Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
12 个月 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 06 5月, 2022 3 次提交
  3. 28 4月, 2022 5 次提交
    • F
      btrfs: skip compression property for anything other than files and dirs · 4b73c55f
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      The compression property only has effect on regular files and directories
(so that it's propagated to files and subdirectories created inside a
directory). For any other inode type (symlink, fifo, device, socket),
it's pointless to set the compression property because it does nothing
and ends up unnecessarily wasting leaf space due to the pointless xattr
(75 or 76 bytes, depending on the compression value). Symlinks in
particular are very common (for example, I have almost 10k symlinks under
/etc, /usr and /var alone) and therefore it's worth to avoid wasting
leaf space with the compression xattr.

For example, the compression property can end up on a symlink or character
device implicitly, through inheritance from a parent directory

  $ mkdir /mnt/testdir
  $ btrfs property set /mnt/testdir compression lzo

  $ ln -s yadayada /mnt/testdir/lnk
  $ mknod /mnt/testdir/dev c 0 0

Or explicitly like this:

  $ ln -s yadayda /mnt/lnk
  $ setfattr -h -n btrfs.compression -v lzo /mnt/lnk

So skip the compression property on inodes that are neither a regular
file nor a directory.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      4b73c55f
    • F
      btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to update inode when setting xattr · 193b4e83
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      We are doing a BUG_ON() if we fail to update an inode after setting (or
clearing) a xattr, but there's really no reason to not instead simply
abort the transaction and return the error to the caller. This should be
a rare error because we have previously reserved enough metadata space to
update the inode and the delayed inode should have already been setup, so
an -ENOSPC or -ENOMEM, which are the possible errors, are very unlikely to
happen.

So replace the BUG_ON()s with a transaction abort.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      193b4e83
    • F
      btrfs: always log symlinks in full mode · d0e64a98
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      On Linux, empty symlinks are invalid, and attempting to create one with
the system call symlink(2) results in an -ENOENT error and this is
explicitly documented in the man page.

If we rename a symlink that was created in the current transaction and its
parent directory was logged before, we actually end up logging the symlink
without logging its content, which is stored in an inline extent. That
means that after a power failure we can end up with an empty symlink,
having no content and an i_size of 0 bytes.

It can be easily reproduced like this:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt

  $ mkdir /mnt/testdir
  $ sync

  # Create a file inside the directory and fsync the directory.
  $ touch /mnt/testdir/foo
  $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/testdir

  # Create a symlink inside the directory and then rename the symlink.
  $ ln -s /mnt/testdir/foo /mnt/testdir/bar
  $ mv /mnt/testdir/bar /mnt/testdir/baz

  # Now fsync again the directory, this persist the log tree.
  $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/testdir

  <power failure>

  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt
  $ stat -c %s /mnt/testdir/baz
  0
  $ readlink /mnt/testdir/baz
  $

Fix this by always logging symlinks in full mode (LOG_INODE_ALL), so that
their content is also logged.

A test case for fstests will follow.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      d0e64a98
    • C
      btrfs: do not allow compression on nodatacow files · 0e852ab8
      由 Chung-Chiang Cheng 提交于 
      Compression and nodatacow are mutually exclusive. A similar issue was
fixed by commit f37c563b ("btrfs: add missing check for nocow and
compression inode flags"). Besides ioctl, there is another way to
enable/disable/reset compression directly via xattr. The following
steps will result in a invalid combination.

  $ touch bar
  $ chattr +C bar
  $ lsattr bar
  ---------------C-- bar
  $ setfattr -n btrfs.compression -v zstd bar
  $ lsattr bar
  --------c------C-- bar

To align with the logic in check_fsflags, nocompress will also be
unacceptable after this patch, to prevent mix any compression-related
options with nodatacow.

