Skip to content

L
libvirt

openeuler / libvirt

通知 3
Star 0
Fork 0
L
libvirt
切换分支/标签
  1. 10 8月, 2015 6 次提交
    • L
      conf: new pci controller model "pcie-root-port" · dce3b8be
      由 Laine Stump 提交于 
      This controller can be connected (at domain startup time only - not
hotpluggable) only to a port on the pcie root complex ("pcie-root" in
libvirt config), hence the new connect type
VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCIE_ROOT. It provides a hotpluggable port that
will accept any PCI or PCIe device.

New attributes must be added to the controller <target> subelement for
this - chassis and port are guest-visible option values that will be
set by libvirt with values derived from the controller's index and pci
address information.
      dce3b8be
    • L
      qemu: add capabilities bit for device ioh3420 · 408b100a
      由 Laine Stump 提交于 
      This is a PCIE "root port". It connects only to a port of the
integrated pcie.0 bus of a Q35 machine (can't be hotplugged), and
provides a single PCIe port that can have PCI or PCIe devices
hotplugged into it.

This device will be used to implement the "pcie-root-port" model of
pci controller.
      408b100a
    • L
      qemu: implement <target chassisNr='n'/> subelement/attribute of <controller> · 18c10451
      由 Laine Stump 提交于 
      This uses the new subelement/attribute in two ways:

1) If a "pci-bridge" pci controller has no chassisNr attribute, it
will automatically be set to the controller's index as soon as the
controller's PCI address is known (during
qemuDomainAssignPCIAddresses()).

2) when creating the commandline for a pci-bridge device, chassisNr
will be used to set qemu's chassis_nr option (rather than the previous
practice of hard-coding it to the controller's index).
      18c10451
    • L
      conf: add new <target> subelement with chassisNr attribute to <controller> · 8dc88aee
      由 Laine Stump 提交于 
      There are some configuration options to some types of pci controllers
that are currently automatically derived from other parts of the
controller's configuration. For example, in qemu a pci-bridge
controller has an option that is called "chassis_nr"; up until now
libvirt has always set chassis_nr to the index of the pci-bridge. So
this:

  <controller type='pci' model='pci-bridge' index='2'/>

will always result in:

  -device pci-bridge,chassis_nr=2,...

on the qemu commandline. In the future we may decide there is a better
way to derive that option, but even in that case we will need for
existing domains to retain the same chassis_nr they were using in the
past - that is something that is visible to the guest so it is part of
the guest ABI and changing it would lead to problems for migrating
guests (or just guests with very picky OSes).

The <target> subelement has been added as a place to put the new
"chassisNr" attribute that will be filled in by libvirt when it
auto-generates the chassisNr; it will be saved in the config, then
reused any time the domain is started:

  <controller type='pci' model='pci-bridge' index='2'>
    <model type='pci-bridge'/>
    <target chassisNr='2'/>
  </controller>

The one oddity of all this is that if the controller configuration
is changed (for example to change the index or the pci address
where the controller is plugged in), the items in <target> will
*not* be re-generated, which might lead to conflict. I can't
really see any way around this, but fortunately if there is a
material conflict qemu will let us know and we will pass that on
to the user.
      8dc88aee
    • L
      qemu: implement <model> subelement to <controller> · 572ebdbc
      由 Laine Stump 提交于 
      This patch provides qemu support for the contents of <model> in
<controller> for the two existing PCI controller types that need it
(i.e. the two controller types that are backed by a device that must
be specified on the qemu commandline):

1) pci-bridge - sets <model> name attribute default as "pci-bridge"

2) dmi-to-pci-bridge - sets <model> name attribute default as
   "i82801b11-bridge".

These both match current hardcoded practice.

The defaults are set at the end of qemuDomainAssignPCIAddresses().
This can't be done earlier because some of the options that will be
autogenerated need full PCI address info for the controller, and
because qemuDomainAssignPCIAddresses() might create extra controllers
which would need default settings added, and that hasn't yet been done
at the time the PostParse callbacks are being run.
qemuDomainAssignPCIAddresses() is still called prior to the XML being
written to disk, though, so the autogenerated defaults are persistent.

