- 06 1月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zheng Yongjun 提交于
Use kzalloc rather than kcalloc(1,...) The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ @@ - kcalloc(1, + kzalloc( ...) // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NZheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 10月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
A driver may refuse to enable VLAN filtering for any reason beyond what the DSA framework cares about, such as: - having tc-flower rules that rely on the switch being VLAN-aware - the particular switch does not support VLAN, even if the driver does (the DSA framework just checks for the presence of the .port_vlan_add and .port_vlan_del pointers) - simply not supporting this configuration to be toggled at runtime Currently, when a driver rejects a configuration it cannot support, it does this from the commit phase, which triggers various warnings in switchdev. So propagate the prepare phase to drivers, to give them the ability to refuse invalid configurations cleanly and avoid the warnings. Since we need to modify all function prototypes and check for the prepare phase from within the drivers, take that opportunity and move the existing driver restrictions within the prepare phase where that is possible and easy. Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> Cc: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> Cc: Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com> Cc: Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com> Cc: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> Cc: Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Cc: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 9月, 2020 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Return the driver name and ASIC ID so that generic user space application are able to know they're looking at sja1105 devlink regions when pretty-printing them. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
We'll have more devlink code soon. Group it together in a separate translation object. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 9月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The whole purpose of tag_8021q is to send VLAN-tagged traffic to the CPU, from which the driver can decode the source port and switch id. Currently this only works if the VLAN filtering on the master is disabled. Change that by explicitly adding code to tag_8021q.c to add the VLANs corresponding to the tags to the filter of the master interface. Because we now need to call vlan_vid_add, then we also need to hold the RTNL mutex. Propagate that requirement to the callers of dsa_8021q_setup and modify the existing call sites as appropriate. Note that one call path, sja1105_best_effort_vlan_filtering_set -> sja1105_vlan_filtering -> sja1105_setup_8021q_tagging, was already holding this lock. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 9月, 2020 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
While working on another tag_8021q driver implementation, some things became apparent: - It is not mandatory for a DSA driver to offload the tag_8021q VLANs by using the VLAN table per se. For example, it can add custom TCAM rules that simply encapsulate RX traffic, and redirect & decapsulate rules for TX traffic. For such a driver, it makes no sense to receive the tag_8021q configuration through the same callback as it receives the VLAN configuration from the bridge and the 8021q modules. - Currently, sja1105 (the only tag_8021q user) sets a priv->expect_dsa_8021q variable to distinguish between the bridge calling, and tag_8021q calling. That can be improved, to say the least. - The crosschip bridging operations are, in fact, stateful already. The list of crosschip_links must be kept by the caller and passed to the relevant tag_8021q functions. So it would be nice if the tag_8021q configuration was more self-contained. This patch attempts to do that. Create a struct dsa_8021q_context which encapsulates a struct dsa_switch, and has 2 function pointers for adding and deleting a VLAN. These will replace the previous channel to the driver, which was through the .port_vlan_add and .port_vlan_del callbacks of dsa_switch_ops. Also put the list of crosschip_links into this dsa_8021q_context. Drivers that don't support cross-chip bridging can simply omit to initialize this list, as long as they dont call any cross-chip function. The sja1105_vlan_add and sja1105_vlan_del functions are refactored into a smaller sja1105_vlan_add_one, which now has 2 entry points: - sja1105_vlan_add, from struct dsa_switch_ops - sja1105_dsa_8021q_vlan_add, from the tag_8021q ops But even this change is fairly trivial. It just reflects the fact that for sja1105, the VLANs from these 2 channels end up in the same hardware table. However that is not necessarily true in the general sense (and that's the reason for making this change). The rest of the patch is mostly plain refactoring of "ds" -> "ctx". The dsa_8021q_context structure needs to be propagated because adding a VLAN is now done through the ops function pointers inside of it. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
There is no point in calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging for each individual port. Additionally, it will become more difficult to do that when we'll have a context structure to tag_8021q (next patch). So refactor this now. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 25 8月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nathan Chancellor 提交于