  $ touch bar
  $ chattr +C bar
  $ lsattr bar
  ---------------C-- bar
  $ setfattr -n btrfs.compression -v zstd bar
  setfattr: bar: Invalid argument
  $ setfattr -n btrfs.compression -v no bar
  setfattr: bar: Invalid argument

When both compression and nodatacow are enabled, then
btrfs_run_delalloc_range prefers nodatacow and no compression happens.
Reported-by: NJayce Lin <jaycelin@synology.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10.x: e6f9d696: btrfs: export a helper for compression hard check
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10.x
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChung-Chiang Cheng <cccheng@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      0e852ab8
    • C
      btrfs: export a helper for compression hard check · e6f9d696
      由 Chung-Chiang Cheng 提交于 
      inode_can_compress will be used outside of inode.c to check the
availability of setting compression flag by xattr. This patch moves
this function as an internal helper and renames it to
btrfs_inode_can_compress.
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChung-Chiang Cheng <cccheng@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      e6f9d696
  5. 21 4月, 2022 2 次提交
    • N
      btrfs: zoned: use dedicated lock for data relocation · 5f0addf7
      由 Naohiro Aota 提交于 
      Currently, we use btrfs_inode_{lock,unlock}() to grant an exclusive
writeback of the relocation data inode in
btrfs_zoned_data_reloc_{lock,unlock}(). However, that can cause a deadlock
in the following path.

Thread A takes btrfs_inode_lock() and waits for metadata reservation by
e.g, waiting for writeback:

prealloc_file_extent_cluster()
  - btrfs_inode_lock(&inode->vfs_inode, 0);
  - btrfs_prealloc_file_range()
  ...
    - btrfs_replace_file_extents()
      - btrfs_start_transaction
      ...
        - btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes()

Thread B (e.g, doing a writeback work) needs to wait for the inode lock to
continue writeback process:

do_writepages
  - btrfs_writepages
    - extent_writpages
      - btrfs_zoned_data_reloc_lock(BTRFS_I(inode));
        - btrfs_inode_lock()

The deadlock is caused by relying on the vfs_inode's lock. By using it, we
introduced unnecessary exclusion of writeback and
btrfs_prealloc_file_range(). Also, the lock at this point is useless as we
don't have any dirty pages in the inode yet.

Introduce fs_info->zoned_data_reloc_io_lock and use it for the exclusive
writeback.

Fixes: 35156d85 ("btrfs: zoned: only allow one process to add pages to a relocation inode")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16.x: 869f4cdc: btrfs: zoned: encapsulate inode locking for zoned relocation
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16.x
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.17
Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      5f0addf7
    • F
      btrfs: fix assertion failure during scrub due to block group reallocation · a692e13d
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      During a scrub, or device replace, we can race with block group removal
and allocation and trigger the following assertion failure:

[7526.385524] assertion failed: cache->start == chunk_offset, in fs/btrfs/scrub.c:3817
[7526.387351] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[7526.387373] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3599!
[7526.388001] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI
[7526.388970] CPU: 2 PID: 1158150 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.17.0-rc8-btrfs-next-114 #4
[7526.390279] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[7526.392430] RIP: 0010:assertfail.constprop.0+0x18/0x1a [btrfs]
[7526.393520] Code: f3 48 c7 c7 20 (...)
[7526.396926] RSP: 0018:ffffb9154176bc40 EFLAGS: 00010246
[7526.397690] RAX: 0000000000000048 RBX: ffffa0db8a910000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[7526.398732] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff9d7239a2 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
[7526.399766] RBP: ffffa0db8a911e10 R08: ffffffffa71a3ca0 R09: 0000000000000001
[7526.400793] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffa0db4b170800
[7526.401839] R13: 00000003494b0000 R14: ffffa0db7c55b488 R15: ffffa0db8b19a000
[7526.402874] FS:  00007f6c99c40640(0000) GS:ffffa0de6d200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[7526.404038] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[7526.405040] CR2: 00007f31b0882160 CR3: 000000014b38c004 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
[7526.406112] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[7526.407148] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[7526.408169] Call Trace:
[7526.408529]  <TASK>
[7526.408839]  scrub_enumerate_chunks.cold+0x11/0x79 [btrfs]
[7526.409690]  ? do_wait_intr_irq+0xb0/0xb0
[7526.410276]  btrfs_scrub_dev+0x226/0x620 [btrfs]
[7526.410995]  ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0
[7526.411592]  btrfs_ioctl+0x1ab5/0x36d0 [btrfs]
[7526.412278]  ? __fget_files+0xc9/0x1b0
[7526.412825]  ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x14/0x40
[7526.413459]  ? lock_release+0x155/0x4a0
[7526.414022]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
[7526.414601]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
[7526.415150]  do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[7526.415675]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[7526.416408] RIP: 0033:0x7f6c99d34397
[7526.416931] Code: 3c 1c e8 1c ff (...)
[7526.419641] RSP: 002b:00007f6c99c3fca8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[7526.420735] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005624e1e007b0 RCX: 00007f6c99d34397
[7526.421779] RDX: 00005624e1e007b0 RSI: 00000000c400941b RDI: 0000000000000003
[7526.422820] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007f6c99c40640 R09: 0000000000000000
[7526.423906] R10: 00007f6c99c40640 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff746755de
[7526.424924] R13: 00007fff746755df R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007f6c99c40640
[7526.425950]  </TASK>

That assertion is relatively new, introduced with commit d04fbe19
("btrfs: scrub: cleanup the argument list of scrub_chunk()").

