Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 25 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 20 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  5. 18 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 16 1月, 2014 2 次提交
    • T
      ipv6 addrconf: don't cleanup prefix route for IFA_F_NOPREFIXROUTE · 5b84efec
      由 Thomas Haller 提交于 
      Refactor the deletion/update of prefix routes when removing an
address. Now also consider IFA_F_NOPREFIXROUTE and if there is an address
present with this flag, to not cleanup the route. Instead, assume
that userspace is taking care of this route.

Also perform the same cleanup, when userspace changes an existing address
to add NOPREFIXROUTE (to an address that didn't have this flag). This is
done because when the address was added, a prefix route was created for it.
Since the user now wants to handle this route by himself, we cleanup this
route.

This cleanup of the route is not totally robust. There is no guarantee,
that the route we are about to delete was really the one added by the
kernel. This behavior does not change by the patch, and in practice it
should work just fine.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      5b84efec
    • T
      ipv6 addrconf: add IFA_F_NOPREFIXROUTE flag to suppress creation of IP6 routes · 761aac73
      由 Thomas Haller 提交于 
      When adding/modifying an IPv6 address, the userspace application needs
a way to suppress adding a prefix route. This is for example relevant
together with IFA_F_MANAGERTEMPADDR, where userspace creates autoconf
generated addresses, but depending on on-link, no route for the
prefix should be added.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      761aac73
  9. 15 1月, 2014 2 次提交
  11. 10 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  13. 07 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  15. 03 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  17. 02 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  19. 01 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  21. 23 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  23. 12 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  25. 11 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  27. 10 12月, 2013 3 次提交
  29. 07 12月, 2013 2 次提交
  31. 03 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  33. 15 11月, 2013 3 次提交
  35. 06 11月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      net: Explicitly initialize u64_stats_sync structures for lockdep · 827da44c
      由 John Stultz 提交于 
      In order to enable lockdep on seqcount/seqlock structures, we
must explicitly initialize any locks.

The u64_stats_sync structure, uses a seqcount, and thus we need
to introduce a u64_stats_init() function and use it to initialize
the structure.

This unfortunately adds a lot of fairly trivial initialization code
to a number of drivers. But the benefit of ensuring correctness makes
this worth while.

Because these changes are required for lockdep to be enabled, and the
changes are quite trivial, I've not yet split this patch out into 30-some
separate patches, as I figured it would be better to get the various
maintainers thoughts on how to best merge this change along with
the seqcount lockdep enablement.

Feedback would be appreciated!
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NJulian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Mirko Lindner <mlindner@marvell.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Roger Luethi <rl@hellgate.ch>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Wensong Zhang <wensong@linux-vs.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1381186321-4906-2-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      827da44c
  37. 29 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  39. 01 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • P
      ipv6: Fix preferred_lft not updating in some cases · c9d55d5b
      由 Paul Marks 提交于 
      Consider the scenario where an IPv6 router is advertising a fixed
preferred_lft of 1800 seconds, while the valid_lft begins at 3600
seconds and counts down in realtime.

A client should reset its preferred_lft to 1800 every time the RA is
received, but a bug is causing Linux to ignore the update.

The core problem is here:
  if (prefered_lft != ifp->prefered_lft) {

Note that ifp->prefered_lft is an offset, so it doesn't decrease over
time.  Thus, the comparison is always (1800 != 1800), which fails to
trigger an update.

The most direct solution would be to compute a "stored_prefered_lft",
and use that value in the comparison.  But I think that trying to filter
out unnecessary updates here is a premature optimization.  In order for
the filter to apply, both of these would need to hold:

  - The advertised valid_lft and preferred_lft are both declining in
    real time.
  - No clock skew exists between the router & client.

