- 12 11月, 2012 19 次提交
-
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
When we add struct intel_digital_port, there will be no direct way of going from intel_{dp,hdmi} to drm_device: we will need to call container_of(). This patch adds functions to go from intel_{dp,hdmi} to drm_device. The main goal here is to greatly reduce the size of the next patch, where we will change the implementation of the functions we just added here (among other things). Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
- Replace container_of with enc_to_intel_dp. - Walk through less structures when making assignments. - Rename some variables to keep our naming standards. As a bonus, this will reduce the usage of "struct intel_dp", making the future patch that introduces intel_digital_port smaller and easier to review. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Zhenyu Wang 提交于
Fix power well control state by reading real register offset. Signed-off-by: NZhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
We were writing DSP_ADDR and DSP_SURF unconditionally. This did not trigger an unclaimed write before HSW as the address of DSP_ADDR has been repurposed as DSP_LINOFF. On HSW, though, DSP_LINOFF has been removed and then writting to it triggers an unclaimed write. This patch writes to DSP_ADDR or DSP_SURF to flush the display plane configuration depending on the gen we're running on. Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Comment says for eaglelake/cantiga, but it's listed in the ilk table, too. So apply it to both. Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Or at least our best understanding of it. v2: Fixup commit message and put the wa name into the comment block. And actually update the commit, too. Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
Just like in: commit c2c75131 Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Date: Thu Jul 5 12:17:30 2012 +0200 drm/i915: adjust framebuffer base address on gen4+ but this time, for the sprite planes. This ensures that the sprite offset are always inside the supported hardware limits since it becomes the offset into a page and we adjust the base address to a page boundary. Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
HSW consolidates SPRTILEOFF and SPRLINOFF into a single SPROFFSET register. v2: Remove a useless level of indentation (Paulo Zanoni) Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> (v1) Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
Haswell consolidates DSP_TILEOFF and DSP_LINOFF into DSP_OFFSET (aka PRI_OFFSET). Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
v2: Use a switch for consistency (Chris Wilson) Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
Instead of writing to the DSP_ADDR ourselves. This will do the right thing on gen >= 4 as well. Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
And properly toggle the chicken bit in the pch to enable/disable fdi C rx. If we don't set this bit correctly, the rx gets confused in link training, which can result in an fdi link that silently fails to train the link (since the corresponding register reports success). Note that both fdi link B and C can suffer when this bit is not set correctly. The code as-is has a few deficiencies: - We presume all pipes use the pch which is not the case for cpu edp. - We don't bother with disabling both pipes when we could make things work, e.g. when pipe B switched from 4 to 2 lanes due to a mode change, we don't bother updating the w/a bit. - It's ugly. All of these are because we compute ->fdi_lanes way too late, when we're already setting up individual pipes. We need to have this information in ->modeset_global_resources already, to set things up correctly. But that is a much larger reorg of the code. Note that we actually hit the 2 lanes limit in practice rather quickly: Even though the 1920x1200 mode native mode of my screen fits into 2 lanes, it needs 3 lanes for the 1920x1080 (since that somehow has much more blanking ...). Not obeying this restriction seems to results in cute-looking digital noise. v2: Only ever clear the chicken bit when both pipes are off. v3: Use the new ->modeset_global_resources callback. v4: Move the WARNs to the right place. Oh how I hate hacks. v5: Fix spelling, noticed by Paulo Zanoni. Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
After all relevant pipes are disabled and after we've updated all the state with the staged state, but before we call the per-crtc ->mode_set functions there's a very natural point to set up any shared/global resources like - shared plls (obviously only the setup, the enabling needs to be separately handling with a separate refcount) - global watermark state like the DSPARB on gmch platforms - workaround bits that depend upon the exact global output configuration - enabling the right set of refclocks - enabling/disabling manual power wells. Now for a lot of these things we can't move them into this function yet, most often because we only compute the required information in the per-crtc ->mode_set callback. Which is too late. But due to a bunch of reasons (check-only atomic modeset, fastboot&hw state checks, ...) we need to separate the computation of that state from the actual hw frobbery anyway. So we can move things into this new callback step- by-step. Others can't be moved here (or implemented at all) because our code lacks the smarts to properly update them. E.g. the DSPARB can only be updated when all pipes are disabled, so if we decide to change it's value, we need to disable _all_ pipes. The infrastructure for that is already in place (with the various pipe masks that driver the modeset logic). But again we need to move a few things out of ->mode_set first before we can even implement the correct decision making. In any case, we need to start somewhere, so let's start with the callback: Some small follow-up patches will make immediate good use of it. Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Since it is one. We need to move this code to encoder specific callbacks eventually, to kill all that inversion of control ... Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Atm we have a few funny issues where we enable/disable shared pll clocks. To make it clear that we are not required to enable/ disable the pch plls together with the other pch resources (and so should keep it running when it's used by another pipe in a shared pll configuration) add a comment. This note is lifted from "Graphics BSpec: vol4g North Display Engine Registers [IVB], Display Mode Set Sequence", step 9.d. of the enable sequence: "Configure and enable PCH DPLL, wait for PCH DPLL warmup (Can be done anytime before enabling PCH transcoder)." Since fixing the pll sharing code to no longer disable shared plls if they're still in use is more involved, let's just stick with the comment for now. v2: Make the comment in the code clearer, to address questions raised by Paulo Zanoni in review. Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
