Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 08 10月, 2021 3 次提交
  3. 07 10月, 2021 3 次提交
  5. 06 10月, 2021 18 次提交
  7. 05 10月, 2021 12 次提交
  9. 04 10月, 2021 4 次提交
    • L
      Linux 5.15-rc4 · 9e1ff307
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
      9e1ff307
    • C
      elf: don't use MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE for elf interpreter mappings · 9b2f72cc
      由 Chen Jingwen 提交于 
      In commit b212921b ("elf: don't use MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE for elf
executable mappings") we still leave MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE in place for
load_elf_interp.

Unfortunately, this will cause kernel to fail to start with:

    1 (init): Uhuuh, elf segment at 00003ffff7ffd000 requested but the memory is mapped already
    Failed to execute /init (error -17)

The reason is that the elf interpreter (ld.so) has overlapping segments.

  readelf -l ld-2.31.so
  Program Headers:
    Type           Offset             VirtAddr           PhysAddr
                   FileSiz            MemSiz              Flags  Align
    LOAD           0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
                   0x000000000002c94c 0x000000000002c94c  R E    0x10000
    LOAD           0x000000000002dae0 0x000000000003dae0 0x000000000003dae0
                   0x00000000000021e8 0x0000000000002320  RW     0x10000
    LOAD           0x000000000002fe00 0x000000000003fe00 0x000000000003fe00
                   0x00000000000011ac 0x0000000000001328  RW     0x10000

The reason for this problem is the same as described in commit
ad55eac7 ("elf: enforce MAP_FIXED on overlaying elf segments").

Not only executable binaries, elf interpreters (e.g. ld.so) can have
overlapping elf segments, so we better drop MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE and go
back to MAP_FIXED in load_elf_interp.

Fixes: 4ed28639 ("fs, elf: drop MAP_FIXED usage from elf_map")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jingwen <chenjingwen6@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      9b2f72cc
    • L
      Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus_stable' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4 · ca3cef46
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      Pull ext4 fixes from Ted Ts'o:
 "Fix a number of ext4 bugs in fast_commit, inline data, and delayed
  allocation.

  Also fix error handling code paths in ext4_dx_readdir() and
  ext4_fill_super().

  Finally, avoid a grabbing a journal head in the delayed allocation
  write in the common cases where we are overwriting a pre-existing
  block or appending to an inode"

* tag 'ext4_for_linus_stable' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4:
  ext4: recheck buffer uptodate bit under buffer lock
  ext4: fix potential infinite loop in ext4_dx_readdir()
  ext4: flush s_error_work before journal destroy in ext4_fill_super
  ext4: fix loff_t overflow in ext4_max_bitmap_size()
  ext4: fix reserved space counter leakage
  ext4: limit the number of blocks in one ADD_RANGE TLV
  ext4: enforce buffer head state assertion in ext4_da_map_blocks
  ext4: remove extent cache entries when truncating inline data
  ext4: drop unnecessary journal handle in delalloc write
  ext4: factor out write end code of inline file
  ext4: correct the error path of ext4_write_inline_data_end()
  ext4: check and update i_disksize properly
  ext4: add error checking to ext4_ext_replay_set_iblocks()
      ca3cef46
    • L
      objtool: print out the symbol type when complaining about it · 7fab1c12
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      The objtool warning that the kvm instruction emulation code triggered
wasn't very useful:

    arch/x86/kvm/emulate.o: warning: objtool: __ex_table+0x4: don't know how to handle reloc symbol type: kvm_fastop_exception

in that it helpfully tells you which symbol name it had trouble figuring
out the relocation for, but it doesn't actually say what the unknown
symbol type was that triggered it all.

In this case it was because of missing type information (type 0, aka
STT_NOTYPE), but on the whole it really should just have printed that
out as part of the message.

Because if this warning triggers, that's very much the first thing you
want to know - why did reloc2sec_off() return failure for that symbol?

So rather than just saying you can't handle some type of symbol without
saying what the type _was_, just print out the type number too.

Fixes: 24ff6525 ("objtool: Teach get_alt_entry() about more relocation types")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wiZwq-0LknKhXN4M+T8jbxn_2i9mcKpO+OaBSSq_Eh7tg@mail.gmail.com/Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      7fab1c12