Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 26 3月, 2018 2 次提交
  3. 29 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 25 1月, 2018 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: fix stale entries in readdir · e4fd493c
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      In fixing the readdir+pagefault deadlock I accidentally introduced a
stale entry regression in readdir.  If we get close to full for the
temporary buffer, and then skip a few delayed deletions, and then try to
add another entry that won't fit, we will emit the entries we found and
retry.  Unfortunately we delete entries from our del_list as we find
them, assuming we won't need them.  However our pos will be with
whatever our last entry was, which could be before the delayed deletions
we skipped, so the next search will add the deleted entries back into
our readdir buffer.  So instead don't delete entries we find in our
del_list so we can make sure we always find our delayed deletions.  This
is a slight perf hit for readdir with lots of pending deletions, but
hopefully this isn't a common occurrence.  If it is we can revist this
and optimize it.

cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 23b5ec74 ("btrfs: fix readdir deadlock with pagefault")
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      e4fd493c
  7. 22 1月, 2018 2 次提交
  9. 03 1月, 2018 1 次提交
    • C
      btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_nodes · ec35e48b
      由 Chris Mason 提交于 
      refcounts have a generic implementation and an asm optimized one.  The
generic version has extra debugging to make sure that once a refcount
goes to zero, refcount_inc won't increase it.

The btrfs delayed inode code wasn't expecting this, and we're tripping
over the warnings when the generic refcounts are used.  We ended up with
this race:

Process A                                         Process B
                                                  btrfs_get_delayed_node()
						  spin_lock(root->inode_lock)
						  radix_tree_lookup()
__btrfs_release_delayed_node()
refcount_dec_and_test(&delayed_node->refs)
our refcount is now zero
						  refcount_add(2) <---
						  warning here, refcount
                                                  unchanged

spin_lock(root->inode_lock)
radix_tree_delete()

With the generic refcounts, we actually warn again when process B above
tries to release his refcount because refcount_add() turned into a
no-op.

We saw this in production on older kernels without the asm optimized
refcounts.

The fix used here is to use refcount_inc_not_zero() to detect when the
object is in the middle of being freed and return NULL.  This is almost
always the right answer anyway, since we usually end up pitching the
delayed_node if it didn't have fresh data in it.

This also changes __btrfs_release_delayed_node() to remove the extra
check for zero refcounts before radix tree deletion.
btrfs_get_delayed_node() was the only path that was allowing refcounts
to go from zero to one.

Fixes: 6de5f18e ("btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_node")
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.12+
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      ec35e48b
  11. 02 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • J
      btrfs: make the delalloc block rsv per inode · 69fe2d75
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      The way we handle delalloc metadata reservations has gotten
progressively more complicated over the years.  There is so much cruft
and weirdness around keeping the reserved count and outstanding counters
consistent and handling the error cases that it's impossible to
understand.

Fix this by making the delalloc block rsv per-inode.  This way we can
calculate the actual size of the outstanding metadata reservations every
time we make a change, and then reserve the delta based on that amount.
This greatly simplifies the code everywhere, and makes the error
handling in btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata far less terrifying.
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      69fe2d75
  13. 18 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  15. 18 4月, 2017 2 次提交
  17. 28 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  19. 14 2月, 2017 14 次提交
  21. 14 12月, 2016 1 次提交
    • M
      btrfs: limit async_work allocation and worker func duration · 2939e1a8
      由 Maxim Patlasov 提交于 
      Problem statement: unprivileged user who has read-write access to more than
one btrfs subvolume may easily consume all kernel memory (eventually
triggering oom-killer).

Reproducer (./mkrmdir below essentially loops over mkdir/rmdir):

[root@kteam1 ~]# cat prep.sh

DEV=/dev/sdb
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
mount $DEV /mnt
for i in `seq 1 16`
do
	mkdir /mnt/$i
	btrfs subvolume create /mnt/SV_$i
	ID=`btrfs subvolume list /mnt |grep "SV_$i$" |cut -d ' ' -f 2`
	mount -t btrfs -o subvolid=$ID $DEV /mnt/$i
	chmod a+rwx /mnt/$i
done

[root@kteam1 ~]# sh prep.sh

[maxim@kteam1 ~]$ for i in `seq 1 16`; do ./mkrmdir /mnt/$i 2000 2000 & done

[root@kteam1 ~]# for i in `seq 1 4`; do grep "kmalloc-128" /proc/slabinfo | grep -v dma; sleep 60; done
kmalloc-128        10144  10144    128   32    1 : tunables    0    0    0 : slabdata    317    317      0
kmalloc-128       9992352 9992352    128   32    1 : tunables    0    0    0 : slabdata 312261 312261      0
kmalloc-128       24226752 24226752    128   32    1 : tunables    0    0    0 : slabdata 757086 757086      0
kmalloc-128       42754240 42754240    128   32    1 : tunables    0    0    0 : slabdata 1336070 1336070      0

The huge numbers above come from insane number of async_work-s allocated
and queued by btrfs_wq_run_delayed_node.

