- 02 7月, 2015 28 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Dubiel 提交于
QEMU working in vhost-user mode communicates with the other end (i.e. some virtual router application) via unix domain sockets. This requires that permissions for the socket files are correctly written into /etc/apparmor.d/libvirt/libvirt-UUID.files. Signed-off-by: NMichal Dubiel <md@semihalf.com>
-
由 Michal Privoznik 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Sorted feature list is easier to review or compare. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Daniel Veillard 提交于
* docs/news.html.in libvirt.spec.in: updated for the release * po/*po*: regenerated
-
由 John Ferlan 提交于
Commit id 'cd490086' added a VIR_FORCE_CLOSE of the 'sock', but it was after the VIR_FREE() of phyp_driver, resulting in a possible/likely NULL dereference. Signed-off-by: NJohn Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
-
由 John Ferlan 提交于
Convert virPCIDriverDir to return the buffer allocated (or not) and make the appropriate check in the caller. Signed-off-by: NJohn Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
-
由 John Ferlan 提交于
Convert virPCIDriverFile to return the buffer allocated (or not) and make the appropriate check in the caller. Signed-off-by: NJohn Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
-
由 John Ferlan 提交于
Convert virPCIFile to return the buffer allocated (or not) and make the appropriate check in the caller. Signed-off-by: NJohn Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
-
- 01 7月, 2015 12 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Privoznik 提交于
So, recently I was testing the LXC driver. You know, startup some domains. But to my surprise, I was not able to start a single one: virsh # start --console test error: Reconnected to the hypervisor error: Failed to start domain test error: internal error: guest failed to start: unexpected exit status 125 So I've start digging. It turns out, that in virExec(), when I printed out the @cmd, I got strange values: *(cmd->outfdptr) was certainly not valid FD number: it has random value of several millions. This obviously made prepareStdFd(childout, STDOUT_FILENO) fail (line 611). But outfdptr is set in virCommandSetOutputFD(). The only place within LXC driver where the function is called is in virLXCProcessBuildControllerCmd(). If you take a closer look at the function it looks like this: static virCommandPtr virLXCProcessBuildControllerCmd(virLXCDriverPtr driver, .. int logfd, const char *pidfile) { ... virCommandSetOutputFD(cmd, &logfd); virCommandSetErrorFD(cmd, &logfd); ... } Yes, you guessed it. @logfd is passed into the function by value. However, in the function we try to get its address (an address of a local variable) which is no longer valid once function is finished and stack is cleaned. Therefore when cmd->outfdptr is evaluated at any point after this function, we may get a random number, depending on what's currently on the stack. Of course, this may work sometimes too - it depends on the compiler how it arranges the code, when the stack is wiped out. In order to fix this, lets pass a pointer to @logfd instead of figuring out (wrong) its value in a function. The bug was introduced in e1de5521. Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
-
由 John Ferlan 提交于
Commit id 'f967e7a6' didn't place the closing parentheses quite right causing DEADCODE errors since the rc setting/comparison was wrong.
-
由 Peter Krempa 提交于
Using a custom device tree image may cause unexpected behavior in architectures that use this approach to detect platform devices. Since usually the device tree is generated by qemu and thus it's not normally used let's taint VMs using it to make it obvious as a possible source of problems.
-
由 Peter Krempa 提交于
The memory device hot(un)plug was missing calls to the auditing code. Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226234
-
由 Peter Krempa 提交于
Since the balloon driver does not guarantee that it returns memory to the host, using the value in the audit message is not a good idea. This patch removes auditing from updating the balloon size and reports the total physical size at startup.
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The code which generates paths for UNIX socket blindly used target name without checking if it was set. Thus for the following device XML <channel type='unix'> <source mode='bind'/> <target type='virtio'/> </channel> we would generate "/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/channel/target/NAME.(null)" path which works but is not really correct. Let's not use the ".target_name" suffix at all if target name is not set. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226854Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Peter Krempa 提交于
While CPU0 was made unpluggable in Linux a while ago it's not desirable to unplug it since some parts of the kernel (suspend-to-ram) still depend on it. This patch fixes the vCPU selection code in libvirt so that it will not be disabled.
-
由 Luyao Huang 提交于
Signed-off-by: NLuyao Huang <lhuang@redhat.com>
-
由 Ján Tomko 提交于
The target type comparison in qemuDomainDetachChrDevice used the VIR_DOMAIN_CHR_SERIAL_TARGET_TYPE enum, so virtio-serial addresses were not freed properly for channel devices. Call qemuDomainReleaseDeviceAddress uncoditionally and decide based on the address type instead of the target/device types.
-
由 Luyao Huang 提交于
Also check the device type when deciding what type the address should be. Commit 9807c471 (aiming to fix another error in address allocation) only checked the target type, but its value is different for different device types. This resulted in an error when trying to attach a channel with target type 'virtio': error: Failed to attach device from channel-file.xml error: internal error: virtio serial device has invalid address type Make the logic for releasing the address dependent only on * the address type * whether it was allocated earlier to avoid copying the device and target type checks. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230039Signed-off-by: NLuyao Huang <lhuang@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jim Fehlig 提交于
def->vcpus was never updated after successfully changing the live vcpu count of a domain. Subsequent queries for vcpu info would return incorrect results. E.g.: virsh vcpucount test maximum config 4 maximum live 4 current config 4 current live 4 virsh setvcpus test 2 virsh vcpucount test maximum config 4 maximum live 4 current config 4 current live 4 After patch, live current config is reported correctly: virsh vcpucount test maximum config 4 maximum live 4 current config 4 current live 2 While fixing this, noticed that the live config was not saved to cfg->stateDir via virDomainSaveStatus. Save the live config and change error handling of virDomainSave{Config,Status} to log a message via VIR_WARN, instead of failing the entire DomainSetVcpusFlags operation. Signed-off-by: NJim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>
-
由 Jim Fehlig 提交于
The libxl driver always uses virDomainObj->def when formatting the domain XML description. Use virDomainObj->newDef when --inactive flag is set. Signed-off-by: NJim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>
-