You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
- 31 5月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
The Freescale SPI chipselects are special: while everyone else is using "cs-gpios" the Freescale platforms just use "gpios". Fix this by responding with "gpios" when asking for "cs-gpios" in a freescale device node, so we hide this pecularity from the SPI core. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 23 4月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Shevchenko 提交于
Since GPIO library operates with enumerator when it's subject to handle the GPIO lookup flags, it will be better to clearly see what default means. Thus, introduce GPIO_LOOKUP_FLAGS_DEFAULT entry to describe the default assumptions. While here, replace 0 by newly introduced constant. Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Andy Shevchenko 提交于
The library uses enum gpio_lookup_flags to define the possible characteristics of GPIO pin. Since enumerator listed only individual bits the common use of it is in a form of a bitmask of gpio_lookup_flags GPIO_* values. The more correct type for this is unsigned long. Due to above convert all users to use unsigned long instead of enum gpio_lookup_flags except enumerator definition. While here, make field and parameter descriptions consistent as well. Suggested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 08 4月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Geert Uytterhoeven 提交于
Simple string comparisons are cheaper than DT lookups, as the latter involve taking a spinlock and traversing properties. Hence optimize quirk checks by postponing DT lookups after string comparisons. Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Reviewed-by: NMukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 29 3月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Geert Uytterhoeven 提交于
If the call to of_gpiochip_scan_gpios() in of_gpiochip_add() fails, no error handling is performed. This lead to the need of callers to call of_gpiochip_remove() on failure, which causes "BAD of_node_put() on ..." if the failure happened before the call to of_node_get(). Fix this by adding proper error handling. Note that calling gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges() multiple times causes no harm: subsequent calls are a no-op. Fixes: dfbd379b ("gpio: of: Return error if gpio hog configuration failed") Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Reviewed-by: NMukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Andrey Smirnov 提交于
"spi-cs-high" is going to be specified in child node of an SPI controller's representing attached SPI device, so change the code to look for it there, instead of checking parent node. Signed-off-by: NAndrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Cc: Chris Healy <cphealy@gmail.com> Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Andrey Smirnov 提交于
SPI GPIO device has more than just "cs-gpio" property in its node and would request those GPIOs as a part of its initialization. To avoid applying CS-specific quirk to all of them add a check to make sure that propname is "cs-gpios". Signed-off-by: NAndrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Cc: Chris Healy <cphealy@gmail.com> Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 21 2月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Marek Vasut 提交于
Handle both enable-gpio and enable-gpios properties of the GPIO regulator in the quirk. The later is the preferred modern name of the property. Signed-off-by: NMarek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Cc: Jan Kotas <jank@cadence.com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org To: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Thierry Reding 提交于
Commit 0e7d6f94 ("gpio: of: Apply regulator-gpio quirk only to enable-gpios") breaks the device tree ABI specified in the device tree bindings for fixed regulators (compatible "regulator-fixed"). According to these bindings the polarity of the GPIO is exclusively controlled by the presence or absence of the enable-active-high property. As such the polarity quirk implemented in of_gpio_flags_quirks() must be applied to the GPIO specified for fixed regulators. However, commit 0e7d6f94 ("gpio: of: Apply regulator-gpio quirk only to enable-gpios") restricted the quirk to the enable-gpios property for fixed regulators as well, whereas according to the commit message itself it should only apply to "regulator-gpio" compatible device tree nodes. Fix this by actually implementing what the offending commit intended, which is to ensure that the quirk is applied to the GPIO specified by the "enable-gpio" property for the "regulator-gpio" bindings only. This fixes a regression on Jetson TX1 where the fixed regulator for the HDMI +5V pin relies on the flags quirk for the proper polarity. Fixes: 0e7d6f94 ("gpio: of: Apply regulator-gpio quirk only to enable-gpios") Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Tested-by: NMarek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 18 2月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marek Vasut 提交于
