Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 26 3月, 2018 18 次提交
  3. 16 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 15 3月, 2018 2 次提交
    • E
      btrfs: add missing initialization in btrfs_check_shared · 18bf591b
      由 Edmund Nadolski 提交于 
      This patch addresses an issue that causes fiemap to falsely
report a shared extent.  The test case is as follows:

xfs_io -f -d -c "pwrite -b 16k 0 64k" -c "fiemap -v" /media/scratch/file5
sync
xfs_io  -c "fiemap -v" /media/scratch/file5

which gives the resulting output:

wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
64 KiB, 4 ops; 0.0000 sec (121.359 MiB/sec and 7766.9903 ops/sec)
/media/scratch/file5:
 EXT: FILE-OFFSET      BLOCK-RANGE      TOTAL FLAGS
   0: [0..127]:        24576..24703       128 0x2001
/media/scratch/file5:
 EXT: FILE-OFFSET      BLOCK-RANGE      TOTAL FLAGS
   0: [0..127]:        24576..24703       128   0x1

This is because btrfs_check_shared calls find_parent_nodes
repeatedly in a loop, passing a share_check struct to report
the count of shared extent. But btrfs_check_shared does not
re-initialize the count value to zero for subsequent calls
from the loop, resulting in a false share count value. This
is a regressive behavior from 4.13.

With proper re-initialization the test result is as follows:

wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
64 KiB, 4 ops; 0.0000 sec (110.035 MiB/sec and 7042.2535 ops/sec)
/media/scratch/file5:
 EXT: FILE-OFFSET      BLOCK-RANGE      TOTAL FLAGS
   0: [0..127]:        24576..24703       128   0x1
/media/scratch/file5:
 EXT: FILE-OFFSET      BLOCK-RANGE      TOTAL FLAGS
   0: [0..127]:        24576..24703       128   0x1

which corrects the regression.

Fixes: 3ec4d323 ("btrfs: allow backref search checks for shared extents")
Signed-off-by: NEdmund Nadolski <enadolski@suse.com>
[ add text from cover letter to changelog ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      18bf591b
    • D
      btrfs: Fix NULL pointer exception in find_bio_stripe · 047fdea6
      由 Dmitriy Gorokh 提交于 
      On detaching of a disk which is a part of a RAID6 filesystem, the
following kernel OOPS may happen:

[63122.680461] BTRFS error (device sdo): bdev /dev/sdo errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 1, corrupt 0, gen 0
[63122.719584] BTRFS warning (device sdo): lost page write due to IO error on /dev/sdo
[63122.719587] BTRFS error (device sdo): bdev /dev/sdo errs: wr 1, rd 0, flush 1, corrupt 0, gen 0
[63122.803516] BTRFS warning (device sdo): lost page write due to IO error on /dev/sdo
[63122.803519] BTRFS error (device sdo): bdev /dev/sdo errs: wr 2, rd 0, flush 1, corrupt 0, gen 0
[63122.863902] BTRFS critical (device sdo): fatal error on device /dev/sdo
[63122.935338] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000080
[63122.946554] IP: fail_bio_stripe+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs]
[63122.958185] PGD 9ecda067 P4D 9ecda067 PUD b2b37067 PMD 0
[63122.971202] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
[63123.006760] CPU: 0 PID: 3979 Comm: kworker/u8:9 Tainted: G W 4.14.2-16-scst34x+ #8
[63123.007091] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006
[63123.007402] Workqueue: btrfs-worker btrfs_worker_helper [btrfs]
[63123.007595] task: ffff880036ea4040 task.stack: ffffc90006384000
[63123.007796] RIP: 0010:fail_bio_stripe+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs]
[63123.007968] RSP: 0018:ffffc90006387ad8 EFLAGS: 00010287
[63123.008140] RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff88004beaa0b8 RCX: ffff8800b2bd5690
[63123.008359] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88007bb43500 RDI: ffff88004beaa000
[63123.008621] RBP: ffffc90006387ae8 R08: 0000000099100000 R09: ffff8800b2bd5600
[63123.008840] R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000010000 R12: ffff88007bb43500
[63123.009059] R13: 00000000fffffffb R14: ffff880036fc5180 R15: 0000000000000004
[63123.009278] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8800b7000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[63123.009564] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[63123.009748] CR2: 0000000000000080 CR3: 00000000b0866000 CR4: 00000000000406f0
[63123.009969] Call Trace:
[63123.010085] raid_write_end_io+0x7e/0x80 [btrfs]
[63123.010251] bio_endio+0xa1/0x120
[63123.010378] generic_make_request+0x218/0x270
[63123.010921] submit_bio+0x66/0x130
[63123.011073] finish_rmw+0x3fc/0x5b0 [btrfs]
[63123.011245] full_stripe_write+0x96/0xc0 [btrfs]
[63123.011428] raid56_parity_write+0x117/0x170 [btrfs]
[63123.011604] btrfs_map_bio+0x2ec/0x320 [btrfs]
[63123.011759] ? ___cache_free+0x1c5/0x300
[63123.011909] __btrfs_submit_bio_done+0x26/0x50 [btrfs]
[63123.012087] run_one_async_done+0x9c/0xc0 [btrfs]
[63123.012257] normal_work_helper+0x19e/0x300 [btrfs]
[63123.012429] btrfs_worker_helper+0x12/0x20 [btrfs]
[63123.012656] process_one_work+0x14d/0x350
[63123.012888] worker_thread+0x4d/0x3a0
[63123.013026] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x15/0x20
[63123.013192] kthread+0x109/0x140
[63123.013315] ? process_scheduled_works+0x40/0x40
[63123.013472] ? kthread_stop+0x110/0x110
[63123.013610] ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30
[63123.014469] RIP: fail_bio_stripe+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] RSP: ffffc90006387ad8
[63123.014678] CR2: 0000000000000080
[63123.016590] ---[ end trace a295ea7259c17880 ]—

This is reproducible in a cycle, where a series of writes is followed by
SCSI device delete command. The test may take up to few minutes.

Fixes: 74d46992 ("block: replace bi_bdev with a gendisk pointer and partitions index")
[ no signed-off-by provided ]
Author: Dmitriy Gorokh <Dmitriy.Gorokh@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      047fdea6
  7. 01 3月, 2018 8 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix log replay failure after unlink and link combination · 1f250e92
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      If we have a file with 2 (or more) hard links in the same directory,
remove one of the hard links, create a new file (or link an existing file)
in the same directory with the name of the removed hard link, and then
finally fsync the new file, we end up with a log that fails to replay,
causing a mount failure.

Example:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt

  $ mkdir /mnt/testdir
  $ touch /mnt/testdir/foo
  $ ln /mnt/testdir/foo /mnt/testdir/bar

  $ sync

  $ unlink /mnt/testdir/bar
  $ touch /mnt/testdir/bar
  $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/testdir/bar

  <power failure>

  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
  mount: mount(2) failed: /mnt: No such file or directory

When replaying the log, for that example, we also see the following in
dmesg/syslog:

  [71813.671307] BTRFS info (device dm-0): failed to delete reference to bar, inode 258 parent 257
  [71813.674204] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [71813.675694] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2)
  [71813.677236] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 13231 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:4128 __btrfs_unlink_inode+0x17b/0x355 [btrfs]
  [71813.679669] Modules linked in: btrfs xfs f2fs dm_flakey dm_mod dax ghash_clmulni_intel ppdev pcbc aesni_intel aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd glue_helper evdev psmouse i2c_piix4 parport_pc i2c_core pcspkr sg serio_raw parport button sunrpc loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 zstd_decompress zstd_compress xxhash raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic raid1 raid0 multipath linear md_mod ata_generic sd_mod virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring crc32c_intel floppy virtio e1000 scsi_mod [last unloaded: btrfs]
  [71813.679669] CPU: 1 PID: 13231 Comm: mount Tainted: G        W        4.15.0-rc9-btrfs-next-56+ #1
  [71813.679669] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.10.2-0-g5f4c7b1-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
  [71813.679669] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_unlink_inode+0x17b/0x355 [btrfs]
  [71813.679669] RSP: 0018:ffffc90001cef738 EFLAGS: 00010286
  [71813.679669] RAX: 0000000000000025 RBX: ffff880217ce4708 RCX: 0000000000000001
  [71813.679669] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff81c14bae RDI: 00000000ffffffff
  [71813.679669] RBP: ffffc90001cef7c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
  [71813.679669] R10: ffffc90001cef5e0 R11: ffffffff8343f007 R12: ffff880217d474c8
  [71813.679669] R13: 00000000fffffffe R14: ffff88021ccf1548 R15: 0000000000000101
  [71813.679669] FS:  00007f7cee84c480(0000) GS:ffff88023fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [71813.679669] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [71813.679669] CR2: 00007f7cedc1abf9 CR3: 00000002354b4003 CR4: 00000000001606e0
  [71813.679669] Call Trace:
  [71813.679669]  btrfs_unlink_inode+0x17/0x41 [btrfs]
  [71813.679669]  drop_one_dir_item+0xfa/0x131 [btrfs]
  [71813.679669]  add_inode_ref+0x71e/0x851 [btrfs]
  [71813.679669]  ? __lock_is_held+0x39/0x71
  [71813.679669]  ? replay_one_buffer+0x53/0x53a [btrfs]
  [71813.679669]  replay_one_buffer+0x4a4/0x53a [btrfs]
  [71813.679669]  ? rcu_read_unlock+0x3a/0x57
  [71813.679669]  ? __lock_is_held+0x39/0x71
  [71813.679669]  walk_up_log_tree+0x101/0x1d2 [btrfs]
  [71813.679669]  walk_log_tree+0xad/0x188 [btrfs]
  [71813.679669]  btrfs_recover_log_trees+0x1fa/0x31e [btrfs]
  [71813.679669]  ? replay_one_extent+0x544/0x544 [btrfs]
  [71813.679669]  open_ctree+0x1cf6/0x2209 [btrfs]
  [71813.679669]  btrfs_mount_root+0x368/0x482 [btrfs]
  [71813.679669]  ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14c/0x1a6
  [71813.679669]  ? __lockdep_init_map+0x176/0x1c2
  [71813.679669]  ? mount_fs+0x64/0x10b
  [71813.679669]  mount_fs+0x64/0x10b
  [71813.679669]  vfs_kern_mount+0x68/0xce
  [71813.679669]  btrfs_mount+0x13e/0x772 [btrfs]
  [71813.679669]  ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14c/0x1a6
  [71813.679669]  ? __lockdep_init_map+0x176/0x1c2
  [71813.679669]  ? mount_fs+0x64/0x10b
  [71813.679669]  mount_fs+0x64/0x10b
  [71813.679669]  vfs_kern_mount+0x68/0xce
  [71813.679669]  do_mount+0x6e5/0x973
  [71813.679669]  ? memdup_user+0x3e/0x5c
  [71813.679669]  SyS_mount+0x72/0x98
  [71813.679669]  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0x8b
  [71813.679669] RIP: 0033:0x7f7cedf150ba
  [71813.679669] RSP: 002b:00007ffca71da688 EFLAGS: 00000206
  [71813.679669] Code: 7f a0 e8 51 0c fd ff 48 8b 43 50 f0 0f ba a8 30 2c 00 00 02 72 17 41 83 fd fb 74 11 44 89 ee 48 c7 c7 7d 11 7f a0 e8 38 f5 8d e0 <0f> ff 44 89 e9 ba 20 10 00 00 eb 4d 48 8b 4d b0 48 8b 75 88 4c
  [71813.679669] ---[ end trace 83bd473fc5b4663b ]---
  [71813.854764] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in __btrfs_unlink_inode:4128: errno=-2 No such entry
  [71813.886994] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in btrfs_replay_log:2307: errno=-2 No such entry (Failed to recover log tree)
  [71813.903357] BTRFS error (device dm-0): cleaner transaction attach returned -30
  [71814.128078] BTRFS error (device dm-0): open_ctree failed