Clang warns: drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c:3418:38: warning: address of array 'match->compatible' will always evaluate to 'true' [-Wpointer-bool-conversion] for (match = sja1105_dt_ids; match->compatible; match++) { ~~~ ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~ 1 warning generated. We should check the value of the first character in compatible to see if it is empty or not. This matches how the rest of the tree iterates over IDs. Fixes: 0b0e2997 ("net: dsa: sja1105: use detected device id instead of DT one on mismatch") Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1139Signed-off-by: NNathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Acked-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Acked-by: NVladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 06 8月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Although we can detect the chip revision 100% at runtime, it is useful to specify it in the device tree compatible string too, because otherwise there would be no way to assess the correctness of device tree bindings statically, without booting a board (only some switch versions have internal RGMII delays and/or an SGMII port). But for testing the P/Q/R/S support, what I have is a reworked board with the SJA1105T replaced by a pin-compatible SJA1105Q, and I don't want to keep a separate device tree blob just for this one-off board. Since just the chip has been replaced, its RGMII delay setup is inherently the same (meaning: delays added by the PHY on the slave ports, and by PCB traces on the fixed-link CPU port). For this board, I'd rather have the driver shout at me, but go ahead and use what it found even if it doesn't match what it's been told is there. [ 2.970826] sja1105 spi0.1: Device tree specifies chip SJA1105T but found SJA1105Q, please fix it! [ 2.980010] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105Q [ 3.005082] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 6月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Po Liu 提交于
Since 'tcfp_burst' with TICK factor, driver side always need to recover it to the original value, this patch moves the generic calculation and recover to the 'burst' original value before offloading to device driver. Signed-off-by: NPo Liu <po.liu@nxp.com> Acked-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 5月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Be there 2 switches spi/spi2.0 and spi/spi2.1 in a cross-chip setup, both under the same VLAN-filtering bridge, both in the SJA1105_VLAN_BEST_EFFORT state. If we try to change the VLAN state of one of the switches (to SJA1105_VLAN_FILTERING_FULL) we get the following error: devlink dev param set spi/spi2.1 name best_effort_vlan_filtering value false cmode runtime [ 38.325683] sja1105 spi2.1: Not allowed to overcommit frame memory. L2 memory partitions and VL memory partitions share the same space. The sum of all 16 memory partitions is not allowed to be larger than 929 128-byte blocks (or 910 with retagging). Please adjust l2-forwarding-parameters-table.part_spc and/or vl-forwarding-parameters-table.partspc. [ 38.356803] sja1105 spi2.1: Invalid config, cannot upload This is because the spi/spi2.1 switch doesn't support tagging anymore in the SJA1105_VLAN_FILTERING_FULL state, so it doesn't need to have any retagging rules defined. Great, so it can use more frame memory (retagging consumes extra memory). But the built-in low-level static config checker from the sja1105 driver says "not so fast, you've increased the frame memory to non-retagging values, but you still kept the retagging rules in the static config". So we need to rebuild the VLAN table immediately before re-uploading the static config, operation which will take care, based on the new VLAN state, of removing the retagging rules. Fixes: 3f01c91a ("net: dsa: sja1105: implement VLAN retagging for dsa_8021q sub-VLANs") Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 5月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
SJA1105, being AVB/TSN switches, provide hardware assist for the Credit-Based Shaper as described in the IEEE 8021Q-2018 document. First generation has 10 shapers, freely assignable to any of the 4 external ports and 8 traffic classes, and second generation has 16 shapers. The Credit-Based Shaper tables are accessed through the dynamic reconfiguration interface, so we have to restore them manually after a switch reset. The tables are backed up by the static config only on P/Q/R/S, and we don't want to add custom code only for that family, since the procedure that is in place now works for both. Tested with the following commands: data_rate_kbps=67000 port_transmit_rate_kbps=1000000 idleslope=$data_rate_kbps sendslope=$(($idleslope - $port_transmit_rate_kbps)) locredit=$((-0x80000000)) hicredit=$((0x7fffffff)) tc qdisc add dev swp2 root handle 1: mqprio hw 0 num_tc 8 \ map 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 \ queues 1@0 1@1 1@2 1@3 1@4 1@5 1@6 1@7 tc qdisc replace dev swp2 parent 1:1 cbs \ idleslope $idleslope \ sendslope $sendslope \ hicredit $hicredit \ locredit $locredit \ offload 1 Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 13 5月, 2020 10 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Expand the delta commit procedure for VLANs with additional logic for treating bridge_vlans in the newly introduced operating mode, SJA1105_VLAN_BEST_EFFORT. For every bridge VLAN on every user port, a sub-VLAN index is calculated and retagging rules are installed towards a dsa_8021q rx_vid that encodes that sub-VLAN index. This way, the tagger can identify the original VLANs. Extra care is taken for VLANs to still work as intended in cross-chip scenarios. Retagging may have unintended consequences for these because a sub-VLAN encoding that works for the CPU does not make any sense for a front-panel port. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
