The ColdFire FEC is common to quite a few ColdFire CPUs. No need to duplicate
its platform setup code for every CPU family member that has it. Merge all the
setup code into a single shared file.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

If we make all FEC (ethernet) addressing consistent across all ColdFire
family members then we will be able to remove the duplicated plaform data
and use a single setup for all.

So modify the ColdFire 532x FEC addressing so that:

. FECs are numbered from 0 up
. base addresses are absolute (not relative to MBAR peripheral register)
. use a common name for IRQs used
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

If we make all FEC (ethernet) addressing consistent across all ColdFire
family members then we will be able to remove the duplicated plaform data
and use a single setup for all.

So modify the ColdFire 528x FEC addressing so that:

. FECs are numbered from 0 up
. base addresses are absolute (not relative to MBAR peripheral register)
. use a common name for IRQs used
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

If we make all FEC (ethernet) addressing consistent across all ColdFire
family members then we will be able to remove the duplicated plaform data
and use a single setup for all.

So modify the ColdFire 527x FEC addressing so that:

. FECs are numbered from 0 up
. base addresses are absolute (not relative to MBAR peripheral register)
. use a common name for IRQs used
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

If we make all FEC (ethernet) addressing consistent across all ColdFire
family members then we will be able to remove the duplicated plaform data
and use a single setup for all.

So modify the ColdFire 5272 FEC addressing so that:

. FECs are numbered from 0 up
. base addresses are absolute (not relative to MBAR peripheral register)
. use a common name for IRQs used
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

If we make all FEC (ethernet) addressing consistent across all ColdFire
family members then we will be able to remove the duplicated plaform data
and use a single setup for all.

So modify the ColdFire 523x FEC addressing so that:

. FECs are numbered from 0 up
. base addresses are absolute (not relative to MBAR peripheral register)
. use a common name for IRQs used
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

If we make all FEC (ethernet) addressing consistent across all ColdFire
family members then we will be able to remove the duplicated plaform data
and use a single setup for all.

So modify the ColdFire 520x FEC addressing so that:

. FECs are numbered from 0 up
. base addresses are absolute (not relative to MBAR peripheral register)
. use a common name for IRQs used
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

Some ColdFire CPU UART hardware modules can configure the IRQ they use.
Currently the same setup code is duplicated in the init code for each of
these ColdFire CPUs. Merge all this code to a single instance.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

The ColdFire UART is common to all ColdFire CPU's. No need to duplicate
its platform setup code for every CPU family member. Merge all the setup
code into a single shared file.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

Simplify the UART setup code so that it no longer loops for each UART
present. Just make it do all the work it needs in a single function.
This will make the code easier to share when we move to a single set
of platform data for ColdFire UARTs.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

Simplify the UART setup code so that it no longer loops for each UART
present. Just make it do all the work it needs in a single function.
This will make the code easier to share when we move to a single set
of platform data for ColdFire UARTs.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

Simplify the UART setup code so that it no longer loops for each UART
present. Just make it do all the work it needs in a single function.
This will make the code easier to share when we move to a single set
of platform data for ColdFire UARTs.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

Simplify the UART setup code so that it no longer loops for each UART
present. Just make it do all the work it needs in a single function.
This will make the code easier to share when we move to a single set
of platform data for ColdFire UARTs.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

Simplify the UART setup code so that it no longer loops for each UART
present. Just make it do all the work it needs in a single function.
This will make the code easier to share when we move to a single set
of platform data for ColdFire UARTs.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

Simplify the UART setup code so that it no longer loops for each UART
present. Just make it do all the work it needs in a single function.
This will make the code easier to share when we move to a single set
of platform data for ColdFire UARTs.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

Simplify the UART setup code so that it no longer loops for each UART
present. Just make it do all the work it needs in a single function.
This will make the code easier to share when we move to a single set
of platform data for ColdFire UARTs.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

Simplify the UART setup code so that it no longer loops for each UART
present. Just make it do all the work it needs in a single function.
This will make the code easier to share when we move to a single set
of platform data for ColdFire UARTs.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

Simplify the UART setup code so that it no longer loops for each UART
present. Just make it do all the work it needs in a single function.
This will make the code easier to share when we move to a single set
of platform data for ColdFire UARTs.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

Simplify the UART setup code so that it no longer loops for each UART
present. Just make it do all the work it needs in a single function.
This will make the code easier to share when we move to a single set
of platform data for ColdFire UARTs.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

If we make all UART addressing consistent across all ColdFire family members
then we will be able to remove the duplicated plaform data and use a single
setup for all.

So modify the ColdFire 54xx UART addressing so that:

. UARTs are numbered from 0 up
. base addresses are absolute (not relative to MBAR peripheral register)
. use a common name for IRQs used
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

If we make all UART addressing consistent across all ColdFire family members
then we will be able to remove the duplicated plaform data and use a single
setup for all.

So modify the ColdFire 5407 UART addressing so that:

. UARTs are numbered from 0 up
. base addresses are absolute (not relative to MBAR peripheral register)
. use a common name for IRQs used
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

If we make all UART addressing consistent across all ColdFire family members
then we will be able to remove the duplicated plaform data and use a single
setup for all.

So modify the ColdFire 532x UART addressing so that:

. UARTs are numbered from 0 up
. use a common name for IRQs used
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

If we make all UART addressing consistent across all ColdFire family members
then we will be able to remove the duplicated plaform data and use a single
setup for all.

