1. 10 8月, 2015 5 次提交
    • L
      conf: new pci controller model "pcie-root-port" · dce3b8be
      Laine Stump 提交于
      This controller can be connected (at domain startup time only - not
      hotpluggable) only to a port on the pcie root complex ("pcie-root" in
      libvirt config), hence the new connect type
      VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCIE_ROOT. It provides a hotpluggable port that
      will accept any PCI or PCIe device.
      
      New attributes must be added to the controller <target> subelement for
      this - chassis and port are guest-visible option values that will be
      set by libvirt with values derived from the controller's index and pci
      address information.
      dce3b8be
    • L
      qemu: add capabilities bit for device ioh3420 · 408b100a
      Laine Stump 提交于
      This is a PCIE "root port". It connects only to a port of the
      integrated pcie.0 bus of a Q35 machine (can't be hotplugged), and
      provides a single PCIe port that can have PCI or PCIe devices
      hotplugged into it.
      
      This device will be used to implement the "pcie-root-port" model of
      pci controller.
      408b100a
    • L
      qemu: implement <target chassisNr='n'/> subelement/attribute of <controller> · 18c10451
      Laine Stump 提交于
      This uses the new subelement/attribute in two ways:
      
      1) If a "pci-bridge" pci controller has no chassisNr attribute, it
      will automatically be set to the controller's index as soon as the
      controller's PCI address is known (during
      qemuDomainAssignPCIAddresses()).
      
      2) when creating the commandline for a pci-bridge device, chassisNr
      will be used to set qemu's chassis_nr option (rather than the previous
      practice of hard-coding it to the controller's index).
      18c10451
    • L
      conf: add new <target> subelement with chassisNr attribute to <controller> · 8dc88aee
      Laine Stump 提交于
      There are some configuration options to some types of pci controllers
      that are currently automatically derived from other parts of the
      controller's configuration. For example, in qemu a pci-bridge
      controller has an option that is called "chassis_nr"; up until now
      libvirt has always set chassis_nr to the index of the pci-bridge. So
      this:
      
        <controller type='pci' model='pci-bridge' index='2'/>
      
      will always result in:
      
        -device pci-bridge,chassis_nr=2,...
      
      on the qemu commandline. In the future we may decide there is a better
      way to derive that option, but even in that case we will need for
      existing domains to retain the same chassis_nr they were using in the
      past - that is something that is visible to the guest so it is part of
      the guest ABI and changing it would lead to problems for migrating
      guests (or just guests with very picky OSes).
      
      The <target> subelement has been added as a place to put the new
      "chassisNr" attribute that will be filled in by libvirt when it
      auto-generates the chassisNr; it will be saved in the config, then
      reused any time the domain is started:
      
        <controller type='pci' model='pci-bridge' index='2'>
          <model type='pci-bridge'/>
          <target chassisNr='2'/>
        </controller>
      
      The one oddity of all this is that if the controller configuration
      is changed (for example to change the index or the pci address
      where the controller is plugged in), the items in <target> will
      *not* be re-generated, which might lead to conflict. I can't
      really see any way around this, but fortunately if there is a
      material conflict qemu will let us know and we will pass that on
      to the user.
      8dc88aee
    • L
      conf: add new <model> subelement with name attribute to <controller> · bf202510
      Laine Stump 提交于
      This new subelement is used in PCI controllers: the toplevel
      *attribute* "model" of a controller denotes what kind of PCI
      controller is being described, e.g. a "dmi-to-pci-bridge",
      "pci-bridge", or "pci-root". But in the future there will be different
      implementations of some of those types of PCI controllers, which
      behave similarly from libvirt's point of view (and so should have the
      same model), but use a different device in qemu (and present
      themselves as a different piece of hardware in the guest). In an ideal
      world we (i.e. "I") would have thought of that back when the pci
      controllers were added, and used some sort of type/class/model
      notation (where class was used in the way we are now using model, and
      model was used for the actual manufacturer's model number of a
      particular family of PCI controller), but that opportunity is long
      past, so as an alternative, this patch allows selecting a particular
      implementation of a pci controller with the "name" attribute of the
      <model> subelement, e.g.:
      
        <controller type='pci' model='dmi-to-pci-bridge' index='1'>
          <model name='i82801b11-bridge'/>
        </controller>
      
      In this case, "dmi-to-pci-bridge" is the kind of controller (one that
      has a single PCIe port upstream, and 32 standard PCI ports downstream,
      which are not hotpluggable), and the qemu device to be used to
      implement this kind of controller is named "i82801b11-bridge".
      
