- 10 8月, 2015 17 次提交
-
-
由 Martin Kletzander 提交于
Since its introduction in 2011 (particularly in commit f4324e32), the option doesn't work. It just effectively disables all incoming connections. That's because the client private data that contain the 'keepalive_supported' boolean, are initialized to zeroes so the bool is false and the only other place where the bool is used is when checking whether the client supports keepalive. Thus, according to the server, no client supports keepalive. Removing this instead of fixing it is better because a) apparently nobody ever tried it since 2011 (4 years without one month) and b) we cannot know whether the client supports keepalive until we get a ping or pong keepalive packet. And that won't happen until after we dispatched the ConnectOpen call. Another two reasons would be c) the keepalive_required was tracked on the server level, but keepalive_supported was in private data of the client as well as the check that was made in the remote layer, thus making all other instances of virNetServer miss this feature unless they all implemented it for themselves and d) we can always add it back in case there is a request and a use-case for it. Signed-off-by: NMartin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
-
由 Cao jin 提交于
Signed-off-by: NCao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Michal Privoznik 提交于
So the API takes @dumpformat argument. This is what makes it special when compared to virDomainCoreDump. The argument is there so that users can choose the format of resulting core dump file. And to ease them the choosing process we even have an enum with supported values across all the hypervisors. But we don't mention the enum in the function description anywhere. Fix it! Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
By specifying parentIndex in a call to virNetworkUpdate(), it was possible to direct libvirt to add a dhcp range or static host of a non-matching address family to the <dhcp> element of an <ip>. For example, given: <ip address='192.168.122.1' netmask='255.255.255.0'/> <ip family='ipv6' address='2001:db6:ca3:45::1' prefix='64'/> you could provide a static host entry with an IPv4 address, and specify that it be added to the 2nd <ip> element (index 1): virsh net-update default add ip-dhcp-host --parent-index 1 \ '<host mac="52:54:00:00:00:01" ip="192.168.122.45"/>' This would be happily added with no error (and no concern of any possible future consequences). This patch checks that any dhcp range or host element being added to a network ip's <dhcp> subelement has addresses of the same family as the ip element they are being added to. This resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184736
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
This is backed by the qemu device xio3130-downstream. It can only be connected to a pcie-switch-upstream-port (x3130-upstream) on the upstream side.
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
This controller can be connected only to a port on a pcie-switch-upstream-port. It provides a single hotpluggable port that will accept any PCI or PCIe device, as well as any device requiring a pcie-*-port (the only current example of such a device is the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
The downstream ports of an x3130-upstream switch can each have one of these plugged into them (and that is the only place they can be connected). Each xio3130-downstream provides a single PCIe port that can have PCI or PCIe devices hotplugged into it. Apparently an entire set of x3130-upstream + several xio3130-downstreams can be hotplugged as a unit, but it's not clear to me yet how that would be done, since qemu only allows attaching a single device at a time. This device will be used to implement the "pcie-switch-downstream-port" model of pci controller.
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
this is backed by the qemu device x3130-upstream. It can only plug into a pcie-root-port or pcie-switch-downstream-port.
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
This controller can be connected only to a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-downstream-port (which will be added in a later patch), which is the reason for the new connect type VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCIE_PORT. A pcie-switch-upstream-port provides 32 ports (slot=0 to slot=31) on the downstream side, which can only have pci controllers of model "pcie-switch-downstream-port" plugged into them, which is the reason for the other new connect type VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCIE_SWITCH.
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
This is the upstream part of a PCIe switch. It connects to a PCIe port (but not PCI) on the upstream side, and can have up to 31 xio3130-downstream controllers (but no other types of devices) connected to its downstream side. This device will be used to implement the "pcie-switch-upstream-port" model of pci controller.
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
This is backed by the qemu device ioh3420. chassis and port from the <target> subelement are used to store/set the respective qemu device options for the ioh3420. Currently, chassis is set to be the index of the controller, and port is set to "(slot << 3) + function" (per suggestion from Alex Williamson).
