1. 28 9月, 2010 7 次提交
  2. 27 9月, 2010 10 次提交
  3. 25 9月, 2010 2 次提交
    • O
      de2104x: disable autonegotiation on broken hardware · e0f9c4f3
      Ondrej Zary 提交于
      At least on older 21041-AA chips (mine is rev. 11), TP duplex autonegotiation
      causes the card not to work at all (link is up but no packets are transmitted).
      
      de4x5 disables autonegotiation completely. But it seems to work on newer
      (21041-PA rev. 21) so disable it only on rev<20 chips.
      Signed-off-by: NOndrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
      Acked-by: NJeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      e0f9c4f3
    • E
      net: fix a lockdep splat · f064af1e
      Eric Dumazet 提交于
      We have for each socket :
      
      One spinlock (sk_slock.slock)
      One rwlock (sk_callback_lock)
      
      Possible scenarios are :
      
      (A) (this is used in net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c)
      read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock) (without blocking BH)
      <BH>
      spin_lock(&sk->sk_slock.slock);
      ...
      read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
      ...
      
      (B)
      write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock)
      stuff
      write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock)
      
      (C)
      spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_slock)
      ...
      write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock)
      stuff
      write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock)
      spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_slock)
      
      This (C) case conflicts with (A) :
      
      CPU1 [A]                         CPU2 [C]
      read_lock(callback_lock)
      <BH>                             spin_lock_bh(slock)
      <wait to spin_lock(slock)>
                                       <wait to write_lock_bh(callback_lock)>
      
      We have one problematic (C) use case in inet_csk_listen_stop() :
      
      local_bh_disable();
      bh_lock_sock(child); // spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_slock)
      WARN_ON(sock_owned_by_user(child));
      ...
      sock_orphan(child); // write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock)
      
      lockdep is not happy with this, as reported by Tetsuo Handa
      
      It seems only way to deal with this is to use read_lock_bh(callbacklock)
      everywhere.
      
      Thanks to Jarek for pointing a bug in my first attempt and suggesting
      this solution.
      Reported-by: NTetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
      Tested-by: NTetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
      Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
      CC: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
      Tested-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      f064af1e
  4. 23 9月, 2010 16 次提交
  5. 22 9月, 2010 5 次提交