So modify the ColdFire 528x UART addressing so that:

. UARTs are numbered from 0 up
. use a common name for IRQs used
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

If we make all UART addressing consistent across all ColdFire family members
then we will be able to remove the duplicated plaform data and use a single
setup for all.

So modify the ColdFire 5307 UART addressing so that:

. UARTs are numbered from 0 up
. base addresses are absolute (not relative to MBAR peripheral register)
. use a common name for IRQs used
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

If we make all UART addressing consistent across all ColdFire family members
then we will be able to remove the duplicated plaform data and use a single
setup for all.

So modify the ColdFire 527x UART addressing so that:

. UARTs are numbered from 0 up
. use a common name for IRQs used
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

If we make all UART addressing consistent across all ColdFire family members
then we will be able to remove the duplicated plaform data and use a single
setup for all.

So modify the ColdFire 5272 UART addressing so that:

. UARTs are numbered from 0 up
. base addresses are absolute (not relative to MBAR peripheral register)
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

If we make all UART addressing consistent across all ColdFire family members
then we will be able to remove the duplicated plaform data and use a single
setup for all.

So modify the ColdFire 5249 UART addressing so that:

. UARTs are numbered from 0 up
. base addresses are absolute (not relative to MBAR peripheral register)
. use a common name for IRQs used
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

If we make all UART addressing consistent across all ColdFire family members
then we will be able to remove the duplicated plaform data and use a single
setup for all.

So modify the ColdFire 523x UART addressing so that:

. UARTs are numbered from 0 up
. use a common name for IRQs used
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

If we make all UART addressing consistent across all ColdFire family members
then we will be able to remove the duplicated plaform data and use a single
setup for all.

So modify the ColdFire 520x UART addressing so that:

. UARTs are numbered from 0 up
. use a common name for IRQs used
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

If we make all UART addressing consistent across all ColdFire family members
then we will be able to remove the duplicated plaform data and use a single
setup for all.

So modify the ColdFire 5206 UART addressing so that:

. UARTs are numbered from 0 up
. base addresses are absolute (not relative to MBAR peripheral register)
. use a common name for IRQs used
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

With a few small changes we can make the m68knommu timer init code the
same as the m68k code. By using the mach_sched_init function pointer
and reworking the current timer initializers to keep track of the common
m68k timer_interrupt() handler we end up with almost identical code for
m68knommu.

This will allow us to more easily merge the mmu and non-mmu m68k time.c
in future patches.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

The read_persistent_clock() code is different on m68knommu, for really no
reason. With a few changes to support function names and some code
re-organization the code can be made the same.

This will make it easier to merge the arch/m68k/kernel/time.c for m68k and
m68knommu in a future patch.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

The base of the real RAM resident hardware vectors, _ramvec, is declared in
our asm/traps.h. No need to have local declarations spread around in other
files that use this. So remove them.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

The ColdFire MBAR register that holds the mapping of the peripheral region
on some ColdFire CPUs is configurable. It can be configured at some address
different to that of the bootloader that loaded the kernel. So hard set
the MBAR register mapping at kernel startup time.
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

The return path from an exception was checking too many bits in the
thread_info->flags, and getting stuck calling do_signal(). There was
no work to do, we should only be checking the low 8 bits (as per comments
and definitions in arch/m68k/include/asm/thread_info.h).

This fixes the stuck process problem when using strace.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

Virtual memory m68k systems build with register a2 dedicated to being the
current proc pointer (non-MMU don't do this). Add code to the ColdFire
interrupt and exception processing to set this on entry, and at context
switch time. We use the same GET_CURRENT() macro that MMU enabled code
uses - modifying it so that the assembler is ColdFire clean.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
Acked-by: NMatt Waddel <mwaddel@yahoo.com>
Acked-by: NKurt Mahan <kmahan@xmission.com>
Acked-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>

Add code to the 54xx ColdFire CPU init to setup memory ready for the m68k
paged memory start up.

Some of the RAM variables that were specific to the non-mmu code paths
now need to be used during this setup, so when CONFIG_MMU is enabled.
Move these out of page_no.h and into page.h.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
Acked-by: NMatt Waddel <mwaddel@yahoo.com>
Acked-by: NKurt Mahan <kmahan@xmission.com>
Acked-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>

The 54xx ColdFire CPU family has an internal MMU. Up to now though we
have only supported running on them with the MMU disabled.

Add code to the 54xx ColdFire init sequence to initialize the bootmem
used by the usual MMU m68k code for paging init.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
Acked-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: NMatt Waddel <mwaddel@yahoo.com>
Acked-by: NKurt Mahan <kmahan@xmission.com>

Compiling for the m68knommu/68328 Palm/Pilot target you get:

  LD      vmlinux
arch/m68k/platform/68328/head.o: In function `L3':
(.text+0x170): undefined reference to `rom_length'

"rom_length" is not used any longer by any of the m68knommu code.
So remove it from here too.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>

Compiling for the m68knommu/68328 Palm/Pilot target you get:

  AS      arch/m68k/platform/68328/head-pilot.o
arch/m68k/platform/68328/head-pilot.S:37:23: fatal error: bootlogo.rh: No such file or directory

The build for this target used to do a conversion on a C coded boot logo
and include this in the head assembler code. This got broken by changes to
the local Makefile.

Clean all this up by just including the C coded boot logo struct in the
C code. With the appropriate alignment attribute there is no difference
to the way it can be used.
Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>