Since commit d6cd33ad ("regulator: gpio: Convert to use descriptors") the GPIO regulator had inverted the polarity of the control GPIO. This problem manifested itself on systems with DT containing the following description (snippet from salvator-common.dtsi): gpios = <&gpio5 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; gpios-states = <1>; states = <3300000 1 1800000 0>; Prior to the aforementioned commit, the gpio-regulator code used gpio_request_array() to claim the GPIO(s) specified in the "gpios" DT node, while the commit changed that to devm_gpiod_get_index(). The legacy gpio_request_array() calls gpio_request_one() and then gpiod_request(), which parses the DT flags of the "gpios" node and populates the GPIO descriptor flags field accordingly. The new devm_gpiod_get_index() calls gpiod_get_index(), then of_find_gpio(), of_get_named_gpiod_flags() with flags != NULL, and then of_gpio_flags_quirks(). Since commit a603a2b8 ("gpio: of: Add special quirk to parse regulator flags"), of_gpio_flags_quirks() contains a quirk for regulator-gpio which was never triggered by the legacy gpio_request_array() code path, but is triggered by devm_gpiod_get_index() code path. This quirk checks whether a GPIO is associated with a fixed or gpio-regulator and if so, checks two additional conditions. First, whether such GPIO is active-low, and if so, ignores the active-low flag. Second, whether the regulator DT node does have an "enable-active-high" property and if the property is NOT present, sets the GPIO flags as active-low. The second check triggers a problem, since it is applied to all GPIOs associated with a gpio-regulator, rather than only on the "enable" GPIOs, as the old code did. This changes the way the gpio-regulator interprets the DT description of the control GPIOs. The old code using gpio_request_array() explicitly parsed the "enable-active-high" DT property and only applied it to the GPIOs described in the "enable-gpios" DT node, and only if those were present. This patch fixes the quirk code by only applying the quirk to "enable-gpios", thus restoring the old behavior. Signed-off-by: NMarek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Cc: Jan Kotas <jank@cadence.com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org To: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 13 2月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
This commit adds support for configuring the pull-up and pull-down resistors available in some GPIO controllers. While configuring pull-up/pull-down is already possible through the pinctrl subsystem, some GPIO controllers, especially simple ones such as GPIO expanders on I2C, don't have any pinmuxing capability and therefore do not use the pinctrl subsystem. This commit implements the GPIO_PULL_UP and GPIO_PULL_DOWN flags, which can be used from the Device Tree, to enable a pull-up or pull-down resistor on a given GPIO. The flag is simply propagated all the way to the core GPIO subsystem, where it is used to call the gpio_chip ->set_config callback with the appropriate existing PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_* values. Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 25 1月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
The SPI chip selects were not properly inspected due to a logic inversion. This made SPI GPIOs not work. Cc: Jan Kotas <jank@cadence.com> Reported-by: NJan Kotas <jank@cadence.com> Tested-by: NJan Kotas <jank@cadence.com> Fixes: f3186dd8 ("spi: Optionally use GPIO descriptors for CS GPIOs") Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
-
- 18 12月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
The device tree bindings for the MMC card detect and write protect lines specify that these should be active low unless "cd-inverted" or "wp-inverted" has been specified. However that is not how the kernel code has worked. It has always respected the flags passed to the phandle in the device tree, but respected the "cd-inverted" and "wp-inverted" flags such that if those are set, the polarity will be the inverse of that specified in the device tree. Switch to behaving like the old code did and fix the regression. Fixes: 81c85ec1 ("gpio: OF: Parse MMC-specific CD and WP properties") Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reported-by: NGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 29 11月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
