Signed-off-by: NChris Lalancette <clalance@redhat.com>

* src/security/security_apparmor.c: unused variable in
  AppArmorSetSecurityAllLabel and unused parameter in
  AppArmorReleaseSecurityLabel

The current security driver architecture has the following
split of logic

 * domainGenSecurityLabel

    Allocate the unique label for the domain about to be started

 * domainGetSecurityLabel

    Retrieve the current live security label for a process

 * domainSetSecurityLabel

    Apply the previously allocated label to the current process
    Setup all disk image / device labelling

 * domainRestoreSecurityLabel

    Restore the original disk image / device labelling.
    Release the unique label for the domain

The 'domainSetSecurityLabel' method is special because it runs
in the context of the child process between the fork + exec.

This is require in order to set the process label. It is not
required in order to label disks/devices though. Having the
disk labelling code run in the child process limits what it
can do.

In particularly libvirtd would like to remember the current
disk image label, and only change shared image labels for the
first VM to start. This requires use & update of global state
in the libvirtd daemon, and thus cannot run in the child
process context.

The solution is to split domainSetSecurityLabel into two parts,
one applies process label, and the other handles disk image
labelling. At the same time domainRestoreSecurityLabel is
similarly split, just so that it matches the style. Thus the
previous 4 methods are replaced by the following 6 new methods

 * domainGenSecurityLabel

    Allocate the unique label for the domain about to be started
    No actual change here.

 * domainReleaseSecurityLabel

   Release the unique label for the domain

 * domainGetSecurityProcessLabel

   Retrieve the current live security label for a process
   Merely renamed for clarity.

 * domainSetSecurityProcessLabel

   Apply the previously allocated label to the current process

 * domainRestoreSecurityAllLabel

    Restore the original disk image / device labelling.

 * domainSetSecurityAllLabel

    Setup all disk image / device labelling

The SELinux and AppArmour drivers are then updated to comply with
this new spec. Notice that the AppArmour driver was actually a
little different. It was creating its profile for the disk image
and device labels in the 'domainGenSecurityLabel' method, where as
the SELinux driver did it in 'domainSetSecurityLabel'. With the
new method split, we can have consistency, with both drivers doing
that in the domainSetSecurityAllLabel method.

NB, the AppArmour changes here haven't been compiled so may not
build.

The QEMU driver is doing 90% of the calls to check for static vs
dynamic labelling. Except it is forgetting todo so in many places,
in particular hotplug is mistakenly assigning disk labels. Move
all this logic into the security drivers themselves, so the HV
drivers don't have to think about it.

* src/security/security_driver.h: Add virDomainObjPtr parameter
  to virSecurityDomainRestoreHostdevLabel and to
  virSecurityDomainRestoreSavedStateLabel
* src/security/security_selinux.c, src/security/security_apparmor.c:
  Add explicit checks for VIR_DOMAIN_SECLABEL_STATIC and skip all
  chcon() code in those cases
* src/qemu/qemu_driver.c: Remove all checks for VIR_DOMAIN_SECLABEL_STATIC
  or VIR_DOMAIN_SECLABEL_DYNAMIC. Add missing checks for possibly NULL
  driver entry points.

* src/security/security_apparmor.c: a few code cleanups following a
  review on the list

- Don't duplicate SystemError
- Use proper error code in domain_conf
- Fix a broken error call in qemu_conf
- Don't use VIR_ERR_ERROR in security driver (isn't a valid code in this case)

* configure.in: look for AppArmor and devel
* src/security/security_apparmor.[ch] src/security/security_driver.c
  src/Makefile.am: add and plug the new driver
* src/security/virt-aa-helper.c: new binary which is used exclusively by
  the AppArmor security driver to manipulate AppArmor.
* po/POTFILES.in: registers the new files
* tests/Makefile.am tests/secaatest.c tests/virt-aa-helper-test:
  tests for virt-aa-helper and the security driver, secaatest.c is
  identical to seclabeltest.c except it initializes the 'apparmor'
  driver instead of 'selinux'