1. 03 7月, 2019 3 次提交
    • M
      qemusecuritymock: Mock virProcessRunInFork · 0a9dcfab
      Michal Privoznik 提交于
      This test is beautiful. It checks if we haven't messed up
      refcounting on security labels (well, XATTRs where the original
      owner is stored). It does this by setting up tracking of XATTR
      setting/removing into a hash table, then calling
      qemuSecuritySetAllLabel() followed by immediate
      qemuSecurityRestoreAllLabel() at which point, the hash table must
      be empty. The test so beautifully written that no matter
      what you do it won't fail. The reason is that all seclabel work
      is done in a child process. Therefore, the hash table in the
      parent is never changed and thus always empty.
      
      There are two reasons for forking (only one of them makes sense
      here though):
      
      1) namespaces - when chown()-ing a file we have to fork() and
      make the child enter desired namespace,
      2) locking - because of exclusive access to XATTRs we lock the
      files we chown() and this is done in a fork (see 20786092 for
      more info).
      
      While we want to fork in real world, we don't want that in a test
      suite. Override virProcessRunInFork() then.
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDaniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
      0a9dcfab
    • M
      maint: Post-release version bump to 5.6.0 · d81d089e
      Michal Privoznik 提交于
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
      d81d089e
    • D
      Release of libvirt-5.5.0 · d828ca12
      Daniel Veillard 提交于
      * docs/news.xml: updated for the release
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
      d828ca12
  2. 02 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  3. 01 7月, 2019 5 次提交
  4. 29 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  5. 28 6月, 2019 2 次提交
  6. 27 6月, 2019 5 次提交
  7. 26 6月, 2019 23 次提交