1. 25 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  2. 16 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  3. 15 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  4. 14 10月, 2019 2 次提交
  5. 13 9月, 2019 3 次提交
  6. 19 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  7. 10 4月, 2019 1 次提交
  8. 06 4月, 2019 1 次提交
  9. 03 4月, 2019 1 次提交
  10. 04 3月, 2019 2 次提交
  11. 22 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  12. 18 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  13. 14 12月, 2018 2 次提交
  14. 05 12月, 2018 1 次提交
  15. 14 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  16. 03 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • A
      Remove backslash alignment attempts · 3e7db8d3
      Andrea Bolognani 提交于
      Right-aligning backslashes when defining macros or using complex
      commands in Makefiles looks cute, but as soon as any changes is
      required to the code you end up with either distractingly broken
      alignment or unnecessarily big diffs where most of the changes
      are just pushing all backslashes a few characters to one side.
      
      Generated using
      
        $ git grep -El '[[:blank:]][[:blank:]]\\$' | \
          grep -E '*\.([chx]|am|mk)$$' | \
          while read f; do \
            sed -Ei 's/[[:blank:]]*[[:blank:]]\\$/ \\/g' "$f"; \
          done
      Signed-off-by: NAndrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
      3e7db8d3
  17. 20 5月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      util: Remove need for STATIC_ANALYSIS check · 4a718d6a
      John Ferlan 提交于
      Seems recent versions of Coverity have (mostly) resolved the issue using
      ternary operations in VIR_FREE (and now VIR_DISPOSE*) macros.  So let's
      just remove it and if necessary handle one off issues as the arise.
      4a718d6a
  18. 18 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  19. 16 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  20. 16 7月, 2014 1 次提交
    • E
      util: forbid freeing const pointers · a0b5ace2
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Now that we've finally fixed all the violators, it's time to
      enforce that any pointer to a const object is never freed (it
      is aliasing some other memory, where the non-const original
      should be freed instead).  Alas, the code still needs a normal
      vs. Coverity version, but at least we are still guaranteeing
      that the macro call evaluates its argument exactly once.
      
      I verified that we still get the following compiler warnings,
      which in turn halts the build thanks to -Werror on gcc (hmm,
      gcc 4.8.3's placement of the ^ for ?: type mismatch is a bit
      off, but that's not our problem):
      
          int oops1 = 0;
          VIR_FREE(oops1);
          const char *oops2 = NULL;
          VIR_FREE(oops2);
          struct blah { int dummy; } oops3;
          VIR_FREE(oops3);
      
      util/virauthconfig.c:159:35: error: pointer/integer type mismatch in conditional expression [-Werror]
           VIR_FREE(oops1);
                                         ^
      util/virauthconfig.c:161:5: error: passing argument 1 of 'virFree' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror]
           VIR_FREE(oops2);
           ^
      In file included from util/virauthconfig.c:28:0:
      util/viralloc.h:79:6: note: expected 'void *' but argument is of type 'const void *'
       void virFree(void *ptrptr) ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(1);
            ^
      util/virauthconfig.c:163:35: error: type mismatch in conditional expression
           VIR_FREE(oops3);
                                         ^
      
      * src/util/viralloc.h (VIR_FREE): No longer cast away const.
      * src/xenapi/xenapi_utils.c (xenSessionFree): Work around bogus
      header.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      a0b5ace2
  21. 02 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  22. 18 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  23. 10 7月, 2013 1 次提交
  24. 08 5月, 2013 1 次提交
    • E
      alloc: make VIR_APPEND_ELEMENT safer · ddcfc549
      Eric Blake 提交于
      VIR_APPEND_ELEMENT(array, size, elem) was not safe if the expression
      for 'size' had side effects.  While no one in the current code base
      was trying to pass side effects, we might as well be robust and
      explicitly document our intentions.
      
      * src/util/viralloc.c (virInsertElementsN): Add special case.
      * src/util/viralloc.h (VIR_APPEND_ELEMENT): Use it.
      (VIR_ALLOC, VIR_ALLOC_N, VIR_REALLOC_N, VIR_EXPAND_N)
      (VIR_RESIZE_N, VIR_SHRINK_N, VIR_INSERT_ELEMENT)
      (VIR_DELETE_ELEMENT, VIR_ALLOC_VAR, VIR_FREE): Document
      which macros are safe in the presence of side effects.
      * docs/hacking.html.in: Document this.
      * HACKING: Regenerate.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      ddcfc549
  25. 22 3月, 2013 1 次提交
    • M
      viralloc: Export virAllocTest* · 70bc623b
      Michal Privoznik 提交于
      If users build with --enable-test-oom configure option,
      they get this error saying, virAllocTest* functions are
      not defined within tests/testutils.c.
      70bc623b
  26. 07 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  27. 25 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  28. 23 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  29. 21 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  30. 11 12月, 2012 1 次提交
    • L
      util: add VIR_(APPEND|INSERT|DELETE)_ELEMENT · 85b22f52
      Laine Stump 提交于
      I noticed when writing the backend functions for virNetworkUpdate that
      I was repeating the same sequence of memmove, VIR_REALLOC, nXXX-- (and
      messed up the args to memmove at least once), and had seen the same
      sequence in a lot of other places, so I decided to write a few
      utility functions/macros - see the .h file for full documentation.
      
