- 19 12月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Amanda Liu 提交于
[why] We want to streamline the calculations made when entering LFC. Previously, the optimizations led to screen tearing and were backed out to unblock development. [how] Integrate other calculations parameters, as well as screen tearing, fixes with the original LFC calculation optimizations. Signed-off-by: NAmanda Liu <amanda.liu@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NAric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com> Acked-by: NRodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 06 12月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Amanda Liu 提交于
[Why] Screen tearing is present in tests when setting the frame rate to certain fps [How] Revert previous optimizations for low frame rates. Signed-off-by: NAmanda Liu <amanda.liu@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NAric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com> Acked-by: NLeo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Amanda Liu 提交于
[Why] Screen tearing is present in tests when setting the frame rate to certain fps [How] Revert previous optimizations for low frame rates. Signed-off-by: NAmanda Liu <amanda.liu@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NAric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com> Acked-by: NLeo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Reza Amini 提交于
[Why] Need support for more color management in 10bit surface. [How] Provide support for DePQ for 10bit surface Signed-off-by: NReza Amini <Reza.Amini@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NKrunoslav Kovac <Krunoslav.Kovac@amd.com> Acked-by: NLeo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 03 12月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Colin Ian King 提交于
The variable v_total is being initialized with a value that is never read and it is being updated later with a new value. The initialization is redundant and can be removed. Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 zhengbin 提交于
Fixes coccicheck warning: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/hdcp/hdcp.c:506:2-3: Unneeded semicolon Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Reported-by: NHulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Nzhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Colin Ian King 提交于
The msg_id field is being assigned twice. Fix this by replacing the second assignment with an assignment to msg_size. Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") Fixes: 11a00965 ("drm/amd/display: Add PSP block to verify HDCP2.2 steps") Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 26 11月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 YueHaibing 提交于
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/modules/hdcp/hdcp_psp.c: In function mod_hdcp_hdcp2_enable_encryption: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/modules/hdcp/hdcp_psp.c:633:77: warning: variable msg_out set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/modules/hdcp/hdcp_psp.c: In function mod_hdcp_hdcp2_enable_dp_stream_encryption: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/modules/hdcp/hdcp_psp.c:710:77: warning: variable msg_out set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] It is never used, so remove it. Reported-by: NHulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 19 11月, 2019 14 次提交
-
-
由 Bhawanpreet Lakha 提交于
[Why] static analysis throws the error below Out-of-bounds read (OVERRUN) Overrunning array of 5 bytes at byte offset 7 by dereferencing pointer (uint64_t *)hdcp->auth.msg.hdcp1.bksv. var n is going to contain r0p and bcaps. if they are non-zero the count will be wrong How] Use memcpy instead to avoid this. Signed-off-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Bhawanpreet Lakha 提交于
[Why] Currently we share rxstatus between HDMI and DP, so we use 16bits The drm defines work with 1bytes at a time. So we need to split the HDMI rxstatus into 2bytes before we can use drm defines [How] -create rxstatus for dp and hdmi. rxstatus for hdmi is split into bytes using arrays. -use drm_hdcp defines for the remaining structs Signed-off-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Bhawanpreet Lakha 提交于
[Why] drm already has this define [How] drm Mask is 0x08 vs 0x0800. The reason is because drm mask works on a byte. ^^ =======|| || Since the first byte is always zero we can ignore it and only check the second byte. Signed-off-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Bhawanpreet Lakha 提交于
[Why] These defines/macros exist already no need to redefine them [How] Use the defines/macros from drm_hdcp.h -we share the rxstatus between HDMI and DP (2 bytes), But upstream defines/macros for HDMI are for 1 byte. So we need to create a separate rxstatus for HDMI Signed-off-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Bhawanpreet Lakha 提交于
[Why] The old way was to poll PSP and update the properties. But due to a limitation in the PSP interface this doesn't work for MST. [How] According to PSP if set_encryption return success, the link is encrypted and the only way it will not be is if we get a link loss(which we handle already). So this method should be good enough to report HDCP status. Signed-off-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Bhawanpreet Lakha 提交于
[Why] Before we had a disable_type1 flag, this forced HDCP 2.2 to type0 There was no way to force type1. [How] Remove disable_type1 flag and instead add a flag to force type0/1. Signed-off-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Bhawanpreet Lakha 提交于
[Why] HDCP 2.2 uses type0 and type1 content type. This is passed to the receiver to stream the proper content. For example, in a MST case if the main device is HDCP2.2 capable but the secondary device is only 1.4 capabale we can use Type0 Type0 content: use HDCP 1.4 or HDCP2.2 type0 Type1 content: Only use HDCP 2.2 type1 [How] We use the "hdcp content type" property in drm. We use the disable_type1 flag in hdcp module to select the type based on the properties. For updating the property we use the same logic as 1.4, but now we consider content_type as well and update the property if the requirements are met Signed-off-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Bhawanpreet Lakha 提交于