The problem is caused by btrfs_wq_run_delayed_node() queuing more and more
works if the number of delayed items is above BTRFS_DELAYED_BACKGROUND. The
worker func (btrfs_async_run_delayed_root) processes at least
BTRFS_DELAYED_BATCH items (if they are present in the list). So, the machinery
works as expected while the list is almost empty. As soon as it is getting
bigger, worker func starts to process more than one item at a time, it takes
longer, and the chances to have async_works queued more than needed is getting
higher.

The problem above is worsened by another flaw of delayed-inode implementation:
if async_work was queued in a throttling branch (number of items >=
BTRFS_DELAYED_WRITEBACK), corresponding worker func won't quit until
the number of items < BTRFS_DELAYED_BACKGROUND / 2. So, it is possible that
the func occupies CPU infinitely (up to 30sec in my experiments): while the
func is trying to drain the list, the user activity may add more and more
items to the list.

The patch fixes both problems in straightforward way: refuse queuing too
many works in btrfs_wq_run_delayed_node and bail out of worker func if
at least BTRFS_DELAYED_WRITEBACK items are processed.

Changed in v2: remove support of thresh == NO_THRESHOLD.
Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.15+
      2939e1a8
  23. 06 12月, 2016 5 次提交
  25. 30 11月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      btrfs: increment ctx->pos for every emitted or skipped dirent in readdir · d2fbb2b5
      由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于 
      If we process the last item in the leaf and hit an I/O error while
reading the next leaf, we return -EIO without having adjusted the
position.  Since we have emitted dirents, getdents() will return
the byte count to the user instead of the error.  Subsequent callers
will emit the last successful dirent again, and return -EIO again,
with the same result.  Callers loop forever.

Instead, if we always increment ctx->pos after emitting or skipping
the dirent, we'll be sure that we won't hit the same one again.  When
we go to process the next leaf, we won't have emitted any dirents
and the -EIO will be returned to the user properly.  We also don't
need to track if we've emitted a dirent already or if we've changed
the position yet.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      d2fbb2b5
  27. 27 9月, 2016 2 次提交
  29. 26 9月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: add a flags field to btrfs_fs_info · afcdd129
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      We have a lot of random ints in btrfs_fs_info that can be put into flags.  This
is mostly equivalent with the exception of how we deal with quota going on or
off, now instead we set a flag when we are turning it on or off and deal with
that appropriately, rather than just having a pending state that the current
quota_enabled gets set to.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      afcdd129
  31. 26 7月, 2016 2 次提交
    • J
      btrfs: btrfs_abort_transaction, drop root parameter · 66642832
      由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于 
      __btrfs_abort_transaction doesn't use its root parameter except to
obtain an fs_info pointer.  We can obtain that from trans->root->fs_info
for now and from trans->fs_info in a later patch.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      66642832
    • N
      btrfs: Fix slab accounting flags · fba4b697
      由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于 
      BTRFS is using a variety of slab caches to satisfy internal needs.
Those slab caches are always allocated with the SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT,
meaning allocations from the caches are going to be accounted as
SReclaimable. At the same time btrfs is not registering any shrinkers
whatsoever, thus preventing memory from the slabs to be shrunk. This
means those caches are not in fact reclaimable.

To fix this remove the SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT on all caches apart from the
inode cache, since this one is being freed by the generic VFS super_block
shrinker. Also set the transaction related caches as SLAB_TEMPORARY,
to better document the lifetime of the objects (it just translates
to SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT).
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      fba4b697
  33. 08 7月, 2016 2 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: change delayed reservation fallback behavior · c48f49d6
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      We reserve space for the inode update when we first reserve space for writing to
a file.  However there are lots of ways that we can use this reservation and not
have it for subsequent ordered extents.  Previously we'd fall through and try to
reserve metadata bytes for this, then we'd just steal the full reservation from
the delalloc_block_rsv, and if that didn't have enough space we'd steal the full
reservation from the global reserve.  The problem with this is we can easily
just return ENOSPC and fallback to updating the inode item directly.  In the
worst case (assuming 4k nodesize) we'd steal 64kib from the global reserve if we
fall all the way through, however if we just fallback and update the inode
directly we'd only steal 4k * BTRFS_PATH_MAX in the worst case which is 32kib.

We would have also just added the extent item for the inode so we likely will
have already cow'ed down most of the way to the leaf containing the inode item,
so we are more often than not only need one or two nodesize's worth of
reservations.  Given the reservation for the extent itself is also a worst case
we will likely already have space to cover the inode update.

This change will make us behave better in the theoretical worst case, and much
better in the case that we don't have our reservation and cannot reserve more
metadata.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      c48f49d6
    • J
      Btrfs: fix callers of btrfs_block_rsv_migrate · 25d609f8
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      So btrfs_block_rsv_migrate just unconditionally calls block_rsv_migrate_bytes.
Not only this but it unconditionally changes the size of the block_rsv.  This
isn't a bug strictly speaking, but it makes truncate block rsv's look funny
because every time we migrate bytes over its size grows, even though we only
want it to be a specific size.  So collapse this into one function that takes an
update_size argument and make truncate and evict not update the size for
consistency sake.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      25d609f8