Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 09 9月, 2016 1 次提交
    • P
      powerpc/mm: Speed up computation of base and actual page size for a HPTE · 0eeede0c
      由 Paul Mackerras 提交于 
      This replaces a 2-D search through an array with a simple 8-bit table
lookup for determining the actual and/or base page size for a HPT entry.

The encoding in the second doubleword of the HPTE is designed to encode
the actual and base page sizes without using any more bits than would be
needed for a 4k page number, by using between 1 and 8 low-order bits of
the RPN (real page number) field to encode the page sizes.  A single
"large page" bit in the first doubleword indicates that these low-order
bits are to be interpreted like this.

We can determine the page sizes by using the low-order 8 bits of the RPN
to look up a 256-entry table.  For actual page sizes less than 1MB, some
of the upper bits of these 8 bits are going to be real address bits, but
we can cope with that by replicating the entries for those smaller page
sizes.

While we're at it, let's move the hpte_page_size() and hpte_base_page_size()
functions from a KVM-specific header to a header for 64-bit HPT systems,
since this computation doesn't have anything specifically to do with KVM.
Reviewed-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
      0eeede0c
  3. 04 8月, 2016 1 次提交
    • M
      powerpc/mm: Move register_process_table() out of ppc_md · eea8148c
      由 Michael Ellerman 提交于 
      We want to initialise register_process_table() before ppc_md is setup,
so that it can be called as part of MMU init (at least on Radix ATM).

That no longer works because probe_machine() requires that ppc_md be
empty before it's called, and we now do probe_machine() much later.

So make register_process_table a global for now. It will probably move
into a mmu_radix_ops struct at some point in the future.

This was broken by me when applying commit 7025776e "powerpc/mm:
Move hash table ops to a separate structure" due to conflicts with other
patches.

Fixes: 7025776e ("powerpc/mm: Move hash table ops to a separate structure")
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
      eea8148c
  5. 01 8月, 2016 14 次提交
  7. 26 7月, 2016 2 次提交
  9. 21 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 17 7月, 2016 3 次提交
  13. 30 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  15. 25 6月, 2016 2 次提交
    • M
      powerpc: get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT · 2379a23e
      由 Michal Hocko 提交于 
      __GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced
around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations.

{pud,pmd}_alloc_one are allocating from {PGT,PUD}_CACHE initialized in
pgtable_cache_init which doesn't have larger than sizeof(void *) << 12
size and that fits into !costly allocation request size.

PGALLOC_GFP is used only in radix__pgd_alloc which uses either order-0
or order-4 requests.  The first one doesn't need the flag while the
second does.  Drop __GFP_REPEAT from PGALLOC_GFP and add it for the
order-4 one.

This means that this flag has never been actually useful here because it
has always been used only for PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY requests.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464599699-30131-12-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      2379a23e
    • M
      tree wide: get rid of __GFP_REPEAT for order-0 allocations part I · 32d6bd90
      由 Michal Hocko 提交于 
      This is the third version of the patchset previously sent [1].  I have
basically only rebased it on top of 4.7-rc1 tree and dropped "dm: get
rid of superfluous gfp flags" which went through dm tree.  I am sending
it now because it is tree wide and chances for conflicts are reduced
considerably when we want to target rc2.  I plan to send the next step
and rename the flag and move to a better semantic later during this
release cycle so we will have a new semantic ready for 4.8 merge window
hopefully.

Motivation:

While working on something unrelated I've checked the current usage of
__GFP_REPEAT in the tree.  It seems that a majority of the usage is and
always has been bogus because __GFP_REPEAT has always been about costly
high order allocations while we are using it for order-0 or very small
orders very often.  It seems that a big pile of them is just a
copy&paste when a code has been adopted from one arch to another.

I think it makes some sense to get rid of them because they are just
making the semantic more unclear.  Please note that GFP_REPEAT is
documented as

* __GFP_REPEAT: Try hard to allocate the memory, but the allocation attempt

* _might_ fail.  This depends upon the particular VM implementation.
  while !costly requests have basically nofail semantic.  So one could
  reasonably expect that order-0 request with __GFP_REPEAT will not loop
  for ever.  This is not implemented right now though.

I would like to move on with __GFP_REPEAT and define a better semantic
for it.

  $ git grep __GFP_REPEAT origin/master | wc -l
  111
  $ git grep __GFP_REPEAT | wc -l
  36

So we are down to the third after this patch series.  The remaining
places really seem to be relying on __GFP_REPEAT due to large allocation
requests.  This still needs some double checking which I will do later
after all the simple ones are sorted out.

I am touching a lot of arch specific code here and I hope I got it right
but as a matter of fact I even didn't compile test for some archs as I
do not have cross compiler for them.  Patches should be quite trivial to
review for stupid compile mistakes though.  The tricky parts are usually
hidden by macro definitions and thats where I would appreciate help from
arch maintainers.

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461849846-27209-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org

This patch (of 19):

__GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced
around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations.  Yet we
have the full kernel tree with its usage for apparently order-0
allocations.  This is really confusing because __GFP_REPEAT is
explicitly documented to allow allocation failures which is a weaker
semantic than the current order-0 has (basically nofail).

Let's simply drop __GFP_REPEAT from those places.  This would allow to
identify place which really need allocator to retry harder and formulate
a more specific semantic for what the flag is supposed to do actually.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464599699-30131-2-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> [for tile]
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Cc: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>
Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      32d6bd90
  17. 17 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  19. 14 6月, 2016 2 次提交
  21. 10 6月, 2016 1 次提交
    • A
      powerpc/mm/radix: Flush page walk cache when freeing page table · a145abf1
      由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于 
      Even though a tlb_flush() does a flush with invalidate all cache,
we can end up doing an RCU page table free before calling tlb_flush().
That means we can have page walk cache entries even after we free the
page table pages. This can result in us doing wrong page table walk.

Avoid this by doing pwc flush on every page table free. We can't batch
the pwc flush, because the rcu call back function where we free the
page table pages doesn't have information of the mmu gather. Thus we
have to do a pwc on every page table page freed.

Note: I also removed the dummy tlb_flush_pgtable call functions for
hash 32.

Fixes: 1a472c9d ("powerpc/mm/radix: Add tlbflush routines")
Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
      a145abf1
  23. 20 5月, 2016 1 次提交
    • H
      arch: fix has_transparent_hugepage() · fd8cfd30
      由 Hugh Dickins 提交于 
      I've just discovered that the useful-sounding has_transparent_hugepage()
is actually an architecture-dependent minefield: on some arches it only
builds if CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=y, on others it's also there when
not, but on some of those (arm and arm64) it then gives the wrong
answer; and on mips alone it's marked __init, which would crash if
called later (but so far it has not been called later).

Straighten this out: make it available to all configs, with a sensible
default in asm-generic/pgtable.h, removing its definitions from those
arches (arc, arm, arm64, sparc, tile) which are served by the default,
adding #define has_transparent_hugepage has_transparent_hugepage to
those (mips, powerpc, s390, x86) which need to override the default at
runtime, and removing the __init from mips (but maybe that kind of code
should be avoided after init: set a static variable the first time it's
called).
Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Ning Qu <quning@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>		[arch/arc]
Acked-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>	[arch/s390]
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      fd8cfd30
  25. 11 5月, 2016 10 次提交