- 07 12月, 2016 6 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Distinguish them better. Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/987709804bc8fe55475e7481fcee03e7b86b1ba3.1480520526.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Consistency FTW. Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/9ab811dc06570bd3fc05a917ade1bdc9bb805a75.1480520526.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Add more consistency to our naming. Pineview remains the outlier. Keep using code names for gen5+. v2: rebased Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1481105584-23033-1-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Move G33 and Pineview higher up in the list. Add a couple of blank lines for OCD while at it. Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ef4cc8e6ddf592c8c2769b84d4b88a5422d46ea5.1480520526.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
The platform flags in device info are (mostly) mutually exclusive. Replace the flags with an enum. Add the platform enum also for platforms that previously didn't have a flag, and give them codename logging in dmesg. Pineview remains an exception, the platform being G33 for that. v2: Sort enum by gen and date v3: rebase on geminilake enabling Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1480596595-3278-1-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com
-
由 Michel Thierry 提交于
Instead of being hidden in sanitize_enable_ppgtt. It also seems to be the place to do so nowadays. Signed-off-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMichał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
-
- 01 12月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
Broxton and Geminilake are both gen9lp platforms. To avoid adding IS_GEMINILAKE() checks everywhere alongside the IS_BROXTON() ones, add a IS_GEN9_LP() macro. v2: Rename macro parameter to dev_priv. (Joonas) Signed-off-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
-
v2: Add new 0x3185 ID. (Joonas) Signed-off-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478791400-21756-4-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com
-
Geminilake is an Intel® Processor containing Intel® HD Graphics following Broxton. Let's start by adding the platform definition. PCI IDs and plaform specific code will follow. v2: Rebase (don't allow dev to be used with the new macro). v3: Update ddb size. (Matt) Rebase on s/preliminary_hw/alpha/ Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1479133526-32389-1-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
The following LP platform inherits a lot of this platform So let's simplify here to re-use this later. v2: Keep ddb_size out of the new macro. v3: Rebase (has_decoupled_mmio). (Imre) Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1480584796-19466-1-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com
-
- 16 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Praveen Paneri 提交于
Decoupled MMIO is an alternative way to access forcewake domain registers, which requires less cycles for a single read/write and avoids frequent software forcewake. This certainly gives advantage over the forcewake as this new mechanism “decouples” CPU cycles and allow them to complete even when GT is in a CPD (frequency change) or C6 state. This can co-exist with forcewake and we will continue to use forcewake as appropriate. E.g. 64-bit register writes to avoid writing 2 dwords separately and land into funny situations. v2: - Moved platform check out of the function and got rid of duplicate functions to find out decoupled power domain (Chris) - Added a check for forcewake already held and skipped decoupled access (Chris) - Skipped writing 64 bit registers through decoupled MMIO (Chris) v3: - Improved commit message with more info on decoupled mmio (Tvrtko) - Changed decoupled operation to enum and used u32 instead of uint_32 data type for register offset (Tvrtko) - Moved HAS_DECOUPLED_MMIO to device info (Tvrtko) - Added lookup table for converting fw_engine to pd_engine (Tvrtko) - Improved __gen9_decoupled_read and __gen9_decoupled_write routines (Tvrtko) v4: - Fixed alignment and variable names (Chris) - Write GEN9_DECOUPLED_REG0_DW1 register in just one go (Zhe Wang) v5: - Changed HAS_DECOUPLED_MMIO() argument name to dev_priv (Tvrtko) - Sanitize info->had_decoupled_mmio at init (Chris) Signed-off-by: NZhe Wang <zhe1.wang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPraveen Paneri <praveen.paneri@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1479230360-22395-1-git-send-email-praveen.paneri@intel.com
-
- 14 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
The term "preliminary hardware support" has always caused confusion both among users and developers. It has always been about preliminary driver support for new hardware, and not so much about preliminary hardware. Of course, initially both the software and hardware are in early stages, but the distinction becomes more clear when the user picks up production hardware and an older kernel to go with it, with just the early support we had for the hardware at the time the kernel was released. The user has to specifically enable the alpha quality *driver* support for the hardware in that specific kernel version. Rename preliminary_hw_support to alpha_support to emphasize that the module parameter, config option, and flag are about software, not about hardware. Improve the language in help texts and debug logging as well. This appears to be a good time to do the change, as there are currently no platforms with preliminary^W alpha support. Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1477909108-18696-1-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com
-
- 03 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joonas Lahtinen 提交于
Move has_64bit_reloc into dev_priv->info. This will make it visible in the feature listing debug output. v2: - Keep the struct member to keep GCC fragile but happy (Chris) v3: - More detailed commit message (Chris) - Include forgotten CHV and BXT (Chris) Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478162386-5018-1-git-send-email-joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com
-
- 28 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Fix sparse warnings: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:1179:5: warning: symbol 'i915_driver_load' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:1267:6: warning: symbol 'i915_driver_unload' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:2444:25: warning: symbol 'i915_pm_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? Fixes: 42f5551d ("drm/i915: Split out the PCI driver interface to i915_pci.c") Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1473946137-1931-3-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com (cherry picked from commit efab0698) Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
- 22 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Fix sparse warnings: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:1179:5: warning: symbol 'i915_driver_load' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:1267:6: warning: symbol 'i915_driver_unload' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:2444:25: warning: symbol 'i915_pm_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? Fixes: 42f5551d ("drm/i915: Split out the PCI driver interface to i915_pci.c") Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1473946137-1931-3-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com