This happens because the log has inode reference items for both inode 258
(the first file we created) and inode 259 (the second file created), and
when processing the reference item for inode 258, we replace the
corresponding item in the subvolume tree (which has two names, "foo" and
"bar") witht he one in the log (which only has one name, "foo") without
removing the corresponding dir index keys from the parent directory.
Later, when processing the inode reference item for inode 259, which has
a name of "bar" associated to it, we notice that dir index entries exist
for that name and for a different inode, so we attempt to unlink that
name, which fails because the inode reference item for inode 258 no longer
has the name "bar" associated to it, making a call to btrfs_unlink_inode()
fail with a -ENOENT error.

Fix this by unlinking all the names in an inode reference item from a
subvolume tree that are not present in the inode reference item found in
the log tree, before overwriting it with the item from the log tree.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      1f250e92
    • F
      Btrfs: fix log replay failure after linking special file and fsync · 9a6509c4
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      If in the same transaction we rename a special file (fifo, character/block
device or symbolic link), create a hard link for it having its old name
then sync the log, we will end up with a log that can not be replayed and
at when attempting to replay it, an EEXIST error is returned and mounting
the filesystem fails. Example scenario:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt
  $ mkdir /mnt/testdir
  $ mkfifo /mnt/testdir/foo
  # Make sure everything done so far is durably persisted.
  $ sync

  # Create some unrelated file and fsync it, this is just to create a log
  # tree. The file must be in the same directory as our special file.
  $ touch /mnt/testdir/f1
  $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/testdir/f1

  # Rename our special file and then create a hard link with its old name.
  $ mv /mnt/testdir/foo /mnt/testdir/bar
  $ ln /mnt/testdir/bar /mnt/testdir/foo

  # Create some other unrelated file and fsync it, this is just to persist
  # the log tree which was modified by the previous rename and link
  # operations. Alternatively we could have modified file f1 and fsync it.
  $ touch /mnt/f2
  $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/f2

  <power failure>

  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt
  mount: mount /dev/sdc on /mnt failed: File exists

This happens because when both the log tree and the subvolume's tree have
an entry in the directory "testdir" with the same name, that is, there
is one key (258 INODE_REF 257) in the subvolume tree and another one in
the log tree (where 258 is the inode number of our special file and 257
is the inode for directory "testdir"). Only the data of those two keys
differs, in the subvolume tree the index field for inode reference has
a value of 3 while the log tree it has a value of 5. Because the same key
exists in both trees, but have different index, the log replay fails with
an -EEXIST error when attempting to replay the inode reference from the
log tree.

Fix this by setting the last_unlink_trans field of the inode (our special
file) to the current transaction id when a hard link is created, as this
forces logging the parent directory inode, solving the conflict at log
replay time.

A new generic test case for fstests was also submitted.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      9a6509c4
    • F
      Btrfs: send, fix issuing write op when processing hole in no data mode · d4dfc0f4
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      When doing an incremental send of a filesystem with the no-holes feature
enabled, we end up issuing a write operation when using the no data mode
send flag, instead of issuing an update extent operation. Fix this by
issuing the update extent operation instead.

Trivial reproducer:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f -O no-holes /dev/sdc
  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc
  $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt/sdd

  $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 32K" /mnt/sdc/foobar
  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdc /mnt/sdc/snap1

  $ xfs_io -c "fpunch 8K 8K" /mnt/sdc/foobar
  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdc /mnt/sdc/snap2

  $ btrfs send /mnt/sdc/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt/sdd
  $ btrfs send --no-data -p /mnt/sdc/snap1 /mnt/sdc/snap2 \
       | btrfs receive -vv /mnt/sdd

Before this change the output of the second receive command is:

  receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=f6922049-8c22-e544-9ff9-fc6755918447...
  utimes
  write foobar, offset 8192, len 8192
  utimes foobar
  BTRFS_IOC_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL uuid=f6922049-8c22-e544-9ff9-...