The block group we get at scrub_enumerate_chunks() can actually have a
start address that is smaller then the chunk offset we extracted from a
device extent item we got from the commit root of the device tree.
This is very rare, but it can happen due to a race with block group
removal and allocation. For example, the following steps show how this
can happen:

1) We are at transaction T, and we have the following blocks groups,
   sorted by their logical start address:

   [ bg A, start address A, length 1G (data) ]
   [ bg B, start address B, length 1G (data) ]
   (...)
   [ bg W, start address W, length 1G (data) ]

     --> logical address space hole of 256M,
         there used to be a 256M metadata block group here

   [ bg Y, start address Y, length 256M (metadata) ]

      --> Y matches W's end offset + 256M

   Block group Y is the block group with the highest logical address in
   the whole filesystem;

2) Block group Y is deleted and its extent mapping is removed by the call
   to remove_extent_mapping() made from btrfs_remove_block_group().

   So after this point, the last element of the mapping red black tree,
   its rightmost node, is the mapping for block group W;

3) While still at transaction T, a new data block group is allocated,
   with a length of 1G. When creating the block group we do a call to
   find_next_chunk(), which returns the logical start address for the
   new block group. This calls returns X, which corresponds to the
   end offset of the last block group, the rightmost node in the mapping
   red black tree (fs_info->mapping_tree), plus one.

   So we get a new block group that starts at logical address X and with
   a length of 1G. It spans over the whole logical range of the old block
   group Y, that was previously removed in the same transaction.

   However the device extent allocated to block group X is not the same
   device extent that was used by block group Y, and it also does not
   overlap that extent, which must be always the case because we allocate
   extents by searching through the commit root of the device tree
   (otherwise it could corrupt a filesystem after a power failure or
   an unclean shutdown in general), so the extent allocator is behaving
   as expected;

4) We have a task running scrub, currently at scrub_enumerate_chunks().
   There it searches for device extent items in the device tree, using
   its commit root. It finds a device extent item that was used by
   block group Y, and it extracts the value Y from that item into the
   local variable 'chunk_offset', using btrfs_dev_extent_chunk_offset();

   It then calls btrfs_lookup_block_group() to find block group for
   the logical address Y - since there's currently no block group that
   starts at that logical address, it returns block group X, because
   its range contains Y.

   This results in triggering the assertion:

      ASSERT(cache->start == chunk_offset);

   right before calling scrub_chunk(), as cache->start is X and
   chunk_offset is Y.

This is more likely to happen of filesystems not larger than 50G, because
for these filesystems we use a 256M size for metadata block groups and
a 1G size for data block groups, while for filesystems larger than 50G,
we use a 1G size for both data and metadata block groups (except for
zoned filesystems). It could also happen on any filesystem size due to
the fact that system block groups are always smaller (32M) than both
data and metadata block groups, but these are not frequently deleted, so
much less likely to trigger the race.

So make scrub skip any block group with a start offset that is less than
the value we expect, as that means it's a new block group that was created
in the current transaction. It's pointless to continue and try to scrub
its extents, because scrub searches for extents using the commit root, so
it won't find any. For a device replace, skip it as well for the same
reasons, and we don't need to worry about the possibility of extents of
the new block group not being to the new device, because we have the write
duplication setup done through btrfs_map_block().

Fixes: d04fbe19 ("btrfs: scrub: cleanup the argument list of scrub_chunk()")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.17
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      a692e13d
  7. 19 4月, 2022 4 次提交
  9. 06 4月, 2022 9 次提交
  11. 25 3月, 2022 5 次提交
    • K
      btrfs: prevent subvol with swapfile from being deleted · 60021bd7
      由 Kaiwen Hu 提交于 
      A subvolume with an active swapfile must not be deleted otherwise it
would not be possible to deactivate it.

