Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 28 10月, 2019 2 次提交
  3. 24 10月, 2019 2 次提交
  5. 23 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  7. 18 10月, 2019 5 次提交
    • A
      selftest/bpf: Remove test_libbpf.sh and test_libbpf_open · cb79a4e1
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      test_progs is much more sophisticated superset of tests compared to
test_libbpf.sh and test_libbpf_open. Remove test_libbpf.sh and
test_libbpf_open.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191016060051.2024182-8-andriin@fb.com
      cb79a4e1
    • A
      selftests/bpf: Move test_queue_stack_map.h into progs/ where it belongs · 5ac93074
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      test_queue_stack_map.h is used only from BPF programs. Thus it should be
part of progs/ subdir. An added benefit of moving it there is that new
TEST_RUNNER_DEFINE_RULES macro-rule will properly capture dependency on
this header for all BPF objects and trigger re-build, if it changes.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191016060051.2024182-7-andriin@fb.com
      5ac93074
    • A
      selftests/bpf: Replace test_progs and test_maps w/ general rule · 74b5a596
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      Define test runner generation meta-rule that codifies dependencies
between test runner, its tests, and its dependent BPF programs. Use that
for defining test_progs and test_maps test-runners. Also additionally define
2 flavors of test_progs:
- alu32, which builds BPF programs with 32-bit registers codegen;
- bpf_gcc, which build BPF programs using GCC, if it supports BPF target.

Overall, this is accomplished through $(eval)'ing a set of generic
rules, which defines Makefile targets dynamically at runtime. See
comments explaining the need for 2 $(evals), though.

For each test runner we have (test_maps and test_progs, currently), and,
optionally, their flavors, the logic of build process is modeled as
follows (using test_progs as an example):
- all BPF objects are in progs/:
  - BPF object's .o file is built into output directory from
    corresponding progs/.c file;
  - all BPF objects in progs/*.c depend on all progs/*.h headers;
  - all BPF objects depend on bpf_*.h helpers from libbpf (but not
    libbpf archive). There is an extra rule to trigger bpf_helper_defs.h
    (re-)build, if it's not present/outdated);
  - build recipe for BPF object can be re-defined per test runner/flavor;
- test files are built from prog_tests/*.c:
  - all such test file objects are built on individual file basis;
  - currently, every single test file depends on all BPF object files;
    this might be improved in follow up patches to do 1-to-1 dependency,
    but allowing to customize this per each individual test;
  - each test runner definition can specify a list of extra .c and .h
    files to be built along test files and test runner binary; all such
    headers are becoming automatic dependency of each test .c file;
  - due to test files sometimes embedding (using .incbin assembly
    directive) contents of some BPF objects at compilation time, which are
    expected to be in CWD of compiler, compilation for test file object does
    cd into test runner's output directory; to support this mode all the
    include paths are turned into absolute paths using $(abspath) make
    function;
- prog_tests/test.h is automatically (re-)generated with an entry for
  each .c file in prog_tests/;
- final test runner binary is linked together from test object files and
  extra object files, linking together libbpf's archive as well;
- it's possible to specify extra "resource" files/targets, which will be
  copied into test runner output directory, if it differes from
  Makefile-wide $(OUTPUT). This is used to ensure btf_dump test cases and
  urandom_read binary is put into a test runner's CWD for tests to find
  them in runtime.

For flavored test runners, their output directory is a subdirectory of
common Makefile-wide $(OUTPUT) directory with flavor name used as
subdirectory name.

BPF objects targets might be reused between different test runners, so
extra checks are employed to not double-define them. Similarly, we have
redefinition guards for output directories and test headers.

test_verifier follows slightly different patterns and is simple enough
to not justify generalizing TEST_RUNNER_DEFINE/TEST_RUNNER_DEFINE_RULES
further to accomodate these differences. Instead, rules for
test_verifier are minimized and simplified, while preserving correctness
of dependencies.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191016060051.2024182-6-andriin@fb.com
      74b5a596
    • A
      selftests/bpf: Add simple per-test targets to Makefile · 03dcb784
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      Currently it's impossible to do `make test_progs` and have only
test_progs be built, because all the binary targets are defined in terms
of $(OUTPUT)/<binary>, and $(OUTPUT) is absolute path to current
directory (or whatever gets overridden to by user).

