1. 20 8月, 2014 1 次提交
  2. 09 6月, 2014 4 次提交
  3. 18 4月, 2014 8 次提交
  4. 27 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  5. 14 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  6. 09 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • M
      target-arm: fix build with gcc 4.8.2 · 7b1aa025
      Michael S. Tsirkin 提交于
      commit 5ce4f357
          "target-arm: A64: add set_pc cpu method"
      
      introduces an array aarch64_cpus which is zero
      size if this code is built without CONFIG_USER_ONLY.
      In particular an attempt to iterate over this array produces a warning
      under gcc 4.8.2:
      
       CC    aarch64-softmmu/target-arm/cpu64.o
      /scm/qemu/target-arm/cpu64.c: In function ‘aarch64_cpu_register_types’:
      /scm/qemu/target-arm/cpu64.c:124:5: error: comparison of unsigned
      expression < 0 is always false [-Werror=type-limits]
           for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(aarch64_cpus); i++) {
           ^
      cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
      
      This is the result of ARRAY_SIZE being an unsigned type,
      causing "i" to be promoted to unsigned int as well.
      
      As zero size arrays are a gcc extension, it seems
      cleanest to add a dummy element with NULL name,
      and test for it during registration.
      
      We'll be able to drop this when we add more CPUs.
      
      Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
      Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
      Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
      Signed-off-by: NMichael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NStefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
      Reviewed-by: NPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
      Message-id: 20131223145216.GA22663@redhat.com
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
      7b1aa025
  7. 08 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • M
      target-arm: fix build with gcc 4.8.2 · 455e1e14
      Michael S. Tsirkin 提交于
      commit 5ce4f357
          "target-arm: A64: add set_pc cpu method"
      
      introduces an array aarch64_cpus which is zero
      size if this code is built without CONFIG_USER_ONLY.
      In particular an attempt to iterate over this array produces a warning
      under gcc 4.8.2:
      
       CC    aarch64-softmmu/target-arm/cpu64.o
      /scm/qemu/target-arm/cpu64.c: In function ‘aarch64_cpu_register_types’:
      /scm/qemu/target-arm/cpu64.c:124:5: error: comparison of unsigned
      expression < 0 is always false [-Werror=type-limits]
           for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(aarch64_cpus); i++) {
           ^
      cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
      
      This is the result of ARRAY_SIZE being an unsigned type,
      causing "i" to be promoted to unsigned int as well.
      
      As zero size arrays are a gcc extension, it seems
      cleanest to add a dummy element with NULL name,
      and test for it during registration.
      
      We'll be able to drop this when we add more CPUs.
      
      Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
      Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
      Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
      Signed-off-by: NMichael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NStefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
      Reviewed-by: NPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
      Message-id: 20131223145216.GA22663@redhat.com
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
      455e1e14
  8. 24 12月, 2013 1 次提交
    • M
      target-arm: fix build with gcc 4.8.2 · 5bf58abf
      Michael S. Tsirkin 提交于
      commit 5ce4f357
          "target-arm: A64: add set_pc cpu method"
      
      introduces an array aarch64_cpus which is zero
      size if this code is built without CONFIG_USER_ONLY.
      In particular an attempt to iterate over this array produces a warning
      under gcc 4.8.2:
      
       CC    aarch64-softmmu/target-arm/cpu64.o
      /scm/qemu/target-arm/cpu64.c: In function ‘aarch64_cpu_register_types’:
      /scm/qemu/target-arm/cpu64.c:124:5: error: comparison of unsigned
      expression < 0 is always false [-Werror=type-limits]
           for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(aarch64_cpus); i++) {
           ^
      cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
      
      This is the result of ARRAY_SIZE being an unsigned type,
      causing "i" to be promoted to unsigned int as well.
      
      As zero size arrays are a gcc extension, it seems
      cleanest to add a dummy element with NULL name,
      and test for it during registration.
      
      We'll be able to drop this when we add more CPUs.
      
      Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
      Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
      Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
      Signed-off-by: NMichael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
      Reviewed-by: NStefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
      5bf58abf
  9. 18 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  10. 11 9月, 2013 3 次提交