After the subvolume is deleted, we cannot swapoff the swapfile in this
deleted subvolume because the path is unreachable.  The swapfile is
still active and holding references, the filesystem cannot be unmounted.

The test looks like this:

  mkfs.btrfs -f $dev > /dev/null
  mount $dev $mnt

  btrfs sub create $mnt/subvol
  touch $mnt/subvol/swapfile
  chmod 600 $mnt/subvol/swapfile
  chattr +C $mnt/subvol/swapfile
  dd if=/dev/zero of=$mnt/subvol/swapfile bs=1K count=4096
  mkswap $mnt/subvol/swapfile
  swapon $mnt/subvol/swapfile

  btrfs sub delete $mnt/subvol
  swapoff $mnt/subvol/swapfile  # failed: No such file or directory
  swapoff --all

  unmount $mnt                  # target is busy.

To prevent above issue, we simply check that whether the subvolume
contains any active swapfile, and stop the deleting process.  This
behavior is like snapshot ioctl dealing with a swapfile.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: NRobbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NKaiwen Hu <kevinhu@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      60021bd7
    • J
      btrfs: do not warn for free space inode in cow_file_range · a7d16d9a
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      This is a long time leftover from when I originally added the free space
inode, the point was to catch cases where we weren't honoring the NOCOW
flag.  However there exists a race with relocation, if we allocate our
free space inode in a block group that is about to be relocated, we
could trigger the COW path before the relocation has the opportunity to
find the extents and delete the free space cache.  In production where
we have auto-relocation enabled we're seeing this WARN_ON_ONCE() around
5k times in a 2 week period, so not super common but enough that it's at
the top of our metrics.

We're properly handling the error here, and with us phasing out v1 space
cache anyway just drop the WARN_ON_ONCE.
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      a7d16d9a
    • Q
      btrfs: avoid defragging extents whose next extents are not targets · 75a36a7d
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      [BUG]
There is a report that autodefrag is defragging single sector, which
is completely waste of IO, and no help for defragging:

   btrfs-cleaner-808 defrag_one_locked_range: root=256 ino=651122 start=0 len=4096

[CAUSE]
In defrag_collect_targets(), we check if the current range (A) can be merged
with next one (B).

If mergeable, we will add range A into target for defrag.

However there is a catch for autodefrag, when checking mergeability
against range B, we intentionally pass 0 as @newer_than, hoping to get a
higher chance to merge with the next extent.

But in the next iteration, range B will looked up by defrag_lookup_extent(),
with non-zero @newer_than.

And if range B is not really newer, it will rejected directly, causing
only range A being defragged, while we expect to defrag both range A and
B.

[FIX]
Since the root cause is the difference in check condition of
defrag_check_next_extent() and defrag_collect_targets(), we fix it by:

1. Pass @newer_than to defrag_check_next_extent()
2. Pass @extent_thresh to defrag_check_next_extent()

This makes the check between defrag_collect_targets() and
defrag_check_next_extent() more consistent.

While there is still some minor difference, the remaining checks are
focus on runtime flags like writeback/delalloc, which are mostly
transient and safe to be checked only in defrag_collect_targets().

Link: https://github.com/btrfs/linux/issues/423#issuecomment-1066981856
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      75a36a7d
    • D
      btrfs: fix fallocate to use file_modified to update permissions consistently · 05fd9564
      由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于 
      Since the initial introduction of (posix) fallocate back at the turn of
the century, it has been possible to use this syscall to change the
user-visible contents of files.  This can happen by extending the file
size during a preallocation, or through any of the newer modes (punch,
zero range).  Because the call can be used to change file contents, we
should treat it like we do any other modification to a file -- update
the mtime, and drop set[ug]id privileges/capabilities.

The VFS function file_modified() does all this for us if pass it a
locked inode, so let's make fallocate drop permissions correctly.
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      05fd9564
    • Q
      btrfs: remove device item and update super block in the same transaction · bbac5869
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      [BUG]
There is a report that a btrfs has a bad super block num devices.

This makes btrfs to reject the fs completely.

