1. 11 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  2. 10 8月, 2015 9 次提交
    • M
    • L
      qemu: support new pci controller model "pcie-switch-downstream-port" · 7d69387c
      Laine Stump 提交于
      This is backed by the qemu device xio3130-downstream. It can only be
      connected to a pcie-switch-upstream-port (x3130-upstream) on the
      upstream side.
      7d69387c
    • L
      conf: new pcie-controller model "pcie-switch-downstream-port" · 76379a6e
      Laine Stump 提交于
      This controller can be connected only to a port on a
      pcie-switch-upstream-port. It provides a single hotpluggable port that
      will accept any PCI or PCIe device, as well as any device requiring a
      pcie-*-port (the only current example of such a device is the
      pcie-switch-upstream-port).
      76379a6e
    • L
      qemu: support new pci controller model "pcie-switch-upstream-port" · cb99086d
      Laine Stump 提交于
      this is backed by the qemu device x3130-upstream. It can only plug
      into a pcie-root-port or pcie-switch-downstream-port.
      cb99086d
    • L
      conf: new pci controller model "pcie-switch-upstream-port" · 38ea9515
      Laine Stump 提交于
      This controller can be connected only to a pcie-root-port or a
      pcie-switch-downstream-port (which will be added in a later patch),
      which is the reason for the new connect type
      VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCIE_PORT. A pcie-switch-upstream-port provides
      32 ports (slot=0 to slot=31) on the downstream side, which can only
      have pci controllers of model "pcie-switch-downstream-port" plugged
      into them, which is the reason for the other new connect type
      VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCIE_SWITCH.
      38ea9515
    • L
      qemu: support new pci controller model "pcie-root-port" · 16328520
      Laine Stump 提交于
      This is backed by the qemu device ioh3420.
      
      chassis and port from the <target> subelement are used to store/set the
      respective qemu device options for the ioh3420. Currently, chassis is
      set to be the index of the controller, and port is set to
      "(slot << 3) + function" (per suggestion from Alex Williamson).
      16328520
    • L
      conf: new pci controller model "pcie-root-port" · dce3b8be
      Laine Stump 提交于
      This controller can be connected (at domain startup time only - not
      hotpluggable) only to a port on the pcie root complex ("pcie-root" in
      libvirt config), hence the new connect type
      VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCIE_ROOT. It provides a hotpluggable port that
      will accept any PCI or PCIe device.
      
      New attributes must be added to the controller <target> subelement for
      this - chassis and port are guest-visible option values that will be
      set by libvirt with values derived from the controller's index and pci
      address information.
      dce3b8be
    • L
      qemu: implement <target chassisNr='n'/> subelement/attribute of <controller> · 18c10451
      Laine Stump 提交于
      This uses the new subelement/attribute in two ways:
      
      1) If a "pci-bridge" pci controller has no chassisNr attribute, it
      will automatically be set to the controller's index as soon as the
      controller's PCI address is known (during
      qemuDomainAssignPCIAddresses()).
      
      2) when creating the commandline for a pci-bridge device, chassisNr
      will be used to set qemu's chassis_nr option (rather than the previous
      practice of hard-coding it to the controller's index).
      18c10451
    • L
      qemu: implement <model> subelement to <controller> · 572ebdbc
      Laine Stump 提交于
      This patch provides qemu support for the contents of <model> in
      <controller> for the two existing PCI controller types that need it
      (i.e. the two controller types that are backed by a device that must
      be specified on the qemu commandline):
      
      1) pci-bridge - sets <model> name attribute default as "pci-bridge"
      
      2) dmi-to-pci-bridge - sets <model> name attribute default as
         "i82801b11-bridge".
      
      These both match current hardcoded practice.
      
      The defaults are set at the end of qemuDomainAssignPCIAddresses().
      This can't be done earlier because some of the options that will be
      autogenerated need full PCI address info for the controller, and
      because qemuDomainAssignPCIAddresses() might create extra controllers
      which would need default settings added, and that hasn't yet been done
      at the time the PostParse callbacks are being run.
      qemuDomainAssignPCIAddresses() is still called prior to the XML being
      written to disk, though, so the autogenerated defaults are persistent.
      
      qemu capabilities bits aren't checked when the domain is defined, but
      rather when the commandline is actually created (so the domain can
      possibly be defined on a host that doesn't yet have support for the
      given device, or a host different from the one where it will
      eventually be run). When the commandline is being generated we compare
      the modelName to known qemu device names implementing the given type
      of controller, and check the capabilities bit for that device.
      572ebdbc
  3. 06 8月, 2015 2 次提交
  4. 04 8月, 2015 2 次提交
  5. 25 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • L
      qemu: reorganize loop in qemuDomainAssignPCIAddresses · 07268782
      Laine Stump 提交于
      This loop occurs just after we've assured that all devices that
      require a PCI device have been assigned and all necessary PCI
      controllers have been added. It is the perfect place to add other
      potentially auto-generated PCI controller attributes that are
      dependent on the controller's PCI address (upcoming patch).
      