When retrieveing CD (card detect) and WP (write protect) GPIO handles from the device tree, make sure to assign them active low by default unless the "cd-inverted" or "wp-inverted" properties are set. These properties mean that respective signal is active HIGH since the SDHCI specification stipulates that this kind of signals should be treated as active LOW. If the twocell GPIO flag is also specified as active low, well that's nice and we will silently ignore the tautological specification. If however the GPIO line is specified as active low in the GPIO flasg cell and "cd-inverted" or "wp-inverted" is also specified, the latter takes precedence and we print a warning. The current effect on the MMC slot-gpio core are as follows: For CD GPIOs: no effect. The current code in mmc/core/host.c calls mmc_gpiod_request_cd() with the "override_active_level" argument set to true, which means that whatever the GPIO descriptor thinks about active low/high will be ignored, the core will use the MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH to keep track of this and reads the raw value from the GPIO descriptor, totally bypassing gpiolibs inversion semantics. I plan to clean this up at a later point passing the handling of inversion semantics over to gpiolib, so this patch prepares the ground for that. Fow WP GPIOs: this is probably fixing a bug, because the code in mmc/core/host.c calls mmc_gpiod_request_ro() with the "override_active_level" argument set to false, which means it will respect the inversion semantics of the gpiolib and ignore the MMC_CAP2_RO_ACTIVE_HIGH flag for everyone using this through device tree. However the code in host.c confusingly goes to great lengths setting up the MMC_CAP2_RO_ACTIVE_HIGH flag from the GPIO descriptor and by reading the "wp-inverted" property of the node. As far as I can tell this is all in vain and the inversion is broken: device trees that use "wp-inverted" do not work as intended, instead the only way to actually get inversion on a line is by setting the second cell flag to GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH (which will be the default) or GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW if they want the proper MMC semantics. Presumably all device trees do this right but we need to parse and handle this properly. Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 26 11月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Zapolskiy 提交于
It's easy to verify that the change of drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c license header to SPDX standard changes the license from GPLv2+ to GPLv2, and this change corrects it. Fixes: dae5f0af ("gpio: Use SPDX header for core library") Signed-off-by: NVladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 25 9月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
Use the SPDX headers and cut down on boilerplate to indicate the license in the core gpiolib implementation. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 11 9月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
The SPI chipselects are assumed to be active low in the current binding, so when we want to use GPIO descriptors and handle the active low/high semantics in gpiolib, we need a special parsing quirk to deal with this. We check for the property "spi-cs-high" and if that is NOT present we assume the CS line is active low. If the line is tagged as active low in the device tree and has no "spi-cs-high" property all is fine, the device tree and the SPI bindings are in agreement. If the line is tagged as active high in the device tree with the second cell flag and has no "spi-cs-high" property we enforce active low semantics (as this is the exception we can just tag on the flag). If the line is tagged as active low with the second cell flag AND tagged with "spi-cs-high" the SPI active high property takes precedence and we print a warning. Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 31 8月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vincent Whitchurch 提交于
gpiochip_add_data_with_key() adds the gpiochip to the gpio_devices list before of_gpiochip_add() is called, but it's only the latter which sets the ->of_xlate function pointer. gpiochip_find() can be called by someone else between these two actions, and it can find the chip and call of_gpiochip_match_node_and_xlate() which leads to the following crash due to a NULL ->of_xlate(). Unhandled prefetch abort: page domain fault (0x01b) at 0x00000000 Modules linked in: leds_gpio(+) gpio_generic(+) CPU: 0 PID: 830 Comm: insmod Not tainted 4.18.0+ #43 Hardware name: ARM-Versatile Express PC is at (null) LR is at of_gpiochip_match_node_and_xlate+0x2c/0x38 Process insmod (pid: 830, stack limit = 0x(ptrval)) (of_gpiochip_match_node_and_xlate) from (gpiochip_find+0x48/0x84) (gpiochip_find) from (of_get_named_gpiod_flags+0xa8/0x238) (of_get_named_gpiod_flags) from (gpiod_get_from_of_node+0x2c/0xc8) (gpiod_get_from_of_node) from (devm_fwnode_get_index_gpiod_from_child+0xb8/0x144) (devm_fwnode_get_index_gpiod_from_child) from (gpio_led_probe+0x208/0x3c4 [leds_gpio]) (gpio_led_probe [leds_gpio]) from (platform_drv_probe+0x48/0x9c) (platform_drv_probe) from (really_probe+0x1d0/0x3d4) (really_probe) from (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1c0) (driver_probe_device) from (__driver_attach+0x120/0x13c) (__driver_attach) from (bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0xb4) (bus_for_each_dev) from (bus_add_driver+0x1a8/0x268) (bus_add_driver) from (driver_register+0x78/0x10c) (driver_register) from (do_one_initcall+0x54/0x1fc) (do_one_initcall) from (do_init_module+0x64/0x1f4) (do_init_module) from (load_module+0x2198/0x26ac) (load_module) from (sys_finit_module+0xe0/0x110) (sys_finit_module) from (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x54) One way to fix this would be to rework the hairy registration sequence in gpiochip_add_data_with_key(), but since I'd probably introduce a couple of new bugs if I attempted that, simply add a check for a non-NULL of_xlate function pointer in of_gpiochip_match_node_and_xlate(). This works since the driver looking for the gpio will simply fail to find the gpio and defer its probe and be reprobed when the driver which is registering the gpiochip has fully completed its probe. Signed-off-by: NVincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 29 8月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rob Herring 提交于