My machine here has the correct ones already, but better safe than sorry. IBX has different settings for that register, and on IBX the device defaults match the recommended values. Hence I did not add the respective writes for IBX. LPT needs the same settings, but that has been done already commit 4acf5186 Author: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com> Date: Wed Jul 4 20:15:16 2012 -0300 drm/i915: program FDI_RX TP and FDI delays Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
For reference, see "Graphics BSpec: vol4g North Display Engine Registers [IVB], Display Mode Set Sequence", step 4 of the enabling sequence: a. "Enable PCH FDI Receiver PLL, wait for warmup plus DMI latency b. "Switch from Rawclk to PCDclk in FDI Receiver c. "Enable CPU FDI Transmitter PLL, wait for warmup" Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
According to "Graphics BSpec: vol4g North Display Engine Registers [IVB], Display Mode Set Sequence" We need to write the TU size register of the fdi RX unit _before_ starting to train the link. Note: The current code is actually correct as Paulo mentioned in review, but it's a bit confusion since only the fdi rx/tx plls need to be enabled before the cpu pipes/planes. Hence it's still a good idea to move the TU_SIZE setting to the "right" spot in the sequence, to better match Bspec. Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
The debug message is only relevant on CPT/PPT PCH ports, so move it into the correct if clause. Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 02 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Daniel's backmerge commit c2fb7916 Merge: 29de6ce5 6f0c0580 Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Date: Mon Oct 22 14:34:51 2012 +0200 Merge tag 'v3.7-rc2' into drm-intel-next-queued to solve conflicts blew up (either git or Daniel was trying to be too clever for their own good; it's usually convenient to blame tools ;) and caused the changes of commit 0c96c65b Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Date: Wed Sep 26 18:43:10 2012 +0300 drm/i915: use adjusted_mode instead of mode for checking the 6bpc force flag in ironlake_crtc_mode_set() to be dropped. Fix the call in ironlake_crtc_mode_set() again, and while at it, also fix the new, copy-pasted haswell_crtc_mode_set() to use adjusted_mode. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 27 10月, 2012 5 次提交
-
-
由 Yuly Novikov 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYuly Novikov <ynovikov@chromium.org> [Jani: ripped this change separate from the scaling mode change support] Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Tested-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Yuly Novikov 提交于
LVDS allowed changing panel fitting scaling mode, while eDP didn't. Copied relevant code from LVDS to eDP. Signed-off-by: NYuly Novikov <ynovikov@chromium.org> [Jani: use fitting mode in intel_panel, remove default mode change] Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Tested-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Prepare for supporting scaling mode configuration also in eDP. Includes a drive-by-removal of an outdated comment about fitting mode. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Tested-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
At some point the DPCD size was increased, but the debug print not. While at it, switch to using hex dump. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
Just like HSW, VLV does not have a sprite scale. Set intel_plane->can_scale accordingly. Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 26 10月, 2012 15 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
SDVOB may be multiplexed with HDMIB. If it's not SDVOB, the same i2c adapter may be used for HDMIB, with the adjusted config (i.e. with GPIO bit-banging instead of gmbus). Restore i2c adapter config before error return from intel_sdvo_init(), letting HDMIB enjoy the joys of gmbus. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
commit 63abf3ed Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Wed Dec 8 16:48:21 2010 +0000 drm/i915/sdvo: Only use the SDVO pin if it is in the valid range added a default fallback if BIOS provides an invalid pin mapping, but failed to force GPIO bit-banging on it. Finish the job, and also clean up the function a bit. With bit-banging, setting the gmbus speed has no effect, so drop it. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> [danvet: Extend comment about gmbus in the code a bit.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Now that all the eDP enablement bits are there, we can actually try to use the eDP. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
It's an important step :) Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
The cdclk frequency is not always the same, so the value here should be adjusted to match it. Version 2: call intel_ddi_get_cdclk_freq instead of reading CDCLK_FREQ, because the register is just for earlier HW steppings. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
See the documentation for the DDI_FUNC_CTL register, EDP Input Select bits: when the EDP input selection is B, the VTOTAL_B must be programmed with the VTOTAL_EDP value, same thing for selection C. V2: Use I915_READ as suggested by Daniel Vetter. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Same thing as the previous commits. Not renaming this one since it exists since way before Haswell. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Same as the other registers. This one also appeared on Haswell for the first time, so that's why we are renaming it. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Because the PIPECONF register is actually part of the CPU transcoder, not the CPU pipe. Ideally we would also rename PIPECONF to TRANSCONF to remind people that they should use the transcoder instead of the pipe, but let's keep it like this for now since most Gens still name it PIPECONF. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
We need to check if any of the pipes is using TRANSCODER_EDP. V2: DDI_BUF_CTL was renamed, so fix the usage here. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Because there's one instance of the register per CPU transcoder and not per CPU pipe. This is another register that appeared for the first time on Haswell, and even though its Haswell name is PIPE_DDI_FUNC_CTL, it will be renamed to TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL, so let's just use the new naming scheme before it confuses more people. Notice that there's a big improvement on intel_ddi_get_hw_state due to the new TRANSCODER_EDP. V2: Also rename the register to TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL as suggested by Damien Lespiau. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
This register appeared in Haswell. It does not have an EDP version because the EDP transcoder is always tied to the DDIA clock. Notice that if we call PIPE_CLK_SEL(pipe) when pipe is PIPE_A and transcoder is TRANSCODER_EDP we might introduce a bug, that's why this is a transcoder register even though it does not have an EDP version. Even though Haswell names this register PIPE_CLK_SEL, it will be renamed to TRANS_CLK_SEL in the future, so let's just start using the real name that makes more sense and avoids misusage. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-