- 12 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Simek 提交于
Fix coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl. Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
-
- 31 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lucas De Marchi 提交于
Fixes generated by 'codespell' and manually reviewed. Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>
-
- 09 3月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Simek 提交于
Warning log: CHECK arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c:522:21: warning: symbol 'wb_msr' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c:538:21: warning: symbol 'wb_nomsr' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c:554:21: warning: symbol 'wt_msr' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c:569:21: warning: symbol 'wt_nomsr' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c:585:21: warning: symbol 'wt_msr_noirq' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c:600:21: warning: symbol 'wt_nomsr_noirq' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
-
由 Michal Simek 提交于
MB version 7.20.d contains fault which is related with WB that's why error message will be shown. Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
-
- 13 5月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Simek 提交于
CC arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.o arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c: In function '__invalidate_dcache_range_wb': arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c:398: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c: In function '__flush_dcache_range_wb': arch/microblaze/kernel/cpu/cache.c:509: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declara Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
-
- 06 5月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Simek 提交于
1. Remove CACHE_ALL_LOOP2 macro because it is identical to CACHE_ALL_LOOP 2. Change BUG_ON to WARN_ON 3. Remove end aligned from CACHE_LOOP_LIMITS. C implementation do not need aligned end address and ASM code do aligned in their macros 4. ASM optimized CACHE_RANGE_LOOP_1/2 macros needs to get aligned end address. Because end address is compound from start + size, end address is the first address which is exclude. Here is the corresponding code which describe it. + int align = ~(line_length - 1); + end = ((end & align) == end) ? end - line_length : end & align; a) end is aligned: it is necessary to subtruct line length because we don't want to work with next cacheline b) end address is not aligned: Just align it to be ready for ASM code. Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
-
由 Michal Simek 提交于
Copy & paste error. Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
-
- 11 3月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Simek 提交于
It is default option but both options must be measured. Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
-
由 Frans Pop 提交于
Signed-off-by: NFrans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Cc: microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
-
由 Michal Simek 提交于
It is better to have init cache handling on one place. Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
-
- 24 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Simek 提交于
I create wrong asm code but none test shows that this part of code is wrong. I am not convinces that were good idea to create asm optimized macros for caches. The reason is that there is not optimization with previous code that's why make sense to add old code and do some benchmarking which functions are faster. Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
-
- 14 12月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Simek 提交于
Microblaze version 7.20.d is the first MB version which can be run on MMU linux. Please do not used previous version because they contain HW bug. Based on WB support was necessary to redesign whole cache design. Microblaze versions from 7.20.a don't need to disable IRQ and cache before working with them that's why there are special structures for it. Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
-
由 Michal Simek 提交于
We used cache_line as cache_line_lenght. For this reason we did cache flushing 4 times longer than was necessary. Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
-
- 23 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Simek 提交于
It is not necessary to check cpuinfo.use_dcache because this checking is done in function which call that functions Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
-
- 27 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Simek 提交于
Reviewed-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Acked-by: NStephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com> Acked-by: NJohn Linn <john.linn@xilinx.com> Acked-by: NJohn Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com> Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
-