Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 11 5月, 2018 4 次提交
  3. 04 5月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 28 4月, 2018 3 次提交
  7. 27 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 21 4月, 2018 2 次提交
  11. 09 4月, 2018 2 次提交
  13. 06 4月, 2018 3 次提交
  15. 31 3月, 2018 2 次提交
  17. 29 3月, 2018 2 次提交
  19. 24 3月, 2018 3 次提交
  21. 22 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  23. 21 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  25. 20 3月, 2018 2 次提交
    • K
      drm/i915/icl: Update subslice define for ICL 11 · d3d57927
      由 Kelvin Gardiner 提交于 
      ICL 11 has a greater number of maximum subslices. This patch
reflects this.

v2: GEN11 updates to MCR_SELECTOR (Oscar)
v3: Copypasta error in the new defines (Lionel)

Bspec: 21139
BSpec: 21108
Signed-off-by: NKelvin Gardiner <kelvin.gardiner@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> (v1)
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> (v1)
Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NLionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180316121456.11577-3-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
      d3d57927
    • O
      drm/i915/icl: Check for fused-off VDBOX and VEBOX instances · 26376a7e
      由 Oscar Mateo 提交于 
      In Gen11, the Video Decode engines (aka VDBOX, aka VCS, aka BSD) and the
Video Enhancement engines (aka VEBOX, aka VECS) could be fused off. Also,
each VDBOX and VEBOX has its own power well, which only exist if the
related engine exists in the HW.

Unfortunately, we have a Catch-22 situation going on: we need the blitter
forcewake to read the register with the fuse info, but we cannot initialize
the forcewake domains without knowin about the engines present in the HW.
We workaround this problem by allowing the initialization of all forcewake
domains and then pruning the fused off ones, as per the fuse information.

Bspec: 20680

v2: We were shifting incorrectly for vebox disable (Vinay)

v3: Assert mmio is ready and warn if we have attempted to initialize
    forcewake for fused-off engines (Paulo)

v4:
  - Use INTEL_GEN in new code (Tvrtko)
  - Shorter local variable (Tvrtko, Michal)
  - Keep "if (!...) continue" style (Tvrtko)
  - No unnecessary BUG_ON (Tvrtko)
  - WARN_ON and cleanup if wrong mask (Tvrtko, Michal)
  - Use I915_READ_FW (Michal)
  - Use I915_MAX_VCS/VECS macros (Michal)

v5: Rebased by Rodrigo fixing conflicts on top of:
    "drm/i915: Simplify intel_engines_init"

v6: Fix v5. Remove info->num_rings. (by Oscar)

v7: Rebase (Rodrigo).

v8:
  - s/intel_device_info_fused_off_engines/
    intel_device_info_init_mmio (Chris)
  - Make vdbox_disable & vebox_disable local variables (Chris)

v9:
  - Move function declaration to intel_device_info.h (Michal)
  - Missing indent in bit fields definitions (Michal)
  - When RC6 is enabled by BIOS, the fuse register cannot be read until
    the blitter powerwell is awake. Shuffle where the fuse is read, prune
    the forcewake domains after the fact and change the commit message
    accordingly (Vinay, Sagar, Chris).

v10:
  - Improved commit message (Sagar)
  - New line in header file (Sagar)
  - Specify the message in fw_domain_reset applies to ICL+ (Sagar)

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NSagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180316121456.11577-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
[Mika: soothe checkpatch on commit msg]
Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
      26376a7e
  27. 17 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  29. 15 3月, 2018 3 次提交
  31. 14 3月, 2018 2 次提交
  33. 13 3月, 2018 1 次提交
    • R
      drm/i915/psr: Display WA 0884 applied broadly for more HW tracking. · caa1fd66
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      WA 0884:bxt:all,cnl:*:A - "When FBC is enabled with eDP PSR,
the CPU host modify writes may not get updated on the Display
as expected.
WA: Write 0x00000000 to CUR_SURFLIVE_A with every CPU
host modify write to trigger PSR exit."

We can also find on spec other cases where they describe
bogus writes to cursor registers to force PSR exit with
HW tracking. And it was confirmed by HW engineers that
this Wa can be safely applied for any frontbuffer activity.

So let's use this more and more here instead of forcibly
disable and re-enable PSR everytime that we have a simple
reliable flush case.

Other commits improve the fbcon/fbdev use a lot, but this
approach is the only when where we can get a fully reliable
console with no slowness or missed frames and PSR still
enabled and active.

v2: - Rebase on drm-tip
    - (DK) Add a comment to explain that WA
    tells about writing 0 to CUR_SURFLIVE_A but we write to
    CUR_SURFLIVE(pipe).
v3: Wa doesn't work on PSR2.

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180309005218.26772-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
      caa1fd66
  35. 08 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  37. 07 3月, 2018 3 次提交
  39. 02 3月, 2018 2 次提交