Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 07 3月, 2020 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Do not poison i915_request.link on removal · dff2a11b
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Do not poison the timeline link on the i915_request to allow both
forward/backward list traversal under RCU.

[ 9759.139229] RIP: 0010:active_request+0x2a/0x90 [i915]
[ 9759.139240] Code: 41 56 41 55 41 54 55 48 89 fd 53 48 89 f3 48 83 c5 60 e8 49 de dc e0 48 8b 83 e8 01 00 00 48 39 c5 74 12 48 8d 90 20 fe ff ff <48> 8b 80 50 fe ff ff a8 01 74 11 e8 66 20 dd e0 48 89 d8 5b 5d 41
[ 9759.139251] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000014ce80 EFLAGS: 00010012
[ 9759.139260] RAX: dead000000000122 RBX: ffff888817cac040 RCX: 0000000000022000
[ 9759.139267] RDX: deacffffffffff42 RSI: ffff888817cac040 RDI: ffff888851fee900
[ 9759.139275] RBP: ffff888851fee960 R08: 000000000000001a R09: ffffffffa04702e0
[ 9759.139282] R10: ffffffff82187ea0 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000004
[ 9759.139289] R13: ffffffffa04d5179 R14: ffff8887f994ae40 R15: ffff888857b9a068
[ 9759.139296] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88885ed80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 9759.139304] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 9759.139311] CR2: 00007fff5bdec000 CR3: 00000008534fe001 CR4: 00000000001606e0
[ 9759.139318] Call Trace:
[ 9759.139325]  <IRQ>
[ 9759.139389]  execlists_reset+0x14d/0x310 [i915]
[ 9759.139400]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0xf/0x30
[ 9759.139445]  ? fwtable_read32+0x90/0x230 [i915]
[ 9759.139499]  execlists_submission_tasklet+0xf6/0x150 [i915]
[ 9759.139508]  tasklet_action_common.isra.17+0x32/0xa0
[ 9759.139516]  __do_softirq+0x114/0x3dc
[ 9759.139525]  ? handle_irq_event_percpu+0x59/0x70
[ 9759.139533]  irq_exit+0xa1/0xc0
[ 9759.139540]  do_IRQ+0x76/0x150
[ 9759.139547]  common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
[ 9759.139554]  </IRQ>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200306140115.3495686-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      dff2a11b
  3. 06 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  5. 05 3月, 2020 2 次提交
  7. 04 3月, 2020 2 次提交
  9. 29 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  11. 28 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  13. 20 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  15. 12 2月, 2020 4 次提交
  17. 06 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  19. 03 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  21. 23 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  23. 17 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  25. 06 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  27. 23 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  29. 22 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  31. 20 12月, 2019 2 次提交
  33. 19 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  35. 18 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  37. 17 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  39. 16 12月, 2019 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Copy across scheduler behaviour flags across submit fences · 99de9536
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      We want the bonded request to have the same scheduler properties as its
master so that it is placed at the same depth in the queue. For example,
consider we have requests A, B and B', where B & B' are a bonded pair to
run in parallel on two engines.

	A -> B
     	     \- B'

B will run after A and so may be scheduled on an idle engine and wait on
A using a semaphore. B' sees B being executed and so enters the queue on
the same engine as A. As B' did not inherit the semaphore-chain from B,
it may have higher precedence than A and so preempts execution. However,
B' then sits on a semaphore waiting for B, who is waiting for A, who is
blocked by B.

Ergo B' needs to inherit the scheduler properties from B (i.e. the
semaphore chain) so that it is scheduled with the same priority as B and
will not be executed ahead of Bs dependencies.

Furthermore, to prevent the priorities changing via the expose fence on
B', we need to couple in the dependencies for PI. This requires us to
relax our sanity-checks that dependencies are strictly in order.

v2: Synchronise (B, B') execution on all platforms, regardless of using
a scheduler, any no-op syncs should be elided.

Fixes: ee113690 ("drm/i915/execlists: Virtual engine bonding")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/464
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/bonded-chain
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/bonded-semaphore
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191210151332.3902215-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit c81471f5)
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
      99de9536
  41. 14 12月, 2019 2 次提交
  43. 12 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  45. 11 12月, 2019 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Copy across scheduler behaviour flags across submit fences · c81471f5
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      We want the bonded request to have the same scheduler properties as its
master so that it is placed at the same depth in the queue. For example,
consider we have requests A, B and B', where B & B' are a bonded pair to
run in parallel on two engines.

	A -> B
     	     \- B'

B will run after A and so may be scheduled on an idle engine and wait on
A using a semaphore. B' sees B being executed and so enters the queue on
the same engine as A. As B' did not inherit the semaphore-chain from B,
it may have higher precedence than A and so preempts execution. However,
B' then sits on a semaphore waiting for B, who is waiting for A, who is
blocked by B.

