- 10 10月, 2007 13 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Call it from call_verify() instead... Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
It completely fouls up the RPC call statistics, and serves no useful purpose. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Since 43780b87..., rpc_create() fills in a default hostname based on the ip address if the servername passed in is null. A small typo made that default incorrect. (But this information appears to be used only for debugging right now, so I don't believe the typo causes any bugs in the current kernel.) Thanks to Olga Kornievskaia for bug report and testing. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Cc: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@citi.umich.edu> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 \"Talpey, Thomas\ 提交于
To prepare for including non-sockets-based RPC transports, select RPC transports by an identifier (to be used in following patches). Signed-off-by: NTom Talpey <tmt@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 \"Talpey, Thomas\ 提交于
To prepare for including non-sockets-based RPC transports, change the overly suggestive name of the transport creation arguments struct. Signed-off-by: NTom Talpey <tmt@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 \"Talpey, Thomas\ 提交于
Adds a flag word to the xdrbuf struct which indicates any bulk disposition of the data. This enables RPC transport providers to marshal it efficiently/appropriately, and may enable other optimizations. Signed-off-by: NTom Talpey <tmt@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
The purpose of an RPC ping (a NULL request) is to determine whether the remote end is operating and supports the RPC program and version of the request. If we do an RPC bind and the remote's rpcbind service says "this program or service isn't supported" then we have our answer already, and we should give up immediately. This is good for the kernel mount client, as it will cause the request to fail, and then allow an immediate retry with different options. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Add more new error code processing to the kernel's rpcbind client and to call_bind_status() to distinguish two cases: Case 1: the remote has replied that the program/version tuple is not registered (returns EACCES) Case 2: retry with a lesser rpcbind version (rpcb now returns EPFNOSUPPORT) This change allows more specific error processing for each of these two cases. We now fail case 2 instead of retrying... it's a server configuration error not to support even rpcbind version 2. And don't expose this new error code to user land -- convert it to EIO before failing the RPC. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Add new error code processing to the kernel's rpcbind client and to call_bind_status() to distinguish two cases: Case 1: the remote has replied that the program/version tuple is not registered (returns -EACCES) Case 2: another process is already in the middle of binding on this transport (now returns -EAGAIN) This change allows more specific retry processing for each of these two cases. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
/home/cel/linux/net/sunrpc/clnt.c: In function ‘rpc_show_tasks’: /home/cel/linux/net/sunrpc/clnt.c:1538: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression This points out another case where a conditional expression returns a signed value in one arm and an unsigned value in the other. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Check the length of the passed-in server name before trying to print it in the log. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
/home/cel/linux/net/sunrpc/clnt.c: In function ‘rpc_bind_new_program’: /home/cel/linux/net/sunrpc/clnt.c:445: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned RPC version numbers are u32, not int. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Remove one of two identical dprintk's that occur when an RPC client is created. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 11 7月, 2007 21 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We don't need the BKL when wrapping and unwrapping; and experiments by Avishay Traeger have found that permitting multiple encryption and decryption operations to proceed in parallel can provide significant performance improvements. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Cc: Avishay Traeger <atraeger@cs.sunysb.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Frank van Maarseveen 提交于
In addition to binding to a local privileged port the NFS client should allow binding to a specific local address. This is used by the server for callbacks. The patch adds the necessary interface. Signed-off-by: NFrank van Maarseveen <frankvm@frankvm.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Frank van Maarseveen 提交于
Cleanup argument passing to functions for creating an RPC transport. Signed-off-by: NFrank van Maarseveen <frankvm@frankvm.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
A couple of callers just use a stringified IP address for the rpc client's hostname. Move the logic for constructing this into rpc_create(), so it can be shared. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Convert them into dprintk() calls. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We should almost always be deferencing the rpc_auth struct by means of the credential's cr_auth field instead of the rpc_clnt->cl_auth anyway. Fix up that historical mistake, and remove the macro that propagated it. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
RPCSEC_GSS needs to be able to send NULL RPC calls to the server in order to free up any remaining GSS contexts. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Does a NULL RPC call and returns a pointer to the resulting rpc_task. The call may be either synchronous or asynchronous. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensures that an rpc_client always has the possibility to send asynchronous RPC calls. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The kref now does most of what cl_count + cl_user used to do. The only remaining role for cl_count is to tell us if we are in a 'shutdown' phase. We can provide that information using a single bit field instead of a full atomic counter. Also rename rpc_destroy_client() to rpc_close_client(), which reflects better what its role is these days. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Replace it with explicit calls to rpc_shutdown_client() or rpc_destroy_client() (for the case of asynchronous calls). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Its use is at best racy, and there is only one user (lockd), which has additional locking that makes the whole thing redundant. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Use that to protect the rpc_clnt->cl_tasks list instead of using a global lock. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 01 5月, 2007 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Currently rpc_malloc sets req->rq_buffer internally. Make this a more generic interface: return a pointer to the new buffer (or NULL) and make the caller set req->rq_buffer and req->rq_bufsize. This looks much more like kmalloc and eliminates the side effects. To fix a potential deadlock, this patch also replaces GFP_NOFS with GFP_NOWAIT in rpc_malloc. This prevents async RPCs from sleeping outside the RPC's task scheduler while allocating their buffer. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
The RPC buffer size estimation logic in net/sunrpc/clnt.c always significantly overestimates the requirements for the buffer size. A little instrumentation demonstrated that in fact rpc_malloc was never allocating the buffer from the mempool, but almost always called kmalloc. To compute the size of the RPC buffer more precisely, split p_bufsiz into two fields; one for the argument size, and one for the result size. Then, compute the sum of the exact call and reply header sizes, and split the RPC buffer precisely between the two. That should keep almost all RPC buffers within the 2KiB buffer mempool limit. And, we can finally be rid of RPC_SLACK_SPACE! Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 21 4月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Fix a regression due to the patch "NFS: disconnect before retrying NFSv4 requests over TCP" The assumption made in xprt_transmit() that the condition "req->rq_bytes_sent == 0 and request is on the receive list" should imply that we're dealing with a retransmission is false. Firstly, it may simply happen that the socket send queue was full at the time the request was initially sent through xprt_transmit(). Secondly, doing this for each request that was retransmitted implies that we disconnect and reconnect for _every_ request that happened to be retransmitted irrespective of whether or not a disconnection has already occurred. Fix is to move this logic into the call_status request timeout handler. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 13 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
RFC3530 section 3.1.1 states an NFSv4 client MUST NOT send a request twice on the same connection unless it is the NULL procedure. Section 3.1.1 suggests that the client should disconnect and reconnect if it wants to retry a request. Implement this by adding an rpc_clnt flag that an ULP can use to specify that the underlying transport should be disconnected on a major timeout. The NFSv4 client asserts this new flag, and requests no retries after a minor retransmit timeout. Note that disconnecting on a retransmit is in general not safe to do if the RPC client does not reuse the TCP port number when reconnecting. See http://bugzilla.linux-nfs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 11 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-