So in this patch, I've set "update_lft = 1" unconditionally, which
allows the surrounding code to be greatly simplified.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Marks <pmarks@google.com>
Acked-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c9d55d5b
  41. 29 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  43. 04 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  45. 01 9月, 2013 3 次提交
  47. 30 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  49. 21 8月, 2013 4 次提交
  51. 20 8月, 2013 1 次提交
    • H
      ipv6: remove max_addresses check from ipv6_create_tempaddr · 4b08a8f1
      由 Hannes Frederic Sowa 提交于 
      Because of the max_addresses check attackers were able to disable privacy
extensions on an interface by creating enough autoconfigured addresses:

<http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q4/292>

But the check is not actually needed: max_addresses protects the
kernel to install too many ipv6 addresses on an interface and guards
addrconf_prefix_rcv to install further addresses as soon as this limit
is reached. We only generate temporary addresses in direct response of
a new address showing up. As soon as we filled up the maximum number of
addresses of an interface, we stop installing more addresses and thus
also stop generating more temp addresses.

Even if the attacker tries to generate a lot of temporary addresses
by announcing a prefix and removing it again (lifetime == 0) we won't
install more temp addresses, because the temporary addresses do count
to the maximum number of addresses, thus we would stop installing new
autoconfigured addresses when the limit is reached.

This patch fixes CVE-2013-0343 (but other layer-2 attacks are still
possible).

Thanks to Ding Tianhong to bring this topic up again.

Cc: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Cc: George Kargiotakis <kargig@void.gr>
Cc: P J P <ppandit@redhat.com>
Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Signed-off-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Acked-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4b08a8f1
  53. 14 8月, 2013 1 次提交
    • H
      ipv6: make unsolicited report intervals configurable for mld · fc4eba58
      由 Hannes Frederic Sowa 提交于 
      Commit cab70040 ("net: igmp:
Reduce Unsolicited report interval to 1s when using IGMPv3") and
2690048c ("net: igmp: Allow user-space
configuration of igmp unsolicited report interval") by William Manley made
igmp unsolicited report intervals configurable per interface and corrected
the interval of unsolicited igmpv3 report messages resendings to 1s.

Same needs to be done for IPv6:

MLDv1 (RFC2710 7.10.): 10 seconds
MLDv2 (RFC3810 9.11.): 1 second

Both intervals are configurable via new procfs knobs
mldv1_unsolicited_report_interval and mldv2_unsolicited_report_interval.

(also added .force_mld_version to ipv6_devconf_dflt to bring structs in
line without semantic changes)

v2:
a) Joined documentation update for IPv4 and IPv6 MLD/IGMP
   unsolicited_report_interval procfs knobs.
b) incorporate stylistic feedback from William Manley

v3:
a) add new DEVCONF_* values to the end of the enum (thanks to David
   Miller)

Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: William Manley <william.manley@youview.com>
Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Signed-off-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      fc4eba58
  55. 02 8月, 2013 1 次提交
    • F
      ipv6: bump genid when delete/add address · 439677d7
      由 fan.du 提交于 
      Server           Client
2001:1::803/64  <-> 2001:1::805/64
2001:2::804/64  <-> 2001:2::806/64

Server side fib binary tree looks like this:

                                   (2001:/64)
                                   /
                                  /
                   ffff88002103c380
                 /                 \
     (2)        /                   \
 (2001::803/128)                     ffff880037ac07c0
                                    /               \
                                   /                 \  (3)
                      ffff880037ac0640               (2001::806/128)
                       /             \
             (1)      /               \
        (2001::804/128)               (2001::805/128)

Delete 2001::804/64 won't cause prefix route deleted as well as rt in (3)
destinate to 2001::806 with source address as 2001::804/64. That's because
2001::803/64 is still alive, which make onlink=1 in ipv6_del_addr, this is
where the substantial difference between same prefix configuration and
different prefix configuration :) So packet are still transmitted out to
2001::806 with source address as 2001::804/64.

So bump genid will clear rt in (3), and up layer protocol will eventually
find the right one for themselves.

This problem arised from the discussion in here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=137404469219410&w=4Signed-off-by: NFan Du <fan.du@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      439677d7