There are 2 different features that require some reserved frame memory space: VLAN retagging and virtual links. Create a central function that modifies the static config and ensures frame memory is never overcommitted. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
This devlink parameter enables the handling of DSA tags when enslaved to a bridge with vlan_filtering=1. There are very good reasons to want this, but there are also very good reasons for not enabling it by default. So a devlink param named best_effort_vlan_filtering, currently driver-specific and exported only by sja1105, is used to configure this. In practice, this is perhaps the way that most users are going to use the switch in. It assumes that no more than 7 VLANs are needed per port. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Create a subvlan_map as part of each port's tagger private structure. This keeps reverse mappings of bridge-to-dsa_8021q VLAN retagging rules. Note that as of this patch, this piece of code is never engaged, due to the fact that the driver hasn't installed any retagging rule, so we'll always see packets with a subvlan code of 0 (untagged). Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
In VLAN-unaware mode, sja1105 uses VLAN tags with a custom TPID of 0xdadb. While in the yet-to-be introduced best_effort_vlan_filtering mode, it needs to work with normal VLAN TPID values. A complication arises when we must transmit a VLAN-tagged packet to the switch when it's in VLAN-aware mode. We need to construct a packet with 2 VLAN tags, and the switch will use the outer header for routing and pop it on egress. But sadly, here the 2 hardware generations don't behave the same: - E/T switches won't pop an ETH_P_8021AD tag on egress, it seems (packets will remain double-tagged). - P/Q/R/S switches will drop a packet with 2 ETH_P_8021Q tags (it looks like it tries to prevent VLAN hopping). But looks like the reverse is also true: - E/T switches have no problem popping the outer tag from packets with 2 ETH_P_8021Q tags. - P/Q/R/S will have no problem popping a single tag even if that is ETH_P_8021AD. So it is clear that if we want the hardware to work with dsa_8021q tagging in VLAN-aware mode, we need to send different TPIDs depending on revision. Keep that information in priv->info->qinq_tpid. The per-port tagger structure will hold an xmit_tpid value that depends not only upon the qinq_tpid, but also upon the VLAN awareness state itself (in case we must transmit using 0xdadb). Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
VLAN filtering is a global property for sja1105, and that means that we rely on the DSA core to not call us more than once. But we need to introduce some per-port state for the tagger, namely the xmit_tpid, and the best place to do that is where the xmit_tpid changes, namely in sja1105_vlan_filtering. So at the moment, exit early from the function to avoid unnecessarily resetting the switch for each port call. Then we'll change the xmit_tpid prior to the early exit in the next patch. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Let the DSA core call our .port_vlan_add methods every time the bridge layer requests so. We will deal internally with saving/restoring VLANs depending on our VLAN awareness state. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Managing the VLAN table that is present in hardware will become very difficult once we add a third operating state (best_effort_vlan_filtering). That is because correct cleanup (not too little, not too much) becomes virtually impossible, when VLANs can be added from the bridge layer, from dsa_8021q for basic tagging, for cross-chip bridging, as well as retagging rules for sub-VLANs and cross-chip sub-VLANs. So we need to rethink VLAN interaction with the switch in a more scalable way. In preparation for that, use the priv->expect_dsa_8021q boolean to classify any VLAN request received through .port_vlan_add or .port_vlan_del towards either one of 2 internal lists: bridge VLANs and dsa_8021q VLANs. Then, implement a central sja1105_build_vlan_table method that creates a VLAN configuration from scratch based on the 2 lists of VLANs kept by the driver, and based on the VLAN awareness state. Currently, if we are VLAN-unaware, install the dsa_8021q VLANs, otherwise the bridge VLANs. Then, implement a delta commit procedure that identifies which VLANs from this new configuration are actually different from the config previously committed to hardware. We apply the delta through the dynamic configuration interface (we don't reset the switch). The result is that the hardware should see the exact sequence of operations as before this patch. This also helps remove the "br" argument passed to dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join, which it was only using to figure out whether it should commit the configuration back to us or not, based on the VLAN awareness state of the bridge. We can simplify that, by always allowing those VLANs inside of our dsa_8021q_vlans list, and committing those to hardware when necessary. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