After this change it is:

  receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=564d36a3-ebc8-7343-aec9-bf6fda278e64...
  utimes
  update_extent foobar: offset=8192, len=8192
  utimes foobar
  BTRFS_IOC_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL uuid=564d36a3-ebc8-7343-aec9-bf6fda278e64...
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      d4dfc0f4
    • A
      btrfs: use proper endianness accessors for super_copy · 3c181c12
      由 Anand Jain 提交于 
      The fs_info::super_copy is a byte copy of the on-disk structure and all
members must use the accessor macros/functions to obtain the right
value.  This was missing in update_super_roots and in sysfs readers.

Moving between opposite endianness hosts will report bogus numbers in
sysfs, and mount may fail as the root will not be restored correctly. If
the filesystem is always used on a same endian host, this will not be a
problem.

Fix this by using the btrfs_set_super...() functions to set
fs_info::super_copy values, and for the sysfs, use the cached
fs_info::nodesize/sectorsize values.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: df93589a ("btrfs: export more from FS_INFO to sysfs")
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      3c181c12
    • H
      btrfs: alloc_chunk: fix DUP stripe size handling · 92e222df
      由 Hans van Kranenburg 提交于 
      In case of using DUP, we search for enough unallocated disk space on a
device to hold two stripes.

The devices_info[ndevs-1].max_avail that holds the amount of unallocated
space found is directly assigned to stripe_size, while it's actually
twice the stripe size.

Later on in the code, an unconditional division of stripe_size by
dev_stripes corrects the value, but in the meantime there's a check to
see if the stripe_size does not exceed max_chunk_size. Since during this
check stripe_size is twice the amount as intended, the check will reduce
the stripe_size to max_chunk_size if the actual correct to be used
stripe_size is more than half the amount of max_chunk_size.

The unconditional division later tries to correct stripe_size, but will
actually make sure we can't allocate more than half the max_chunk_size.

Fix this by moving the division by dev_stripes before the max chunk size
check, so it always contains the right value, instead of putting a duct
tape division in further on to get it fixed again.

Since in all other cases than DUP, dev_stripes is 1, this change only
affects DUP.

Other attempts in the past were made to fix this:
* 37db63a4 "Btrfs: fix max chunk size check in chunk allocator" tried
to fix the same problem, but still resulted in part of the code acting
on a wrongly doubled stripe_size value.
* 86db2578 "Btrfs: fix max chunk size on raid5/6" unintentionally
broke this fix again.

The real problem was already introduced with the rest of the code in
73c5de00.

The user visible result however will be that the max chunk size for DUP
will suddenly double, while it's actually acting according to the limits
in the code again like it was 5 years ago.
Reported-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg69752.html
Fixes: 73c5de00 ("btrfs: quasi-round-robin for chunk allocation")
Fixes: 86db2578 ("Btrfs: fix max chunk size on raid5/6")
Signed-off-by: NHans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update comment ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      92e222df
    • N
      btrfs: Handle btrfs_set_extent_delalloc failure in relocate_file_extent_cluster · 765f3ceb
      由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于 
      Essentially duplicate the error handling from the above block which
handles the !PageUptodate(page) case and additionally clear
EXTENT_BOUNDARY.
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      765f3ceb
    • N
      btrfs: handle failure of add_pending_csums · ac01f26a
      由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于 
      add_pending_csums was added as part of the new data=ordered
implementation in e6dcd2dc ("Btrfs: New data=ordered
implementation"). Even back then it called the btrfs_csum_file_blocks
which can fail but it never bothered handling the failure. In ENOMEM
situation this could lead to the filesystem failing to write the
checksums for a particular extent and not detect this. On read this
could lead to the filesystem erroring out due to crc mismatch. Fix it by
propagating failure from add_pending_csums and handling them.
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      ac01f26a
    • J
      btrfs: use kvzalloc to allocate btrfs_fs_info · a8fd1f71
      由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于 
      The srcu_struct in btrfs_fs_info scales in size with NR_CPUS.  On
kernels built with NR_CPUS=8192, this can result in kmalloc failures
that prevent mounting.

