- 21 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ján Tomko 提交于
A new type to track USB addresses. Every <controller type='usb' index='i'/> is represented by an object of type virDomainUSBAddressHub located at buses[i]. Each of these hubs has up to 'nports' ports. If a port is occupied, it has the corresponding bit set in the 'ports' bitmap, e.g. port 1 would have the 0th bit set. If there is a hub on this port, then hubs[i] will point to this hub.
-
- 18 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ján Tomko 提交于
In preparation to tracking which USB addresses are occupied. Introduce two helper functions for printing the port path as a string and appending it to a virBuffer.
-
- 21 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
Rather than only assigning a PCI address when no address is given at all, also do it when the config says that the address type is 'pci', but it gives no address (virDeviceInfoPCIAddressWanted()). There are also several places after parsing but prior to address assignment where code previously expected that any info with address type='pci' would have a *valid* PCI address, which isn't always the case - now we check not only for type='pci', but also for a valid address (virDeviceInfoPCIAddressPresent()). The test case added in this patch was directly copied from Cole's patch titled: qemu: Wire up address type=pci auto_allocate
-
- 02 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Martin Kletzander 提交于
We had both and the only difference was that the latter also included information about multifunction setting. The problem with that was that we couldn't use functions made for only one of the structs (e.g. parsing). To consolidate those two structs, use the one in virpci.h, include that in domain_conf.h and add the multifunction member in it. Signed-off-by: NMartin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
-
- 15 4月, 2016 6 次提交
-
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
This controller provides a single PCIe port on a new root. It is similar to pci-expander-bus, intended to provide a bus that can be associated with a guest-identifiable NUMA node, but is for machinetypes with PCIe rather than PCI (e.g. q35-based machinetypes). Aside from PCIe vs. PCI, the other main difference is that a pci-expander-bus has a companion pci-bridge that is automatically attached along with it, but pcie-expander-bus has only a single port, and that port will only connect to a pcie-root-port, or to a pcie-switch-upstream-port. In order for the bus to be of any use in the guest, it must have either a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-upstream-port attached (and one or more pcie-switch-downstream-ports attached to the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
This is a standard PCI root bus (not a bridge) that can be added to a 440fx-based domain. Although it uses a PCI slot, this is *not* how it is connected into the PCI bus hierarchy, but is only used for control. Each pci-expander-bus provides 32 slots (0-31) that can accept hotplug of standard PCI devices. The usefulness of pci-expander-bus relative to a pci-bridge is that the NUMA node of the bus can be specified with the <node> subelement of <target>. This gives guest-side visibility to the NUMA node of attached devices (presuming that management apps only assign a device to a bus that has a NUMA node number matching the node number of the device on the host). Each pci-expander-bus also has a "busNr" attribute. The expander-bus itself will take the busNr specified, and all buses that are connected to this bus (including the pci-bridge that is automatically added to any expander bus of model "pxb" (see the next commit)) will use busNr+1, busNr+2, etc, and the pci-root (or the expander-bus with next lower busNr) will use bus numbers lower than busNr.
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
There are two places in qemu_domain_address.c where we have a switch statement to convert PCI controller models (VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCI*) into the connection type flag that is matched when looking for an upstream connection for that model of controller (VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_*). This patch makes a utility function in conf/domain_addr.c to do that, so that when a new PCI controller is added, we only need to add the new model-->connect-type in a single place.
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
The flags used to determine which devices could be plugged into which controllers were quite confusing, as they tried to create classes of connections, then put particular devices into possibly multiple classes, while sometimes setting multiple flags for the controllers themselves. The attempt to have a single flag indicate, e.g. that a root-port or a switch-downstream-port could connect was not only confusing, it was leading to a situation where it would be impossible to specify exactly the right combinations for a new controller. The solution is for the VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_* flags to have a 1:1 correspondence with each type of PCI controller, plus a flag for a PCI endpoint device and another for a PCIe endpoint device (the only exception to this is that pci-bridge and pcie-expander-bus controllers have their upstream connection classified as VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCI_DEVICE since they can be plugged into *exactly* the same ports as any endpoint device). Each device then has a single flag for connect type (plus the HOTPLUG flag if that device can e hotplugged), and each controller sets the CONNECT bits for all controllers that can be plugged into it, as well as for either type of endpoint device that can be plugged in (and the HOTPLUG flag if it can accept hotplugged devices). With this change, it is *slightly* easier to understand the matching of connections (as long as you remember that the flag for a device/upstream-facing connection of a controller is the same as that device's type, while the flags for a controller's downstream connections is the OR of all device types that can be plugged into that controller). More importantly, it will be possible to correctly specify what can be plugged into a pcie-switch-expander-bus, when support for it is added.
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
When support for dmi-to-pci-bridge was added, it was assumed that, just as with the pci-root bus, slot 0 was reserved. This is not the case - it can be used to connect a device just like any other slot, so remove the restriction and update the test cases that auto-assign an address on a dmi-to-pci-bridge.
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
Every other maxSlot was either set to 0 or to VIR_PCI_ADDRESS_SLOT_LAST, but this one was for some reason set to the literal value 31 (which is the same as VIR_PCI_ADDRESS_SLOT_LAST). This makes them all consistent.
-
- 17 12月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ján Tomko 提交于
This function is no longer used outside domain_addr.c
-
- 10 8月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
This controller can be connected only to a port on a pcie-switch-upstream-port. It provides a single hotpluggable port that will accept any PCI or PCIe device, as well as any device requiring a pcie-*-port (the only current example of such a device is the pcie-switch-upstream-port).
