
                                                     btrfs_get_blocks_direct()
                                                       btrfs_lock_extent_direct()
                                                         locks range in the io tree
                                                       btrfs_new_extent_direct()
                                                         btrfs_reserve_extent()
                                                           --> extent allocated
                                                               from bg X
      
         btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(bg X)
      
         btrfs_start_delalloc_roots()
           __start_delalloc_inodes()
             --> does nothing, no dealloc ranges
                 in the inode's io tree so the
                 inode's root is not in the list
                 fs_info->delalloc_roots
      
         btrfs_wait_ordered_roots()
           --> does not find the inode's root in the
               list fs_info->ordered_roots
      
           --> ends up not waiting for the direct IO
               write started by the task at CPU 2
      
         relocate_block_group(rc->stage ==
           MOVE_DATA_EXTENTS)
      
           prepare_to_relocate()
             btrfs_commit_transaction()
      
           iterates the extent tree, using its
           commit root and moves extents into new
           locations
      
                                                         btrfs_add_ordered_extent_dio()
                                                           --> now a ordered extent is
                                                               created and added to the
                                                               list root->ordered_extents
                                                               and the root added to the
                                                               list fs_info->ordered_roots
                                                           --> this is too late and the
                                                               task at CPU 1 already
                                                               started the relocation
      
           btrfs_commit_transaction()
      
                                                         btrfs_finish_ordered_io()
                                                           btrfs_alloc_reserved_file_extent()
                                                             --> adds delayed data reference
                                                                 for the extent allocated
                                                                 from bg X
      
         relocate_block_group(rc->stage ==
           UPDATE_DATA_PTRS)
      
           prepare_to_relocate()
             btrfs_commit_transaction()
               --> delayed refs are run, so an extent
                   item for the allocated extent from
                   bg X is added to extent tree
               --> commit roots are switched, so the
                   next scan in the extent tree will
                   see the extent item
      
           sees the extent in the extent tree
      
      When this happens the relocation produces the following warning when it
      finishes:
      
      [ 7260.832836] ------------[ cut here ]------------
      [ 7260.834653] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 6765 at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4318 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x245/0x2a1 [btrfs]()
      [ 7260.838268] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor ppdev raid6_pq psmouse sg acpi_cpufreq evdev i2c_piix4 tpm_tis serio_raw tpm i2c_core pcspkr parport_pc
      [ 7260.850935] CPU: 5 PID: 6765 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 4.5.0-rc6-btrfs-next-28+ #1
      [ 7260.852998] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
      [ 7260.852998]  0000000000000000 ffff88020bf57bc0 ffffffff812648b3 0000000000000000
      [ 7260.852998]  0000000000000009 ffff88020bf57bf8 ffffffff81051608 ffffffffa03c1b2d
      [ 7260.852998]  ffff8800b2bbb800 0000000000000000 ffff8800b17bcc58 ffff8800399dd000
      [ 7260.852998] Call Trace:
      [ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff812648b3>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90
      [ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff81051608>] warn_slowpath_common+0x99/0xb2
      [ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffffa03c1b2d>] ? btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x245/0x2a1 [btrfs]
      [ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff810516d4>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
      [ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffffa03c1b2d>] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x245/0x2a1 [btrfs]
      [ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffffa039d9de>] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.29+0x66/0xdb [btrfs]
      [ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffffa039f314>] btrfs_balance+0xde1/0xe4e [btrfs]
      [ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff8127d671>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x19
      [ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffffa03a9583>] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x255/0x2d3 [btrfs]
      [ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffffa03ac96a>] btrfs_ioctl+0x11e0/0x1dff [btrfs]
      [ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff811451df>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x443/0xd63
      [ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff81491817>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x44
      [ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff8108b36a>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
      [ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff811876ab>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34
      [ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff81187cb2>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be
      [ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff81190c30>] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71
      [ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff81187d77>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
      [ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff81492017>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6b
      [ 7260.893268] ---[ end trace eb7803b24ebab8ad ]---
      