There is work in progress to try to resolve this for every user of
srcu_struct but using kvzalloc will work around the failures until
that is complete.

As an example with NR_CPUS=512 on x86_64: the overall size of
subvol_srcu is 3460 bytes, fs_info is 6496.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      a8fd1f71
  9. 06 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  11. 02 2月, 2018 9 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix null pointer dereference when replacing missing device · 627e0873
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      When we are replacing a missing device we mount the filesystem with the
degraded mode option in which case we are allowed to have a btrfs device
structure without a backing device member (its bdev member is NULL) and
therefore we can't dereference that member. Commit 38b5f68e
("btrfs: drop btrfs_device::can_discard to query directly") started to
dereference that member when discarding extents, resulting in a null
pointer dereference:

 [ 3145.322257] BTRFS warning (device sdf): devid 2 uuid 4d922414-58eb-4880-8fed-9c3840f6c5d5 is missing
 [ 3145.364116] BTRFS info (device sdf): dev_replace from <missing disk> (devid 2) to /dev/sdg started
 [ 3145.413489] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000e0
 [ 3145.415085] IP: btrfs_discard_extent+0x6a/0xf8 [btrfs]
 [ 3145.415085] PGD 0 P4D 0
 [ 3145.415085] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
 [ 3145.415085] Modules linked in: ppdev ghash_clmulni_intel pcbc aesni_intel aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd glue_helper evdev psmouse parport_pc serio_raw i2c_piix4 i2
 [ 3145.415085] CPU: 0 PID: 11989 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W        4.15.0-rc9-btrfs-next-55+ #1
 [ 3145.415085] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.10.2-0-g5f4c7b1-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
 [ 3145.415085] RIP: 0010:btrfs_discard_extent+0x6a/0xf8 [btrfs]
 [ 3145.415085] RSP: 0018:ffffc90004813c60 EFLAGS: 00010293
 [ 3145.415085] RAX: ffff88020d39cc00 RBX: ffff88020c4ea2a0 RCX: 0000000000000002
 [ 3145.415085] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88020c4ea240 RDI: 0000000000000000
 [ 3145.415085] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000004000 R09: 0000000000000000
 [ 3145.415085] R10: ffffc90004813ae8 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
 [ 3145.415085] R13: ffff88020c418000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
 [ 3145.415085] FS:  00007f565681f8c0(0000) GS:ffff88023fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 [ 3145.415085] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 [ 3145.415085] CR2: 00000000000000e0 CR3: 000000020d208006 CR4: 00000000001606f0
 [ 3145.415085] Call Trace:
 [ 3145.415085]  btrfs_finish_extent_commit+0x9a/0x1be [btrfs]
 [ 3145.415085]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x649/0x7a0 [btrfs]
 [ 3145.415085]  ? start_transaction+0x2b0/0x3b3 [btrfs]
 [ 3145.415085]  btrfs_dev_replace_start+0x274/0x30c [btrfs]
 [ 3145.415085]  btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl+0x45/0x59 [btrfs]
 [ 3145.415085]  btrfs_ioctl+0x1a91/0x1d62 [btrfs]
 [ 3145.415085]  ? lock_acquire+0x16a/0x1af
 [ 3145.415085]  ? vfs_ioctl+0x1b/0x28
 [ 3145.415085]  ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14c/0x1a6
 [ 3145.415085]  vfs_ioctl+0x1b/0x28
 [ 3145.415085]  do_vfs_ioctl+0x5a9/0x5e0
 [ 3145.415085]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x34/0x46
 [ 3145.415085]  ? entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x5/0x8b
 [ 3145.415085]  ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14c/0x1a6
 [ 3145.415085]  SyS_ioctl+0x52/0x76
 [ 3145.415085]  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0x8b
 [ 3145.415085] RIP: 0033:0x7f56558b3c47
 [ 3145.415085] RSP: 002b:00007ffdcfac4c58 EFLAGS: 00000202
 [ 3145.415085] Code: be 02 00 00 00 4c 89 ef e8 b9 e7 03 00 85 c0 89 c5 75 75 48 8b 44 24 08 45 31 f6 48 8d 58 60 eb 52 48 8b 03 48 8b b8 a0 00 00 00 <48> 8b 87 e0 00
 [ 3145.415085] RIP: btrfs_discard_extent+0x6a/0xf8 [btrfs] RSP: ffffc90004813c60
 [ 3145.415085] CR2: 00000000000000e0
 [ 3145.458185] ---[ end trace 06302e7ac31902bf ]---