  BTRFS error (device sdd3): super_num_devices 3 mismatch with num_devices 2 found here
  BTRFS error (device sdd3): failed to read chunk tree: -22
  BTRFS error (device sdd3): open_ctree failed

[CAUSE]
During btrfs device removal, chunk tree and super block num devs are
updated in two different transactions:

  btrfs_rm_device()
  |- btrfs_rm_dev_item(device)
  |  |- trans = btrfs_start_transaction()
  |  |  Now we got transaction X
  |  |
  |  |- btrfs_del_item()
  |  |  Now device item is removed from chunk tree
  |  |
  |  |- btrfs_commit_transaction()
  |     Transaction X got committed, super num devs untouched,
  |     but device item removed from chunk tree.
  |     (AKA, super num devs is already incorrect)
  |
  |- cur_devices->num_devices--;
  |- cur_devices->total_devices--;
  |- btrfs_set_super_num_devices()
     All those operations are not in transaction X, thus it will
     only be written back to disk in next transaction.

So after the transaction X in btrfs_rm_dev_item() committed, but before
transaction X+1 (which can be minutes away), a power loss happen, then
we got the super num mismatch.

[FIX]
Instead of starting and committing a transaction inside
btrfs_rm_dev_item(), start a transaction in side btrfs_rm_device() and
pass it to btrfs_rm_dev_item().

And only commit the transaction after everything is done.
Reported-by: NLuca Béla Palkovics <luca.bela.palkovics@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CA+8xDSpvdm_U0QLBAnrH=zqDq_cWCOH5TiV46CKmp3igr44okQ@mail.gmail.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      bbac5869
  13. 24 3月, 2022 3 次提交
    • E
      btrfs: fix qgroup reserve overflow the qgroup limit · b642b52d
      由 Ethan Lien 提交于 
      We use extent_changeset->bytes_changed in qgroup_reserve_data() to record
how many bytes we set for EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED state. Currently the
bytes_changed is set as "unsigned int", and it will overflow if we try to
fallocate a range larger than 4GiB. The result is we reserve less bytes
and eventually break the qgroup limit.

Unlike regular buffered/direct write, which we use one changeset for
each ordered extent, which can never be larger than 256M.  For
fallocate, we use one changeset for the whole range, thus it no longer
respects the 256M per extent limit, and caused the problem.

The following example test script reproduces the problem:

  $ cat qgroup-overflow.sh
  #!/bin/bash

  DEV=/dev/sdj
  MNT=/mnt/sdj

  mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
  mount $DEV $MNT

  # Set qgroup limit to 2GiB.
  btrfs quota enable $MNT
  btrfs qgroup limit 2G $MNT

  # Try to fallocate a 3GiB file. This should fail.
  echo
  echo "Try to fallocate a 3GiB file..."
  fallocate -l 3G $MNT/3G.file

  # Try to fallocate a 5GiB file.
  echo
  echo "Try to fallocate a 5GiB file..."
  fallocate -l 5G $MNT/5G.file

  # See we break the qgroup limit.
  echo
  sync
  btrfs qgroup show -r $MNT

  umount $MNT

When running the test:

  $ ./qgroup-overflow.sh
  (...)

  Try to fallocate a 3GiB file...
  fallocate: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded

  Try to fallocate a 5GiB file...

  qgroupid         rfer         excl     max_rfer
  --------         ----         ----     --------
  0/5           5.00GiB      5.00GiB      2.00GiB

Since we have no control of how bytes_changed is used, it's better to
set it to u64.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NEthan Lien <ethanlien@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      b642b52d
    • J
      btrfs: zoned: remove left over ASSERT checking for single profile · 62ed0bf7
      由 Johannes Thumshirn 提交于 
      With commit dcf5652291f6 ("btrfs: zoned: allow DUP on meta-data block
groups") we started allowing DUP on metadata block groups, so the
ASSERT()s in btrfs_can_activate_zone() and btrfs_zoned_get_device() are
no longer valid and in fact even harmful.