      This is because at the end of the first stage, in relocate_block_group(),
      we commit the current transaction, which makes delayed refs run, the
      commit roots are switched and so the second stage will find the extent
      item that the ordered extent added to the delayed refs. But this extent
      was not moved (ordered extent completed after first stage finished), so
      at the end of the relocation our block group item still has a positive
      used bytes counter, triggering a warning at the end of
      btrfs_relocate_block_group(). Later on when trying to read the extent
      contents from disk we hit a BUG_ON() due to the inability to map a block
      with a logical address that belongs to the block group we relocated and
      is no longer valid, resulting in the following trace:
      
      [ 7344.885290] BTRFS critical (device sdi): unable to find logical 12845056 len 4096
      [ 7344.887518] ------------[ cut here ]------------
      [ 7344.888431] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:1833!
      [ 7344.888431] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
      [ 7344.888431] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor ppdev raid6_pq psmouse sg acpi_cpufreq evdev i2c_piix4 tpm_tis serio_raw tpm i2c_core pcspkr parport_pc
      [ 7344.888431] CPU: 0 PID: 6831 Comm: od Tainted: G        W       4.5.0-rc6-btrfs-next-28+ #1
      [ 7344.888431] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
      [ 7344.888431] task: ffff880215818600 ti: ffff880204684000 task.ti: ffff880204684000
      [ 7344.888431] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa037c88c>]  [<ffffffffa037c88c>] btrfs_merge_bio_hook+0x54/0x6b [btrfs]
      [ 7344.888431] RSP: 0018:ffff8802046878f0  EFLAGS: 00010282
      [ 7344.888431] RAX: 00000000ffffffea RBX: 0000000000001000 RCX: 0000000000000001
      [ 7344.888431] RDX: ffff88023ec0f950 RSI: ffffffff8183b638 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
      [ 7344.888431] RBP: ffff880204687908 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
      [ 7344.888431] R10: ffff880204687770 R11: ffffffff82f2d52d R12: 0000000000001000
      [ 7344.888431] R13: ffff88021afbfee8 R14: 0000000000006208 R15: ffff88006cd199b0
      [ 7344.888431] FS:  00007f1f9e1d6700(0000) GS:ffff88023ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      [ 7344.888431] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
      [ 7344.888431] CR2: 00007f1f9dc8cb60 CR3: 000000023e3b6000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
      [ 7344.888431] Stack:
      [ 7344.888431]  0000000000001000 0000000000001000 ffff880204687b98 ffff880204687950
      [ 7344.888431]  ffffffffa0395c8f ffffea0004d64d48 0000000000000000 0000000000001000
      [ 7344.888431]  ffffea0004d64d48 0000000000001000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
      [ 7344.888431] Call Trace:
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa0395c8f>] submit_extent_page+0xf5/0x16f [btrfs]
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa03970ac>] __do_readpage+0x4a0/0x4f1 [btrfs]
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa039680d>] ? btrfs_create_repair_bio+0xcb/0xcb [btrfs]
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa037eeb4>] ? btrfs_writepage_start_hook+0xbc/0xbc [btrfs]
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff8108df55>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa039728c>] __do_contiguous_readpages.constprop.26+0xc2/0xe4 [btrfs]
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa037eeb4>] ? btrfs_writepage_start_hook+0xbc/0xbc [btrfs]
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa039739b>] __extent_readpages.constprop.25+0xed/0x100 [btrfs]
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff81129d24>] ? lru_cache_add+0xe/0x10
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa0397ea8>] extent_readpages+0x160/0x1aa [btrfs]
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa037eeb4>] ? btrfs_writepage_start_hook+0xbc/0xbc [btrfs]
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff8115daad>] ? alloc_pages_current+0xa9/0xcd
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa037cdc9>] btrfs_readpages+0x1f/0x21 [btrfs]
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff81128316>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x168/0x1fc
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff811285a0>] ondemand_readahead+0x1f6/0x207
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff811285a0>] ? ondemand_readahead+0x1f6/0x207
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff8111cf34>] ? pagecache_get_page+0x2b/0x154
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff8112870e>] page_cache_sync_readahead+0x3d/0x3f
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff8111dbf7>] generic_file_read_iter+0x197/0x4e1
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff8117773a>] __vfs_read+0x79/0x9d
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff81178050>] vfs_read+0x8f/0xd2
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff81178a38>] SyS_read+0x50/0x7e
      [ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff81492017>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6b
      [ 7344.888431] Code: 8d 4d e8 45 31 c9 45 31 c0 48 8b 00 48 c1 e2 09 48 8b 80 80 fc ff ff 4c 89 65 e8 48 8b b8 f0 01 00 00 e8 1d 42 02 00 85 c0 79 02 <0f> 0b 4c 0
      [ 7344.888431] RIP  [<ffffffffa037c88c>] btrfs_merge_bio_hook+0x54/0x6b [btrfs]
      [ 7344.888431]  RSP <ffff8802046878f0>
      [ 7344.970544] ---[ end trace eb7803b24ebab8ae ]---
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      9cfa3e34
    • F
      Btrfs: don't wait for unrelated IO to finish before relocation · 578def7c
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      Before the relocation process of a block group starts, it sets the block
      group to readonly mode, then flushes all delalloc writes and then finally
      it waits for all ordered extents to complete. This last step includes
      waiting for ordered extents destinated at extents allocated in other block
      groups, making us waste unecessary time.
      