This is trivially reproduced by running the test btrfs/027 from fstests
like this:

  $ MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o discard" ./check btrfs/027

Fix this by skipping devices without a backing device before attempting
to discard.

Fixes: 38b5f68e ("btrfs: drop btrfs_device::can_discard to query directly")
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      627e0873
    • Z
      btrfs: remove spurious WARN_ON(ref->count < 0) in find_parent_nodes · c8195a7b
      由 Zygo Blaxell 提交于 
      Until v4.14, this warning was very infrequent:

	WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 18172 at fs/btrfs/backref.c:1391 find_parent_nodes+0xc41/0x14e0
	Modules linked in: [...]
	CPU: 3 PID: 18172 Comm: bees Tainted: G      D W    L  4.11.9-zb64+ #1
	Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/M5A78L-M/USB3, BIOS 2101    12/02/2014
	Call Trace:
	 dump_stack+0x85/0xc2
	 __warn+0xd1/0xf0
	 warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
	 find_parent_nodes+0xc41/0x14e0
	 __btrfs_find_all_roots+0xad/0x120
	 ? extent_same_check_offsets+0x70/0x70
	 iterate_extent_inodes+0x168/0x300
	 iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xb0
	 ? iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xb0
	 ? extent_same_check_offsets+0x70/0x70
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x8ac/0x2820
	 ? lock_acquire+0xc2/0x200
	 do_vfs_ioctl+0x91/0x700
	 ? __fget+0x112/0x200
	 SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6
	 ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x1f/0x140

Starting with v4.14 (specifically 86d5f994 ("btrfs: convert prelimary
reference tracking to use rbtrees")) the WARN_ON occurs three orders of
magnitude more frequently--almost once per second while running workloads
like bees.

Replace the WARN_ON() with a comment rationale for its removal.
The rationale is paraphrased from an explanation by Edmund Nadolski
<enadolski@suse.de> on the linux-btrfs mailing list.

Fixes: 8da6d581 ("Btrfs: added btrfs_find_all_roots()")
Signed-off-by: NZygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Reviewed-by: NLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      c8195a7b
    • N
      btrfs: Ignore errors from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post · 952bd3db
      由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于 
      Running generic/019 with qgroups on the scratch device enabled is almost
guaranteed to trigger the BUG_ON in btrfs_free_tree_block. It's supposed
to trigger only on -ENOMEM, in reality, however, it's possible to get
-EIO from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post. This function just finds the
roots of the extent being tracked and sets the qrecord->old_roots list.
If this operation fails nothing critical happens except the quota
accounting can be considered wrong. In such case just set the
INCONSISTENT flag for the quota and print a warning, rather than killing
off the system. Additionally, it's possible to trigger a BUG_ON in
btrfs_truncate_inode_items as well.
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
[ error message adjustments ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      952bd3db
    • L
      Btrfs: fix unexpected -EEXIST when creating new inode · 900c9981
      由 Liu Bo 提交于 
      The highest objectid, which is assigned to new inode, is decided at
the time of initializing fs roots.  However, in cases where log replay
gets processed, the btree which fs root owns might be changed, so we
have to search it again for the highest objectid, otherwise creating
new inode would end up with -EEXIST.

cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> v4.4-rc6+
Fixes: f32e48e9 ("Btrfs: Initialize btrfs_root->highest_objectid when loading tree root and subvolume roots")
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      900c9981
    • L
      Btrfs: fix use-after-free on root->orphan_block_rsv · 1a932ef4
      由 Liu Bo 提交于 
      I got these from running generic/475,

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 26384 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:3326 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0x1ac/0x2b0 [btrfs]
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010
IP: btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x1c/0x70 [btrfs]
Call Trace:
  btrfs_orphan_release_metadata+0x9f/0x200 [btrfs]
  btrfs_orphan_del+0x10d/0x170 [btrfs]
  btrfs_setattr+0x500/0x640 [btrfs]
  notify_change+0x7ae/0x870
  do_truncate+0xca/0x130
  vfs_truncate+0x2ee/0x3d0
  do_sys_truncate+0xaf/0xf0
  SyS_truncate+0xe/0x10
  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0x96

The race is between btrfs_orphan_commit_root and btrfs_orphan_del,
        t1                                        t2
btrfs_orphan_commit_root                     btrfs_orphan_del
   spin_lock
   check (&root->orphan_inodes)
   root->orphan_block_rsv = NULL;
   spin_unlock
                                             atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
                                             access root->orphan_block_rsv

Accessing root->orphan_block_rsv must be done before decreasing
root->orphan_inodes.

cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> v3.12+
Fixes: 703c88e0 ("Btrfs: fix tracking of orphan inode count")
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      1a932ef4
    • L
      Btrfs: fix btrfs_evict_inode to handle abnormal inodes correctly · e8f1bc14
      由 Liu Bo 提交于 
      This regression is introduced in
commit 3d48d981 ("btrfs: Handle uninitialised inode eviction").

There are two problems,

a) it is ->destroy_inode() that does the final free on inode, not
   ->evict_inode(),
b) clear_inode() must be called before ->evict_inode() returns.

This could end up hitting BUG_ON(inode->i_state != (I_FREEING | I_CLEAR));
in evict() because I_CLEAR is set in clear_inode().

Fixes: commit 3d48d981 ("btrfs: Handle uninitialised inode eviction")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.7-rc6+
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      e8f1bc14
    • L
      Btrfs: fix extent state leak from tree log · 55237a5f
      由 Liu Bo 提交于 
      It's possible that btrfs_sync_log() bails out after one of the two
btrfs_write_marked_extents() which convert extent state's state bit into
EXTENT_NEED_WAIT from EXTENT_DIRTY/EXTENT_NEW, however only EXTENT_DIRTY
and EXTENT_NEW are searched by free_log_tree() so that those extent states
with EXTENT_NEED_WAIT lead to memory leak.

cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      55237a5f
    • L
      Btrfs: fix crash due to not cleaning up tree log block's dirty bits · 1846430c
      由 Liu Bo 提交于 
      In cases that the whole fs flips into readonly status due to failures in
critical sections, then log tree's blocks are still dirty, and this leads
to a crash during umount time, the crash is about use-after-free,

umount
 -> close_ctree
    -> stop workers
    -> iput(btree_inode)
       -> iput_final
          -> write_inode_now
	     -> ...
	       -> queue job on stop'd workers

cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> v3.12+
Fixes: 681ae509 ("Btrfs: cleanup reserved space when freeing tree log on error")
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      1846430c
    • L
      Btrfs: fix deadlock in run_delalloc_nocow · e8916699
      由 Liu Bo 提交于 
      @cur_offset is not set back to what it should be (@cow_start) if
btrfs_next_leaf() returns something wrong, and the range [cow_start,
cur_offset) remains locked forever.

cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      e8916699
  13. 30 1月, 2018 1 次提交