Fixes: dcf5652291f6 ("btrfs: zoned: allow DUP on meta-data block groups")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.17
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      62ed0bf7
    • J
      btrfs: zoned: traverse devices under chunk_mutex in btrfs_can_activate_zone · 0b9e6676
      由 Johannes Thumshirn 提交于 
      btrfs_can_activate_zone() can be called with the device_list_mutex already
held, which will lead to a deadlock:

insert_dev_extents() // Takes device_list_mutex
`-> insert_dev_extent()
 `-> btrfs_insert_empty_item()
  `-> btrfs_insert_empty_items()
   `-> btrfs_search_slot()
    `-> btrfs_cow_block()
     `-> __btrfs_cow_block()
      `-> btrfs_alloc_tree_block()
       `-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
        `-> find_free_extent()
         `-> find_free_extent_update_loop()
          `-> can_allocate_chunk()
           `-> btrfs_can_activate_zone() // Takes device_list_mutex again

Instead of using the RCU on fs_devices->device_list we
can use fs_devices->alloc_list, protected by the chunk_mutex to traverse
the list of active devices.

We are in the chunk allocation thread. The newer chunk allocation
happens from the devices in the fs_device->alloc_list protected by the
chunk_mutex.

  btrfs_create_chunk()
    lockdep_assert_held(&info->chunk_mutex);
    gather_device_info
      list_for_each_entry(device, &fs_devices->alloc_list, dev_alloc_list)

Also, a device that reappears after the mount won't join the alloc_list
yet and, it will be in the dev_list, which we don't want to consider in
the context of the chunk alloc.

  [15.166572] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
  [15.167117] 5.17.0-rc6-dennis #79 Not tainted
  [15.167487] --------------------------------------------
  [15.167733] kworker/u8:3/146 is trying to acquire lock:
  [15.167733] ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
  [15.167733]
  [15.167733] but task is already holding lock:
  [15.167733] ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x20a/0x560 [btrfs]
  [15.167733]
  [15.167733] other info that might help us debug this:
  [15.167733]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
  [15.167733]
  [15.171834]        CPU0
  [15.171834]        ----
  [15.171834]   lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
  [15.171834]   lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
  [15.171834]
  [15.171834]  *** DEADLOCK ***
  [15.171834]
  [15.171834]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
  [15.171834]
  [15.171834] 5 locks held by kworker/u8:3/146:
  [15.171834]  #0: ffff888100050938 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c3/0x5a0
  [15.171834]  #1: ffffc9000067be80 ((work_completion)(&fs_info->async_data_reclaim_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c3/0x5a0
  [15.176244]  #2: ffff88810521e620 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: flush_space+0x335/0x600 [btrfs]
  [15.176244]  #3: ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x20a/0x560 [btrfs]
  [15.176244]  #4: ffff8881152e4b78 (btrfs-dev-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x130 [btrfs]
  [15.179641]
  [15.179641] stack backtrace:
  [15.179641] CPU: 1 PID: 146 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc6-dennis #79
  [15.179641] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1.fc35 04/01/2014
  [15.179641] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs]
  [15.179641] Call Trace:
  [15.179641]  <TASK>
  [15.179641]  dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x59
  [15.179641]  __lock_acquire.cold+0x217/0x2b2
  [15.179641]  lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2b0
  [15.183838]  ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
  [15.183838]  __mutex_lock+0x8e/0x970
  [15.183838]  ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
  [15.183838]  ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
  [15.183838]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xd7/0x130
  [15.183838]  ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
  [15.183838]  find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
  [15.183838]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x24/0x40
  [15.183838]  ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x106/0x230 [btrfs]
  [15.187601]  btrfs_reserve_extent+0x131/0x260 [btrfs]
  [15.187601]  btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb5/0x3b0 [btrfs]
  [15.187601]  __btrfs_cow_block+0x138/0x600 [btrfs]
  [15.187601]  btrfs_cow_block+0x10f/0x230 [btrfs]
  [15.187601]  btrfs_search_slot+0x55f/0xbc0 [btrfs]
  [15.187601]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xd7/0x130
  [15.187601]  btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x2d/0x60 [btrfs]
  [15.187601]  btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x2b3/0x560 [btrfs]
  [15.187601]  __btrfs_end_transaction+0x36/0x2a0 [btrfs]
  [15.192037]  flush_space+0x374/0x600 [btrfs]
  [15.192037]  ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
  [15.192037]  ? btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x49/0x180 [btrfs]
  [15.192037]  ? lock_release+0x131/0x2b0
  [15.192037]  btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x70/0x180 [btrfs]
  [15.192037]  process_one_work+0x24c/0x5a0
  [15.192037]  worker_thread+0x4a/0x3d0

Fixes: a85f05e5 ("btrfs: zoned: avoid chunk allocation if active block group has enough space")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      0b9e6676
  15. 14 3月, 2022 9 次提交