Ergo B' needs to inherit the scheduler properties from B (i.e. the
semaphore chain) so that it is scheduled with the same priority as B and
will not be executed ahead of Bs dependencies.

Furthermore, to prevent the priorities changing via the expose fence on
B', we need to couple in the dependencies for PI. This requires us to
relax our sanity-checks that dependencies are strictly in order.

v2: Synchronise (B, B') execution on all platforms, regardless of using
a scheduler, any no-op syncs should be elided.

Fixes: ee113690 ("drm/i915/execlists: Virtual engine bonding")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/464
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/bonded-chain
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/bonded-semaphore
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191210151332.3902215-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      c81471f5
  47. 07 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  49. 22 11月, 2019 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Use a ctor for TYPESAFE_BY_RCU i915_request · 67a3acaa
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      As we start peeking into requests for longer and longer, e.g.
incorporating use of spinlocks when only protected by an
rcu_read_lock(), we need to be careful in how we reset the request when
recycling and need to preserve any barriers that may still be in use as
the request is reset for reuse.

Quoting Linus Torvalds:

> If there is refcounting going on then why use SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU?

  .. because the object can be accessed (by RCU) after the refcount has
  gone down to zero, and the thing has been released.

  That's the whole and only point of SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU.

  That flag basically says:

  "I may end up accessing this object *after* it has been free'd,
  because there may be RCU lookups in flight"

  This has nothing to do with constructors. It's ok if the object gets
  reused as an object of the same type and does *not* get
  re-initialized, because we're perfectly fine seeing old stale data.

  What it guarantees is that the slab isn't shared with any other kind
  of object, _and_ that the underlying pages are free'd after an RCU
  quiescent period (so the pages aren't shared with another kind of
  object either during an RCU walk).

  And it doesn't necessarily have to have a constructor, because the
  thing that a RCU walk will care about is

    (a) guaranteed to be an object that *has* been on some RCU list (so
    it's not a "new" object)

    (b) the RCU walk needs to have logic to verify that it's still the
    *same* object and hasn't been re-used as something else.

  In contrast, a SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU memory gets free'd and re-used
  immediately, but because it gets reused as the same kind of object,
  the RCU walker can "know" what parts have meaning for re-use, in a way
  it couidn't if the re-use was random.

  That said, it *is* subtle, and people should be careful.

> So the re-use might initialize the fields lazily, not necessarily using a ctor.

  If you have a well-defined refcount, and use "atomic_inc_not_zero()"
  to guard the speculative RCU access section, and use
  "atomic_dec_and_test()" in the freeing section, then you should be
  safe wrt new allocations.

  If you have a completely new allocation that has "random stale
  content", you know that it cannot be on the RCU list, so there is no
  speculative access that can ever see that random content.

  So the only case you need to worry about is a re-use allocation, and
  you know that the refcount will start out as zero even if you don't
  have a constructor.

  So you can think of the refcount itself as always having a zero
  constructor, *BUT* you need to be careful with ordering.

  In particular, whoever does the allocation needs to then set the
  refcount to a non-zero value *after* it has initialized all the other
  fields. And in particular, it needs to make sure that it uses the
  proper memory ordering to do so.

  NOTE! One thing to be very worried about is that re-initializing
  whatever RCU lists means that now the RCU walker may be walking on the
  wrong list so the walker may do the right thing for this particular
  entry, but it may miss walking *other* entries. So then you can get
  spurious lookup failures, because the RCU walker never walked all the
  way to the end of the right list. That ends up being a much more
  subtle bug.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191122094924.629690-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      67a3acaa
  51. 27 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  53. 26 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  55. 24 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  57. 18 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  59. 15 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  61. 14 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  63. 10 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  65. 09 10月, 2019 1 次提交
    • Q
      locking/lockdep: Remove unused @nested argument from lock_release() · 5facae4f
      由 Qian Cai 提交于 
      Since the following commit:

  b4adfe8e ("locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in __lock_release")

@nested is no longer used in lock_release(), so remove it from all
lock_release() calls and friends.
Signed-off-by: NQian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: airlied@linux.ie
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: alexander.levin@microsoft.com
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: duyuyang@gmail.com
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jack@suse.com
Cc: jlbec@evilplan.or
Cc: joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com
Cc: joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: jslaby@suse.com
Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com
Cc: maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Cc: mark@fasheh.com
Cc: mhocko@kernel.org
Cc: mripard@kernel.org
Cc: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Cc: rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Cc: sean@poorly.run
Cc: st@kernel.org
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu
Cc: vdavydov.dev@gmail.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1568909380-32199-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pwSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      5facae4f