[Why] HDCP 2.2 was disabled, we need to enable it [How] -Update display topology to support 2.2 -Unset hdcp2.disable in update_config -Change logic of event_update_property, now we set the property to be ENABLED for any level of encryption (2.2 or 1.4). Signed-off-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Bhawanpreet Lakha 提交于
[Why] HDCP is a bit finicky so we try it 3 times, this leads to a case where if we fail the first time and pass the second time the error is still shown in dmesg for the first failed attempt. This leads to false positive errors. [How] Change the logging from ERROR to WARNING. Warnings are still shown in dmesg to know what went wrong. Signed-off-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Bhawanpreet Lakha 提交于
[Why] We need to log the state changes for 2.2 This patch extends the existing logging functions to handle HDCP2.2. [How] We do this by adding if/else in the defines, and output the log based on the hdcp version Signed-off-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Bhawanpreet Lakha 提交于
The module works like a state machine +-------------+ ------> | Execution.c | ------ | +-------------+ | | V +----+ +--------+ +--------------+ | DM | -----> | Hdcp.c | <------------ | Transition.c | +----+ <----- +--------+ +--------------+ This patch adds the execution and transition files for 2.2 Signed-off-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Bhawanpreet Lakha 提交于
[Why] We need these to read and write to aux/i2c, during authentication [How] Create read/write functions for all the steps (Eg, h_prime, paring_info etc) Signed-off-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Bhawanpreet Lakha 提交于
[Why] All the HDCP transactions should be verified using PSP [How] This patch adds the psp calls we need to verify the steps Signed-off-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 zhengbin 提交于
Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/color/color_gamma.c: In function build_freesync_hdr: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/color/color_gamma.c:830:20: warning: variable min_content set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] It is not used since commit 50575eb5 ("drm/amd/display: Only use EETF when maxCL > max display") Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Reported-by: NHulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Nzhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 14 11月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bhawanpreet Lakha 提交于
[Why] DCN2 and DSC are stable enough to be build by default. So drop the flags. [How] Remove them using the unifdef tool. The following commands were executed in sequence: $ find -name '*.c' -exec unifdef -m -DCONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_DSC_SUPPORT -DCONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_DCN2_0 -UCONFIG_TRIM_DRM_AMD_DC_DCN2_0 '{}' ';' $ find -name '*.h' -exec unifdef -m -DCONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_DSC_SUPPORT -DCONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_DCN2_0 -UCONFIG_TRIM_DRM_AMD_DC_DCN2_0 '{}' ';' In addition: * Remove from kconfig, and replace any dependencies with DCN1_0. * Remove from any makefiles. * Fix and cleanup NV defninitions in dal_asic_id.h * Expand DCN1 ifdef to include DCN2 code in the following files: * clk_mgr/clk_mgr.c: dc_clk_mgr_create() * core/dc_resources.c: dc_create_resource_pool() * dce/dce_dmcu.c: dcn20_*lock_phy() * dce/dce_dmcu.c: dcn20_funcs * dce/dce_dmcu.c: dcn20_dmcu_create() * gpio/hw_factory.c: dal_hw_factory_init() * gpio/hw_translate.c: dal_hw_translate_init() Signed-off-by: NLeo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Anthony Koo 提交于
[Why] It is confusing to sinks if we send VSC SDP only on some format. Today we signal colorimetry format using MSA while in formats like sRGB. But when we switch to BT2020 we set the bit to ignore MSA colorimetry and instead use the colorimetry information in the VSC SDP. But if sink supports signaling of colorimetry via VSC SDP we should always set the MSA MISC1 bit 6, instead of doing so selectively. [How] If sink supports signaling of colorimetry via VSC SDP, and we are sending the colorimetry info via VSC SDP with packet revision 05h, then always set MSA MISC1 bit 6. Signed-off-by: NAnthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NAric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com> Acked-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 26 10月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Krunoslav Kovac 提交于
[Why&How] BT.2390 EETF is used for tone mapping/range reduction. Say display is 0.1 - 500 nits. The problematic case is when content is 0-400. We apply EETF because 0<0.1 so we need to reduce the range by 0.1. In the commit, we ignore the bottom range. Most displays map 0 to min and then have a ramp to 0.1, so sending 0.1 is actually >0.1. Furthermode, HW that uses 3D LUT also assumes min=0. Signed-off-by: NKrunoslav Kovac <Krunoslav.Kovac@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NAric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com> Acked-by: NLeo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Aidan Yang 提交于
[why] Optimized gamma22 assumes fixed point distribution which is not true for eetf true. [how] Use long calculation for eetf. Signed-off-by: NAidan Yang <Aidan.Yang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NKrunoslav Kovac <Krunoslav.Kovac@amd.com> Acked-by: NLeo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Acked-by: NReza Amini <Reza.Amini@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 11 10月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jaehyun Chung 提交于
[Why] Static ramp to max refresh rate does not have capability check on calculated v_total. Programming a lower v_total_min and max than the total causes continuous spurious HPDs. [How] Add a capability check after v_total calculation similar to calculate v_total helper functions. Signed-off-by: NJaehyun Chung <jaehyun.chung@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NAnthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com> Acked-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Aric Cyr 提交于
[Why] Some displays rely on the SPD verticle frequency maximum value. Must round the calculated refresh rate to the nearest integer. [How] Round the nominal calculated refresh rate to the nearest whole integer. Signed-off-by: NAric Cyr <aric.cyr@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NAnthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com> Acked-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Wayne Lin 提交于
