1. 27 8月, 2016 3 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Tidy reporting busy status during i915_gem_retire_requests() · f6407193
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      As we know by inspection whether any engine is still busy as we retire
      all the requests, we can pass that information back via return value
      rather than check again afterwards.
      
      v2: A little more polish missed in patch splitting
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160827075401.16470-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      f6407193
    • C
      drm/i915: Allow the user to pass a context to any ring · f7978a0c
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      With full-ppgtt, we want the user to have full control over their memory
      layout, with a separate instance per context. Forcing them to use a
      shared memory layout for !RCS not only duplicates the amount of work we
      have to do, but also defeats the memory segregation on offer.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160822080350.4964-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NThomas Daniel <thomas.daniel@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      f7978a0c
    • C
      drm/i915: Add GEN7_PCODE_MIN_FREQ_TABLE_GT_RATIO_OUT_OF_RANGE to SNB · 7850d1c3
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      According to the CI test machines, SNB also uses the
      GEN7_PCODE_MIN_FREQ_TABLE_GT_RATIO_OUT_OF_RANGE value to report a bad
      GEN6_PCODE_MIN_FREQ_TABLE request.
      
      [  157.744641] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 9238 at
      drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:7760 sandybridge_pcode_write+0x141/0x200 [i915]
      [  157.744642] Missing switch case (16) in gen6_check_mailbox_status
      [  157.744642] Modules linked in: snd_hda_intel i915 ax88179_178a usbnet mii x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_hda_core mei_me lpc_ich snd_pcm mei broadcom bcm_phy_lib tg3 ptp pps_core [last unloaded: vgem]
      [  157.744658] CPU: 5 PID: 9238 Comm: drv_hangman Tainted: G     U  W 4.8.0-rc3-CI-CI_DRM_1589+ #1
      [  157.744658] Hardware name: Dell Inc. XPS 8300  /0Y2MRG, BIOS A06 10/17/2011
      [  157.744659]  0000000000000000 ffff88011f093a98 ffffffff81426415 ffff88011f093ae8
      [  157.744662]  0000000000000000 ffff88011f093ad8 ffffffff8107d2a6 00001e50810d3c9f
      [  157.744663]  ffff880128680000 0000000000000008 0000000000000000 ffff88012868a650
      [  157.744665] Call Trace:
      [  157.744669]  [<ffffffff81426415>] dump_stack+0x67/0x92
      [  157.744672]  [<ffffffff8107d2a6>] __warn+0xc6/0xe0
      [  157.744673]  [<ffffffff8107d30a>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4a/0x50
      [  157.744685]  [<ffffffffa0029831>] sandybridge_pcode_write+0x141/0x200 [i915]
      [  157.744697]  [<ffffffffa002a88a>] intel_enable_gt_powersave+0x64a/0x1330 [i915]
      [  157.744712]  [<ffffffffa006b4cb>] ? i9xx_emit_request+0x1b/0x80 [i915]
      [  157.744725]  [<ffffffffa0055ed3>] __i915_add_request+0x1e3/0x370 [i915]
      [  157.744738]  [<ffffffffa00428bd>] i915_gem_do_execbuffer.isra.16+0xced/0x1b80 [i915]
      [  157.744740]  [<ffffffff811a232e>] ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
      [  157.744752]  [<ffffffffa0043b72>] i915_gem_execbuffer2+0xc2/0x2a0 [i915]
      [  157.744753]  [<ffffffff815485b7>] drm_ioctl+0x207/0x4c0
      [  157.744765]  [<ffffffffa0043ab0>] ? i915_gem_execbuffer+0x360/0x360 [i915]
      [  157.744767]  [<ffffffff810ea4ad>] ?  debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled+0x1d/0x20
      [  157.744769]  [<ffffffff811fe09e>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x8e/0x680
      [  157.744770]  [<ffffffff811a2377>] ? __might_fault+0x87/0x90
      [  157.744771]  [<ffffffff811a232e>] ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
      [  157.744773]  [<ffffffff810d3df2>] ?  trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x122/0x1b0
      [  157.744774]  [<ffffffff811fe6cc>] SyS_ioctl+0x3c/0x70
      [  157.744776]  [<ffffffff8180fe69>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xac
      
      Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97491
      Fixes: 87660502 ("drm/i915/gen6+: Interpret mailbox error flags")
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com>
      Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
      Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160826105926.3413-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukAcked-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
      7850d1c3
  2. 26 8月, 2016 2 次提交
  3. 25 8月, 2016 6 次提交
  4. 24 8月, 2016 8 次提交
  5. 23 8月, 2016 18 次提交
  6. 22 8月, 2016 3 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Fix nesting of filelist_mutex vs struct_mutex in i915_ppgtt_info · 637ee29e
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      An unlikely ABBA deadlock in debugfs that no one has reported.
      