In preparation to remove the node name pointer from struct device_node, convert printf users to use the %pOFn format specifier. Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 11 8月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Biju Das 提交于
Some platforms are not setting of_node in the driver. On these platforms defining gpio-reserved-ranges on device tree leads to kernel crash. It is due to some parts of the gpio core relying on the driver to set up of_node,while other parts do themselves.This inconsistent behaviour leads to a crash. gpiochip_add_data_with_key() calls gpiochip_init_valid_mask() with of_node as NULL. of_gpiochip_add() fills "of_node" and calls of_gpiochip_init_valid_mask(). The fix is to move the assignment to chip->of_node from of_gpiochip_add() to gpiochip_add_data_with_key(). Signed-off-by: NBiju Das <biju.das@bp.renesas.com> Reviewed-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Tested-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 24 7月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
This fixes up the handling of fixed regulator polarity inversion flags: while I remembered to fix it for the undocumented "reg-fixed-voltage" I forgot about the official "regulator-fixed" binding, there are two ways to do a fixed regulator. The error was noticed and fixed. Fixes: a603a2b8 ("gpio: of: Add special quirk to parse regulator flags") Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Reported-by: NThierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 16 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Shevchenko 提交于
The new helper returns index of the matching string in an array. We are going to use it here. Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 27 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Boyd 提交于
Some qcom platforms make some GPIOs or pins unavailable for use by non-secure operating systems, and thus reading or writing the registers for those pins will cause access control issues. Add support for a DT property to describe the set of GPIOs that are available for use so that higher level OSes are able to know what pins to avoid reading/writing. Non-DT platforms can add support by directly updating the chip->valid_mask. Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Tested-by: NTimur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 27 2月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chen-Yu Tsai 提交于
of_get_named_gpiod_flags() used directly in of_find_gpio() or indirectly through of_find_spi_gpio() or of_find_regulator_gpio() can return -EPROBE_DEFER. This gets overwritten by the subsequent of_find_*_gpio() calls. This patch fixes this by trying of_find_spi_gpio() or of_find_regulator_gpio() only if deferred probing was not requested by the previous of_get_named_gpiod_flags() call. Fixes: 6a537d48 ("gpio: of: Support regulator nonstandard GPIO properties") Fixes: c8582339 ("gpio: of: Support SPI nonstandard GPIO properties") Signed-off-by: NChen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> [Augmented to fit with Maxime's patch] Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Maxime Ripard 提交于
Commits c8582339 ("gpio: of: Support SPI nonstandard GPIO properties") and 6a537d48 ("gpio: of: Support regulator nonstandard GPIO properties") have introduced a regression in the way error codes from of_get_named_gpiod_flags are handled. Previously, those errors codes were returned immediately, but the two commits mentioned above are now overwriting the error pointer, meaning that whatever value has been returned will be dropped in favor of whatever the two new functions will return. This might not be a big deal except for EPROBE_DEFER, on which GPIOlib customers will depend on, and that will now be returned as an hard error which means that they will not probe anymore, instead of gently deferring their probe. Since EPROBE_DEFER basically means that we have found a valid property but there was no GPIO controller registered to handle it, fix this issues by returning it as soon as we encounter it. Fixes: c8582339 ("gpio: of: Support SPI nonstandard GPIO properties") Fixes: 6a537d48 ("gpio: of: Support regulator nonstandard GPIO properties") Signed-off-by: NMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> [Fold in fix to the fix] Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 12 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Boyd 提交于
