提交 bbac5869 编写于 作者: Q Qu Wenruo 提交者: David Sterba

btrfs: remove device item and update super block in the same transaction

[BUG]
There is a report that a btrfs has a bad super block num devices.

This makes btrfs to reject the fs completely.

  BTRFS error (device sdd3): super_num_devices 3 mismatch with num_devices 2 found here
  BTRFS error (device sdd3): failed to read chunk tree: -22
  BTRFS error (device sdd3): open_ctree failed

[CAUSE]
During btrfs device removal, chunk tree and super block num devs are
updated in two different transactions:

  btrfs_rm_device()
  |- btrfs_rm_dev_item(device)
  |  |- trans = btrfs_start_transaction()
  |  |  Now we got transaction X
  |  |
  |  |- btrfs_del_item()
  |  |  Now device item is removed from chunk tree
  |  |
  |  |- btrfs_commit_transaction()
  |     Transaction X got committed, super num devs untouched,
  |     but device item removed from chunk tree.
  |     (AKA, super num devs is already incorrect)
  |
  |- cur_devices->num_devices--;
  |- cur_devices->total_devices--;
  |- btrfs_set_super_num_devices()
     All those operations are not in transaction X, thus it will
     only be written back to disk in next transaction.

So after the transaction X in btrfs_rm_dev_item() committed, but before
transaction X+1 (which can be minutes away), a power loss happen, then
we got the super num mismatch.

[FIX]
Instead of starting and committing a transaction inside
btrfs_rm_dev_item(), start a transaction in side btrfs_rm_device() and
pass it to btrfs_rm_dev_item().

And only commit the transaction after everything is done.
Reported-by: NLuca Béla Palkovics <luca.bela.palkovics@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CA+8xDSpvdm_U0QLBAnrH=zqDq_cWCOH5TiV46CKmp3igr44okQ@mail.gmail.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
上级 b642b52d
......@@ -1896,23 +1896,18 @@ static void update_dev_time(const char *device_path)
path_put(&path);
}
static int btrfs_rm_dev_item(struct btrfs_device *device)
static int btrfs_rm_dev_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_device *device)
{
struct btrfs_root *root = device->fs_info->chunk_root;
int ret;
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_key key;
struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 0);
if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
btrfs_free_path(path);
return PTR_ERR(trans);
}
key.objectid = BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID;
key.type = BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY;
key.offset = device->devid;
......@@ -1923,21 +1918,12 @@ static int btrfs_rm_dev_item(struct btrfs_device *device)
if (ret) {
if (ret > 0)
ret = -ENOENT;
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
goto out;
}
ret = btrfs_del_item(trans, root, path);
if (ret) {
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
}
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
if (!ret)
ret = btrfs_commit_transaction(trans);
return ret;
}
......@@ -2078,6 +2064,7 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
struct btrfs_dev_lookup_args *args,
struct block_device **bdev, fmode_t *mode)
{
struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
struct btrfs_device *device;
struct btrfs_fs_devices *cur_devices;
struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices = fs_info->fs_devices;
......@@ -2098,7 +2085,7 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
ret = btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(fs_info, num_devices - 1);
if (ret)
goto out;
return ret;
device = btrfs_find_device(fs_info->fs_devices, args);
if (!device) {
......@@ -2106,27 +2093,22 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
ret = BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_MISSING_NOT_FOUND;
else
ret = -ENOENT;
goto out;
return ret;
}
if (btrfs_pinned_by_swapfile(fs_info, device)) {
btrfs_warn_in_rcu(fs_info,
"cannot remove device %s (devid %llu) due to active swapfile",
rcu_str_deref(device->name), device->devid);
ret = -ETXTBSY;
goto out;
return -ETXTBSY;
}
if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT, &device->dev_state)) {
ret = BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_TGT_REPLACE;
goto out;
}
if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT, &device->dev_state))
return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_TGT_REPLACE;
if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state) &&
fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices == 1) {
ret = BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_ONLY_WRITABLE;
goto out;
}
fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices == 1)
return BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_ONLY_WRITABLE;
if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state)) {
mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
......@@ -2139,14 +2121,22 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
if (ret)
goto error_undo;
/*
* TODO: the superblock still includes this device in its num_devices
* counter although write_all_supers() is not locked out. This
* could give a filesystem state which requires a degraded mount.
*/
ret = btrfs_rm_dev_item(device);
if (ret)
trans = btrfs_start_transaction(fs_info->chunk_root, 0);
if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(trans);
goto error_undo;
}
ret = btrfs_rm_dev_item(trans, device);
if (ret) {
/* Any error in dev item removal is critical */
btrfs_crit(fs_info,
"failed to remove device item for devid %llu: %d",
device->devid, ret);
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
return ret;
}
clear_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_IN_FS_METADATA, &device->dev_state);
btrfs_scrub_cancel_dev(device);
......@@ -2229,7 +2219,8 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
free_fs_devices(cur_devices);
}
out:
ret = btrfs_commit_transaction(trans);
return ret;
error_undo:
......@@ -2240,7 +2231,7 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
device->fs_devices->rw_devices++;
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
}
goto out;
return ret;
}
void btrfs_rm_dev_replace_remove_srcdev(struct btrfs_device *srcdev)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册