      So improve this by waiting only for ordered extents that fall into the
      block group's range.
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      578def7c
  7. 09 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  8. 29 4月, 2016 4 次提交
  9. 28 4月, 2016 2 次提交
  10. 05 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • K
      mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros · 09cbfeaf
      Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
      PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
      ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
      cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
      
      This promise never materialized.  And unlikely will.
      
      We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
      PAGE_SIZE.  And it's constant source of confusion on whether
      PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
      especially on the border between fs and mm.
      
      Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
      breakage to be doable.
      
      Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special.  They are
      not.
      
      The changes are pretty straight-forward:
      
       - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
      
       - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
      
       - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
      
       - page_cache_get() -> get_page();
      
       - page_cache_release() -> put_page();
      
      This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
      script below.  For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
      I've called spatch for them manually.
      
      The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
      PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
      
      There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach.  I'll
      fix them manually in a separate patch.  Comments and documentation also
      will be addressed with the separate patch.
      
      virtual patch
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
      + E
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
      + E
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
      + PAGE_SHIFT
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
      + PAGE_SIZE
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_MASK
      + PAGE_MASK
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
      + PAGE_ALIGN(E)
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - page_cache_get(E)
      + get_page(E)
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - page_cache_release(E)
      + put_page(E)
      Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      09cbfeaf
  11. 04 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  12. 14 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  13. 18 2月, 2016 3 次提交
    • S
      btrfs: fix build warning · 89771cc9
      Sudip Mukherjee 提交于
      We were getting build warning about:
      fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:7021:34: warning: ‘used_bg’ may be used
      	uninitialized in this function
      
      It is not a valid warning as used_bg is never used uninitilized since
      locked is initially false so we can never be in the section where
      'used_bg' is used. But gcc is not able to understand that and we can
      initialize it while declaring to silence the warning.
      Signed-off-by: NSudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      89771cc9
    • J
      Btrfs: check reserved when deciding to background flush · baee8790
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      We will sometimes start background flushing the various enospc related things
      (delayed nodes, delalloc, etc) if we are getting close to reserving all of our
      available space.  We don't want to do this however when we are actually using
      this space as it causes unneeded thrashing.  We currently try to do this by
      checking bytes_used >= thresh, but bytes_used is only part of the equation, we
      need to use bytes_reserved as well as this represents space that is very likely
      to become bytes_used in the future.
      