Platforms like 96boards have a standardized connector/expansion slot that exposes signals like GPIOs to expansion boards in an SoC agnostic way. We'd like the DT overlays for the expansion boards to be written once without knowledge of the SoC on the other side of the connector. This avoids the unscalable combinatorial explosion of a different DT overlay for each expansion board and SoC pair. Now that we have nexus support in the OF core let's change the function call here that parses the phandle lists of gpios to use the nexus variant. This allows us to remap phandles and their arguments through any number of nexus nodes and end up with the actual gpio provider being used. Cc: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
-
- 17 1月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
Some calls to of_get_named_gpio() calls sets the flags argument to NULL because they are not interested in the flags. This caused a null pointer exception since we were unconditionally using these flags. Fix it. Fixes: 6a537d48 ("gpio: of: Support regulator nonstandard GPIO properties") Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> Reported-by: NHeiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 12 1月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
While most GPIOs are indicated to be active low or open drain using their twocell flags, we have legacy regulator bindings to take into account. Add a quirk respecting the special boolean active-high and open drain flags when parsing regulator nodes for GPIOs. This makes it possible to get rid of duplicated inversion semantics handling in the regulator core and any regulator drivers parsing and handling this separately. Unfortunately the old regulator inversion semantics are specified such that the presence or absence of "enable-active-high" solely controls the semantics, so we cannot deprecate this in favor of the phandle-provided inversion flag, instead any such phandle inversion flag provided in the second cell of a GPIO handle must be actively ignored, so we print a warning to contain the situation and make things easy for the users. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> -
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
Before it was clearly established that all GPIO properties in the device tree shall be named "foo-gpios" (with the deprecated variant "foo-gpio" for single lines) we unfortunately merged a few bindings for regulators with random phandle names. As we want to switch the GPIO regulator driver to using descriptors, we need devm_gpiod_get() to return something reasonable when looking up these in the device tree. Put in a special #ifdef:ed kludge to do this special lookup only for the regulator case and gets compiled out if we're not enabling regulators. Supply a whitelist with properties we accept. Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 09 1月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
Before it was clearly established that all GPIO properties in the device tree shall be named "foo-gpios" (with the deprecated variant "foo-gpio" for single lines) we unfortunately merged a few bindings which named the lines "gpio-foo" instead. This is most prominent in the GPIO SPI driver in Linux which names the lines "gpio-sck", "gpio-mosi" and "gpio-miso". As we want to switch the GPIO SPI driver to using descriptors, we need devm_gpiod_get() to return something reasonable when looking up these in the device tree. Put in a special #ifdef:ed kludge to do this special lookup only for the SPI case and gets compiled out if we're not enabling SPI. If we have more oddly defined legacy GPIOs like this, they can be handled in a similar manner. Reviewed-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 22 12月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christophe Leroy 提交于
Following commit 9427ecbe ("gpio: Rework of_gpiochip_set_names() to use device property accessors"), "gpio-line-names" DT property is not retrieved anymore when chip->parent is not set by the driver. This is due to OF based property reads having been replaced by device based property reads. This patch fixes that by making use of fwnode_property_read_string_array() instead of device_property_read_string_array() and handing over either of_fwnode_handle(chip->of_node) or dev_fwnode(chip->parent) to that function. Fixes: 9427ecbe ("gpio: Rework of_gpiochip_set_names() to use device property accessors") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NChristophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> Acked-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 03 12月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew Jeffery 提交于