[Why] The vendor specific infoframe is needed for HDMI while displaying specific modes. DC supports sending it, but we aren't currently building it [How] Add mod_build_hf_vsif_infopacket() to build the vendor specific info packet. Signed-off-by: NWayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NNicholas Kazlauskas <Nicholas.Kazlauskas@amd.com> Acked-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 08 10月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 YueHaibing 提交于
Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning: rivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/modules/freesync/freesync.c: In function mod_freesync_get_settings: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/modules/freesync/freesync.c:984:24: warning: variable core_freesync set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] It is not used since commit 98e6436d ("drm/amd/display: Refactor FreeSync module") Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Reported-by: NHulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 04 10月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Colin Ian King 提交于
There is a spelling mistake in the macros H1_A45_AUTHENICATED and D1_A4_AUTHENICATED, fix these by adding the missing T. Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 03 10月, 2019 4 次提交
-
-
由 Bhawanpreet Lakha 提交于
[Why] All the HDCP transactions should be verified using PSP. [How] This patch calls psp with the correct inputs to verify the steps of authentication. Signed-off-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Bhawanpreet Lakha 提交于
This module manages HDCP for amdgpu driver. The module behaves as a state machine which handles the different authentication states of HDCP The module is divided into 3 major components +--------+ | Hdcp.c | +--------+ Manages the state machine, sends the events to be executed and communicates with the dm +-----------+ |Execution.c| +-----------+ This executes events based on the current state. Also generates execution results as transition inputs +------------+ |Transition.c| +------------+ Decides the next state based on the input and makes requests to hdcp.c to handle. +-------------+ ------> | Execution.c | ------ | +-------------+ | | V +----+ +--------+ +--------------+ | DM | -----> | Hdcp.c | <------------ | Transition.c | +----+ <----- +--------+ +--------------+ v2: Drop unused function definitions Signed-off-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NWenjing Liu <Wenjing.Liu@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NWenjing Liu <Wenjing.Liu@amd.com> Acked-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Aric Cyr 提交于
[Why] There can be some unsynchronized frames when entering/exiting LFC. This may cause tearing or stuttering at such transitions. [How] Add a enter/exit margin to algorithm to smoothly transition into and out of LFC without desynchronizing frames. Signed-off-by: NAric Cyr <aric.cyr@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NReza Amini <Reza.Amini@amd.com> Acked-by: NLeo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Acked-by: NSivapiriyan Kumarasamy <Sivapiriyan.Kumarasamy@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Anthony Koo 提交于
[Why] A lot of the time, the backlight characteristic curve maps min backlight to a non-zero value. But there are cases where we want the curve to intersect at 0. In this scenario even if OS never asks to set 0% backlight, the ABM reduction can result in backlight being lowered close to 0. This particularly can cause problems in some LED drivers, and in general just looks like backlight is completely off. [How] Add default cap to disallow backlight from dropping below 1% even after ABM reduction is applied. Signed-off-by: NAnthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NAric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com> Acked-by: NLeo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 17 9月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josip Pavic 提交于
[Why] Current configuration 0 is just a placeholder, and final parameters needed. Also, configuration 1 is expected to emulate ABM 2.1 but is too aggressive. [How] Redefine configuration 0 with the finalized parameters, and increase the contrast gain of configuration 1 so that it properly emulates ABM 2.1. Signed-off-by: NJosip Pavic <Josip.Pavic@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NAnthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com> Acked-by: NLeo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 27 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 YueHaibing 提交于
After commit a9f54ce3 ("drm/amd/display: Refactoring VTEM"), there is no caller in tree. Reported-by: NHulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NYueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 24 8月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Wyatt Wood 提交于
[Why] A recent bug showed that logging would be useful in debugging various gamma issues. [How] Add logging in dc. Fix formatting for easier graphing. Signed-off-by: NWyatt Wood <wyatt.wood@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NAnthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com> Acked-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Ahmad Othman 提交于
[Why] Video Timing Extended Metadata packet (VTEM) is not specific to freesync. So move it out of freesync module [How] - Moved VTEM from freesync module to info_packet module - Created new structure for VTEM parameters that can be used for VRR and FVA Signed-off-by: NAhmad Othman <ahmad.othman@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Park <Chris.Park@amd.com> Acked-by: NAhmad Othman <Ahmad.Othman@amd.com> Acked-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
由 Josip Pavic 提交于
[Why] ABM 2.3 firmware expects information in iRAM that differs from previous versions of ABM, so a mechanism is required to provide it with that information. [How] Extend the existing iRAM definition to include parameters added by ABM 2.3, and load it if DMCU is running ABM 2.3. Signed-off-by: NJosip Pavic <Josip.Pavic@amd.com> Reviewed-by: NAnthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com> Acked-by: NBhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-