Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 07 5月, 2020 2 次提交
  3. 05 5月, 2020 1 次提交
    • T
      iocost: protect iocg->abs_vdebt with iocg->waitq.lock · 0b80f986
      由 Tejun Heo 提交于 
      abs_vdebt is an atomic_64 which tracks how much over budget a given cgroup
is and controls the activation of use_delay mechanism. Once a cgroup goes
over budget from forced IOs, it has to pay it back with its future budget.
The progress guarantee on debt paying comes from the iocg being active -
active iocgs are processed by the periodic timer, which ensures that as time
passes the debts dissipate and the iocg returns to normal operation.

However, both iocg activation and vdebt handling are asynchronous and a
sequence like the following may happen.

1. The iocg is in the process of being deactivated by the periodic timer.

2. A bio enters ioc_rqos_throttle(), calls iocg_activate() which returns
   without anything because it still sees that the iocg is already active.

3. The iocg is deactivated.

4. The bio from #2 is over budget but needs to be forced. It increases
   abs_vdebt and goes over the threshold and enables use_delay.

5. IO control is enabled for the iocg's subtree and now IOs are attributed
   to the descendant cgroups and the iocg itself no longer issues IOs.

This leaves the iocg with stuck abs_vdebt - it has debt but inactive and no
further IOs which can activate it. This can end up unduly punishing all the
descendants cgroups.

The usual throttling path has the same issue - the iocg must be active while
throttled to ensure that future event will wake it up - and solves the
problem by synchronizing the throttling path with a spinlock. abs_vdebt
handling is another form of overage handling and shares a lot of
characteristics including the fact that it isn't in the hottest path.

This patch fixes the above and other possible races by strictly
synchronizing abs_vdebt and use_delay handling with iocg->waitq.lock.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: NVlad Dmitriev <vvd@fb.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4+
Fixes: e1518f63 ("blk-iocost: Don't let merges push vtime into the future")
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      0b80f986
  5. 01 5月, 2020 1 次提交
  7. 30 4月, 2020 1 次提交
  9. 27 4月, 2020 1 次提交
    • N
      nvme: prevent double free in nvme_alloc_ns() error handling · 132be623
      由 Niklas Cassel 提交于 
      When jumping to the out_put_disk label, we will call put_disk(), which will
trigger a call to disk_release(), which calls blk_put_queue().

Later in the cleanup code, we do blk_cleanup_queue(), which will also call
blk_put_queue().

Putting the queue twice is incorrect, and will generate a KASAN splat.

Set the disk->queue pointer to NULL, before calling put_disk(), so that the
first call to blk_put_queue() will not free the queue.

The second call to blk_put_queue() uses another pointer to the same queue,
so this call will still free the queue.

Fixes: 85136c01 ("lightnvm: simplify geometry enumeration")
Signed-off-by: NNiklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      132be623
  11. 23 4月, 2020 2 次提交
    • D
      null_blk: Cleanup zoned device initialization · d205bde7
      由 Damien Le Moal 提交于 
      Move all zoned mode related code from null_blk_main.c to
null_blk_zoned.c, avoiding an ugly #ifdef in the process.
Rename null_zone_init() into null_init_zoned_dev(), null_zone_exit()
into null_free_zoned_dev() and add the new function
null_register_zoned_dev() to finalize the zoned dev setup before
add_disk().
Signed-off-by: NDamien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      d205bde7
    • D
      null_blk: Fix zoned command handling · 9dd44c7e
      由 Damien Le Moal 提交于 
      For write operations issued to a null_blk device with zoned mode
enabled, the state and write pointer position of the zone targeted by
the command should be checked before badblocks and memory backing
are handled as the write may be first failed due to, for instance, a
sector position not aligned with the zone write pointer. This order of
checking for errors reflects more accuratly the behavior of physical
zoned devices.

Furthermore, the write pointer position of the target zone should be
incremented only and only if no errors are reported by badblocks and
memory backing handling.