General support for state persistence is added to gpiolib with the introduction of a new pinconf parameter to propagate the request to hardware. The existing persistence support for sleep is adapted to include hardware support if the GPIO driver provides it. Persistence continues to be enabled by default; in-kernel consumers can opt out, but userspace (currently) does not have a choice. The *_SLEEP_MAY_LOSE_VALUE and *_SLEEP_MAINTAIN_VALUE symbols are renamed, dropping the SLEEP prefix to reflect that the concept is no longer sleep-specific. I feel that renaming to just *_MAY_LOSE_VALUE could initially be misinterpreted, so I've further changed the symbols to *_TRANSITORY and *_PERSISTENT to address this. The sysfs interface is modified only to keep consistency with the chardev interface in enforcing persistence for userspace exports. Signed-off-by: NAndrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> Reviewed-by: NCharles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 20 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew Jeffery 提交于
Literally. I expect "lose" was meant here, rather than "loose", though you could feasibly use a somewhat uncommon definition of "loose" to mean what would be meant by "lose": "Loose the hounds" for instance, as in "Release the hounds". Substituting in "value" for "hounds" gives "release the value", and makes some sense, but futher substituting back to loose gives "loose the value" which overall just seems a bit anachronistic. Instead, use modern, pragmatic English and save a character. Cc: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 14 8月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Thierry Reding 提交于
Add descriptions for missing fields and fix up some parameter references to match the code. Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Rob Herring 提交于
Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing of the full path string for each node. Signed-off-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Tien Hock Loh <thloh@altera.com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> Cc: "Sören Brinkmann" <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Acked-by: NGregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 16 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Geert Uytterhoeven 提交于
Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 29 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Charles Keepax 提交于
Add new flags to allow users to specify that they are not concerned with the status of GPIOs whilst in a sleep/low power state. Signed-off-by: NCharles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Acked-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 07 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Laxman Dewangan 提交于
Currently, the GPIO interface is said to Open Drain if it is Single Ended and active LOW. Similarly, it is said as Open Source if it is Single Ended and active HIGH. The active HIGH/LOW is used in the interface for setting the pin state to HIGH or LOW when enabling/disabling the interface. In Open Drain interface, pin is set to HIGH by putting pin in high impedance and LOW by driving to the LOW. In Open Source interface, pin is set to HIGH by driving pin to HIGH and set to LOW by putting pin in high impedance. With above, the Open Drain/Source is unrelated to the active LOW/HIGH in interface. There is interface where the enable/disable of interface is ether active LOW or HIGH but it is Open Drain type. Hence decouple the Open Drain with Single Ended + Active LOW and Open Source with Single Ended + Active HIGH. Adding different flag for the Open Drain/Open Source which is valid only when Single ended flag is enabled. Signed-off-by: NLaxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 30 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Geert Uytterhoeven 提交于
When listing multiple GPIOs in the "gpios" property of a GPIO hog, only the first GPIO is affected. The user is left clueless about the dysfunctioning of the other GPIOs specified. Fix this by adding and documenting support for specifying multiple GPIOs in a single GPIO hog. Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Acked-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 01 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Masahiro Yamada 提交于
Sylvain Lemieux reports the LPC32xx GPIO driver is broken since commit 762c2e46 ("gpio: of: remove of_gpiochip_and_xlate() and struct gg_data"). Probably, gpio-etraxfs.c and gpio-davinci.c are broken too. Those drivers register multiple gpio_chip that are associated to a single OF node, and their own .of_xlate() checks if the passed gpio_chip is valid. Now, the problem is of_find_gpiochip_by_node() returns the first gpio_chip found to match the given node. So, .of_xlate() fails, except for the first GPIO bank. Reverting the commit could be a solution, but I do not want to go back to the mess of struct gg_data. Another solution here is to take the match by a node pointer and the success of .of_xlate(). It is a bit clumsy to call .of_xlate twice; for gpio_chip matching and for really getting the gpio_desc index. Perhaps, our long-term goal might be to convert the drivers to single chip registration, but this commit will solve the problem until then. Fixes: 762c2e46 ("gpio: of: remove of_gpiochip_and_xlate() and struct gg_data") Signed-off-by: NMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reported-by: NSylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com> Tested-by: NDavid Lechner <david@lechnology.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-