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
This controller can be connected (at domain startup time only - not hotpluggable) only to a port on the pcie root complex ("pcie-root" in libvirt config), hence the new connect type VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCIE_ROOT. It provides a hotpluggable port that will accept any PCI or PCIe device. New attributes must be added to the controller <target> subelement for this - chassis and port are guest-visible option values that will be set by libvirt with values derived from the controller's index and pci address information.
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
This is a PCIE "root port". It connects only to a port of the integrated pcie.0 bus of a Q35 machine (can't be hotplugged), and provides a single PCIe port that can have PCI or PCIe devices hotplugged into it. This device will be used to implement the "pcie-root-port" model of pci controller.
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
This uses the new subelement/attribute in two ways: 1) If a "pci-bridge" pci controller has no chassisNr attribute, it will automatically be set to the controller's index as soon as the controller's PCI address is known (during qemuDomainAssignPCIAddresses()). 2) when creating the commandline for a pci-bridge device, chassisNr will be used to set qemu's chassis_nr option (rather than the previous practice of hard-coding it to the controller's index).
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
There are some configuration options to some types of pci controllers that are currently automatically derived from other parts of the controller's configuration. For example, in qemu a pci-bridge controller has an option that is called "chassis_nr"; up until now libvirt has always set chassis_nr to the index of the pci-bridge. So this: <controller type='pci' model='pci-bridge' index='2'/> will always result in: -device pci-bridge,chassis_nr=2,... on the qemu commandline. In the future we may decide there is a better way to derive that option, but even in that case we will need for existing domains to retain the same chassis_nr they were using in the past - that is something that is visible to the guest so it is part of the guest ABI and changing it would lead to problems for migrating guests (or just guests with very picky OSes). The <target> subelement has been added as a place to put the new "chassisNr" attribute that will be filled in by libvirt when it auto-generates the chassisNr; it will be saved in the config, then reused any time the domain is started: <controller type='pci' model='pci-bridge' index='2'> <model type='pci-bridge'/> <target chassisNr='2'/> </controller> The one oddity of all this is that if the controller configuration is changed (for example to change the index or the pci address where the controller is plugged in), the items in <target> will *not* be re-generated, which might lead to conflict. I can't really see any way around this, but fortunately if there is a material conflict qemu will let us know and we will pass that on to the user.
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
This patch provides qemu support for the contents of <model> in <controller> for the two existing PCI controller types that need it (i.e. the two controller types that are backed by a device that must be specified on the qemu commandline): 1) pci-bridge - sets <model> name attribute default as "pci-bridge" 2) dmi-to-pci-bridge - sets <model> name attribute default as "i82801b11-bridge". These both match current hardcoded practice. The defaults are set at the end of qemuDomainAssignPCIAddresses(). This can't be done earlier because some of the options that will be autogenerated need full PCI address info for the controller, and because qemuDomainAssignPCIAddresses() might create extra controllers which would need default settings added, and that hasn't yet been done at the time the PostParse callbacks are being run. qemuDomainAssignPCIAddresses() is still called prior to the XML being written to disk, though, so the autogenerated defaults are persistent. qemu capabilities bits aren't checked when the domain is defined, but rather when the commandline is actually created (so the domain can possibly be defined on a host that doesn't yet have support for the given device, or a host different from the one where it will eventually be run). When the commandline is being generated we compare the modelName to known qemu device names implementing the given type of controller, and check the capabilities bit for that device.