At the moment, this can never happen. The 2 modes that we operate in do not permit that: - SJA1105_VLAN_UNAWARE: we are guarded from bridge VLANs added by the user by the DSA core. We will later lift this restriction by setting ds->vlan_bridge_vtu = true, and that is where we'll need it. - SJA1105_VLAN_FILTERING_FULL: in this mode, dsa_8021q configuration is disabled. So the user is free to add these VLANs in the 1024-3071 range. The reason for the patch is that we'll introduce a third VLAN awareness state, where both dsa_8021q as well as the bridge are going to call our .port_vlan_add and .port_vlan_del methods. For that, we need a good way to discriminate between the 2. The easiest (and less intrusive way for upper layers) is to recognize the fact that dsa_8021q configurations are always driven by our driver - we _know_ when a .port_vlan_add method will be called from dsa_8021q because _we_ initiated it. So introduce an expect_dsa_8021q boolean which is only used, at the moment, for blacklisting VLANs in range 1024-3071 in the modes when dsa_8021q is active. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Soon we'll add a third operating mode to the driver. Introduce a vlan_state to make things more easy to manage, and use it where applicable. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 5月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
sja1105 uses dsa_8021q for DSA tagging, a format which is VLAN at heart and which is compatible with cascading. A complete description of this tagging format is in net/dsa/tag_8021q.c, but a quick summary is that each external-facing port tags incoming frames with a unique pvid, and this special VLAN is transmitted as tagged towards the inside of the system, and as untagged towards the exterior. The tag encodes the switch id and the source port index. This means that cross-chip bridging for dsa_8021q only entails adding the dsa_8021q pvids of one switch to the RX filter of the other switches. Everything else falls naturally into place, as long as the bottom-end of ports (the leaves in the tree) is comprised exclusively of dsa_8021q-compatible (i.e. sja1105 switches). Otherwise, there would be a chance that a front-panel switch transmits a packet tagged with a dsa_8021q header, header which it wouldn't be able to remove, and which would hence "leak" out. The only use case I tested (due to lack of board availability) was when the sja1105 switches are part of disjoint trees (however, this doesn't change the fact that multiple sja1105 switches still need unique switch identifiers in such a system). But in principle, even "true" single-tree setups (with DSA links) should work just as fine, except for a small change which I can't test: dsa_towards_port should be used instead of dsa_upstream_port (I made the assumption that the routing port that any sja1105 should use towards its neighbours is the CPU port. That might not hold true in other setups). Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
- 08 5月, 2020 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Restrict the TTEthernet hardware support on this switch to operate as closely as possible to IEEE 802.1Qci as possible. This means that it can perform PTP-time-based ingress admission control on streams identified by {DMAC, VID, PCP}, which is useful when trying to ensure the determinism of traffic scheduled via IEEE 802.1Qbv. The oddity comes from the fact that in hardware (and in TTEthernet at large), virtual links always need a full-blown action, including not only the type of policing, but also the list of destination ports. So in practice, a single tc-gate action will result in all packets getting dropped. Additional actions (either "trap" or "redirect") need to be specified in the same filter rule such that the conforming packets are actually forwarded somewhere. Apart from the VL Lookup, Policing and Forwarding tables which need to be programmed for each flow (virtual link), the Schedule engine also needs to be told to open/close the admission gates for each individual virtual link. A fairly accurate (and detailed) description of how that works is already present in sja1105_tas.c, since it is already used to trigger the egress gates for the tc-taprio offload (IEEE 802.1Qbv). Key point here, we remember that the schedule engine supports 8 "subschedules" (execution threads that iterate through the global schedule in parallel, and that no 2 hardware threads must execute a schedule entry at the same time). For tc-taprio, each egress port used one of these 8 subschedules, leaving a total of 4 subschedules unused. In principle we could have allocated 1 subschedule for the tc-gate offload of each ingress port, but actually the schedules of all virtual links installed on each ingress port would have needed to be merged together, before they could have been programmed to