1. 03 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  2. 11 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 05 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  4. 28 12月, 2011 2 次提交
  5. 24 12月, 2011 5 次提交
  6. 19 12月, 2011 4 次提交
  7. 18 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  8. 13 12月, 2011 3 次提交
  9. 08 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  10. 06 12月, 2011 1 次提交
    • N
      ARM: 7186/1: fix Kconfig issue with PHYS_OFFSET and !MMU · 974c0724
      Nicolas Pitre 提交于
      Commit 1b9f95f8 (ARM: prepare for removal of a bunch of <mach/memory.h>
      files) introduced CONFIG_PHYS_OFFSET but the Kconfig hex prompt did not
      provide a default value.
      
      This has the undesired side effect of breaking a reportedly used
      trick for updating defconfigs on the fly for routine buildtesting
      across all arch and all platforms, i.e.
      
      	cp /path/to/somedefconfig .config ; yes "" | make oldconfig
      
      because the config system will endlessly loop until a valid address is
      provided.
      
      However we can't just pick a random default value since it is likely to
      be wrong for the majority of the boards as the right answer for this
      option is quite varied.  So the fact that the config system insists on
      having a proper value be entered is actually a good thing.
      
      It turns out that only at91x40_defconfig has this problem because it has
      CONFIG_MMU=n. However, in the !MMU case, there is already a CONFIG_DRAM_BASE
      value that can be used here.  So let's use that as a default in that case
      and suppress the redundant CONFIG_PHYS_OFFSET prompt.
      
      Eventually the DRAM_BASE config option could simply be replaced by
      PHYS_OFFSET directly, but that's a larger change better suited for later.
      Reported-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
      Acked-by: NUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      974c0724
  11. 29 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  12. 21 11月, 2011 2 次提交
  13. 16 11月, 2011 17 次提交