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
This new subelement is used in PCI controllers: the toplevel *attribute* "model" of a controller denotes what kind of PCI controller is being described, e.g. a "dmi-to-pci-bridge", "pci-bridge", or "pci-root". But in the future there will be different implementations of some of those types of PCI controllers, which behave similarly from libvirt's point of view (and so should have the same model), but use a different device in qemu (and present themselves as a different piece of hardware in the guest). In an ideal world we (i.e. "I") would have thought of that back when the pci controllers were added, and used some sort of type/class/model notation (where class was used in the way we are now using model, and model was used for the actual manufacturer's model number of a particular family of PCI controller), but that opportunity is long past, so as an alternative, this patch allows selecting a particular implementation of a pci controller with the "name" attribute of the <model> subelement, e.g.: <controller type='pci' model='dmi-to-pci-bridge' index='1'> <model name='i82801b11-bridge'/> </controller> In this case, "dmi-to-pci-bridge" is the kind of controller (one that has a single PCIe port upstream, and 32 standard PCI ports downstream, which are not hotpluggable), and the qemu device to be used to implement this kind of controller is named "i82801b11-bridge". Implementing the above now will allow us in the future to add a new kind of dmi-to-pci-bridge that doesn't use qemu's i82801b11-bridge device, but instead uses something else (which doesn't yet exist, but qemu people have been discussing it), all without breaking existing configs. (note that for the existing "pci-bridge" type of PCI controller, both the model attribute and <model> name are 'pci-bridge'. This is just a coincidence, since it turns out that in this case the device name in qemu really is a generic 'pci-bridge' rather than being the name of some real-world chip)
-
- 09 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
If a pci address had a function number out of range, the error message would be: Insufficient specification for PCI address which is logged by virDevicePCIAddressParseXML() after virDevicePCIAddressIsValid returns a failure. This patch enhances virDevicePCIAddressIsValid() to optionally report the error itself (since it is the place that decides which part of the address is "invalid"), and uses that feature when calling from virDevicePCIAddressParseXML(), so that the error will be more useful, e.g.: Invalid PCI address function=0x8, must be <= 7 Previously, virDevicePCIAddressIsValid didn't check for the theoretical limits of domain or bus, only for slot or function. While adding log messages, we also correct that ommission. (The RNG for PCI addresses already enforces this limit, which by the way means that we can't add any negative tests for this - as far as I know our domainschematest has no provisions for passing XML that is supposed to fail). Note that virDevicePCIAddressIsValid() can only check against the absolute maximum attribute values for *any* possible PCI controller, not for the actual maximums of the specific controller that this device is attaching to; fortunately there is later more specific validation for guest-side PCI addresses when building the set of assigned PCI addresses. For host-side PCI addresses (e.g. for <hostdev> and for network device pools), we rely on the error that will be logged when it is found that the device doesn't actually exist. This resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004596
-
- 07 8月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Privoznik 提交于
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176020 Some users think this is a good idea: <vcpu placement='static'>4</vcpu> <cpu mode='host-model'> <model fallback='allow'/> <numa> <cell id='0' cpus='0-1' memory='1048576' unit='KiB'/> <cell id='1' cpus='9-10' memory='2097152' unit='KiB'/> </numa> </cpu> It's not. Lets therefore introduce a check and discourage them in doing so. Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
-
由 Michal Privoznik 提交于
This function should return the greatest CPU number set in /domain/cpu/numa/cell/@cpus. The idea is that we should compare the returned value against /domain/vcpu value. Yes, there exist users who think the following is a good idea: <vcpu placement='static'>4</vcpu> <cpu mode='host-model'> <model fallback='allow'/> <numa> <cell id='0' cpus='0-1' memory='1048576' unit='KiB'/> <cell id='1' cpus='9-10' memory='2097152' unit='KiB'/> </numa> </cpu> Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
-
由 Peter Krempa 提交于
Qemu reports physical size 0 for block devices. As 15fa84ac changed the behavior of qemuDomainGetBlockInfo to just query the monitor this created a regression since we didn't report the size correctly any more. This patch adds code to refresh the physical size of a block device by opening it and seeking to the end and uses it both in qemuDomainGetBlockInfo and also in qemuDomainGetStatsOneBlock that was broken since it was introduced in this respect. Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250982
-
- 06 8月, 2015 7 次提交
-
-
由 Shivaprasad G Bhat 提交于
The commit 7e72de49 didn't consider the hotplug scenarios. The patch addresses the hotplug case whereby if atleast one of the pci function is owned by a guest, the hotplug of other functions/devices in the same iommu group to the same guest goes through successfully. Signed-off-by: NShivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Michal Privoznik 提交于