hardware. So simplify our life and just merge the entire tc-gate configuration, for all virtual links on all ingress ports, into a single subschedule. Be sure to check that against the usual hardware scheduling conflicts, and program it to hardware alongside any tc-taprio subschedule that may be present. The following scenarios were tested: 1. Quantitative testing: tc qdisc add dev swp2 clsact tc filter add dev swp2 ingress flower skip_sw \ dst_mac 42:be:24:9b:76:20 \ action gate index 1 base-time 0 \ sched-entry OPEN 1200 -1 -1 \ sched-entry CLOSE 1200 -1 -1 \ action trap ping 192.168.1.2 -f PING 192.168.1.2 (192.168.1.2) 56(84) bytes of data. ............................. --- 192.168.1.2 ping statistics --- 948 packets transmitted, 467 received, 50.7384% packet loss, time 9671ms 2. Qualitative testing (with a phase-aligned schedule - the clocks are synchronized by ptp4l, not shown here): Receiver (sja1105): tc qdisc add dev swp2 clsact now=$(phc_ctl /dev/ptp1 get | awk '/clock time is/ {print $5}') && \ sec=$(echo $now | awk -F. '{print $1}') && \ base_time="$(((sec + 2) * 1000000000))" && \ echo "base time ${base_time}" tc filter add dev swp2 ingress flower skip_sw \ dst_mac 42:be:24:9b:76:20 \ action gate base-time ${base_time} \ sched-entry OPEN 60000 -1 -1 \ sched-entry CLOSE 40000 -1 -1 \ action trap Sender (enetc): now=$(phc_ctl /dev/ptp0 get | awk '/clock time is/ {print $5}') && \ sec=$(echo $now | awk -F. '{print $1}') && \ base_time="$(((sec + 2) * 1000000000))" && \ echo "base time ${base_time}" tc qdisc add dev eno0 parent root taprio \ num_tc 8 \ map 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 \ queues 1@0 1@1 1@2 1@3 1@4 1@5 1@6 1@7 \ base-time ${base_time} \ sched-entry S 01 50000 \ sched-entry S 00 50000 \ flags 2 ping -A 192.168.1.1 PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes ... ^C --- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics --- 1425 packets transmitted, 1424 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 0.322/0.361/0.990 ms And just for comparison, with the tc-taprio schedule deleted: ping -A 192.168.1.1 PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes ... ^C --- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics --- 33 packets transmitted, 19 packets received, 42% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 0.336/0.464/0.597 ms Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Implement tc-flower offloads for redirect, trap and drop using non-critical virtual links. Commands which were tested to work are: # Send frames received on swp2 with a DA of 42:be:24:9b:76:20 to the # CPU and to swp3. This type of key (DA only) when the port's VLAN # awareness state is off. tc qdisc add dev swp2 clsact tc filter add dev swp2 ingress flower skip_sw dst_mac 42:be:24:9b:76:20 \ action mirred egress redirect dev swp3 \ action trap # Drop frames received on swp2 with a DA of 42:be:24:9b:76:20, a VID # of 100 and a PCP of 0. tc filter add dev swp2 ingress protocol 802.1Q flower skip_sw \ dst_mac 42:be:24:9b:76:20 vlan_id 100 vlan_prio 0 action drop Under the hood, all rules match on DMAC, VID and PCP, but when VLAN filtering is disabled, those are set internally by the driver to the port-based defaults. Because we would be put in an awkward situation if the user were to change the VLAN filtering state while there are active rules (packets would no longer match on the specified keys), we simply deny changing vlan_filtering unless the list of flows offloaded via virtual links is empty. Then the user can re-add new rules. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 31 3月, 2020 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
This patch adds complete support for manipulating the L2 Policing Tables from this switch. There are 45 table entries, one entry per each port and traffic class, and one dedicated entry for broadcast traffic for each ingress port. Policing entries are shareable, and we use this functionality to support shared block filters. We are modeling broadcast policers as simple tc-flower matches on dst_mac. As for the traffic class policers, the switch only deduces the traffic class from the VLAN PCP field, so it makes sense to model this as a tc-flower match on vlan_prio. How to limit broadcast traffic coming from all front-panel ports to a cumulated total of 10 Mbit/s: tc qdisc add dev sw0p0 ingress_block 1 clsact tc qdisc add dev sw0p1 ingress_block 1 clsact tc qdisc add dev sw0p2 ingress_block 1 clsact tc qdisc add dev sw0p3 ingress_block 1 clsact tc filter add block 1 flower skip_sw dst_mac ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff \ action police rate 10mbit burst 64k How to limit traffic with VLAN PCP 0 (also includes untagged traffic) to 100 Mbit/s on port 0 only: tc filter add dev sw0p0 ingress protocol 802.1Q flower skip_sw \ vlan_prio 0 action police rate 100mbit burst 64k The broadcast, VLAN PCP and port policers are compatible with one another (can be installed at the same time on a port). Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
This adds partial configuration support for the L2 Policing Table. Out of the 45 policing entries, only 5 are used (one for each port), in a shared manner. All 8 traffic classes, and the broadcast policer, are redirected to a common instance which belongs to the ingress port. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 28 3月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
