OMAP_MODE_GPIO() macro verified only OMAP_MUX_MODE4.
It is not correct for following platforms:
    2430 - gpio mux mode 3
    44xx - gpio mux mode 3
    54xx - gpio mux mode 6

Patch reserves first 3 bits in partition flags for storing gpio mux
mode in same format as stored in control pad register.
Modified OMAP_MODE_GPIO() macro to handle all possible cases of gpio mux mode.
Modified omap_mux_init() flags of omap34xx to include OMAP_MUX_GPIO_IN_MODE4.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Matcovschi <oleg.matcovschi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

On n900 uart1 pins are not not used for uart, instead they are
used to connect to a cell modem over ssi. Looks like we're
currently missing these signal names for 3430 for some reason,
and only have some of them listed for 3630. Obviously the signals
are there for 3430 if n900 is using them and they are documented
in some TRMs.

Note that these will eventually be replaced by device tree
based pinctrl-single.c driver. But for now these are needed
to verify the SSI pins for devices like Nokia N900.
Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

Mux data is passed by pointers to mux.c from the SoC specific
mux file, these variables dont really need to be global scope.

This fixes the following sparse warnings:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux44xx.c:547:29: warning: symbol 'omap4_core_cbl_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux44xx.c:1265:29: warning: symbol 'omap4_core_cbs_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux44xx.c:1549:29: warning: symbol 'omap4_wkup_cbl_cbs_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

Removed mux: and added the __func__ macro to make debugging
easier.
Signed-off-by: NDan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NBenoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

Starting on OMAP4, the pin mux configuration is located in two
different partitions of the control module (CODE_PAD and WKUP_PAD).
The first one is inside the core power domain whereas the second
one is inside the wakeup.
- Add the capability to add any number of partition during board init
time depending of Soc partitioning.
- Add some init flags as well in order to avoid explicit Soc version
check inside the mux core code.
- Add a comment with mux0 mode on top of omap_mux/board/<partition>
if the current mux mode is not the default one.

Thanks to Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> for the following improvements:
- Add omap_mux_get for getting the partition data so platform level
device code can use it.
- Fix the rx51 board code to use the new API.
- Do not store the partition for each mux entry. Look up the partition
for debugfs instead.

Thanks to Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com> for testing on OMAP4 and reporting
a couple of bugs.
Thanks to Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@ti.com> for testing on OMAP3 zoom and
bug report.
Signed-off-by: NBenoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Tested-by: NMurphy Dan <dmurphy@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@ti.com>

This patch fixes sparse warnings due to non declaration of
static structures and variables.

Sparse warning logs fixed:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:88:6: warning: symbol 'omap3_secure_ram_storage' was not declared. Should it be static?
n
arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer-gp.c:50:22: warning: symbol 'gptimer_wakeup' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer-gp.c:240:18: warning: symbol 'omap_timer' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c:121:24: warning: symbol 'prcm_context' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux2420.c:510:29: warning: symbol 'omap2420_pop_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux2430.c:589:29: warning: symbol 'omap2430_pop_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:934:28: warning: symbol 'omap3_cus_subset' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1080:29: warning: symbol 'omap3_cus_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1272:28: warning: symbol 'omap3_cbb_subset' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1393:29: warning: symbol 'omap3_cbb_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1603:28: warning: symbol 'omap36xx_cbp_subset' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1821:29: warning: symbol 'omap36xx_cbp_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm-debug.c:165:15: warning: symbol 'pm_dbg_dir' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c:587:30: warning: symbol 'ads7846_config' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c:606:23: warning: symbol 'omap3evm_spi_board_info' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-sdram.c:46:25: warning: symbol 'rx51_sdrc_params' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-sdram.c:211:25: warning: symbol 'rx51_get_sdram_timings' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3touchbook.c:64:15: warning: symbol 'touchbook_revision' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-am3517evm.c:350:24: warning: symbol 'am3517_evm_dss_device' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3stalker.c:567:23: warning: symbol 'omap3stalker_spi_board_info' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: NManjunath Kondaiah G <manjugk@ti.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

Remove unncessary parens from mux34xx.c
Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

These are currently non-muxable, so let's save some memory
and remove them. Otherwise we get the following warnings:

mux: Unknown ball offset 0x5e
mux: Unknown ball offset 0x60
mux: Unknown ball offset 0x62
...
Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

3630 has more mux signals than 34xx. The additional pins
exist in omap36xx_cbp_subset, but are not initialized
as the superset is missing these offsets. This causes
the following errors during the boot:

mux: Unknown entry offset 0x236
mux: Unknown entry offset 0x22e
mux: Unknown entry offset 0x1ec
mux: Unknown entry offset 0x1ee
mux: Unknown entry offset 0x1f4
mux: Unknown entry offset 0x1f6
mux: Unknown entry offset 0x1f8
mux: Unknown entry offset 0x1fa
mux: Unknown entry offset 0x1fc
mux: Unknown entry offset 0x22a
mux: Unknown entry offset 0x226
mux: Unknown entry offset 0x230
mux: Unknown entry offset 0x22c
mux: Unknown entry offset 0x228

Fix this by adding the missing offsets to omap3 superset.
Note that additionally the uninitialized pins need to be
skipped on 34xx.

Based on an earlier patch by Allen Pais <allen.pais@ti.com>.
Reported-by: NAllen Pais <allen.pais@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NAllen Pais <allen.pais@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

Add 36xx CBP package support

Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

Add new style mux data for 34xx. This should also
work with 3630 easily by adding the processor subset
and ball data.

Note that this data is __initdata, and gets optimized
out except for the GPIO pins if CONFIG_OMAP_MUX
is not set.

Also note that this data uses omap3630 naming for
the SDMMC registers instead of 34xx naming with just
MMC.

Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>