提交 0e3cf7e9 编写于 作者: D Denis Cheng 提交者: David S. Miller

[X25]: use LIST_HEAD instead of LIST_HEAD_INIT

single list_head variable initialized with LIST_HEAD_INIT could almost
always can be replaced with LIST_HEAD declaration, this shrinks the code
and looks better.
Signed-off-by: NDenis Cheng <crquan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 14d0e7b7
......@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <net/x25.h>
struct list_head x25_forward_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(x25_forward_list);
LIST_HEAD(x25_forward_list);
DEFINE_RWLOCK(x25_forward_list_lock);
int x25_forward_call(struct x25_address *dest_addr, struct x25_neigh *from,
......
......@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <net/x25.h>
static struct list_head x25_neigh_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(x25_neigh_list);
static LIST_HEAD(x25_neigh_list);
static DEFINE_RWLOCK(x25_neigh_list_lock);
static void x25_t20timer_expiry(unsigned long);
......
......@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <net/x25.h>
struct list_head x25_route_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(x25_route_list);
LIST_HEAD(x25_route_list);
DEFINE_RWLOCK(x25_route_list_lock);
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册