Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 06 3月, 2010 2 次提交
  3. 16 2月, 2010 2 次提交
  5. 11 2月, 2010 2 次提交
  7. 29 11月, 2009 3 次提交
  9. 26 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  11. 19 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  13. 12 11月, 2009 1 次提交
    • E
      sysctl net: Remove unused binary sysctl code · f8572d8f
      由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于 
      Now that sys_sysctl is a compatiblity wrapper around /proc/sys
all sysctl strategy routines, and all ctl_name and strategy
entries in the sysctl tables are unused, and can be
revmoed.

In addition neigh_sysctl_register has been modified to no longer
take a strategy argument and it's callers have been modified not
to pass one.

Cc: "David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      f8572d8f
  15. 07 11月, 2009 1 次提交
    • A
      net/x25: push BKL usage into x25_proto · 91774904
      由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于 
      The x25 driver uses lock_kernel() implicitly through
its proto_ops wrapper. The makes the usage explicit
in order to get rid of that wrapper and to better document
the usage of the BKL.

The next step should be to get rid of the usage of the BKL
in x25 entirely, which requires understanding what data
structures need serialized accesses.

Cc: Henner Eisen <eis@baty.hanse.de>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-x25@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      91774904
  17. 06 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  19. 29 10月, 2009 1 次提交
  21. 13 10月, 2009 1 次提交
  23. 07 10月, 2009 1 次提交
  25. 01 10月, 2009 1 次提交
  27. 13 7月, 2009 1 次提交
  29. 18 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  31. 17 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  33. 16 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  35. 27 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  37. 14 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  39. 10 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  41. 01 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  43. 04 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      net: '&' redux · 6d9f239a
      由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于 
      I want to compile out proc_* and sysctl_* handlers totally and
stub them to NULL depending on config options, however usage of &
will prevent this, since taking adress of NULL pointer will break
compilation.

So, drop & in front of every ->proc_handler and every ->strategy
handler, it was never needed in fact.
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6d9f239a
  45. 20 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  47. 17 6月, 2008 2 次提交
  49. 26 3月, 2008 2 次提交
  51. 29 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  53. 01 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  55. 29 1月, 2008 5 次提交
  57. 04 1月, 2008 1 次提交
    • J
      [X25]: Add missing x25_neigh_put · 76975f8a
      由 Julia Lawall 提交于 
      The function x25_get_neigh increments a reference count.  At the point of
the second goto out, the result of calling x25_get_neigh is only stored in
a local variable, and thus no one outside the function will be able to
decrease the reference count.  Thus, x25_neigh_put should be called before
the return in this case.

The problem was found using the following semantic match.
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)

// <smpl>

@@
type T,T1,T2;
identifier E;
statement S;
expression x1,x2,x3;
int ret;
@@

  T E;
  ...
* if ((E = x25_get_neigh(...)) == NULL)
  S
  ... when != x25_neigh_put(...,(T1)E,...)
      when != if (E != NULL) { ... x25_neigh_put(...,(T1)E,...); ...}
      when != x1 = (T1)E
      when != E = x3;
      when any
  if (...) {
    ... when != x25_neigh_put(...,(T2)E,...)
        when != if (E != NULL) { ... x25_neigh_put(...,(T2)E,...); ...}
        when != x2 = (T2)E
(
*   return;
|
*   return ret;
)
  }
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      76975f8a