      [  284.922349] ======================================================
      [  284.922355] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
      [  284.922361] 4.8.0-rc2+ #430 Tainted: G        W
      [  284.922366] -------------------------------------------------------
      [  284.922371] cat/1197 is trying to acquire lock:
      [  284.922376]  (&dev->filelist_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0055ba2>] i915_ppgtt_info+0x82/0x390 [i915]
      [  284.922423]
      [  284.922423] but task is already holding lock:
      [  284.922429]  (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0055b55>] i915_ppgtt_info+0x35/0x390 [i915]
      [  284.922465]
      [  284.922465] which lock already depends on the new lock.
      [  284.922465]
      [  284.922471]
      [  284.922471] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
      [  284.922477]
      -> #1 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}:
      [  284.922493]        [<ffffffff81087710>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
      [  284.922505]        [<ffffffff8143e96f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5f/0x360
      [  284.922520]        [<ffffffffa004f877>] print_context_stats+0x37/0xf0 [i915]
      [  284.922549]        [<ffffffffa00535f5>] i915_gem_object_info+0x265/0x490 [i915]
      [  284.922581]        [<ffffffff81144491>] seq_read+0xe1/0x3b0
      [  284.922592]        [<ffffffff811f77b3>] full_proxy_read+0x83/0xb0
      [  284.922604]        [<ffffffff8111ba03>] __vfs_read+0x23/0x110
      [  284.922616]        [<ffffffff8111c9b9>] vfs_read+0x89/0x110
      [  284.922626]        [<ffffffff8111dbf4>] SyS_read+0x44/0xa0
      [  284.922636]        [<ffffffff81442be9>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xac
      [  284.922648]
      -> #0 (&dev->filelist_mutex){+.+...}:
      [  284.922667]        [<ffffffff810871fc>] __lock_acquire+0x10fc/0x1270
      [  284.922678]        [<ffffffff81087710>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
      [  284.922689]        [<ffffffff8143e96f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5f/0x360
      [  284.922701]        [<ffffffffa0055ba2>] i915_ppgtt_info+0x82/0x390 [i915]
      [  284.922729]        [<ffffffff81144491>] seq_read+0xe1/0x3b0
      [  284.922739]        [<ffffffff811f77b3>] full_proxy_read+0x83/0xb0
      [  284.922750]        [<ffffffff8111ba03>] __vfs_read+0x23/0x110
      [  284.922761]        [<ffffffff8111c9b9>] vfs_read+0x89/0x110
      [  284.922771]        [<ffffffff8111dbf4>] SyS_read+0x44/0xa0
      [  284.922781]        [<ffffffff81442be9>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xac
      [  284.922793]
      [  284.922793] other info that might help us debug this:
      [  284.922793]
      [  284.922809]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      [  284.922809]
      [  284.922818]        CPU0                    CPU1
      [  284.922825]        ----                    ----
      [  284.922831]   lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
      [  284.922842]                                lock(&dev->filelist_mutex);
      [  284.922854]                                lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
      [  284.922865]   lock(&dev->filelist_mutex);
      [  284.922875]
      [  284.922875]  *** DEADLOCK ***
      [  284.922875]
      [  284.922888] 3 locks held by cat/1197:
      [  284.922895]  #0:  (debugfs_srcu){......}, at: [<ffffffff811f7730>] full_proxy_read+0x0/0xb0
      [  284.922919]  #1:  (&p->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811443e8>] seq_read+0x38/0x3b0
      [  284.922942]  #2:  (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0055b55>] i915_ppgtt_info+0x35/0x390 [i915]
      [  284.922983]
      
      Fixes: 1d2ac403 ("drm: Protect dev->filelist with its own mutex")
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160822132820.21725-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      637ee29e
    • C
      drm/i915: Ignore stuck requests when considering hangs · 34730fed
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      If the engine isn't being retired (worker starvation?) then it is
      possible for us to repeatedly observe that between consecutive
      hangchecks the seqno on the ring to be the same and there remain
      unretired requests. Ignore these completely and only regard the engine
      as busy for the purpose of hang detection (not stall detection) if there
      are outstanding breadcrumbs.
      
      In recent history we have looked at using both the request and seqno as
      indication of activity on the engine, but that was reduced to just
      inspecting seqno in commit cffa781e ("drm/i915: Simplify check for
      idleness in hangcheck"). However, in commit dcff85c8 ("drm/i915:
      Enable i915_gem_wait_for_idle() without holding struct_mutex"), I made
      the decision to use the new common lockless function, under the
      assumption that request retirement was more frequent than hangcheck and
      so we would not have a stuck busy check. The flaw there was in
      forgetting that we accumulate the hang score, and so successive checks
      seeing a stuck request, albeit with the GPU advancing elsewhere and so
      not necessary the same stuck request, would eventually trigger the hang.
      
      Fixes: dcff85c8 ("drm/i915: Enable i915_gem_wait_for_idle()...")
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160820145408.32180-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
      34730fed
    • C
      drm/i915: Allow DMA pagetables to use highmem · bb8f9cff
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      As we never need to directly access the pages we allocate for scratch and
      the pagetables, and always remap them into the GTT through the dma
      remapper, we do not need to limit the allocations to lowmem i.e. we can
      pass in the __GFP_HIGHMEM flag to the page allocation.
      
      For backwards compatibility, e.g. certain old GPUs not liking highmem
      for certain functions that may be accidentally mapped to the scratch
      page by userspace, keep the GMCH probe as only allocating from DMA32.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160822074431.26872-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
      bb8f9cff