      Implementing the above now will allow us in the future to add a new
      kind of dmi-to-pci-bridge that doesn't use qemu's i82801b11-bridge
      device, but instead uses something else (which doesn't yet exist, but
      qemu people have been discussing it), all without breaking existing
      configs.
      
      (note that for the existing "pci-bridge" type of PCI controller, both
      the model attribute and <model> name are 'pci-bridge'. This is just a
      coincidence, since it turns out that in this case the device name in
      qemu really is a generic 'pci-bridge' rather than being the name of
      some real-world chip)
      bf202510
  2. 09 8月, 2015 1 次提交
    • L
      conf: more useful error message when pci function is out of range · f8fe8f03
      Laine Stump 提交于
      If a pci address had a function number out of range, the error message
      would be:
      
        Insufficient specification for PCI address
      
      which is logged by virDevicePCIAddressParseXML() after
      virDevicePCIAddressIsValid returns a failure.
      
      This patch enhances virDevicePCIAddressIsValid() to optionally report
      the error itself (since it is the place that decides which part of the
      address is "invalid"), and uses that feature when calling from
      virDevicePCIAddressParseXML(), so that the error will be more useful,
      e.g.:
      
        Invalid PCI address function=0x8, must be <= 7
      
      Previously, virDevicePCIAddressIsValid didn't check for the
      theoretical limits of domain or bus, only for slot or function. While
      adding log messages, we also correct that ommission. (The RNG for PCI
      addresses already enforces this limit, which by the way means that we
      can't add any negative tests for this - as far as I know our
      domainschematest has no provisions for passing XML that is supposed to
      fail).
      
      Note that virDevicePCIAddressIsValid() can only check against the
      absolute maximum attribute values for *any* possible PCI controller,
      not for the actual maximums of the specific controller that this
      device is attaching to; fortunately there is later more specific
      validation for guest-side PCI addresses when building the set of
      assigned PCI addresses. For host-side PCI addresses (e.g. for
      <hostdev> and for network device pools), we rely on the error that
      will be logged when it is found that the device doesn't actually
      exist.
      
      This resolves:
      
        https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004596
      f8fe8f03
  3. 04 8月, 2015 2 次提交
  4. 03 8月, 2015 4 次提交
  5. 27 7月, 2015 2 次提交
  6. 24 7月, 2015 3 次提交
  7. 23 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • R
      bhyve: add UTC clock support · 6cb9ef1b
      Roman Bogorodskiy 提交于
      Bhyve as of r279225 (FreeBSD -CURRENT) or r284894 (FreeBSD 10-STABLE)
      supports using UTC time offset via the '-u' argument to bhyve(8). By
      default it's still using localtime.
      
      Make the bhyve driver use UTC clock if it's requested by specifying
      <clock offset='utc'> in domain XML and if the bhyve(8) binary supports
      the '-u' flag.
      6cb9ef1b
  8. 22 7月, 2015 2 次提交
    • A
      tests: Restore links in deconfigured-cpus nodeinfo test · cc3d52eb
      Andrea Bolognani 提交于
      When cleaning up the data (taken from a running system) for inclusion
      I went a little too far and deleted a bunch of links that should have
      been left alone. The test worked despite this because it was going
      through a fallback code path.
      
      A few other files are affected as well: again, the data is taken from
      a running system, so even thought we would probably be okay if we
      just added the links, aligning everything is definitely safer.
      cc3d52eb
    • P
      cgroup: Drop resource partition from virSystemdMakeScopeName · 88f6c007
      Peter Krempa 提交于
      The scope name, even according to our docs is
      "machine-$DRIVER\x2d$VMNAME.scope" virSystemdMakeScopeName would use the
      resource partition name instead of "machine-" if it was specified thus
      creating invalid scope paths.
      
      This makes libvirt drop cgroups for a VM that uses custom resource
      partition upon reconnecting since the detected scope name would not
      match the expected name generated by virSystemdMakeScopeName.
      
      The error is exposed by the following log entry:
      
      debug : virCgroupValidateMachineGroup:302 : Name 'machine-qemu\x2dtestvm.scope' for controller 'cpu' does not match 'testvm', 'testvm.libvirt-qemu' or 'machine-test-qemu\x2dtestvm.scope'
      
      for a "/machine/test" resource and "testvm" vm.
      
      Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238570
      88f6c007
  9. 21 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • M
      nodedev: add RDMA and tx-udp_tnl-segmentation NIC capabilities · ac3ed208
      Moshe Levi 提交于
      Adding functionality to libvirt that will allow
      it query the interface for the availability of RDMA and
      tx-udp_tnl-segmentation Offloading NIC capabilities
      
      Here is an example of the feature XML definition:
      
      <device>
      <name>net_eth4_90_e2_ba_5e_a5_45</name>
        <path>/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:03.0/0000:08:00.1/net/eth4</path>
        <parent>pci_0000_08_00_1</parent>
        <capability type='net'>
          <interface>eth4</interface>
          <address>90:e2:ba:5e:a5:45</address>
          <link speed='10000' state='up'/>
          <feature name='rx'/>
          <feature name='tx'/>
          <feature name='sg'/>
          <feature name='tso'/>
          <feature name='gso'/>
          <feature name='gro'/>
          <feature name='rxvlan'/>
          <feature name='txvlan'/>
          <feature name='rxhash'/>
          <feature name='rdma'/>
          <feature name='txudptnl'/>
          <capability type='80203'/>
        </capability>
      </device>
      ac3ed208
  10. 20 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 15 7月, 2015 2 次提交
  12. 14 7月, 2015 2 次提交
    • A
      tests: Add nodeinfo test for non-present CPUs · f8b784a8
      Andrea Bolognani 提交于
      Some of the possible CPUs in a system might not be present, eg. they
      might be defective or might have been deconfigured from the ASM console
      in a Power system. Due to this fact, Linux keeps track of what CPUs are
      possible and what are present separately.
      
      This test uses the data from a system where not all the possible CPUs
      are present to make sure libvirt handles this situation correctly.
      f8b784a8
    • J
      nodeinfo: Add sysfs_prefix to nodeGetCPUCount · f1a43a0f
      John Ferlan 提交于
      Add the sysfs_prefix argument to the call to allow for setting the
      path for tests to something other than SYSFS_SYSTEM_PATH.
      f1a43a0f
  13. 10 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  14. 09 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  15. 08 7月, 2015 4 次提交
  16. 01 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  17. 30 6月, 2015 2 次提交
  18. 29 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  19. 26 6月, 2015 4 次提交
    • P
      test: qemu: Make sure that wr_highest_offset_valid gets set properly · 1c5e782c
      Peter Krempa 提交于
      Remove one instance of the field being present so that the code that
      sets that flag can be tested.
      1c5e782c
    • P
      qemu: monitor: Remove qemuMonitorGetBlockExtent · 78aefb52
      Peter Krempa 提交于
      Now that qemuMonitorGetAllBlockStatsInfo collects also wr_highest_offset
      the whole function can be killed.
      78aefb52
    • P
      qemu: monitor: Open-code retrieval of wr_highest_offset · 0d130a01
      Peter Krempa 提交于
      Instead of using qemuMonitorJSONDevGetBlockExtent (which I plan to
      remove later) extract the data in place.
      
      Additionally add a flag that will be set when the wr_highest_offset was
      extracted correctly so that callers can act according to that.
      
      The test case addition should help make sure that everything works.
      0d130a01
    • M
      qemuBuildMemoryBackendStr: Honour passed @pagesize · 70d75ffc
      Michal Privoznik 提交于
      So far the argument has not much meaning and was practically ignored.
      This is not good since when doing memory hotplug, the size of desired
      hugepage backing is passed in that argument. Taking closer look at the
      tests I'm fixing reveals the bug. For instance, while the following is
      in the test:
      
          <memory model='dimm'>
            <source>
              <nodemask>1-3</nodemask>
              <pagesize unit='KiB'>4096</pagesize>
            </source>
            <target>
              <size unit='KiB'>524287</size>
              <node>0</node>
            </target>
            <address type='dimm' slot='0' base='0x100000000'/>
          </memory>
      
      the generated commandline corresponding to this XML was:
      
          -object memory-backend-ram,id=memdimm0,size=536870912,\
          host-nodes=1-3,policy=bind
      
      Have you noticed? Yes, memory-backend-ram! Nothing can be further away
      from the right answer. The hugepage backing is requested in the XML
      and we happily ignore it. This is just not right. It's
      memory-backend-file which should have been used:
      
          -object memory-backend-file,id=memdimm0,prealloc=yes,\
          mem-path=/dev/hugepages4M/libvirt/qemu,size=536870912,\
          host-nodes=1-3,policy=bind
      
      The problem is, that @pagesize passed to qemuBuildMemoryBackendStr
      (where this part of commandline is built) was ignored. The hugepage to
      back memory was searched only and only by NUMA nodes pinning. This
      works only for regular guest NUMA nodes.
      
      Then, I'm changing the hugepages size in the test XMLs too. This is
      simply because in the test suite we create dummy mount points just for
      2M and 1G hugepages. And in the test 4M was requested. I'm sticking to
      2M, but 1G should just work too.
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
      70d75ffc