On this switch, the frame length enforcements are performed by the ingress policers. There are 2 types of those: regular L2 (also called best-effort) and Virtual Link policers (an ARINC664/AFDX concept for defining L2 streams with certain QoS abilities). To avoid future confusion, I prefer to call the reset reason "Best-effort policers", even though the VL policers are not yet supported. We also need to change the setup of the initial static config, such that DSA calls to .change_mtu (which are expensive) become no-ops and don't reset the switch 5 times. A driver-level decision is to unconditionally allow single VLAN-tagged traffic on all ports. The CPU port must accept an additional VLAN header for the DSA tag, which is again a driver-level decision. The policers actually count bytes not only from the SDU, but also from the Ethernet header and FCS, so those need to be accounted for as well. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 24 3月, 2020 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The SJA1105 switch family has a PTP_CLK pin which emits a signal with fixed 50% duty cycle, but variable frequency and programmable start time. On the second generation (P/Q/R/S) switches, this pin supports even more functionality. The use case described by the hardware documents talks about synchronization via oneshot pulses: given 2 sja1105 switches, arbitrarily designated as a master and a slave, the master emits a single pulse on PTP_CLK, while the slave is configured to timestamp this pulse received on its PTP_CLK pin (which must obviously be configured as input). The difference between the timestamps then exactly becomes the slave offset to the master. The only trouble with the above is that the hardware is very much tied into this use case only, and not very generic beyond that: - When emitting a oneshot pulse, instead of being told when to emit it, the switch just does it "now" and tells you later what time it was, via the PTPSYNCTS register. [ Incidentally, this is the same register that the slave uses to collect the ext_ts timestamp from, too. ] - On the sync slave, there is no interrupt mechanism on reception of a new extts, and no FIFO to buffer them, because in the foreseen use case, software is in control of both the master and the slave pins, so it "knows" when there's something to collect. These 2 problems mean that: - We don't support (at least yet) the quirky oneshot mode exposed by the hardware, just normal periodic output. - We abuse the hardware a little bit when we expose generic extts. Because there's no interrupt mechanism, we need to poll at double the frequency we expect to receive a pulse. Currently that means a non-configurable "twice a second". Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Acked-by: NRichard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
These fields configure the destination and source MAC address that the switch will put in the Ethernet frames sent towards the CPU port that contain RX timestamps for PTP. These fields do not enable the feature itself, that is configured via SEND_META0 and SEND_META1 in the General Params table. The implication of this patch is that the AVB Params table will always be present in the static config. Which doesn't really hurt. This is needed because in a future patch, we will add another field from this table, CAS_MASTER, for configuring the PTP_CLK pin function. That can be configured irrespective of whether RX timestamping is enabled or not, so always having this table present is going to simplify things a bit. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 3月, 2020 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
SJA1105 switches R and S have one SerDes port with an 802.3z quasi-compatible PCS, hardwired on port 4. The other ports are still MII/RMII/RGMII. The PCS performs rate adaptation to lower link speeds; the MAC on this port is hardwired at gigabit. Only full duplex is supported. The SGMII port can be configured as part of the static config tables, as well as through a dedicated SPI address region for its pseudo-clause-22 registers. However it looks like the static configuration is not able to change some out-of-reset values (like the value of MII_BMCR), so at the end of the day, having code for it is utterly pointless. We are just going to use the pseudo-C22 interface. Because the PCS gets reset when the switch resets, we have to add even more restoration logic to sja1105_static_config_reload, otherwise the SGMII port breaks after operations such as enabling PTP timestamping which require a switch reset. >From PHYLINK perspective, the switch supports *only* SGMII (it doesn't support 1000Base-X). It also doesn't expose access to the raw config word for in-band AN in registers MII_ADV/MII_LPA. It is able to work in the following modes: - Forced speed - SGMII in-band AN slave (speed received from PHY) - SGMII in-band AN master (acting as a PHY) The latter mode is not supported by this patch. It is even unclear to me how that would be described. There is some code for it left in the patch, but 'an_master' is always passed as false. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
