Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 03 10月, 2018 29 次提交
  3. 05 9月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 01 8月, 2018 1 次提交
  7. 31 7月, 2018 5 次提交
    • M
      mtd: rawnand: allocate model parameter dynamically · 2023f1fa
      由 Miquel Raynal 提交于 
      Thanks to the migration of all drivers to use nand_scan() and the
related nand_controller_ops, we can now allocate data during the
detection phase. Let's do it first for the NAND model parameter which
is allocated in nand_detect().
Signed-off-by: NMiquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: NBoris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
      2023f1fa
    • M
      mtd: rawnand: do not export nand_scan_[ident|tail]() anymore · 98732da1
      由 Miquel Raynal 提交于 
      Both nand_scan_ident() and nand_scan_tail() helpers used to be called
directly from controller drivers that needed to tweak some ECC-related
parameters before nand_scan_tail(). This separation prevented dynamic
allocations during the phase of NAND identification, which was
inconvenient.

All controller drivers have been moved to use nand_scan(), in
conjunction with the chip->ecc.[attach|detach]_chip() hooks that
actually do the required tweaking sequence between both ident/tail
calls, allowing programmers to use dynamic allocation as they need all
across the scanning sequence.

Declare nand_scan_[ident|tail]() statically now.
Signed-off-by: NMiquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: NBoris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
      98732da1
    • M
      mtd: rawnand: add hooks that may be called during nand_scan() · 05b54c7b
      由 Miquel Raynal 提交于 
      In order to remove the limitation that forbids dynamic allocation in
nand_scan_ident(), we must create a path that will be the same for all
controller drivers. The idea is to use nand_scan() instead of the widely
used nand_scan_ident()/nand_scan_tail() couple. In order to achieve
this, controller drivers will need to adjust some parameters between
these two functions depending on the NAND chip wired on them.

This takes the form of two new hooks (->{attach,detach}_chip()) that are
placed in a new nand_controller_ops structure, which is then attached
to the nand_controller object at driver initialization time.
->attach_chip() is called between nand_scan_ident() and
nand_scan_tail(), and ->detach_chip() is called in the error path of
nand_scan() and in nand_cleanup().

Note that some NAND controller drivers don't have a dedicated
nand_controller object and instead rely on the default/dummy one
embedded in nand_chip. If you're in this case and still want to
initialize the controller ops, you'll have to manipulate
chip->dummy_controller directly.

Last but not least, it's worth mentioning that we plan to move some of
the controller related hooks placed in nand_chip into
nand_controller_ops to make the separation between NAND chip and NAND
controller methods clearer.
Signed-off-by: NMiquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: NBoris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
      05b54c7b
    • M
      mtd: rawnand: better name for the controller structure · 7da45139
      由 Miquel Raynal 提交于 
      In the raw NAND core, a NAND chip is described by a nand_chip structure,
while a NAND controller is described with a nand_hw_control structure
which is not very meaningful.

Rename this structure nand_controller.

As the structure gets renamed, it is logical to also rename the core
function initializing it from nand_hw_control_init() to
nand_controller_init().

Lastly, the 'hwcontrol' entry of the nand_chip structure is not
meaningful neither while it has the role of fallback when no controller
structure is provided by the driver (the controller driver is dumb and
can only control a single chip). Thus, it is renamed dummy_controller.
Signed-off-by: NMiquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: NBoris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
      7da45139
    • M
      mtd: rawnand: make subop helpers return unsigned values · 760c435e
      由 Miquel Raynal 提交于 
      A report from Colin Ian King pointed a CoverityScan issue where error
values on these helpers where not checked in the drivers. These
helpers can error out only in case of a software bug in driver code,
not because of a runtime/hardware error. Hence, let's WARN_ON() in this
case and return 0 which is harmless anyway.

Fixes: 8878b126 ("mtd: nand: add ->exec_op() implementation")
Signed-off-by: NMiquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: NBoris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
      760c435e
  9. 20 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  11. 18 7月, 2018 3 次提交