qemu capabilities bits aren't checked when the domain is defined, but
rather when the commandline is actually created (so the domain can
possibly be defined on a host that doesn't yet have support for the
given device, or a host different from the one where it will
eventually be run). When the commandline is being generated we compare
the modelName to known qemu device names implementing the given type
of controller, and check the capabilities bit for that device.
      572ebdbc
    • L
      conf: add new <model> subelement with name attribute to <controller> · bf202510
      由 Laine Stump 提交于 
      This new subelement is used in PCI controllers: the toplevel
*attribute* "model" of a controller denotes what kind of PCI
controller is being described, e.g. a "dmi-to-pci-bridge",
"pci-bridge", or "pci-root". But in the future there will be different
implementations of some of those types of PCI controllers, which
behave similarly from libvirt's point of view (and so should have the
same model), but use a different device in qemu (and present
themselves as a different piece of hardware in the guest). In an ideal
world we (i.e. "I") would have thought of that back when the pci
controllers were added, and used some sort of type/class/model
notation (where class was used in the way we are now using model, and
model was used for the actual manufacturer's model number of a
particular family of PCI controller), but that opportunity is long
past, so as an alternative, this patch allows selecting a particular
implementation of a pci controller with the "name" attribute of the
<model> subelement, e.g.:

  <controller type='pci' model='dmi-to-pci-bridge' index='1'>
    <model name='i82801b11-bridge'/>
  </controller>

In this case, "dmi-to-pci-bridge" is the kind of controller (one that
has a single PCIe port upstream, and 32 standard PCI ports downstream,
which are not hotpluggable), and the qemu device to be used to
implement this kind of controller is named "i82801b11-bridge".

Implementing the above now will allow us in the future to add a new
kind of dmi-to-pci-bridge that doesn't use qemu's i82801b11-bridge
device, but instead uses something else (which doesn't yet exist, but
qemu people have been discussing it), all without breaking existing
configs.

(note that for the existing "pci-bridge" type of PCI controller, both
the model attribute and <model> name are 'pci-bridge'. This is just a
coincidence, since it turns out that in this case the device name in
qemu really is a generic 'pci-bridge' rather than being the name of
some real-world chip)
      bf202510
  3. 09 8月, 2015 1 次提交
    • L
      conf: more useful error message when pci function is out of range · f8fe8f03
      由 Laine Stump 提交于 
      If a pci address had a function number out of range, the error message
would be:

  Insufficient specification for PCI address

which is logged by virDevicePCIAddressParseXML() after
virDevicePCIAddressIsValid returns a failure.

This patch enhances virDevicePCIAddressIsValid() to optionally report
the error itself (since it is the place that decides which part of the
address is "invalid"), and uses that feature when calling from
virDevicePCIAddressParseXML(), so that the error will be more useful,
e.g.:

  Invalid PCI address function=0x8, must be <= 7

Previously, virDevicePCIAddressIsValid didn't check for the
theoretical limits of domain or bus, only for slot or function. While
adding log messages, we also correct that ommission. (The RNG for PCI
addresses already enforces this limit, which by the way means that we
can't add any negative tests for this - as far as I know our
domainschematest has no provisions for passing XML that is supposed to
fail).

Note that virDevicePCIAddressIsValid() can only check against the
absolute maximum attribute values for *any* possible PCI controller,
not for the actual maximums of the specific controller that this
device is attaching to; fortunately there is later more specific
validation for guest-side PCI addresses when building the set of
assigned PCI addresses. For host-side PCI addresses (e.g. for
<hostdev> and for network device pools), we rely on the error that
will be logged when it is found that the device doesn't actually
exist.

This resolves:

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004596
      f8fe8f03
  5. 07 8月, 2015 3 次提交
  7. 06 8月, 2015 7 次提交
  9. 05 8月, 2015 7 次提交
  11. 04 8月, 2015 14 次提交
  13. 03 8月, 2015 2 次提交
    • A
      nodeinfo: Fix build failure when KVM headers are not available · 88c4c32a
      由 Andrea Bolognani 提交于 
      Compiler error:

  ../../src/nodeinfo.c: In function 'nodeGetThreadsPerSubcore':
  ../../src/nodeinfo.c:2393: error: label 'out' defined but not used [-Wunused-label]
  ../../src/nodeinfo.c:2352: error: unused parameter 'arch' [-Wunused-parameter]
      88c4c32a
    • M
      qemu: Remove double unlock for domains · c43c661f
      由 Martin Kletzander 提交于 
      The virDomainObjListRemove() function unlocks a domain that it's given
due to legacy code.  And because of that code, which should be
refactored, that last virObjectUnlock() cannot be just removed.  So
instead, lock it right back for qemu for now.  All calls to
qemuDomainRemoveInactive() are followed by code that unlocks the domain
again, plus the domain should be locked during qemuDomainObjEndJob(), so
the right place to lock it is right after virDomainObjListRemove().

The only place where this would cause a problem is the autodestroy
callback, so we need to get another reference there and uref+unlock it
afterwards.  Luckily, returning NULL from that function doesn't mean an
error, and only means that it doesn't need to be unlocked anymore.
Signed-off-by: NMartin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
      c43c661f