      The intent is to reduce the number of lines of code, but more
      importantly to eliminate the need to check the element size and
      element count arithmetic every time we need to do this (I *always*
      make at least one mistake.)
      
      VIR_INSERT_ELEMENT: insert one element at an arbitrary index within an
        array of objects. The size of each object is determined
        automatically by the macro using sizeof(*array). The new element's
        contents are copied into the inserted space, then the original copy
        of contents are 0'ed out (if everything else was
        successful). Compile-time assignment and size compatibility between
        the array and the new element is guaranteed (see explanation below
        [*])
      
      VIR_INSERT_ELEMENT_COPY: identical to VIR_INSERT_ELEMENT, except that
        the original contents of newelem are not cleared to 0 (i.e. a copy
        is made).
      
      VIR_APPEND_ELEMENT: This is just a special case of VIR_INSERT_ELEMENT
        that "inserts" one past the current last element.
      
      VIR_APPEND_ELEMENT_COPY: identical to VIR_APPEND_ELEMENT, except that
        the original contents of newelem are not cleared to 0 (i.e. a copy
        is made).
      
      VIR_DELETE_ELEMENT: delete one element at an arbitrary index within an
        array of objects. It's assumed that the element being deleted is
        already saved elsewhere (or cleared, if that's what is appropriate).
      
      All five of these macros have an _INPLACE variant, which skips the
      memory re-allocation of the array, assuming that the caller has
      already done it (when inserting) or will do it later (when deleting).
      
      Note that VIR_DELETE_ELEMENT* can return a failure, but only if an
      invalid index is given (index + amount to delete is > current array
      size), so in most cases you can safely ignore the return (that's why
      the helper function virDeleteElementsN isn't declared with
      ATTRIBUTE_RETURN_CHECK). A warning is logged if this ever happens,
      since it is surely a coding error.
      
      [*] One initial problem with the INSERT and APPEND macros was that,
      due to both the array pointer and newelem pointer being cast to void*
      when passing to virInsertElementsN(), any chance of type-checking was
      lost. If we were going to move in newelem with a memmove anyway, we
      would be no worse off for this. However, most current open-coded
      insert/append operations use direct struct assignment to move the new
      element into place (or just populate the new element directly) - thus
      use of the new macros would open a possibility for new usage errors
      that didn't exist before (e.g. accidentally sending &newelemptr rather
      than newelemptr - I actually did this quite a lot in my test
      conversions of existing code).
      
      But thanks to Eric Blake's clever thinking, I was able to modify the
      INSERT and APPEND macros so that they *do* check for both assignment
      and size compatibility of *ptr (an element in the array) and newelem
      (the element being copied into the new position of the array). This is
      done via clever use of the C89-guaranteed fact that the sizeof()
      operator must have *no* side effects (so an assignment inside sizeof()
      is checked for validity, but not actually evaluated), and the fact
      that virInsertElementsN has a "# of new elements" argument that we
      want to always be 1.
      85b22f52
  31. 21 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  32. 23 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • O
      Desert the FSF address in copyright · f9ce7dad
      Osier Yang 提交于
      Per the FSF address could be changed from time to time, and GNU
      recommends the following now: (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html)
      
        You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
        along with Foobar.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
      
      This patch removes the explicit FSF address, and uses above instead
      (of course, with inserting 'Lesser' before 'General').
      
      Except a bunch of files for security driver, all others are changed
      automatically, the copyright for securify files are not complete,
      that's why to do it manually:
      
        src/security/security_selinux.h
        src/security/security_driver.h
        src/security/security_selinux.c
        src/security/security_apparmor.h
        src/security/security_apparmor.c
        src/security/security_driver.c
      f9ce7dad
  33. 30 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  34. 26 4月, 2011 1 次提交
    • E
      build: make VIR_FREE do some type checking · 90d761ee
      Eric Blake 提交于
      We can exploit the fact that gcc warns about int-to-pointer conversion
      in ternary cond?(void*):(int) in order to prevent future mistakes of
      calling VIR_FREE on a scalar lvalue.  For example, between commits
      158ba873 and 802e2df9, we would have had this warning:
      
      cc1: warnings being treated as errors
      remote.c: In function 'remoteDispatchListNetworks':
      remote.c:3684:70: error: pointer/integer type mismatch in conditional expression
      
      There are still a number of places that malloc into a const char*;
      while it would probably be worth scrubbing them to use char*
      instead, that is a separate patch, so we have to cast away const
      in VIR_FREE for now.
      
      * src/util/memory.h (VIR_FREE): Make gcc warn about integers.
      Iteratively developed from a patch by Christophe Fergeau.
      90d761ee
  35. 03 2月, 2011 1 次提交
    • D
      Fix conflicts with glibc globals · de53effe
      Davidlohr Bueso 提交于
      When compiling libvirt with GCC 3.4.6 the following warning is being triggered quite a lot:
      
      util/memory.h:60: warning: declaration of 'remove' shadows a global declaration
      /usr/include/stdio.h:175: warning: shadowed declaration is here
      
      Fix this by renaming the parameter to 'toremove'.
      de53effe