When sja1105_init_mii_settings iterates over the port list, it prints this message for disabled ports, because they don't have a valid phy-mode: [ 4.778702] sja1105 spi2.0: Unsupported PHY mode unknown! Suggested-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Suggested-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 15 3月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The switches supported so far by the driver only have non-SerDes ports, so they should be configured in the PHYLINK callback that provides the resolved PHY link parameters. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 3月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Oleksij Rempel 提交于
Validate 100baseT1_Full to make this driver work with TJA1102 PHY. Signed-off-by: NOleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: NVladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 3月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Fixes the following NULL pointer dereference on PHY connect error path teardown: [ 2.291010] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.310044] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.314970] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.322463] 8<--- cut here --- [ 2.325497] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000018 [ 2.333555] pgd = (ptrval) [ 2.336241] [00000018] *pgd=00000000 [ 2.339797] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM [ 2.344384] Modules linked in: [ 2.347420] CPU: 1 PID: 64 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.5.0-rc5 #1 [ 2.353820] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.358070] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.363182] PC is at kthread_destroy_worker+0x4/0x74 [ 2.368117] LR is at sja1105_teardown+0x70/0xb4 [ 2.372617] pc : [<c036cdd4>] lr : [<c0b89238>] psr: 60000013 [ 2.378845] sp : eeac3d30 ip : eeab1900 fp : eef45480 [ 2.384036] r10: eef4549c r9 : 00000001 r8 : 00000000 [ 2.389227] r7 : eef527c0 r6 : 00000034 r5 : ed8ddd0c r4 : ed8ddc40 [ 2.395714] r3 : 00000000 r2 : 00000000 r1 : eef4549c r0 : 00000000 [ 2.402204] Flags: nZCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none [ 2.409297] Control: 10c5387d Table: 8020406a DAC: 00000051 [ 2.415008] Process kworker/1:1 (pid: 64, stack limit = 0x(ptrval)) [ 2.421237] Stack: (0xeeac3d30 to 0xeeac4000) [ 2.612635] [<c036cdd4>] (kthread_destroy_worker) from [<c0b89238>] (sja1105_teardown+0x70/0xb4) [ 2.621379] [<c0b89238>] (sja1105_teardown) from [<c10717fc>] (dsa_switch_teardown.part.1+0x48/0x74) [ 2.630467] [<c10717fc>] (dsa_switch_teardown.part.1) from [<c1072438>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8b0/0xbf4) [ 2.639984] [<c1072438>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0b89c30>] (sja1105_probe+0x2ac/0x464) [ 2.648378] [<c0b89c30>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b11a5c>] (spi_drv_probe+0x7c/0xa0) [ 2.656081] [<c0b11a5c>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a26ab8>] (really_probe+0x208/0x480) [ 2.663871] [<c0a26ab8>] (really_probe) from [<c0a26f0c>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1c4) [ 2.672093] [<c0a26f0c>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a24c48>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xc4) [ 2.680574] [<c0a24c48>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a26810>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.688794] [<c0a26810>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a259d8>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.696927] [<c0a259d8>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a25f24>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.705842] [<c0a25f24>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03667b0>] (process_one_work+0x22c/0x560) [ 2.714926] [<c03667b0>] (process_one_work) from [<c0366d8c>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5d4) [ 2.723059] [<c0366d8c>] (worker_thread) from [<c036cf94>] (kthread+0x150/0x154) [ 2.730416] [<c036cf94>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) Checking for NULL pointer is correct because the per-port xmit kernel threads are created in sja1105_probe immediately after calling dsa_register_switch. Fixes: a68578c2 ("net: dsa: Make deferred_xmit private to sja1105") Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 28 2月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Propagate the resolved link configuration down via DSA's phylink_mac_link_up() operation to allow split PCS/MAC to work. Tested-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 1月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The sja1105_parse_ports_node function was tested only on device trees where all ports were enabled. Fix this check so that the driver continues to probe only with the ports where status is not "disabled", as expected. Fixes: 8aa9ebcc ("net: dsa: Introduce driver for NXP SJA1105 5-port L2 switch") Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 1月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Florian Fainelli 提交于