While reviewing e8d55172 I've noticed a few unaligned lines. Fix this. Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
-
由 Michal Privoznik 提交于
We've split the python bindings a long time ago. However, we are still requiring python-config (as an obfuscation to python-devel). This does not make any sense. The only thing we need is python, not python-devel. Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
-
由 Pavel Fedin 提交于
virtio-net-pci adapter is capable to use irqfd with vhost-net only in MSI-X mode, which appears to be available only on PCIe bus, at least on ARM Signed-off-by: NPavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
-
由 Pavel Fedin 提交于
Legacy -net option works correctly only with embedded device models, which do not require any bus specification. Therefore, we should use -device for PCI hardware Signed-off-by: NPavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
-
由 Pavel Fedin 提交于
Here we assume that if qemu supports generic PCI host controller, it is a part of virt machine and can be used for adding PCI devices. In qemu this is actually a PCIe bus, so we also declare multibus capability so that 0'th bus is specified to qemu correctly as 'pcie.0' Signed-off-by: NPavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
-
由 Pavel Fedin 提交于
This capability specifies that qemu can implement generic PCI host controller. It is often used for virtual environments, including ARM. Signed-off-by: NPavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
-
- 05 8月, 2015 7 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Krempa 提交于
Libvirt doesn't reliably know the location of the backing chain when pre-creating images for non-shared migration. This isn't a problem for full copy, but incremental copy requires the information. Forbid pre-creating the image in cases where incremental migration is required. This limitation can perhaps be lifted once libvirt will fully support loading of backing chain information from the XML. Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249587
-
由 Andrea Bolognani 提交于
-
由 Andrea Bolognani 提交于
Update the names of the symbols used internally by the driver. No functional changes.
-
由 Andrea Bolognani 提交于
Only the symbols exported by the driver have been updated; the driver implementation itself still uses the old names internally. No functional changes.
-
由 Andrea Bolognani 提交于
The driver only supports VIR_ARCH_PPC64 and VIR_ARCH_PPC64LE. Just shuffling files around and updating the build system accordingly. No functional changes.
-
由 John Ferlan 提交于
The recent changes to perform SCSI device address checks during the post parse callbacks ran afoul of the Coverity checker since the changes assumed that the 'xmlopt' parameter to virDomainDeviceDefPostParse would be non NULL (commit id 'ca2cf74e'); however, what was missed is there was an "if (xmlopt &&" check being made, so Coverity believed that it could be possible for a NULL 'xmlopt'. Checking the various calling paths seemingly disproves that. If called from virDomainDeviceDefParse, there were two other possible calls that would end up dereffing, so that path could not be NULL. If called via virDomainDefPostParseDeviceIterator via virDomainDefPostParse there are two callers (virDomainDefParseXML and qemuParseCommandLine) which deref xmlopt either directly or through another call. So I'm removing the check for non-NULL xmlopt.
-
由 Luyao Huang 提交于
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250287 When run domfsinfo in quiet mode, we cannot get any useful information (just get \n), this is because we didn't use vshPrint to print useful information. Signed-off-by: NLuyao Huang <lhuang@redhat.com>
-
- 04 8月, 2015 5 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel P. Berrange 提交于
In gnutls 3.4.3 there is a regression in the loading of private keys via gnutls_x509_privkey_import. We already have a workaround to deal with failures on older gnutls, but the error code that the new gnutls returns is different. Extend the workaround so that is checks for GNUTLS_E_REQUESTED_DATA_NOT_AVAILABLE too. See also gnutls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250020Signed-off-by: NDaniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
-
由 John Ferlan 提交于
Rather than provide a somewhat generic error message when the API returns false, allow the caller to supply a "report = true" option in order to cause virReportError's to describe which of the 3 paths that can cause failure. Some callers don't care about what caused the failure, they just want to have a true/false - for those, calling with report = false should be sufficient.
-
由 John Ferlan 提交于
"Further" clarification (and testing) shows that using a SCSI Fibre Channel NPIV device/lun from a storage pool as a <disk type='volume' device'lun'> will work. So just add that to the allowable options Related to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230179
-
由 Kothapally Madhu Pavan 提交于
PowerPC pseries based VMs do not support a floppy disk controller. This prohibits libvirt from creating qemu command with floppy device. Signed-off-by: NKothapally Madhu Pavan <kmp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180486Signed-off-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Kothapally Madhu Pavan 提交于
PowerPC pseries based VMs do not support a floppy disk controller. This prohibits libvirt from adding floppy disk for a PowerPC pseries VM. Signed-off-by: NKothapally Madhu Pavan <kmp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-