To fix this, introduce the small helper function null_process_cmd()
which execute null_handle_badblocks() and null_handle_memory_backed()
and use this function in null_zone_write() to correctly handle write
requests to zoned null devices depending on the type and state of the
write target zone. Also call this function in null_handle_zoned() to
process read requests to zoned null devices.

null_process_cmd() is called directly from null_handle_cmd() for
regular null devices, resulting in no functional change for these type
of devices. To have symmetric names, the function null_handle_zoned()
is renamed to null_process_zoned_cmd().
Signed-off-by: NDamien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NChaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      9dd44c7e
  13. 21 4月, 2020 2 次提交
  15. 20 4月, 2020 1 次提交
    • D
      bdev: Reduce time holding bd_mutex in sync in blkdev_close() · b849dd84
      由 Douglas Anderson 提交于 
      While trying to "dd" to the block device for a USB stick, I
encountered a hung task warning (blocked for > 120 seconds).  I
managed to come up with an easy way to reproduce this on my system
(where /dev/sdb is the block device for my USB stick) with:

  while true; do dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=4M; done

With my reproduction here are the relevant bits from the hung task
detector:

 INFO: task udevd:294 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
 ...
 udevd           D    0   294      1 0x00400008
 Call trace:
  ...
  mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x50
  __blkdev_get+0x7c/0x3d4
  blkdev_get+0x118/0x138
  blkdev_open+0x94/0xa8
  do_dentry_open+0x268/0x3a0
  vfs_open+0x34/0x40
  path_openat+0x39c/0xdf4
  do_filp_open+0x90/0x10c
  do_sys_open+0x150/0x3c8
  ...

 ...
 Showing all locks held in the system:
 ...
 1 lock held by dd/2798:
  #0: ffffff814ac1a3b8 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}, at: __blkdev_put+0x50/0x204
 ...
 dd              D    0  2798   2764 0x00400208
 Call trace:
  ...
  schedule+0x8c/0xbc
  io_schedule+0x1c/0x40
  wait_on_page_bit_common+0x238/0x338
  __lock_page+0x5c/0x68
  write_cache_pages+0x194/0x500
  generic_writepages+0x64/0xa4
  blkdev_writepages+0x24/0x30
  do_writepages+0x48/0xa8
  __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xac/0xd8
  filemap_write_and_wait+0x30/0x84
  __blkdev_put+0x88/0x204
  blkdev_put+0xc4/0xe4
  blkdev_close+0x28/0x38
  __fput+0xe0/0x238
  ____fput+0x1c/0x28
  task_work_run+0xb0/0xe4
  do_notify_resume+0xfc0/0x14bc
  work_pending+0x8/0x14

The problem appears related to the fact that my USB disk is terribly
slow and that I have a lot of RAM in my system to cache things.
Specifically my writes seem to be happening at ~15 MB/s and I've got
~4 GB of RAM in my system that can be used for buffering.  To write 4
GB of buffer to disk thus takes ~4000 MB / ~15 MB/s = ~267 seconds.

The 267 second number is a problem because in __blkdev_put() we call
sync_blockdev() while holding the bd_mutex.  Any other callers who
want the bd_mutex will be blocked for the whole time.

The problem is made worse because I believe blkdev_put() specifically
tells other tasks (namely udev) to go try to access the device at right
around the same time we're going to hold the mutex for a long time.

Putting some traces around this (after disabling the hung task detector),
I could confirm:
 dd:    437.608600: __blkdev_put() right before sync_blockdev() for sdb
 udevd: 437.623901: blkdev_open() right before blkdev_get() for sdb
 dd:    661.468451: __blkdev_put() right after sync_blockdev() for sdb
 udevd: 663.820426: blkdev_open() right after blkdev_get() for sdb

A simple fix for this is to realize that sync_blockdev() works fine if
you're not holding the mutex.  Also, it's not the end of the world if
you sync a little early (though it can have performance impacts).
Thus we can make a guess that we're going to need to do the sync and
then do it without holding the mutex.  We still do one last sync with
the mutex but it should be much, much faster.

With this, my hung task warnings for my test case are gone.
Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: NGuenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      b849dd84
  17. 18 4月, 2020 14 次提交
  19. 17 4月, 2020 15 次提交