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
This controller can be connected only to a pcie-root-port or a pcie-switch-downstream-port (which will be added in a later patch), which is the reason for the new connect type VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCIE_PORT. A pcie-switch-upstream-port provides 32 ports (slot=0 to slot=31) on the downstream side, which can only have pci controllers of model "pcie-switch-downstream-port" plugged into them, which is the reason for the other new connect type VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCIE_SWITCH.
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
This controller can be connected (at domain startup time only - not hotpluggable) only to a port on the pcie root complex ("pcie-root" in libvirt config), hence the new connect type VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCIE_ROOT. It provides a hotpluggable port that will accept any PCI or PCIe device. New attributes must be added to the controller <target> subelement for this - chassis and port are guest-visible option values that will be set by libvirt with values derived from the controller's index and pci address information.
-
- 25 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
The function that auto-assigns PCI addresses was written with the hardcoded assumptions that any PCI bus would have slots available starting at 1 and ending at 31. This isn't true for many types of controllers (some have a single slot/port at 0, some have slots/ports from 0 to 31). This patch updates that function to remove the hardcoded assumptions. It will properly find/assign addresses for devices that can only connect to pcie-(root|downstream)-port (which have minSlot/maxSlot of 0/0) or a pcie-switch-upstream-port (0/31). It still will not auto-create a new bus of the proper kind for these connections when one doesn't exist, that task is for another day.
-
- 27 6月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
Certain PCI buses don't support hotplug, and when automatically assigning PCI addresses for devices, libvirt is very conservative in its assumptions about whether or not a device will need to be hotplugged/unplugged in the future. But if the user manually assigns an address, they likely are aware of any hotplug requirements of the device (or at least they should be). In short, after this patch, automatically PCI address assignment will assume that the device must be plugged in to a hot-pluggable slot, but manually assignment can place the device in any bus that is compatible, regardless of whether or not it supports hotplug. If the user makes a mistake and plugs the device into a bus that doesn't support hotplug, then later tries to do a hot-unplug, qemu will give an appropriate error. (in the future we may want to add a "hotpluggable" attribute to all devices, with default being "yes" for autoassign, and "no" for manual assign).
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
When support for the pcie-root and dmi-to-pci-bridge buses on a Q35 machinetype was added, I was concerned that even though qemu at the time allowed plugging a PCI device into a PCIe port, that it might not be supported in the future. To prevent painful backtracking in the possible future where this happened, I disallowed such connections except in a few specific cases requested by qemu developers (indicated in the code with the flag VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_EITHER_IF_CONFIG). Now that a couple years have passed, there is a clear message from qemu that there is no danger in allowing PCI devices to be plugged into PCIe ports. This patch eliminates VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_EITHER_IF_CONFIG and changes the code to always allow PCI->PCIe or PCIe->PCI connection *when the PCI address is specified in the config. (For newly added devices that haven't yet been given a PCI address, the auto-placement still prefers using the correct type of bus).
-
- 08 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Privoznik 提交于
==19015== 8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 34 of 1,049 ==19015== at 0x4C29F80: malloc (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==19015== by 0x4C2C32F: realloc (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==19015== by 0x52AD888: virReallocN (viralloc.c:245) ==19015== by 0x52AD97E: virExpandN (viralloc.c:294) ==19015== by 0x52ADC51: virInsertElementsN (viralloc.c:436) ==19015== by 0x5335864: virDomainVirtioSerialAddrSetAddController (domain_addr.c:816) ==19015== by 0x53358E0: virDomainVirtioSerialAddrSetAddControllers (domain_addr.c:839) ==19015== by 0x1DD5513B: qemuDomainAssignVirtioSerialAddresses (qemu_command.c:1422) ==19015== by 0x1DD55A6E: qemuDomainAssignAddresses (qemu_command.c:1711) ==19015== by 0x1DDA5818: qemuProcessStart (qemu_process.c:4616) ==19015== by 0x1DDF1807: qemuDomainObjStart (qemu_driver.c:7265) ==19015== by 0x1DDF1A66: qemuDomainCreateWithFlags (qemu_driver.c:7320) Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
-
- 02 4月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ján Tomko 提交于
In virDomainVirtioSerialAddrNext, add another controller if we've exhausted all ports of the existing controllers. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076708
-
由 Ján Tomko 提交于
Create a sorted array of virtio-serial controllers. Each of the elements contains the controller index and a bitmap of available ports. Buses are not tracked, because they aren't supported by QEMU.
-
- 23 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ján Tomko 提交于
It returns NULL on failure. Checking if the negation of it is less than zero makes no sense. (Found by coverity after moving the code) In another case, the return value wasn't checked at all.
-
- 21 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ján Tomko 提交于
Just code movement and rename.
-
- 14 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Roman Bogorodskiy 提交于
Move sharable PCI handling functions to domain_addr.[ch], and change theirs prefix from 'qemu' to 'vir': - virDomainPCIAddressAsString; - virDomainPCIAddressBusSetModel; - virDomainPCIAddressEnsureAddr; - virDomainPCIAddressFlagsCompatible; - virDomainPCIAddressGetNextSlot; - virDomainPCIAddressReleaseSlot; - virDomainPCIAddressReserveAddr; - virDomainPCIAddressReserveNextSlot; - virDomainPCIAddressReserveSlot; - virDomainPCIAddressSetFree; - virDomainPCIAddressSetGrow; - virDomainPCIAddressSlotInUse; - virDomainPCIAddressValidate; The only change here is function names, the implementation itself stays untouched. Extract common allocation code from DomainPCIAddressSetCreate into virDomainPCIAddressSetAlloc.
-