It is possible to stack multiple DSA switches in a way that they are not part of the tree (disjoint) but the DSA master of a switch is a DSA slave of another. When that happens switch drivers may have to know this is the case so as to determine whether their tagging protocol has a remove chance of working. This is useful for specific switch drivers such as b53 where devices have been known to be stacked in the wild without the Broadcom tag protocol supporting that feature. This allows b53 to continue supporting those devices by forcing the disabling of Broadcom tags on the outermost switches if necessary. The get_tag_protocol() function is therefore updated to gain an additional enum dsa_tag_protocol argument which denotes the current tagging protocol used by the DSA master we are attached to, else DSA_TAG_PROTO_NONE for the top of the dsa_switch_tree. Signed-off-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 06 1月, 2020 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
There are 3 things that are wrong with the DSA deferred xmit mechanism: 1. Its introduction has made the DSA hotpath ever so slightly more inefficient for everybody, since DSA_SKB_CB(skb)->deferred_xmit needs to be initialized to false for every transmitted frame, in order to figure out whether the driver requested deferral or not (a very rare occasion, rare even for the only driver that does use this mechanism: sja1105). That was necessary to avoid kfree_skb from freeing the skb. 2. Because L2 PTP is a link-local protocol like STP, it requires management routes and deferred xmit with this switch. But as opposed to STP, the deferred work mechanism needs to schedule the packet rather quickly for the TX timstamp to be collected in time and sent to user space. But there is no provision for controlling the scheduling priority of this deferred xmit workqueue. Too bad this is a rather specific requirement for a feature that nobody else uses (more below). 3. Perhaps most importantly, it makes the DSA core adhere a bit too much to the NXP company-wide policy "Innovate Where It Doesn't Matter". The sja1105 is probably the only DSA switch that requires some frames sent from the CPU to be routed to the slave port via an out-of-band configuration (register write) rather than in-band (DSA tag). And there are indeed very good reasons to not want to do that: if that out-of-band register is at the other end of a slow bus such as SPI, then you limit that Ethernet flow's throughput to effectively the throughput of the SPI bus. So hardware vendors should definitely not be encouraged to design this way. We do _not_ want more widespread use of this mechanism. Luckily we have a solution for each of the 3 issues: For 1, we can just remove that variable in the skb->cb and counteract the effect of kfree_skb with skb_get, much to the same effect. The advantage, of course, being that anybody who doesn't use deferred xmit doesn't need to do any extra operation in the hotpath. For 2, we can create a kernel thread for each port's deferred xmit work. If the user switch ports are named swp0, swp1, swp2, the kernel threads will be named swp0_xmit, swp1_xmit, swp2_xmit (there appears to be a 15 character length limit on kernel thread names). With this, the user can change the scheduling priority with chrt $(pidof swp2_xmit). For 3, we can actually move the entire implementation to the sja1105 driver. So this patch deletes the generic implementation from the DSA core and adds a new one, more adequate to the requirements of PTP TX timestamping, in sja1105_main.c. Suggested-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
I finally found out how the 4 management route slots are supposed to be used, but.. it's not worth it. The description from the comment I've just deleted in this commit is still true: when more than 1 management slot is active at the same time, the switch will match frames incoming [from the CPU port] on the lowest numbered management slot that matches the frame's DMAC. My issue was that one was not supposed to statically assign each port a slot. Yes, there are 4 slots and also 4 non-CPU ports, but that is a mere coincidence. Instead, the switch can be used like this: every management frame gets a slot at the right of the most recently assigned slot: Send mgmt frame 1 through S0: S0 x x x Send mgmt frame 2 through S1: S0 S1 x x Send mgmt frame 3 through S2: S0 S1 S2 x Send mgmt frame 4 through S3: S0 S1 S2 S3 The difference compared to the old usage is that the transmission of frames 1-4 doesn't need to wait until the completion of the management route. It is safe to use a slot to the right of the most recently used one, because by protocol nobody will program a slot to your left and "steal" your route towards the correct egress port. So there is a potential throughput benefit here. But mgmt frame 5 has no more free slot to use, so it has to wait until _all_ of S0, S1, S2, S3 are full, in order to use S0 again. And that's actually exactly the problem: I was looking for something that would bring more predictable transmission latency, but this is exactly the opposite: 3 out of 4 frames would be transmitted quicker, but the 4th would draw the short straw and have a worse worst-case latency than before. Useless. Things are made even worse by PTP TX timestamping, which is something I won't go deeply into here. Suffice to say that the fact there is a driver-level lock on the SPI bus offsets any potential throughput gains that parallelism might bring. So there's no going back to the multi-slot scheme, remove the "mgmt_slot" variable from sja1105_port and the dummy static assignment made at probe time. While passing by, also remove the assignment to casc_port altogether. Don't pretend that we support cascaded setups. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-