      My tracing tool will keep count of the number of times we kick off the async
      flusher, the following are counts for the entire run of generic/027
      
      		No Patch	Patch
      avg: 		5385		5009
      median:		5500		4916
      
      We skewed lower than the average with my patch and higher than the average with
      the patch, overall it cuts the flushing from anywhere from 5-10%, which in the
      case of actual ENOSPC is quite helpful.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      baee8790
    • J
      Btrfs: change how we update the global block rsv · fb4b10e5
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      I'm writing a tool to visualize the enospc system in order to help debug enospc
      bugs and I found weird data and ran it down to when we update the global block
      rsv.  We add all of the remaining free space to the block rsv, do a trace event,
      then remove the extra and do another trace event.  This makes my visualization
      look silly and is unintuitive code as well.  Fix this stuff to only add the
      amount we are missing, or free the amount we are missing.  This is less clean to
      read but more explicit in what it is doing, as well as only emitting events for
      values that make sense.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      fb4b10e5
  14. 20 1月, 2016 3 次提交
    • Z
      btrfs: Fix no_space in write and rm loop · e1746e83
      Zhao Lei 提交于
      I see no_space in v4.4-rc1 again in xfstests generic/102.
      It happened randomly in some node only.
      (one of 4 phy-node, and a kvm with non-virtio block driver)
      
      By bisect, we can found the first-bad is:
       commit bdced438 ("block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting")'
      But above patch only triggered the bug by making bio operation
      faster(or slower).
      
      Main reason is in our space_allocating code, we need to commit
      page writeback before wait it complish, this patch fixed above
      bug.
      
      BTW, there is another reason for generic/102 fail, caused by
      disable default mixed-blockgroup, I'll fix it in xfstests.
      Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      e1746e83
    • Z
      btrfs: merge functions for wait snapshot creation · 0bc19f90
      Zhao Lei 提交于
      wait_for_snapshot_creation() is in same group with oher two:
       btrfs_start_write_no_snapshoting()
       btrfs_end_write_no_snapshoting()
      
      Rename wait_for_snapshot_creation() and move it into same place
      with other two.
      Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      0bc19f90
    • F
      Btrfs: fix deadlock running delayed iputs at transaction commit time · c2d6cb16
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      While running a stress test I ran into a deadlock when running the delayed
      iputs at transaction time, which produced the following report and trace:
      