This patch adds simple re-directing targets for all test targets making
it possible to do simple and nice `make test_progs` (and any other
target).
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191016060051.2024182-5-andriin@fb.com
      03dcb784
    • A
      selftests/bpf: Switch test_maps to test_progs' test.h format · ee6c52e9
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      Make test_maps use tests.h header format consistent with the one used by
test_progs, to facilitate unification.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191016060051.2024182-4-andriin@fb.com
      ee6c52e9
  9. 13 10月, 2019 2 次提交
  11. 10 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  13. 09 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  15. 08 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  17. 07 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  19. 06 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  21. 16 9月, 2019 1 次提交
    • I
      selftests/bpf: add bpf-gcc support · 4ce150b6
      由 Ilya Leoshkevich 提交于 
      Now that binutils and gcc support for BPF is upstream, make use of it in
BPF selftests using alu32-like approach. Share as much as possible of
CFLAGS calculation with clang.

Fixes only obvious issues, leaving more complex ones for later:
- Use gcc-provided bpf-helpers.h instead of manually defining the
  helpers, change bpf_helpers.h include guard to avoid conflict.
- Include <linux/stddef.h> for __always_inline.
- Add $(OUTPUT)/../usr/include to include path in order to use local
  kernel headers instead of system kernel headers when building with O=.

In order to activate the bpf-gcc support, one needs to configure
binutils and gcc with --target=bpf and make them available in $PATH. In
particular, gcc must be installed as `bpf-gcc`, which is the default.

Right now with binutils 25a2915e8dba and gcc r275589 only a handful of
tests work:

	# ./test_progs_bpf_gcc
	# Summary: 7/39 PASSED, 1 SKIPPED, 98 FAILED

The reason for those failures are as follows:

- Build errors:
  - `error: too many function arguments for eBPF` for __always_inline
    functions read_str_var and read_map_var - must be inlining issue,
    and for process_l3_headers_v6, which relies on optimizing away
    function arguments.
  - `error: indirect call in function, which are not supported by eBPF`
    where there are no obvious indirect calls in the source calls, e.g.
    in __encap_ipip_none.
  - `error: field 'lock' has incomplete type` for fields of `struct
    bpf_spin_lock` type - bpf_spin_lock is re#defined by bpf-helpers.h,
    so its usage is sensitive to order of #includes.
  - `error: eBPF stack limit exceeded` in sysctl_tcp_mem.
- Load errors:
  - Missing object files due to above build errors.
  - `libbpf: failed to create map (name: 'test_ver.bss')`.
  - `libbpf: object file doesn't contain bpf program`.
  - `libbpf: Program '.text' contains unrecognized relo data pointing to
    section 0`.
  - `libbpf: BTF is required, but is missing or corrupted` - no BTF
    support in gcc yet.
Signed-off-by: NIlya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      4ce150b6
  23. 07 9月, 2019 6 次提交
  25. 31 8月, 2019 1 次提交
    • Q
      tools: bpftool: improve and check builds for different make invocations · 45c5589d
      由 Quentin Monnet 提交于 
      There are a number of alternative "make" invocations that can be used to
compile bpftool. The following invocations are expected to work:

  - through the kbuild system, from the top of the repository
    (make tools/bpf)
  - by telling make to change to the bpftool directory
    (make -C tools/bpf/bpftool)
  - by building the BPF tools from tools/
    (cd tools && make bpf)
  - by running make from bpftool directory
    (cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make)

Additionally, setting the O or OUTPUT variables should tell the build
system to use a custom output path, for each of these alternatives.

The following patch fixes the following invocations:

  $ make tools/bpf
  $ make tools/bpf O=<dir>
  $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool OUTPUT=<dir>
  $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool O=<dir>
  $ cd tools/ && make bpf O=<dir>
  $ cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make OUTPUT=<dir>
  $ cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make O=<dir>

After this commit, the build still fails for two variants when passing
the OUTPUT variable:

  $ make tools/bpf OUTPUT=<dir>
  $ cd tools/ && make bpf OUTPUT=<dir>

In order to remember and check what make invocations are supposed to
work, and to document the ones which do not, a new script is added to
the BPF selftests. Note that some invocations require the kernel to be
configured, so the script skips them if no .config file is found.

v2:
- In make_and_clean(), set $ERROR to 1 when "make" returns non-zero,
  even if the binary was produced.
- Run "make clean" from the correct directory (bpf/ instead of bpftool/,
  when relevant).
Reported-by: NLorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: NQuentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      45c5589d
  27. 21 8月, 2019 2 次提交
  29. 18 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  31. 06 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  33. 28 7月, 2019 2 次提交
  35. 17 7月, 2019 2 次提交
  37. 16 7月, 2019 2 次提交
  39. 12 7月, 2019 2 次提交
  41. 03 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  43. 28 6月, 2019 2 次提交