      There is a convenient loop through all controllers at the end of the
      function, but the patch to add new functionality will be cleaner if we
      first rearrange that loop a bit.
      
      Note that the loop originally was accessing info.addr.pci.bus prior to
      determining that the pci part of the object was valid. This isn't
      dangerous in any way, but seemed a bit ugly, so I fixed it.
      07268782
  6. 24 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  7. 20 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  8. 15 7月, 2015 2 次提交
  9. 08 7月, 2015 7 次提交
  10. 01 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 30 6月, 2015 3 次提交
  12. 27 6月, 2015 2 次提交
    • L
      qemu: always permit PCI devices to be manually assigned to a PCIe bus · 1e15be1b
      Laine Stump 提交于
      When support for the pcie-root and dmi-to-pci-bridge buses on a Q35
      machinetype was added, I was concerned that even though qemu at the
      time allowed plugging a PCI device into a PCIe port, that it might not
      be supported in the future. To prevent painful backtracking in the
      possible future where this happened, I disallowed such connections
      except in a few specific cases requested by qemu developers (indicated
      in the code with the flag VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_EITHER_IF_CONFIG).
      
      Now that a couple years have passed, there is a clear message from
      qemu that there is no danger in allowing PCI devices to be plugged
      into PCIe ports. This patch eliminates
      VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_EITHER_IF_CONFIG and changes the code to always
      allow PCI->PCIe or PCIe->PCI connection *when the PCI address is
      specified in the config. (For newly added devices that haven't yet
      been given a PCI address, the auto-placement still prefers using the
      correct type of bus).
      1e15be1b
    • L
      qemu: refactor qemuBuildControllerDevStr to eliminate future duplicate code · 1074fc50
      Laine Stump 提交于
      The PCI case of the switch statement in this function contains another
      switch statement with a case for each model. Currently every model
      except pci-root and pcie-root has a check for index > 0 (since only
      those two can have index==0), and the function should never be called
      for those two anyway. If we move the check for !pci[e]-root to the top
      of the pci case, then we can move the check for index > 0 out of the
      individual model cases. This will save repeating that check for the
      three new controller models about to be added.
      1074fc50
  13. 26 6月, 2015 2 次提交
    • M
      qemuBuildMemoryBackendStr: Honour passed @pagesize · 70d75ffc
      Michal Privoznik 提交于
      So far the argument has not much meaning and was practically ignored.
      This is not good since when doing memory hotplug, the size of desired
      hugepage backing is passed in that argument. Taking closer look at the
      tests I'm fixing reveals the bug. For instance, while the following is
      in the test:
      
          <memory model='dimm'>
            <source>
              <nodemask>1-3</nodemask>
              <pagesize unit='KiB'>4096</pagesize>
            </source>
            <target>
              <size unit='KiB'>524287</size>
              <node>0</node>
            </target>
            <address type='dimm' slot='0' base='0x100000000'/>
          </memory>
      
      the generated commandline corresponding to this XML was:
      
          -object memory-backend-ram,id=memdimm0,size=536870912,\
          host-nodes=1-3,policy=bind
      
      Have you noticed? Yes, memory-backend-ram! Nothing can be further away
      from the right answer. The hugepage backing is requested in the XML
      and we happily ignore it. This is just not right. It's
      memory-backend-file which should have been used:
      
          -object memory-backend-file,id=memdimm0,prealloc=yes,\
          mem-path=/dev/hugepages4M/libvirt/qemu,size=536870912,\
          host-nodes=1-3,policy=bind
      
      The problem is, that @pagesize passed to qemuBuildMemoryBackendStr
      (where this part of commandline is built) was ignored. The hugepage to
      back memory was searched only and only by NUMA nodes pinning. This
      works only for regular guest NUMA nodes.
      
      Then, I'm changing the hugepages size in the test XMLs too. This is
      simply because in the test suite we create dummy mount points just for
      2M and 1G hugepages. And in the test 4M was requested. I'm sticking to
      2M, but 1G should just work too.
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
      70d75ffc
    • M
      qemuBuildMemoryBackendStr: Fix hugepages lookup process · f8e9deb1
      Michal Privoznik 提交于
      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196644
      
      This function constructs the backend (host facing) part of the
      memory device.  At the beginning, the configured hugepages are
      searched to find the best match for given guest NUMA node.
      Configured hugepages can have a @nodeset attribute to specify on
      which guest NUMA nodes should be the hugepages backing used.
      There is, however, one 'corner case'. Users may just tell 'use
      hugepages to back all the nodes'. In other words:
      
        <memoryBacking>
          <hugepages/>
        </memoryBacking>
      
        <cpu>
          <numa>
            <cell id='0' cpus='0-1' memory='1024000' unit='KiB'/>
          </numa>
        </cpu>
      
      Our code fails in this case. Well, since there's no @nodeset (nor
      any <page/> child element to <hugepages/>) we fail to lookup the
      default hugepage size to use.
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
      f8e9deb1
  14. 24 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  15. 18 6月, 2015 5 次提交