      [  886.399989] =============================================
      [  886.400871] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
      [  886.401663] 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 Not tainted
      [  886.402384] ---------------------------------------------
      [  886.403182] fio/8277 is trying to acquire lock:
      [  886.403568]  (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568] but task is already holding lock:
      [  886.403568]  (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568] other info that might help us debug this:
      [  886.403568]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568]        CPU0
      [  886.403568]        ----
      [  886.403568]   lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem);
      [  886.403568]   lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem);
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568]  *** DEADLOCK ***
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568] 3 locks held by fio/8277:
      [  886.403568]  #0:  (sb_writers#11){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81174c4c>] __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
      [  886.403568]  #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa054620d>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x73/0x408 [btrfs]
      [  886.403568]  #2:  (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568] stack backtrace:
      [  886.403568] CPU: 6 PID: 8277 Comm: fio Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
      [  886.403568] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
      [  886.403568]  0000000000000000 ffff88009f80f770 ffffffff8125d4fd ffffffff82af1fc0
      [  886.403568]  ffff88009f80f830 ffffffff8108e5f9 0000000200000000 ffff88009fd92290
      [  886.403568]  0000000000000000 ffffffff82af1fc0 ffffffff829cfb01 00042b216d008804
      [  886.403568] Call Trace:
      [  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8125d4fd>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x79
      [  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8108e5f9>] __lock_acquire+0xd42/0xf0b
      [  886.403568]  [<ffffffff810c22db>] ? __module_address+0xdf/0x108
      [  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8108eb77>] lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194
      [  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8108eb77>] ? lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194
      [  886.403568]  [<ffffffffa0538823>] ? btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8148556b>] down_read+0x3e/0x4d
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0538823>] ? btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0533953>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8f5/0x96e [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0521d7a>] flush_space+0x435/0x44a [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa052218b>] ? reserve_metadata_bytes+0x26a/0x384 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa05221ae>] reserve_metadata_bytes+0x28d/0x384 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa052256c>] ? btrfs_block_rsv_refill+0x58/0x96 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0522584>] btrfs_block_rsv_refill+0x70/0x96 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa053d747>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x394/0x55a [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81188e31>] evict+0xa7/0x15c
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81189878>] iput+0x1d3/0x266
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa053887c>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x8f/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0533953>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8f5/0x96e [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81085096>] ? signal_pending_state+0x31/0x31
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0521191>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1d7/0x288 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0521282>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x40/0x59 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa05228f5>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x4e [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa053620a>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x10c/0x27e [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8111d9a1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa05463c3>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x229/0x408 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8108ae38>] ? __lock_is_held+0x38/0x50
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8117279e>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81172cda>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff811734cc>] SyS_write+0x50/0x7e
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
      [ 1081.852335] INFO: task fio:8244 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
      [ 1081.854348]       Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
      [ 1081.857560] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
      [ 1081.863227] fio        D ffff880213f9bb28     0  8244   8240 0x00000000
      [ 1081.868719]  ffff880213f9bb28 00ffffff810fc6b0 ffffffff0000000a ffff88023ed55240
      [ 1081.872499]  ffff880206b5d400 ffff880213f9c000 ffff88020a4d5318 ffff880206b5d400
      [ 1081.876834]  ffffffff00000001 ffff880206b5d400 ffff880213f9bb40 ffffffff81482ba4
      [ 1081.880782] Call Trace:
      [ 1081.881793]  [<ffffffff81482ba4>] schedule+0x7f/0x97
      [ 1081.883340]  [<ffffffff81485eb5>] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x2d5/0x325
      [ 1081.895525]  [<ffffffff8108d48d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x16/0x1ab
      [ 1081.897419]  [<ffffffff81269723>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
      [ 1081.899251]  [<ffffffff81269723>] ? call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
      [ 1081.901063]  [<ffffffff81089fae>] ? __down_write_nested.isra.0+0x1f/0x21
      [ 1081.902365]  [<ffffffff814855bd>] down_write+0x43/0x57
      [ 1081.903846]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
      [ 1081.906078]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
      [ 1081.908846]  [<ffffffff8108d461>] ? mark_held_locks+0x56/0x6c
      [ 1081.910409]  [<ffffffffa0521282>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x40/0x59 [btrfs]
      [ 1081.912482]  [<ffffffffa05228f5>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x4e [btrfs]
      [ 1081.914597]  [<ffffffffa053620a>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x10c/0x27e [btrfs]
      [ 1081.919037]  [<ffffffff8111d9a1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128
      [ 1081.920754]  [<ffffffffa05463c3>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x229/0x408 [btrfs]
      [ 1081.922496]  [<ffffffff8108ae38>] ? __lock_is_held+0x38/0x50
      [ 1081.923922]  [<ffffffff8117279e>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5
      [ 1081.925275]  [<ffffffff81172cda>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4
      [ 1081.926584]  [<ffffffff811734cc>] SyS_write+0x50/0x7e
      [ 1081.927968]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
      [ 1081.985293] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
      [ 1081.986132] INFO: task fio:8249 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
      [ 1081.987434]       Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
      [ 1081.988534] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
      [ 1081.990147] fio        D ffff880218febbb8     0  8249   8240 0x00000000
      [ 1081.991626]  ffff880218febbb8 00ffffff81486b8e ffff88020000000b ffff88023ed75240
      [ 1081.993258]  ffff8802120a9a00 ffff880218fec000 ffff88020a4d5318 ffff8802120a9a00
      [ 1081.994850]  ffffffff00000001 ffff8802120a9a00 ffff880218febbd0 ffffffff81482ba4
      [ 1081.996485] Call Trace:
      [ 1081.997037]  [<ffffffff81482ba4>] schedule+0x7f/0x97
      [ 1081.998017]  [<ffffffff81485eb5>] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x2d5/0x325
      [ 1081.999241]  [<ffffffff810852a5>] ? finish_wait+0x6d/0x76
      [ 1082.000306]  [<ffffffff81269723>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
      [ 1082.001533]  [<ffffffff81269723>] ? call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
      [ 1082.002776]  [<ffffffff81089fae>] ? __down_write_nested.isra.0+0x1f/0x21
      [ 1082.003995]  [<ffffffff814855bd>] down_write+0x43/0x57
      [ 1082.005000]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
      [ 1082.007403]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
      [ 1082.008988]  [<ffffffffa0545064>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7c1/0xc2f [btrfs]
      [ 1082.010193]  [<ffffffff8108a1ba>] ? percpu_down_read+0x4e/0x77
      [ 1082.011280]  [<ffffffff81174c4c>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
      [ 1082.012265]  [<ffffffff81174c4c>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
      [ 1082.013021]  [<ffffffff811712e4>] vfs_fallocate+0x170/0x1ff
      [ 1082.013738]  [<ffffffff81181ebb>] ioctl_preallocate+0x89/0x9b
      [ 1082.014778]  [<ffffffff811822d7>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x40a/0x4ea
      [ 1082.015778]  [<ffffffff81176ea7>] ? SYSC_newfstat+0x25/0x2e
      [ 1082.016806]  [<ffffffff8118b4de>] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71
      [ 1082.017789]  [<ffffffff8118240e>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
      [ 1082.018706]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
      