-
- 15 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Deepak M 提交于
Adding the ddb size into the devide info will avoid platform checks while computing wm. v2: Added comment and WARN_ON if ddb size is zero.(Jani) v3: Added WARN_ON at the right place.(Jani) Suggested-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDeepak M <m.deepak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1473931870-7724-1-git-send-email-m.deepak@intel.com
-
- 08 9月, 2016 21 次提交
-
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
Moving all GPU features to the platform definition allows for - standard place when adding new features from new platform - possible to see supported features when dumping struct definitions Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
Make the .hws_needs_physical the exception by switching the flag on earlier platforms since they are fewer to support. Remove the flag on later GPUs hardware since they all use GTT hws by default. Switch the logic as well in the driver to reflect this change Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
Moving all GPU features to the platform definition allows for - standard place when adding new features from new platforms - possible to see supported features when dumping struct definitions Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
Moving all GPU features to the platform definition allows for - standard place when adding new features from new platforms - possible to see supported features when dumping struct definitions Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
Moving all GPU features to the platform definition allows for - standard place when adding new features from new platforms - possible to see supported features when dumping struct definitions Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
Moving all GPU features to the platform definition allows for - standard place when adding new features from new platforms - possible to see supported features when dumping struct definitions Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
Introducing a GEN2_FEATURES macro to simplify the struct definitions by platforms given that most of the features are common. Inspired by the GEN7_FEATURES macro done by Ben W. and others. Use it for 830, 845g, i85x, i865g. CC: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
Introducing a GEN3_FEATURES macro to simplify the struct definitions by platforms given that most of the features are common. Inspired by the GEN7_FEATURES macro done by Ben W. and others. Use it for i915g, i915gm, i945g, i945gm, g33 and pnv. CC: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
Introducing a GEN4_FEATURES macro to simplify the struct definitions by platforms given that most of the features are common. Inspired by the GEN7_FEATURES macro done by Ben W. and others. Use it for i965g, i965gm, g45 and gm45. CC: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
Moving all GPU features to the platform struct definition allows for - standard place when adding new features from new platforms - possible to see supported features when dumping struct definitions Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
Introducing a GEN5_FEATURES macro to simplify the struct definitions by platforms given that most of the features are common. Inspired by the GEN7_FEATURES macro done by Ben W. and others. Use it for ilk. CC: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
Moving all GPU features to the platform struct definition allows for - standard place when adding new features from new platforms - possible to see supported features when dumping struct definitions Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
Moving all GPU features to the platform struct definition allows for - standard place when adding new features from new platforms - possible to see supported features when dumping struct definitions Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
Moving all GPU features to the platform struct definition allows for - standard place when adding new features from new platforms - possible to see supported features when dumping struct definitions Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
Moving all GPU features to the platform struct definition allows for - standard place when adding new features from new platforms - possible to see supported features when dumping struct definitions Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
Moving all GPU features to the platform struct definition allows for - standard place when adding new features from new platforms - possible to see supported features when dumping struct definitions Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
Remove runtime PM support for SNB as it breaks hotplug support. Feedback from V. Syrjala. Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
Moving all GPU features to the platform struct definition allows for - standard place when adding new features from new platforms - possible to see supported features when dumping struct definitions Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
Introducing a GEN6_FEAUTRES macro to simplify the struct definitions by platforms given that most of the features are common. Inspired by the GEN7_FEATURES macro done by Ben W. and others. Use it for snb. CC: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
As recommended by Ville Syrjala removing .is_mobile field from the platform struct definition for vlv and hsw+ GPUs as there's no need to make the distinction in later hardware anymore. Keep it for older GPUs as it is still needed for ilk-ivb. Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
由 Carlos Santa 提交于
[patch series] Moving all GPU features to the platform struct definition allows for - standard place when adding new features from new platforms - possible to see supported features when dumping struct definition Signed-off-by: NCarlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
- 29 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
It appears that we never told Pineview it has a RENDER_RING. This was all fine until we started using the ring_mask for determining all the available rings to initialise for legacy ringbuffer submission in commit 88d2ba2e ("drm/i915: Unify engine init loop"). Though really it is a latent bug since the ring_mask inception in commit 73ae478c ("drm/i915: Replace has_bsd/blt/vebox with a mask"). To prevent similar mishaps in future, add a WARN_ON() if we find ourselves with a device without any rings. Fixes: 73ae478c ("drm/i915: Replace has_bsd/blt/vebox with a mask") Fixes: 88d2ba2e ("drm/i915: Unify engine init loop") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469749535-2382-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org
-
- 02 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
Broxton is now part of CI which doesn't indicate any major problems so enable the driver by default. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467384045-17028-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
- 24 6月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
The module init/exit routines are a wrapper around the PCI device init/exit, so move them across. Note that in order to avoid exporting the driver struct, instead of manipulating driver.features inside i915_init we instead opt to simply exit if i915.modeset is disabled. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1466773227-7994-15-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-