      This happens because we can recursively acquire the semaphore
      fs_info->delayed_iput_sem when attempting to allocate space to satisfy
      a file write request as shown in the first trace above - when committing
      a transaction we acquire (down_read) the semaphore before running the
      delayed iputs, and when running a delayed iput() we can end up calling
      an inode's eviction handler, which in turn commits another transaction
      and attempts to acquire (down_read) again the semaphore to run more
      delayed iput operations.
      This results in a deadlock because if a task acquires multiple times a
      semaphore it should invoke down_read_nested() with a different lockdep
      class for each level of recursion.
      
      Fix this by simplifying the implementation and use a mutex instead that
      is acquired by the cleaner kthread before it runs the delayed iputs
      instead of always acquiring a semaphore before delayed references are
      run from anywhere.
      
      Fixes: d7c15171 (btrfs: Fix NO_SPACE bug caused by delayed-iput)
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org   # 4.1+
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      c2d6cb16
  15. 16 1月, 2016 2 次提交
  16. 07 1月, 2016 3 次提交
    • D
      btrfs: cleanup, use enum values for btrfs_path reada · e4058b54
      David Sterba 提交于
      Replace the integers by enums for better readability. The value 2 does
      not have any meaning since a7175319
      "Btrfs: do less aggressive btree readahead" (2009-01-22).
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      e4058b54
    • B
      Btrfs: use linux/sizes.h to represent constants · ee22184b
      Byongho Lee 提交于
      We use many constants to represent size and offset value.  And to make
      code readable we use '256 * 1024 * 1024' instead of '268435456' to
      represent '256MB'.  However we can make far more readable with 'SZ_256MB'
      which is defined in the 'linux/sizes.h'.
      
      So this patch replaces 'xxx * 1024 * 1024' kind of expression with
      single 'SZ_xxxMB' if 'xxx' is a power of 2 then 'xxx * SZ_1M' if 'xxx' is
      not a power of 2. And I haven't touched to '4096' & '8192' because it's
      more intuitive than 'SZ_4KB' & 'SZ_8KB'.
      Signed-off-by: NByongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      ee22184b
    • D
      btrfs: better packing of btrfs_delayed_extent_op · 35b3ad50
      David Sterba 提交于
      btrfs_delayed_extent_op can be packed in a better way, it's 40 bytes now
      and has 8 unused bytes. Reducing the level type to u8 makes it possible
      to squeeze it to the padding byte after key. The bitfields were switched
      to bool as there's space to store the full byte without increasing the
      whole structure, besides that the generated assembly is smaller.
      
      struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op {
      	struct btrfs_disk_key      key;                  /*     0    17 */
      	u8                         level;                /*    17     1 */
      	bool                       update_key;           /*    18     1 */
      	bool                       update_flags;         /*    19     1 */
      	bool                       is_data;              /*    20     1 */
      
      	/* XXX 3 bytes hole, try to pack */
      
      	u64                        flags_to_set;         /*    24     8 */
      
      	/* size: 32, cachelines: 1, members: 6 */
      	/* sum members: 29, holes: 1, sum holes: 3 */
      	/* last cacheline: 32 bytes */
      };
      
      The final size is 32 bytes which gives +26 object per slab page.
      
         text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
       938811	  43670	  23144	1005625	  f5839	fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko.before
       938747	  43670	  23144	1005561	  f57f9	fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko.after
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      35b3ad50